Searched for: person:pessar01
in-biosketch:true
Bone Health ECHO Case Report: Is it Paget's Disease? [Case Report]
Cohen, Melissa F; Pessah-Pollack, Rachel; Michael Lewiecki, E
A 54-year-old woman was referred by her rheumatologist for evaluation of an elevated serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in the setting of polyarthritis. The metabolic work-up was significant for an elevated bone fraction of alkaline phosphatase isoenzymes, and high bone turnover markers, including fasting C- telopeptide (CTX). A diagnosis of Paget's disease of bone (PDB) was considered. A whole-body nuclear bone scan showed diffuse increased uptake in the calvarium, suggestive of PDB, with no other localizing areas of increased uptake. Skull X-rays show mild sclerosis and medullary expansion of the posterior parietal bones and occiput, interpreted by the radiologist as unlikely to be PDB with a high level of uncertainty. Bone density testing with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry showed low bone mass (osteopenia) with fracture probability that was below the treatment threshold. The case was presented and discussed on Bone Health ECHO, a virtual community of practice with the aim of enhancing global capacity to deliver best practice skeletal health care. The results of the discussion are presented here.
PMID: 39837041
ISSN: 1094-6950
CID: 5780452
Endocrine Disorders During Pregnancy [Editorial]
Pessah-Pollack, Rachel; Papaleontiou, Maria
PMID: 39084823
ISSN: 1558-4410
CID: 5731452
Use of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients With HF With and Without Type 2 Diabetes: An Endocrinologist's Perspective
Butler, Javed; Pessah-Pollack, Rachel
In this video, Javed Butler, MD, and Rachel Pessah-Pollack, MD, discuss the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with and without type 2 diabetes.
PMID: 38839136
ISSN: 2213-1787
CID: 5665422
Summary and Panel Discussion
Butler, Javed; Rich, Jonathan; Pessah-Pollack, Rachel; Anderson, John E
In this video, Javed Butler, MD, Jonathan Rich, MD, Rachel Pessah-Pollack, MD, and John E. Anderson, MD, summarize the key points of the enhanced publication "Role of SGLT2 Inhibitors in the Management of Heart Failure With and Without Type 2 Diabetes." The panel then delves deeper into some of the topics raised.
PMID: 38839135
ISSN: 2213-1787
CID: 5665412
American Association of Clinical Endocrinology And Associazione Medici Endocrinologi Thyroid Nodule Algorithmic Tool
Garber, Jeffrey R; Papini, Enrico; Frasoldati, Andrea; Lupo, Mark A; Harrell, R Mack; Parangi, Sareh; Patkar, Vivek; Baloch, Zubair W; Pessah-Pollack, Rachel; Hegedus, Laszlo; Crescenzi, Anna; Lubitz, Carrie C; Paschke, Ralf; Randolph, Gregory W; Guglielmi, Rinaldo; Lombardi, Celestino P; Gharib, Hossein
OBJECTIVE:The first edition of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology/American College of Endocrinology/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules was published in 2006 and updated in 2010 and 2016. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology/American College of Endocrinology/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi multidisciplinary thyroid nodules task force was charged with developing a novel interactive electronic algorithmic tool to evaluate thyroid nodules. METHODS:The Thyroid Nodule App (termed TNAPP) was based on the updated 2016 clinical practice guideline recommendations while incorporating recent scientific evidence and avoiding unnecessary diagnostic procedures and surgical overtreatment. This manuscript describes the algorithmic tool development, its data requirements, and its basis for decision making. It provides links to the web-based algorithmic tool and a tutorial. RESULTS:TNAPP and TI-RADS were cross-checked on 95 thyroid nodules with histology-proven diagnoses. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:TNAPP is a novel interactive web-based tool that uses clinical, imaging, cytologic, and molecular marker data to guide clinical decision making to evaluate and manage thyroid nodules. It may be used as a heuristic tool for evaluating and managing patients with thyroid nodules. It can be adapted to create registries for solo practices, large multispecialty delivery systems, regional and national databases, and research consortiums. Prospective studies are underway to validate TNAPP to determine how it compares with other ultrasound-based classification systems and whether it can improve the care of patients with clinically significant thyroid nodules while reducing the substantial burden incurred by those who do not benefit from further evaluation and treatment.
PMID: 34090820
ISSN: 1530-891x
CID: 4899412
American Association of Clinical Endocrinology And Associazione Medici Endocrinologi Thyroid Nodule Algorithmic Tool
Garber, Jeffrey R; Papini, Enrico; Frasoldati, Andrea; Lupo, Mark A; Harrell, R Mack; Parangi, Sareh; Patkar, Vivek; Baloch, Zubair W; Pessah-Pollack, Rachel; Hegedus, Laszlo; Crescenzi, Anna; Lubitz, Carrie C; Paschke, Ralf; Randolph, Gregory W; Guglielmi, Rinaldo; Lombardi, Celestino P; Gharib, Hossein
OBJECTIVE:The first edition of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology/American College of Endocrinology/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules was published in 2006 and updated in 2010 and 2016. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology/American College of Endocrinology/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi multidisciplinary thyroid nodules task force was charged with developing a novel interactive electronic algorithmic tool to evaluate thyroid nodules. METHODS:The Thyroid Nodule App (termed TNAPP) was based on the updated 2016 clinical practice guideline recommendations while incorporating recent scientific evidence and avoiding unnecessary diagnostic procedures and surgical overtreatment. This manuscript describes the algorithmic tool development, its data requirements, and its basis for decision making. It provides links to the web-based algorithmic tool and a tutorial. RESULTS:TNAPP and TI-RADS were cross-checked on 95 thyroid nodules with histology-proven diagnoses. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:TNAPP is a novel interactive web-based tool that uses clinical, imaging, cytologic, and molecular marker data to guide clinical decision making to evaluate and manage thyroid nodules. It may be used as a heuristic tool for evaluating and managing patients with thyroid nodules. It can be adapted to create registries for solo practices, large multispecialty delivery systems, regional and national databases, and research consortiums. Prospective studies are underway to validate TNAPP to determine how it compares with other ultrasound-based classification systems and whether it can improve the care of patients with clinically significant thyroid nodules while reducing the substantial burden incurred by those who do not benefit from further evaluation and treatment.
