Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

person:polskb01

in-biosketch:true

Total Results:

43


Failure to implement respiratory isolation: why does it happen?

Iwata, Kentaro; Smith, Barbara A; Santos, Eloisa; Polsky, Bruce; Sordillo, Emilia M
BACKGROUND:Respiratory isolation for 90% of individuals with acid-fast bacillus (AFB)-smear-positive tuberculosis (TB) is a recommended performance indicator in recent Infectious Diseases Society of America and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. However, compliance with respiratory isolation reported from multiple centers in the United States and Europe falls short of that goal. OBJECTIVE:To identify missed clues in TB patients who are not appropriately isolated. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective survey. SETTING/METHODS:A 900-bed voluntary hospital. PATIENTS/METHODS:All patients with AFB-smear-positive TB admitted between January 1995 and December 1999 who were not appropriately isolated. RESULTS:There were 173 TB cases admitted, including 106 with pulmonary TB. AFB smears were positive in 82 cases; 24 (29%) of these were not appropriately isolated. During the study period, the number of TB cases declined, but the proportion of appropriately isolated patients did not change. Most isolation failure cases were men (median age, 45.5 years); 21 of these patients were black, 2 were Hispanic white, and 1 was Asian, but none was non-Hispanic white. All isolation failure cases had at least one characteristic predictive of TB that could have been elicited at admission (eg, abnormal chest radiograph findings consistent with TB, fever, weight loss, a history of TB, a positive result on tuberculin skin test, hemoptysis, and human immunodeficiency virus infection). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Consistent with experiences at other hospitals, we found that the rate of isolation failure remained unchanged despite an overall decline in TB cases. In our experience, almost all isolation failures could be avoided by careful review of the history, physical examination, and chest radiograph for characteristics classically considered predictive of TB.
PMID: 12400889
ISSN: 0899-823x
CID: 3531252

Guidelines for using body composition measurement in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection

Wanke, Christine; Polsky, Bruce; Kotler, Donald
Wasting remains a significant condition of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection despite antiretroviral treatment. Early identification requires the measurement of various body composition parameters, particularly body cell mass (BCM). Anthropometry may provide some useful information. Cost and complexity issues make many body composition techniques unsuitable for the clinical setting. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) may be the best method available to caregivers for monitoring serial changes in BCM over time and for determining the occurrence of wasting. It is not useful, however, for detecting body composition changes in patients with fat redistribution syndromes. Portability, low cost, ease of use, and patient acceptance make anthropometry and BIA ideally suited for the clinical setting.
PMID: 12227988
ISSN: 1087-2914
CID: 3531242

Clinical microbiological case: refractory chest wall infection following reconstructive surgery in a patient with relapsed lung cancer [Case Report]

Safdar, A; Bains, M; Polsky, B
PMID: 11683798
ISSN: 1198-743x
CID: 174325

Long-term follow-up of patients with AIDS treated with parenteral cidofovir for cytomegalovirus retinitis: the HPMPC Peripheral Cytomegalovirus Retinitis Trial - The Studies of Ocular Complications of AIDS Research Group in collaboration with the AIDS Clinical Trials Group

