Faculty Bibliography

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE:We conducted a prespecified examination of the efficacy and safety of allopurinol and febuxostat administered using a treat-to-target strategy in trial participants with chronic kidney disease (CKD). STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Prespecified sub cohort analysis of a randomized controlled trial. SETTING/METHODS:at baseline. EXPOSURE/METHODS:Trial participants with CKD and gout and serum urate (sUA) concentration ≥6.8 mg/dL were randomized 1:1 to receive allopurinol or febuxostat. Urate lowering therapy (ULT) was titrated during weeks 0-24 to achieve a goal sUA of <6.0 mg/dl (<5.0 mg/dl with tophi) (Phase 1) and maintained during weeks 25-48 (Phase 2). Gout flare was assessed between weeks 49-72 (Phase 3). OUTCOME/RESULTS:Gout flare between weeks 49-72 (Phase 3) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included sUA goal achievement and ULT dosing at end of Phase 2, and serious adverse events (SAEs). ANALYTICAL APPROACH/METHODS:Outcomes between treatment groups were compared using logistic regression models for binary outcomes, and Poisson regression for flare rates. Multivariable models were subsequently used, adjusting for factors identified to be imbalanced by treatment arm. RESULTS:351 of 940 participants (37.3%) had CKD; 277 were assessed for the primary outcome. Fewer patients randomized to allopurinol had a flare during phase 3 (32% vs 45%; p=0.02) despite similar attainment of sUA goal (79% vs. 81%; p=0.6) by the end of Phase 2. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was more common in participants with stage 3 CKD randomized to allopurinol compared to febuxostat. LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Limited power to assess infrequent safety events, largely male, older population. CONCLUSIONS:Allopurinol and febuxostat are similarly efficacious and well-tolerated in the treatment of gout in people with CKD when used in a treat-to-target regimen.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Patients with chronic refractory gout face a considerable burden of disease due to unexpected flares characterized by severe and debilitating pain, which can lead to chronic pain and joint damage. This study aimed to understand the symptoms and impacts of chronic refractory gout on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS:A targeted literature review was conducted to identify and review key articles describing the symptoms and impacts of gout, and articles examining the psychometric performance of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) in gout. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 participants with chronic refractory gout. The results were used to develop the conceptual model and determine the appropriateness of the SF-36 and HAQ-DI in evaluating HRQoL in this population. RESULTS:Most frequently reported symptoms included bodily pain (n = 18, 90.0%), joint swelling (n = 18, 90.0%), joint tenderness (n = 18, 90.0%), and joint pain (n = 16, 80.0%). Most frequently reported impacts were difficulties climbing a flight (n = 20, 100.0%) or several flights of stairs (n = 20, 100.0%), climbing five steps (n = 19, 95.0%), completing chores (n = 19, 95.0%), and running errands and shopping (n = 19, 95.0%). All assessed items from SF-36 and HAQ-DI were reported by ≥ 25% (n = 5) of participants and mapped sufficiently to concepts elicited by participants. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with chronic refractory gout report symptoms and impacts that are highly bothersome and burdensome to everyday life. Items included in the HAQ-DI and SF-36 mapped directly to these symptoms and impacts and are relevant to understand the burden of disease of chronic refractory gout.

Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02594111.

