Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of dacarbazine in combination with thalidomide in metastatic melanoma patients. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically confirmed, measurable metastatic melanoma with no evidence of brain metastases and adequate hematologic and organ function received dacarbazine (1,000 mg/m(2) i.v. every 3 weeks) and thalidomide (starting dose of 200 mg/day orally at night, escalated every 3 weeks) as tolerated. The primary endpoint was objective tumor response, evaluated after every 3 cycles of treatment. Fifteen patients, age range 29-77 years, were accrued for this study. All had stage IV disease (1 M1a, 5 M1b, 9 M1c). Nine patients had had no prior adjuvant therapy, 6 had received prior immunotherapy. The median number of cycles was 5 (range 1-18), with 8 patients receiving >or=3 cycles. The median thalidomide dose administered was 200 mg/day with a maximum tolerated dose of 400 mg/day. RESULTS: Of the 13 patients evaluable for response, 1 patient had a partial response, 3 patients had stable disease and 9 patients had progressive disease. No complete responses were seen. Two patients were not evaluable for response: 1 withdrew due to toxicity and 1 died of unrelated causes. Grade III neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and nausea were attributed to dacarbazine. Grade III/IV constipation, peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, edema and rash were attributed to thalidomide. CONCLUSION: The addition of thalidomide to dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma yielded activity insufficient to proceed with additional trials of this combination. Thalidomide dose escalation beyond 200 mg/day was limited by unacceptable toxicity. Therefore, this combination does not warrant further investigation

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated concomitant pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) plus trastuzumab as therapy for HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This open-label, prospective, phase II trial assessed the safety and efficacy of this regimen, with cardiac tolerance as the principal focus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with HER2-overexpressing recurrent MBC, baseline left ventricular ejection fraction >or= 55%, and no history of serious cardiac illness were eligible; preexisting cardiac risk factors, including previous anthracyclines and previous trastuzumab for MBC, were allowed. Patients received weekly trastuzumab and every-3-week PLD until progression, prohibitive toxicity, or patient refusal. Left ventricular ejection fraction was assessed during and after therapy. Grade 3/4 congestive heart failure (CHF) was monitored for premature closure. RESULTS: The trial closed after 2.5 years for slow accrual. Twelve patients were enrolled: 7 had received adjuvant anthracyclines; 9 had received previous MBC treatment, of whom 7 had received trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy. Patients received a mean of 4.8 cycles of PLD; 8 patients experienced stable disease; 4 patients experienced progression. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction levels did not change substantially: 60.4%, 57%, 60.3%, and 56.8% at baseline, after cycle 2, after cycle 4, and after completion of treatment, respectively. No patients experienced grade 4 CHF. One patient discontinued treatment after grade 3 CHF. Three patients experienced grade 2 left ventricular dysfunction, of whom 2 discontinued treatment. Cardiac function improved in all 4 patients after going off study. Other adverse events were generally mild (grade 1/2) and infrequent. CONCLUSION: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus trastuzumab might be an option for heavily pretreated patients with recurrent HER2-overexpressing MBC

PURPOSE: To investigate whether recurrence score (RS) as determined using a commercial reference laboratory test influences clinicians' treatment recommendations and eventual treatment in patients with early-stage breast cancer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 74 patients from a community-based oncology practice with estrogen receptor (ER) -positive, lymph node (LN) -negative stage I or II breast cancer for which RS was obtained. Demographic and pathology information was extracted from medical records. Ten-year relapse-free survival was calculated using Adjuvant! Online. Treatment recommendations before the RS knowledge were compared with treatment recommendations after RS knowledge and to the treatment eventually administered. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A weak correlation was found between RS and both patient age and tumor size, modest correlation between RS and tumor grade, and modest correlation between RS and 10-year recurrence as determined by Adjuvant! Online. For 21% and 25% of patients, knowledge of the RS changed the clinicians' treatment recommendations and eventual treatment, respectively. The decision to change from hormone therapy to chemotherapy (with or without hormone therapy) was generally associated with high RS (high distant recurrence risk as determined by the commercial reference laboratory test), whereas the decision to change from chemotherapy to hormone therapy was generally associated with low RS (low distant recurrence risk as determined by the commercial reference laboratory test). Knowledge of the RS changed treatment recommendations and eventual treatment in patients with ER-positive/LN-negative early-stage breast cancer. Use of genomic-based prognosis may result in more accurate estimates of true recurrence risk than currently possible with commonly used prognostic factors (such as patient age, tumor size, and tumor grade) alone and thus lead to an increase in appropriate adjuvant therapy decision making