Lewis, RA; Carr, LM; Doyle, K; Fainstein, V; Gross, R; Orengo-Nania, S; Samo, TC; Shigley, JW; Spencer, SS; Weinert, M; Dunn, JP; Bartlett, J; Becker, R; Feinberg, J; Jabs, DA; Johnson, DA; LaSalvia, S; Miller, T; Neisser, LG; Semba, RD; Tay-Kearney, ML; Tucker, P; Barron, B; Jarrott, C; Peyman, G; Swenie, D; Friedman, AH; Ginsburg, R; Sacks, H; Severin, C; Teich, S; Wallach, F; Rescigno, R; Cowan, J; Horan, C; Kloser, P; Wanner, M; Friedberg, DN; Addessi, A; Chachoua, A; Dieterich, D; Hill, J; Hutt, R; Ligh, J; Lorenzo-Latkany, M; Pei, M; Powers, T; Scoppe, C; Weinberg, DV; Jampol, LM; Lyon, AT; Munana, A; Murphy, R; Palella, F; Richine, L; Strugala, Z; Valadez, G; Holland, GN; Carlson, ME; Chafey, S; Hardy, WD; Johiro, AK; MacArthur-Chang, LJ; Martin, MA; Moe, AA; Strong, CA; Tufail, A; Ugalat, PS; Weisz, JM; Freeman, WR; Arevalo-Colina, JF; Clark, T; Jarman, CL; Meixner, L; Meng, TC; Spector, S; Taskintuna, I; Torriani, FJ; O'Donnell, J; Alfred, P; Ballesteros, F; Clay, D; Coleman, R; Gordon, K; Gumbley, D; Hoffman, J; Irvine, A; Jacobson, M; Larson, J; Macalalag, L; Narahara, M; Payne, M; Seiff, S; Wilson, S; Woodring, H; Davis, J; Mendez, P; Murray, T; Simmons, T; van der Horst, C; Kylstra, J; Wohl, D; Ziman, K; Pavan, PR; Bergen, GA; Cohen, SM; Craig, JA; Dehler, RL; Elbert, E; Fox, RW; Grizzard, WS; Hammer, ME; Hernandez, LS; Herrera, S; Holt, D; Kemp, S; Larkin, JA; Ledford, DK; Lockey, RF; Menosky, MM; Millard, S; Nadler, JP; Nelson, RP; Norris, D; Ormerod, LD; Pautler, SE; Poblete, SJ; Rodriguez, D; Rosenbach, KP; Seekins, DW; Toney, JR; Jabs, DA; Dodge, JM; Klemstine, JL; Schuerholtz, TA; Stevens, M; Meinert, CL; Amend-Libercci, D; Coleson, L; Collins, KL; Collison, BJ; Dawson, C; Dodge, J; Donithan, M; Ewing, C; Fink, N; Gerczak, C; Harle, J; Holbrook, JT; Huffman, R; Isaacson, MR; Gilpin, AMK; Lane, M; Levine, CR; Martin, B; Meinert, J; Nowakowski, DJ; Owens, RM; Piantadosi, B; Saah, A; Smith, M; Tonascia, J; Van Natta, ML; Davis, MD; Armstrong, J; Brickbauer, J; Brothers, R; Chop, M; Hubbard, L; Hurlburt, D; Kastorff, L; Magli, Y; Neider, M; Onofrey, J; Stoppenbach, V; Vanderhoof-Young, M; Walls, M; Hughes, R; Kurinij, N; Mowery, RL; Alston, B; Foulkes, M; Jabs, DA; Davis, MD; Kurinij, N; Meinert, CL; Mowery, RL; Jabs, DA; Addessi, A; Alston, B; Clark, T; Davis, MD; Feinberg, J; Freeman, W; Holbrook, J; Holland, GN; Hubbard, L; Jacobson, M; Kurinij, N; Lewis, RA; McArthur-Chang, L; Meinert, C; Mowery, R; Murphy, R; Polsky, B; Tonascia, J; Jabs, DA; Davis, MD; Duncan, WR; Feinberg, J; Kessler, H; Kurinij, N; Lambert, AG; Meinert, CL; Mowery, RL; Powderly, W; Schnittman, S; Spector, S; Tonascia, J; Brown, BW; Conway, B; Grizzle, J; Nussenblatt, R; Phair, JP; Smith, H; Whitley, R; Alston, B; Davis, MD; Foulkes, M; Jabs, DA; Kurinij, N; Meinert, CL; Mowery, RL; Tonascia, J; Jabs, DA; Freeman, WR; Jacobson, M; Murphy, R; Van Natta, ML; Meinert, CL; Cheng, B; Frost, K; Lambert, AG; Marco, M
Objective: To evaluate patients with cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis treated with intravenous cidofovir for long-term outcomes. Design: Patients with CMV retinitis enrolled in a randomized, controlled clinical trial of intravenous cidofovir as treatment for retinitis were followed for long-term outcomes, including 21 patients initially enrolled in the deferral group who received cidofovir therapy after progression of retinitis. Setting: Thirteen tertiary care clinics specializing in AIDS care and ophthalmology. Participants: Fifty-eight patients with AIDS and small peripheral CMV retinitis lesions. Interventions: Cidofovir 5 mg/kg once weekly for 2 weeks followed by low-dose maintenance cidofovir therapy (3 mg/kg) in 35 patients or high-dose maintenance (5 mg/kg) in 23 patients. Main outcome measures: Time to progression of retinitis, drug toxicities. Results: Median time to progression of retinitis was 2.5 months. Median time to discontinuation of cidofovir because of intolerance was 6.6 months, and did not differ significantly between the two maintenance doses. Median time to discontinuation of cidofovir for intolerance other than probenecid reaction was 16.3 months for patients treated with low-dose maintenance and 5.0 months for patients treated with high-dose maintenance (P = 0.021). Proteinuria of 2+ or more occurred at a rate of 1.22/person year. In patients with sufficient follow-up to determine resolution of proteinuria, 89.9% of episodes resolved, and the median time to resolution was 20 days. Rates of probenecid intolerance and of cidofovir-associated uveitis were 0.35/person-year, and 0.20/person-year, respectively
ISI:000089021600012
ISSN: 0269-9370
CID: 54539