OBJECTIVE:Initiating urate-lowering therapy (ULT) in gout can precipitate arthritis flares. There have been limited comparisons of flare risk during the initiation and escalation of allopurinol and febuxostat, administered as a treat-to-target strategy with optimal anti-inflammatory prophylaxis. METHODS:This was a post-hoc analysis of a 72-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, noninferiority trial comparing the efficacy of allopurinol and febuxostat. For this analysis, the occurrence of flares was examined during weeks 0 to 24 when ULT was initiated and titrated to a serum urate (sUA) goal of less than 6 mg/dl (<5 mg/dl if tophi). Flares were assessed at regular intervals through structured participant interviews. Predictors of flare, including treatment assignment, were examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS:Study participants (n = 940) were predominantly male (98.4%) and had a mean age of 62.1 years with approximately equal proportions receiving allopurinol or febuxostat. Mean baseline sUA was 8.5 mg/dl and all participants received anti-inflammatory prophylaxis (90% colchicine). In a multivariable model, there were no significant associations of ULT treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 1.17; febuxostat vs allopurinol), ULT-dose escalation (HR 1.18 vs no escalation), prophylaxis type, or individual comorbidity with flare and no evidence of ULT-dose escalation interaction. Factors independently associated with flare risk during ULT initiation/escalation included younger age, higher baseline sUA, and absence of tophi. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:These results demonstrate that gout flare risk during the initiation and titration of allopurinol is similar to febuxostat when these agents are administered according to a treat-to-target strategy using gradual ULT-dose titration and best practice gout flare prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE:This report evaluates rheumatologists' stated adherence to and agreement with the 2020 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Guideline for the Management of Gout. METHODS:A 57-item questionnaire was administered to a sample of US rheumatologists. Stated adherence scores were based on several guideline recommendations reported to be followed by rheumatologists in practice, whereas stated agreement scores were based on whether respondents always followed the recommendations. RESULTS:≤ 0.05). Approximately 78% of rheumatologists claimed to follow the guideline for initiating urate-lowering therapy (ULT), and 89% were likely to prescribe allopurinol as a first-line ULT. Claimed adherence to recommendations for dosing was lower (febuxostat: 43%; allopurinol: 39%). Rheumatologists from academic settings were more likely to prescribe an interleukin-1 inhibitor for gout flares. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The self-reported practice of the surveyed US rheumatologists was generally concordant with the 2020 ACR Guideline for the Management of Gout. However, there were gaps in guideline knowledge and stated adherence among rheumatologists, mainly concerning the dosing of treatment regimens.

OBJECTIVE:Patients with gout are at elevated risk of multiple vascular and metabolic comorbidities. Whether they are also at risk of sarcopenia, which is known to affect patients with other rheumatic diseases, has not been previously assessed. We examined whether patients with gout have decreased lumbar muscle quality and quantity, indicating an association between gout and sarcopenia. METHODS:50 gout subjects and 25 controls, ages 45-80, underwent computed tomography imaging of the lumbosacral spine. We measured muscle quantity (skeletal muscle area [SMA] and index [SMI]) and quality (skeletal muscle radiation attenuation [SMRA] and intermuscular adipose tissue [IMAT] area and index [IMATI]) of the psoas and erector spinae muscles at the L3 level. RESULTS:70 subjects (45 gout and 25 controls) were included in the analysis. Gout subjects had higher BMI, more kidney disease and hypertension, lower exercise frequency, and higher mean serum urate and creatinine vs. controls. Lumbar SMRA was significantly lower in gout subjects vs. controls, indicating reduced muscle quality. Lumbar IMAT area was significantly higher in gout subjects vs. controls, as was lumbar IMATI, indicating increased muscle adiposity. These differences persisted after adjusting for potential confounders. In contrast, there was no significant difference between gout and control groups in lumbar SMA or lumbar SMI, suggesting that muscle quantity may not be routinely affected by the diagnosis of gout. CONCLUSIONS:Gout patients exhibit decreased lumbar muscle quality compared with controls, consistent with an association between gout and sarcopenia.

OBJECTIVE:Using trial data comparing treat-to-target allopurinol and febuxostat in gout, we examined participant characteristics associated with serum urate (SU) goal achievement. METHODS:Participants with gout and SU ≥6.8 mg/dL were randomized to allopurinol or febuxostat, titrated during weeks 0 to 24, and maintained weeks 25 to 48. Participants were considered to achieve SU goal if the mean SU from weeks 36, 42, and 48 was <6.0 mg/dL or <5 mg/dL if tophi were present. Possible determinants of treatment response were preselected and included sociodemographics, comorbidities, diuretic use, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), body mass index, and gout measures. Determinants of SU response were assessed using multivariable logistic regression with additional analyses to account for treatment adherence. RESULTS:Of 764 study participants completing week 48, 618 (81%) achieved SU goal. After multivariable adjustment, factors associated with a greater likelihood of SU goal achievement included older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.40 per 10 years), higher education (aOR 2.02), and better HRQoL (aOR 1.17 per 0.1 unit). Factors associated with a lower odds of SU goal achievement included non-White race (aORs 0.32-0.47), higher baseline SU (aOR 0.83 per 1 mg/dL), presence of tophi (aOR 0.29), and the use of diuretics (aOR 0.52). Comorbidities including chronic kidney disease, hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease were not associated with SU goal achievement. Results were not meaningfully changed in analyses accounting for adherence. CONCLUSIONS:Several patient-level factors were predictive of SU goal achievement among patients with gout who received treat-to-target urate-lowering therapy (ULT). Approaches that accurately predict individual responses to treat-to-target ULT hold promise in facilitating personalized management and improving outcomes in patients with gout.