INTRODUCTION: A retrospective review of 91 patients with brain metastases from malignant melanoma treated at New York University Medical Center between 1989-1999. Overall survival was the outcome evaluated. METHODS: Charts of 91 patients having malignant melanoma with brain metastases were reviewed. Cases were stratified according to therapy: surgical excision, surgical excision plus whole brain radiation therapy, gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery, gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole brain radiation therapy, and whole brain radiation therapy alone. Patients treated with gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery plus radiation therapy were combined with patients treated with surgical excision plus radiation therapy and compared to those treated with radiation therapy alone. Prognostic characteristics of the two groups were compared and survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to control for prognostic factors that differed between the groups. RESULTS: Patients treated with gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery or surgical excision plus radiation therapy were younger, less likely to present with symptoms, and presented with fewer metastases to the brain than patients treated with radiation therapy alone. A survival benefit of 7.3 months (p = 0.05) was found to be associated with gamma knife radiosurgery or surgical excision plus radiation therapy over radiation therapy alone after controlling for differences in age, number of brain lesions, and presence of symptoms. DISCUSSION: This retrospective study of 91 patients treated for melanoma metastases to the brain attempts to examine the effectiveness of different treatments in prolonging survival. Our results suggest that surgical excision or stereotactic radiosurgery with gamma knife in addition to radiation therapy may be more effective than radiation alone at prolonging survival for patients with a limited number of brain lesions. CONCLUSION: Survival of patients with melanoma metastases to the brain may be prolonged by treatment with gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery or surgical excision plus whole brain radiation therapy

Local therapies have been highly effective in the treatment of melanoma. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of a novel intralesional chemotherapy - cisplatin/adrenaline injectable gel - for the treatment of refractory or recurrent cutaneous and soft tissue melanoma metastases. The gel is injected directly into the lesion and delivers high concentrations of cisplatin at the injection site, where it is retained for extended periods, with little systemic exposure. A total of 28 patients with refractory or recurrent melanoma were enrolled in this open-label, multicentre study. Of these, 25 patients with 244 lesions were evaluable for efficacy. Lesions were injected with 0.5 ml (2 mg cisplatin + 0.05 mg adrenaline) of gel/cm(3) of tumour. Patients received up to six weekly treatments within an 8 week period. The objective response rate (complete responses [CRs] plus partial responses [PRs]) for all the tumours treated (1-72 per patient) was 53% (130 out of 244; 114 CRs, 16 PRs). The response rate for the target tumours (i.e. each patient's single, most symptomatic, largest or most threatening tumour) was 44%. The median response duration for all tumours was 347 days (range 30-783 days) and median number of treatments per tumour was five (range one to twelve). Systemic toxicity was negligible; local adverse reactions such as erythema, necrosis or pain occurred frequently, but were easily managed in most cases. In conclusion, cisplatin/adrenaline injectable gel was well tolerated, easy to administer, and effective in treating metastatic melanoma confined to the skin or soft tissues