MSL-109 adjuvant therapy for cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with acquired immunodeficiency in syndrome - The monoclonal antibody cytomegalovirus retinitis trial

Lewis, RA; CarrHolden, LM; Doyle, K; Fainstein, V; Gardner, N; Gross, R; OrengoNania, S; Patel, V; Samo, TC; Shigley, JW; Shawver, L; Spencer, SS; Weinert, M; Martin, DF; Gibbs, D; Jernigan, J; Dunn, JP; Bartlett, J; Becker, R; Jabs, DA; Johnson, DA; LaSalvia, S; Leslie, J; Maenza, J; Miller, T; Neisser, LG; Semba, RD; Tucker, P; Barron, B; Jarrott, C; Peyman, G; Swenie, D; Heinemann, MH; Janis, R; Polsky, B; Sepkowitz, K; Friedman, AH; Ginsburg, R; Severin, C; Teich, S; Wallach, F; Rescigno, R; PaezBoham, R; Buroff, E; Kloser, P; Wanner, M; Friedberg, DN; Addessi, A; Chachoua, A; Dieterich, D; Hill, J; Hutt, R; Kaul, A; Ligh, J; LorenzoLatkany, M; Pei, M; Powers, T; Weinberg, DV; Jampol, EM; Lyon, AT; Munana, A; Murphy, R; Palella, F; Richine, L; Strugala, Z; Valadez, G; Holland, GN; Carlson, ME; Chafey, SA; Hardy, WD; Johiro, AK; MacArthurChang, LJ; Martin, MA; Moe, AA; Strong, CA; Tufail, A; Ugalat, PS; Weisz, JM; Freeman, WR; ArevaloColina, JF; Clark, T; Jarman, CL; Meixner, L; Meng, TC; Spector, S; Taskintuna, I; Torriani, FJ; ODonnell, J; Alfred, P; Ballesteros, F; Clay, D; Coleman, R; Gordon, K; Gumbley, D; Hoffman, J; Irvine, A; Jacobson, M; Larson, M; Macalalag, L; Narahara, M; Payne, M; Seiff, S; Wilson, S; Woodring, H; Davis, J; Blenke, A; Madera, I; Mendez, P; Murray, T; vanderHorst, C; Kylstra, J; Wohl, D; Ziman, K; Pavan, PR; Grizzard, WS; Bergen, GA; Cohen, SM; Craig, JA; Dehler, RL; Elbert, E; Fox, RW; Hammer, ME; Hernandez, LS; Herrera, S; Holt, D; Kemp, S; Larkin, JA; Ledford, DK; Lockey, RF; Menosky, MM; Millard, S; Nadler, JP; Nelson, RP; Norris, D; Ormerod, LD; Pautler, SE; Poblete, SJ; Rodriguez, D; Rosenbach, KP; Seekins, DW; Toney, JR; Dodge, JM; Klemstine, JL; Schuerholtz, TA; Stevens, M; Meinert, CL; AmendLibercci, D; Coleson, L; Collins, KL; Collison, BJ; Dawson, C; Dodge, J; Donithan, M; Ewing, C; Fink, N; Gerczak, C; Harle, J; Holbrook, JT; Huffman, R; Isaacson, MR; Gilpin, AMK; Lane, M; Levine, CR; Martin, B; Meinert, J; Min, N; Nowakowski, DJ; Owens, RM; Oziemkowska, MJ; Piantadosi, B; Saah, A; Smith, M; Tonascia, J; VanNatta, ML; Davis, MD; Armstrong, J; Brickbauer, J; Brothers, R; Chop, M; Hubbard, L; Hurlburt, D; Kastorff, L; Neider, M; Onofrey, J; Stoppenbach, V; VanderhoofYoung, M; Walls, M; Hughes, R; Kurinij, N; Mowery, RL; Alston, B; Foulkes, M; Nadler, PI; Wood, DL; Bladet, M; Wu, N; Clark, T; Feinberg, J; Freeman, W; Holbrook, J; McArthurChang, L; Duncan, WR; Kessler, H; Lambert, AG; Powderly, W; Schnittman, S; Spector, S; Brown, BW; Conway, B; Grizzle, J; Nussenblatt, R; Phair, JP; Smith, H; Whitley, R; Cheng, B; Frost, K; Marco, M
Objective: To evaluate the the efficacy and safety of an intravenous human monoclonal antibody to cytomegalovirus (CMV), MSL-109, as adjuvant treatment for CMV retinitis. Methods: Two hundred nine patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and active CMV retinitis were enrolled in a multicenter, phase 2/3, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Patients received adjuvant treatment with MSL-109, 60 mg intravenously every 2 weeks, or placebo. Randomization was stratified on the basis of whether patients had untreated or relapsed retinitis. Primary drug therapy for CMV retinitis was determined by the treating physician. Results: The rates of retinitis progression, as evaluated in a masked fashion, were 3.04/person-year in the MSL-109-treated group and 3.05/person-year in the placebo-treated group (P=.98; Wald test); the median times to progression were 67 days in the MSL-109-treated group and 65 days in the placebo-treated group. No differences between the 2 groups were noted in the rates of increase in retinal area involved by CMV, visual field loss, or visual acuity outcomes. The mortality rate in the MSL-109-treated group was 0.68/person-year, and in the placebo-treated group, 0.31/person-year (P=.01). The mortality difference was not explained by differences in baseline variables or in concurrent antiretroviral therapy. Among patients with newly diagnosed retinitis, mortality rates were similar (MSL-109, 0.41/person-year; placebo, 0.42/person-year; P=.95), whereas among patients with relapsed retinitis the MSL-109-treated group had a greater mortality rate (MSL-109, 0.83/person-year, placebo, 0.24/person-year; P=.003). However, the mortality rate in the placebo-treated patients with relapsed CMV retinitis was lower than that in the placebo-treated patients with newly diagnosed CMV retinitis and lower than that in other trials of patients with relapsed CMV retinitis. Conclusions: Intravenous MSL-109, 60 mg every 2 weeks, appeared to be ineffective adjuvant therapy for CMV retinitis. The mortality rate was higher in the MSL-109-treated group, but the reasons for this difference remain uncertain
ISI:A1997YK25100005
ISSN: 0003-9950
CID: 53126