OBJECTIVE:Transparency of disclosure in publication is necessary for readers to be aware of any potential conflicts of interest (PCOIs). Past studies of accuracy of disclosure in rheumatology journals have focused exclusively on clinical practice guidelines and not research works. We assessed discrepancy in reporting PCOIs in clinically oriented manuscripts published in the three top-ranked (by impact factor) US-based general rheumatology journals. METHODS:We reviewed disclosures provided by first, second, and last authors of 50 published clinically oriented articles in each of the three top-ranked general US rheumatology journals. For each author, we extracted payment reports from the Open Payments Database (OPD) related to consulting fees, honoraria, and speaker or faculty compensation. We defined a PCOI as a payment received from a company with an ongoing clinical trial or a medication on the market related to the manuscript's subject matter within the 36 months before the online publication date. We additionally analyzed each author individually to determine whether their reported disclosures matched PCOIs from the OPD. RESULTS:Of 150 articles analyzed, 101 included authors with PCOIs. Ninety-two of these 101 publications (92%) contained inaccurate (non- or under-) disclosures. Among 135 authors with PCOIs, 118 reported inaccurately (87%). All 14 articles that published clinical trial results (and all 23 of their qualifying authors) had disclosure inaccuracies. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Inaccurate financial disclosure by authors remains an issue in clinically oriented research studies reported in top rheumatology journals. Improved community education and firmer expectations would permit readers to better assess any possible impact of PCOIs on publications.

Periprocedural inflammation is associated with major adverse cardiovascular events in patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In the contemporary era, 5% to 10% of patients develop restenosis, and in the acute coronary syndrome cohort, there remains a 20% major adverse cardiovascular events rate at 3 years, half of which are culprit-lesion related. In patients at risk of restenosis, colchicine has been shown to reduce restenosis when started within 24 hours of PCI and continued for 6 months thereafter, compared with placebo. The Colchicine-PCI trial, which randomized patients to a 1-time loading dose of colchicine or placebo 1 to 2 hours before PCI, showed a dampening of the inflammatory response to PCI but no difference in postprocedural myocardial injury. On mean follow-up of 3.3 years, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events did not differ between colchicine and placebo groups (32.5% vs 34.9%; hazard ratio 0.95 [0.68 to 1.34]).

OBJECTIVES:The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effects of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) inhibitors on gout flares. METHODS:Studies published between 2011 and 2022 that evaluated the effects of IL-1β inhibitors in adult patients experiencing gout flares were eligible for inclusion. Outcomes including pain, frequency and intensity of gout flares, inflammation, and safety were assessed. Five electronic databases (Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Biosis/Ovid, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) were searched. Two independent reviewers performed study screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessments (Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 for randomised controlled trials [RCTs] and Downs and Black for non-RCTs). Data are reported as a narrative synthesis. RESULTS:Fourteen studies (10 RCTs) met the inclusion criteria, with canakinumab, anakinra, and rilonacept being the three included IL-1β inhibitors. A total of 4367 patients with a history of gout were included from the 14 studies (N = 3446, RCTs; N = 159, retrospective studies [with a history of gout]; N = 762, post hoc analysis [with a history of gout]). In the RCTs, canakinumab and rilonacept were reported to have a better response compared to an active comparator for resolving pain, while anakinra appeared to be not inferior to an active comparator for resolving pain. Furthermore, canakinumab and rilonacept reduced the frequency of gout flares compared to the comparators. All three medications were mostly well-tolerated compared to their comparators. CONCLUSION:IL-1β inhibitors may be a beneficial and safe medication for patients experiencing gout flares for whom current standard therapies are unsuitable. REVIEW PROTOCOL REGISTRATION:PROSPERO ID: CRD42021267670.