PMID: 35026973
ISSN: 2212-3873
CID: 5119012
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS/AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS-2020 UPDATE
Camacho, Pauline M; Petak, Steven M; Binkley, Neil; Diab, Dima L; Eldeiry, Leslie S; Farooki, Azeez; Harris, Steven T; Hurley, Daniel L; Kelly, Jennifer; Lewiecki, E Michael; Pessah-Pollack, Rachel; McClung, Michael; Wimalawansa, Sunil J; Watts, Nelson B
PMID: 32427503
ISSN: 1530-891x
CID: 4444152
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS/AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS- 2020 UPDATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Camacho, Pauline M; Petak, Steven M; Binkley, Neil; Diab, Dima L; Eldeiry, Leslie S; Farooki, Azeez; Harris, Steven T; Hurley, Daniel L; Kelly, Jennifer; Lewiecki, E Michael; Pessah-Pollack, Rachel; McClung, Michael; Wimalawansa, Sunil J; Watts, Nelson B
PMID: 32427525
ISSN: 1530-891x
CID: 4444162
Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Perioperative Nutrition, Metabolic, and Nonsurgical Support of Patients Undergoing Bariatric Procedures - 2019 Update: Cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists
Mechanick, Jeffrey I; Apovian, Caroline; Brethauer, Stacy; Timothy Garvey, W; Joffe, Aaron M; Kim, Julie; Kushner, Robert F; Lindquist, Richard; Pessah-Pollack, Rachel; Seger, Jennifer; Urman, Richard D; Adams, Stephanie; Cleek, John B; Correa, Riccardo; Figaro, M Kathleen; Flanders, Karen; Grams, Jayleen; Hurley, Daniel L; Kothari, Shanu; Seger, Michael V; Still, Christopher D
OBJECTIVE:The development of these updated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) was commissioned by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), The Obesity Society (TOS), American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), Obesity Medicine Association (OMA), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Boards of Directors in adherence with the AACE 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPGs, algorithms, and checklists. METHODS:Each recommendation was evaluated and updated based on new evidence from 2013 to the present and subjective factors provided by experts. RESULTS:New or updated topics in this CPG include: contextualization in an adiposity-based chronic disease complications-centric model, nuance-based and algorithm/checklist-assisted clinical decision-making about procedure selection, novel bariatric procedures, enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols, and logistical concerns (including cost factors) in the current health care arena. There are 85 numbered recommendations that have updated supporting evidence, of which 61 are revised and 12 are new. Noting that there can be multiple recommendation statements within a single numbered recommendation, there are 31 (13%) Grade A, 42 (17%) Grade B, 72 (29%) Grade C, and 101 (41%) Grade D recommendations. There are 858 citations, of which 81 (9.4%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 562 (65.5%) are EL 2, 72 (8.4%) are EL 3, and 143 (16.7%) are EL 4 (lowest). CONCLUSIONS:Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity. Clinical decision-making should be evidence based within the context of a chronic disease. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory, with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.
PMID: 32202076
ISSN: 1930-739x
CID: 4357492
Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures - 2019 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists
Mechanick, Jeffrey I; Apovian, Caroline; Brethauer, Stacy; Garvey, W Timothy; Joffe, Aaron M; Kim, Julie; Kushner, Robert F; Lindquist, Richard; Pessah-Pollack, Rachel; Seger, Jennifer; Urman, Richard D; Adams, Stephanie; Cleek, John B; Correa, Riccardo; Figaro, M Kathleen; Flanders, Karen; Grams, Jayleen; Hurley, Daniel L; Kothari, Shanu; Seger, Michael V; Still, Christopher D
OBJECTIVE:The development of these updated clinical practice guidelines (CPG) was commissioned by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, the Obesity Medicine Association, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists boards of directors in adherence to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPG, algorithms, and checklists. METHODS:Each recommendation was evaluated and updated based on new evidence from 2013 to the present and subjective factors provided by experts. RESULTS:New or updated topics in this CPG include contextualization in an adiposity-based, chronic disease complications-centric model, nuance-based, and algorithm/checklist-assisted clinical decision-making about procedure selection, novel bariatric procedures, enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols, and logistical concerns (including cost factors) in the current healthcare arena. There are 85 numbered recommendations that have updated supporting evidence, of which 61 are revised and 12 are new. Noting that there can be multiple recommendation statements within a single numbered recommendation, there are 31 (13%) Grade A, 42 (17%) Grade B, 72 (29%) Grade C, and 101 (41%) Grade D recommendations. There are 858 citations, of which 81 (9.4%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 562 (65.5%) are EL 2, 72 (8.4%) are EL 3, and 143 (16.7%) are EL 4 (lowest). CONCLUSIONS:Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity. Clinical decision-making should be evidence-based within the context of a chronic disease. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.
PMID: 31917200
ISSN: 1878-7533
CID: 4257562