Parenteral cidofovir for cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with AI

Lewis, RA; Carr, LM; Doyle, K; Fainstein, V; Gross, R; OrengoNania, S; Samo, TC; Shigley, JW; Spencer, SS; Weinert, M; Dunn, JP; Bartlett, J; Becker, R; Feinberg, J; Jabs, DA; Johnson, DA; LaSalvia, S; Miller, T; Neisser, LG; Semba, RD; TayKearney, ML; Tucker, P; Barron, B; Jarrott, C; Peyman, G; Swenie, D; Friedman, AH; Ginsburg, R; Sacks, H; Severin, C; Teich, S; Wallach, F; Rescigno, R; Cowan, J; Horan, C; Kloser, P; Wanner, M; Friedberg, DN; Addessi, A; Chachoua, A; Dieterich, D; Hill, J; Hutt, R; Ligh, J; LorenzoLatkany, M; Pei, M; Powers, T; Scoppe, C; Weinberg, DV; Jampol, LM; Lyon, AT; Munana, A; Murphy, R; Palella, F; Richine, L; Strugala, Z; Valadez, G; Holland, GN; Carlson, ME; Chafey, S; Hardy, WD; Johiro, AK; MacarthurChang, L; Martin, MA; Moe, AA; Strong, CA; Tufail, A; Ugalat, PS; Weisz, JM; Freeman, WR; ArevaloColina, JF; Clark, T; Jarman, CL; Meixner, L; Meng, TC; Spector, S; Taskintuna, I; Torriani, FJ; ODonnell, J; Alfred, P; Ballesteros, F; Clay, D; Coleman, R; Gumbley, D; Hoffman, J; Irvine, A; Jacobson, M; Larson, J; Macalalag, L; Narahara, M; Payne, M; Seiff, S; Wilson, S; Woodring, H; Davis, J; Mendez, P; Murray, T; Simmons, T; vanderHorst, C; Kylstra, J; Wohl, D; Ziman, K; Pavan, PR; Bergen, GA; Cohen, SM; Craig, JA; Dehler, RL; Elbert, E; Fox, RW; Grizzard, WS; Hammer, ME; Hernandez, LS; Herrera, S; Holt, D; Kemp, S; Larkin, JA; Ledford, DK; Lockey, RF; Menosky, MM; Millard, S; Nadler, JP; Nelson, RP; Norris, D; Ormerod, LD; Pautler, SE; Poblete, SJ; Rodriguez, D; Rosenbach, KP; Seekins, DW; Toney, JR; Dodge, JM; Klemstine, JL; Schuerholtz, TA; Stevens, M; Meinert, CL; AmendLibercci, D; Coleson, L; Collins, KL; Collison, BJ; Dawson, C; Dodge, J; Donithan, M; Ewing, C; Fink, N; Gerczak, C; Harle, J; Holbrook, JT; Huffman, R; Isaacson, MR; Gilpin, AMK; Lane, M; Levine, CR; Martin, B; Meinert, J; Nowakowski, DJ; Owens, RM; Piantadosi, B; Saah, A; Smith, M; Tonascia, J; VanNatta, ML; Davis, MD; Armstrong, J; Brickbauer, J; Brothers, R; Chop, M; Hubbard, L; Hurlburt, D; Kastorff, L; Magli, Y; Neider, M; Onofrey, J; Stoppenbach, V; VanderhoofYoung, M; Walls, M; Hughes, R; Kurinij, N; Mowery, RL; Alston, B; Foulkes, M; Freeman, W; Holbrook, J; Meinert, C; Mowery, R; Polsky, B; Duncan, WR; Kessler, H; Lambert, AG; Powderly, W; Schnittman, S; Spector, S; Brown, BW; Conway, B; Grizzle, J; Nussenblatt, R; Phair, JP; Smith, H; Whitley, R; Cheng, B; Frost, K; Marco, M
Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis is a common infection and a major cause of visual loss in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Objective: To evaluate intravenous cidofovir as a treatment for CMV retinitis. Design: Two-stage, multicenter, phase II/III, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Setting: Ophthalmology and AIDS services at tertiary care medical centers. Patients: 64 patients with AIDS and previously untreated, small, peripheral CMV retinitis lesions (that is, patients at low risk for loss of visual acuity). Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the deferral group, in which treatment was deferred until retinitis progressed; the low-dose cidofovir group, which received cidofovir, 5 mg/kg of body weight once weekly for 2 weeks, then maintenance therapy with cidofovir, 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks; or the high-dose cidofovir group, which received cidofovir, 5 mg/kg once weekly for 2 weeks, then maintenance therapy with cidofovir, 5 mg/kg once every 2 weeks. To minimize nephrotoxicity, cidofovir was administered with hydration and probenecid. Measurements: Progression of retinitis, evaluated in a masked manner by a fundus photograph reading center; the amount of retinal area involved by CMV; the loss of visual acuity; and morbidity. Results: Median time to progression was 64 days in the low-dose cidofovir group and 21 days in the deferral group (P = 0.052, log-rank test). The median time to progression was not reached in the high-dose cidofovir group but was 20 days in the deferral group (P = 0.009, log-rank test). Analysis of the rates of increase in the retinal area affected by CMV confirmed the data on time to progression. The three groups had similar rates of visual loss. Proteinuria of 2+ or more occurred at rates of 2.6 per person-year in the deferral group, 2.8 per person-year in the low-dose cidofovir group (P > 0.2), and 6.8 per person-year in the high-dose cidofovir group (P = 0.135). No patient developed 4+ proteinuria, but two cidofovir recipients developed persistent elevations of serum creatinine levels at more than 177 mu mol/L (2.0 mg/dL). Reactions to probenecid occurred at a rate of 0.70 per person-year. Conclusions: Intravenous cidofovir, high- or low-dose, effectively slowed the progression of CMV retinitis. Concomitant probenecid and hydration therapy, intermittent dosing, and monitoring for proteinuria seemed to minimize but not eliminate the risk for nephrotoxicity
ISI:A1997WH06800004
ISSN: 0003-4819
CID: 53289