PURPOSE: Local-regional recurrence rates of 30%-50% have been reported after resection of high-risk malignant melanomas (multiple node involvement, extracapsular spread, deep invasion, recurrent disease, and/or microscopically involved margins). Recently, we have been offering elective radiation therapy, after definitive surgery, to selected patients who have high-risk malignant melanomas. We herein report our initial results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1993 to 1999, 40 patients who underwent surgery for high-risk malignant melanomas (multiple involved lymph nodes [21 patients]; close or microscopically involved surgical margins [nine patients]; extracapsular extension [six patients]; previously resected, recurrent disease [three patients]; and/or primary tumors more than 4 mm thick [four patients]) received elective radiation therapy. Thirty-six patients received 3000 cGy in five fractions (600 cGy per fraction given twice weekly), and four patients received 3600 cGy in six fractions. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 18.4 months (range, 3.8-74.1 months), the actuarial 5-year local-regional control rate was 84%. Systemic recurrence rates in these patients were similar to those reported for this subset of patients, and the actuarial overall survival rate at 5 years was 39%. Acute toxicity was limited to erythema of the skin and, in one instance, probable cellulitis, with no late sequelae. DISCUSSION: Elective radiation therapy (600 cGy per fraction for five or six fractions) effectively controlled residual subclinical disease after surgery; however, better adjuvant systemic therapies need to be designed to eliminate distant metastases and to alter survival rates

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer creates new possibilities for the analysis of biological factors in the tumor and/or host, which may play a role in the response to treatment. In this study we analyzed whether changes in local antitumor immunity take place after neoadjuvant paclitaxel therapy and if they correlate with response to treatment. Experimental Design: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (paclitaxel, 200 mg/m2 q2w, 4 treatments) was followed by definitive surgical management. Histological sections from the pre- and post-treatment surgical specimens of 25 patients were analyzed for the extent of lymphocytic infiltration and presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). The cumulative apoptotic response in the tumor after the first dose of paclitaxel was also studied in 10 of 25 patients. RESULTS: Pretreatment lymphocytic infiltrate in the tumor was minimal in the majority of patients and showed no relationship with clinical response. In the patients without TILs before treatment, development of TILs after treatment was noted in 0/3 (0%) patients with stable disease, 3/12 (25%) patients with clinical partial response, and 4/6 (67%) patients with clinical complete response and pathological residual disease. These correlated with the tumor cell apoptotic response to the first dose of paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that development of TILs after treatment correlates with clinical response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel therapy. The possible mechanism(s) whereby neoadjuvant chemotherapy may lead to induction of antitumor T cells is discussed. Immunological processes may influence the response of breast cancer patients to neoadjuvant treatment

A polyvalent melanoma vaccine prepared from shed antigens stimulates humoral and cellular immune responses and improves survival compared with historical controls. We conducted a double-blind, prospectively randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess whether this vaccine could slow the progression of resected melanoma. Thirty-eight patients with resected melanoma metastatic to regional nodes (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III) who had a particularly poor prognosis on the basis of the nodes being clinically positive or two or more histologically positive nodes were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to treatment with 40 microg of melanoma or placebo (human albumin) vaccine, both of which were bound to alum as an adjuvant. Immunizations were given intradermally into the extremities every 3 weeks x 4, monthly x 3, every 3 months x 2, and then every 6 months for 5 years or until disease progression. Twenty-four patients were treated with the melanoma, and 14 patients were treated with the placebo vaccine. The groups were evenly balanced with respect to prognostic factors. Median length of observation was 2.5 years. There was no local or systemic toxicity. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, median time to disease progression was two and a half times longer in patients treated with melanoma vaccine compared with that in patients treated with placebo vaccine, i.e., 1.6 years (95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.0 years) compared with 0.6 year [95% confidence interval, 0.3-1.9 year(s)]. By Cox proportional hazards analysis, this difference was significant at P = 0.03. Overall survival was 40% longer in the melanoma vaccine-treated group (median overall survival of 3.8 years versus 2.7 years), but this difference was not statistically significant. In a double-blind and placebo-controlled trial, these results suggest that immunization with a melanoma vaccine may be able to slow the progression of melanoma. Although statistically significant, these results must be interpreted with caution because they are based on a small number of patients