Assessment of cytomegalovirus retinitis - Clinical evaluation vs centralized grading of fundus photographs

Lewis, RA; Clogston, P; Fainstein, V; Gross, R; Samo, TC; Tuttle, C; Jabs, DA; Apuzzo, L; Bartlett, J; Coleson, L; Dunn, JP; Eldred, L; Feinberg, J; Flynn, T; King, R; Leslie, J; Barron, B; Greenspan, D; Heinemann, MD; Polsky, B; Squires, K; WiseCampbell, S; Friedman, AH; Cheung, TW; Justin, N; Teich, S; Sacks, H; Severin, C; Friedberg, DN; Addessi, A; Dieterich, D; Frost, K; Weinberg, D; Jampol, L; Murphy, R; Naughton, K; Henderly, D; Holland, GN; Chafey, S; Fall, H; Hardy, WD; Kimbrell, C; McArthurChang, L; Freeman, WR; Meinert, L; Peterson, TJ; Quiceno, JI; Rickman, L; Simanello, MA; Spector, S; ODonnell, J; Hoffman, J; Irvine, A; Jacobson, M; Larson, J; Seiff, S; Wanner, M; Davis, J; Chuang, E; Espinal, M; Mendez, P; Vandenbroucke, R; Cheesman, SH; Gittinger, J; Haubrich, R; Kachadoorian, H; Tolson, K; Kline, JM; Klemm, AC; Stevens, M; Webb, R; BrownBellamy, J; Markowitz, JA; Brookmeyer, R; Collins, KB; Collison, BJ; Dodge, J; Donithan, M; Fink, N; Gilpin, AMK; Gerczak, C; Holbrook, JT; Isaacson, MR; Levine, CR; Martin, B; Min, YI; Owens, RM; Nowakowski, DJ; Saah, A; Singer, S; Smith, M; Sternberg, AL; Tonascia, J; VanNatta, ML; Davies, MD; AgresSegal, M; Armstrong, J; Brickbauer, J; Brothers, R; Freitag, G; Hubbard, L; Hurlburt, D; Jensen, K; Kastorff, L; King, B; Magli, Y; Messing, S; Miner, K; Neider, M; Onofrey, J; Stoppenbach, V; Thomas, S; VanderhoofYoung, M; Stewart, G; Hughes, R; Welch, L; Kurinij, N; Mowery, R; Ellenberg, S; Korvick, J; Davis, MD; Clark, T; Clogston, PS; Freeman, W; Kolvick, J; Mowery, R; Sattler, F; Brown, BW; Conway, B; Grizzle, J; Nussenblatt, R; Phair, J; Smith, H; Whitley, R; Bowers, M; Cheng, B; Lambert, AG; Link, D
Background: In the Foscarnet-Ganciclovir Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Retinitis Trial, time to first progression of newly diagnosed CMV retinitis was similar in the 2 treatment groups but was shorter when assessed by grading of fundus photographs at a central reading center than when assessed at the participating clinical centers. This report describes the extent and causes of this disagreement and considers the implications of the findings for clinical practice and future research. Methods: Clinical findings and photographic gradings were compared for extent and activity of retinitis at baseline and during follow-up. In selected cases of disagreement, the photographs and summaries of gradings and clinical findings were reviewed concurrently to determine the cause of disagreement. Results: Movement of the border of retinitis was observed sooner and activity of the border was considered to have increased more often at the reading center than at the clinical centers. Disagreements on time to first progression were more frequent when degree of border movement was small (odds ratios [ORs] for several comparisons ranged from 1.7 to 5.2), when border activity was judged to have decreased or remained the same since the preceding visit (OR, 2.0-193), and when retinitis at baseline did not involve zone 1 (the area within 1 disc diameter of the disc or within 2 disc diameters of the center of the macula [OR, 1.4-3.6]). There were 2 important causes of disagreement between clinical center and reading center. First, difficulty was encountered clinically in recognizing retinitis border movement in the absence of an obvious increase in border activity. Second, the reading center used a threshold for border movement small enough to be crossed by an initial expansion of retinitis borders occurring within 2 to 5 weeks of enrollment in some patients who were responding favorably to treatment (in that retinitis was becoming inactive and showed no further progression for many weeks). Conclusions: Comparisons of photographs from the current visit with those from several previous visits may increase clinicians' abilities to detect progression promptly. The use of additional outcome measures by reading centers, such as border movement of 1500 pm or more and change in area of retina involved by retinitis, may provide more accurate and useful comparisons of treatments. In making such comparisons, centralized photographic grading has the advantages of greater reproducibility and lesser risk of observer bias
ISI:A1996UX51500001
ISSN: 0003-9950
CID: 52858

Nevirapine, zidovudine, and didanosine compared with zidovudine and didanosine in patients with HIV-1 infection - A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

DAquila, RT; Hughes, MD; Johnson, VA; Fischl, MA; Sommadossi, JP; Liou, SH; Timpone, J; Myers, M; Basgoz, N; Niu, M; Hirsch, MS; Costanzo, L; Ruben, S; Berzins, B; Martinez, A; Fishman, I; Kazial, K; Cort, SN; Robinson, P; Hall, D; Macy, H; McLaren, C; Rooney, J; Warwick, J; CavailleColl, M; Valentine, F; Booth, D; Soeiro, R; Stein, D; Zingman, B; Schliosberg, J; Polsky, B; Sepkowitz, K; Sharpe, V; Giordano, M; Wanke, C; Gulick, R; Craven, D; Grodman, C; Fife, K; Black, J; Todd, K; Nixon, H; Sperber, K; Gerits, P; Mildvan, D; Nicholas, P; Murphy, RL; Kessler, H; Pulvirenti, J; Squires, K; Saag, M; Weingarten, J; Gnann, J; Havlir, D; Fegan, C; Spector, S; Richman, D; Jacobson, M; Dybeck, K; Joseph, P; Clanon, K; McKenzie, S; Daniel, P; Dayton, D; Leonard, J; Schooley, R; Kuritzkes, D; Ray, G; Putnam, B; Jayaweera, D; PatroneReese, J; Tanner, T; Moebus, J; Reed, N; StJacque, R; Henry, K; Swindells, S; Eron, J; Ragan, D; Horton, J; Lane, T; Frank, I; Norris, A; Pomerantz, R; Hauptman, S; Geiseler, J; Leedom, J; Canchola, F; Olson, C; Deyton, L; Pettinelli, C
Objective: To study the addition of a third human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase inhibitor, nevirapine, to the combination of zidovudine and didanosine. Design: A 48-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at 16 AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) Clinical Trials Units. Patients: 398 adults who had HIV-1 infection, had 350 or fewer CD4(+) T lymphocytes/mm(3), and had had more than 6 months of previous nucleoside therapy. Intervention: 1) Either nevirapine or placebo (200 mg/d for 2 weeks, then 400 mg/d thereafter) and 2) open-label zidovudine (600 mg/d) and didanosine (400 mg/d for patients weighing greater than or equal to 60 kg). Measurements: CD4(+) T lymphocyte counts, time to first HIV-1 disease progression event or death, adverse events, and nevirapine levels in plasma samples taken at random were measured in all patients. Plasma levels of HIV-1 RNA; HIV-1 infectivity titer in peripheral blood mononuclear cells; serum p24 antigen levels; and plasma levels of zidovudine and didanosine were measured in patients enrolled at half the study sites. Results: After 48 weeks of study treatment, the patients assigned to the triple-combination regimen (nevirapine, zidovudine, and didanosine) had an 18% higher mean absolute CD4 cell count (95% CI, 7% to 29%; P = 0.001), a 0.32 log(10) lower mean infectious HIV-1 titer in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (CI, 0.05 to 0.59 log(10) infectious units per million cells; P = 0.023), and a 0.25 log(10) lower mean plasma HIV-1 RNA level (CI, 0.03 to 0.48 log(10) RNA copies/mL; P = 0.028) than did patients assigned to the double-combination regimen (zidovudine and didanosine). Severe rashes were more common among patients assigned to receive the triple combination (9% compared with 2%; P = 0.002). Risk for disease progression did not differ between the two groups (relative hazard of the triple-combination group, 1.24 [CI, 0.75 to 2.06]; P > 0.2), although the study had only moderate power to detect a major difference. Conclusions: Adding nevirapine to zidovudine and didanosine improved the long-term immunologic and virologic effects of therapy and was associated with severe rash among the patients studied, who had had extensive previous therapy. These results support 1) the continuing development of combinations of more than two antiretroviral drugs to increase and prolong HIV-1 suppression and 2) the potential utility of nevirapine in combination regimens
ISI:A1996UQ65800001
ISSN: 0003-4819
CID: 52887

ANTIVIRAL EFFECTS OF FOSCARNET AND GANCICLOVIR THERAPY ON HUMAN-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS P24 ANTIGEN IN PATIENTS WITH AIDS AND CYTOMEGALOVIRUS RETINITIS

QUINN, TC; JABS, DA; HOLBROOK, JT; HARDY, WD; POLSKY, B; LEWIS, RA; CLOGSTON, P; FAINSTEIN, V; GROSS, R; SAMO, T; TUTTLE, C; APUZZO, L; BARTLETT, J; DUNN, JP; ELDRED, L; FEINBERG, J; FLYNN, T; KING, R; BARRON, B; GREENSPAN, D; LECOUNT, C; PEYMAN, G; FRANKLIN, R; HEINEMANN, M; SQUIRES, K; WISECAMPBELL, S; FRIEDMAN, AH; CHEUNG, TW; JUSTIN, N; TEICH, SA; SACKS, H; SEVERIN, C; FRIEDBERG, DN; ADDESSI, A; DIETERICH, D; LAFLEUR, F; WEINBERG, D; JAMPOL, L; MURPHY, R; NAUGHTON, K; HENDERLY, D; HOLLAND, GN; CHAFEY, S; FALL, H; KIMBRELL, C; MACARTHUR, LJ; FREEMAN, WR; MEIXNERT, L; PETERSON, TJ; QUICENO, JI; RICKMAN, L; SIMANELLO, MA; SPECTOR, S; ODONNELL, J; HOFFMAN, J; IRVINE, A; JACOBSON, M; LARSON, J; SEIFF, S; WARNER, L; DAVIS, J; CHUANG, E; ESPINAL, M; MENDEZ, P; CHEESEMAN, SH; GITTINGER, J; HAUBRICH, R; KACHADOORIAN, H; TOLSON, K; BROWNBELLAMY, J; KLEMM, AC; MARKOWITZ, JA; MEINERT, CL; AMENDLIBERCCI, A; COLESON, L; COLLINS, KL; COLLISON, BJ; DODGE, J; DONITHAN, M; EWING, C; FINK, N; GERCZAK, C; ISAACSON, MR; KAPLANGILIPIN, A; HUFFMAN, R; LEVINE, CR; NOWAKOWSKI, DJ; SMITH, M; TONASCIA, J; VANNATTA, ML; AGRESSEGAL, M; ARMSTRONG, J; BROTHERS, R; HUBBARD, L; HURLBURT, D; MAGLI, Y; MINER, K; THOMAS, S; VANDERHOOFYOUNG, M; STEWART, G; HUGHES, R; LEEF, J; PALMER, S; MOWERY, R; ELLENBERG, S; KORVICK, J; DAVIS, MD; CLARK, T; MERIN, L; SATTLER, F; JORDAN, C; MILLS, J; BROWN, BW; CONWAY, B; GRIZZLE, J; NUSSENBLATT, R; PHAIR, J; SMITH, H; KLINE, R; MOSS, M; CARELLA, A
To examine whether the prolonged survival seen in patients treated with foscarnet compared with those treated with ganciclovir was due to a direct effect on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication, HIV p24 antigen was measured. Of 71 receiving foscarnet, 54% were p24 antigen-positive at enrollment (vs. 44% of 79 receiving ganciclovir). By immune complex-dissociated (ICD) p24 antigen analysis, 87% and 78%, respectively, were positive. After 1 month of treatment, there was a significant decline in standard (mean decline, 10.1 pg/mL) and ICD (mean, 39.6 pg/mL) p24 antigen in both groups (P = .0001). Mortality was greater in those who were ICD p24 antigen-positive than in those -negative at baseline (P = .03) and in subjects with an increase in ICD p24 antigen than in those with a decline (P = .09). Thus, each drug had a suppressive effect on circulating p24 antigen, which was predictive of improved survival. The inhibitory effect on CMV replication may have a beneficial effect on limiting HIV replication
ISI:A1995RR07300001
ISSN: 0022-1899
CID: 86764

MORBIDITY AND TOXIC EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH GANCICLOVIR OR FOSCARNET THERAPY IN A RANDOMIZED CYTOMEGALOVIRUS RETINITIS TRIAL

LEWIS, RA; CLOGSTON, P; FAINSTEIN, V; GROSS, R; SAMO, T; TUTTLE, C; JABS, DA; APUZZO, L; BARTLETT, J; COLESON, L; DUNN, JP; ELDRED, L; FEINBERG, J; FLYNN, T; KING, R; LESLIE, J; BARRON, B; GREENSPAN, D; LECOUNT, C; PEYMAN, G; FRANKLIN, R; HEINEMANN, MH; POLSKY, B; SQUIRES, K; WISECAMPBELL, S; FRIEDMAN, AH; CHEUNG, TW; JUSTIN, N; TEICH, S; SACKS, H; SEVERIN, C; FRIEDBERG, DN; ADDESSI, A; DIETERICH, D; FROST, K; WEINBERG, D; JAMPOL, L; MURPHY, R; NAUGHTON, K; HENDERLY, D; HOLLAND, GN; CHAFEY, S; FALL, H; HARDY, WD; KIMBRELL, C; MACARTHUR, LJ; FREEMAN, WR; MEIXNERT, L; PETERSON, TJ; QUICENO, JI; RICKMAN, L; SIMANELLO, MA; SPECTOR, S; ODONNELL, J; HOFFMAN, J; IRVINE, A; JACOBSON, M; LARSON, J; SEIFF, S; WANNER, M; DAVIS, J; CHUANG, E; ESPINAL, M; MENDEZ, P; VANDENBROUCKE, R; CHEESEMAN, SH; GITTINGER, J; HAUBRICH, R; KACHADOORIAN, H; TOLSON, K; KLINE, JM; KLEMM, AC; STEVENS, M; WEBB, R; BROWNBELLAMY, J; MARKOWITZ, JA; MEINERT, CL; BINDER, KL; BROOKMEYER, R; BROWN, VE; COLLISON, BJ; DODGE, J; DONITHAN, M; FINK, N; GERCZAK, C; HOLBROOK, JT; ISAACSON, MR; JONES, CP; LEVINE, CR; MIN, YI; MEINERT, JL; OWENS, RM; NOWAKOWSKI, DJ; SAAH, A; SANDFORD, GR; SINGER, S; SMITH, M; STERNBERG, AL; TONASCIA, J; VANNATTA, ML; DAVID, MD; AGRESSEGAL, M; ARMSTRONG, J; BROTHERS, R; FREITAG, G; HUBBARD, L; HURLBURT, D; KASTORFF, L; MAGLI, Y; MINER, K; THOMAS, S; VANDERHOOFYOUNG, M; STEWART, G; HUGHES, R; WELCH, L; MOWERY, R; ELLENBERG, S; KORVICK, J; DAVIS, MD; CLARK, T; CLOGSTON, PS; FREEMAN, W; SATTLER, F; JORDAN, C; MILLS, J; BROWN, BW; CONWAY, B; GRIZZLE, J; NUSSENBLATT, R; PHAIR, J; SMITH, H
Background: The Foscarnet-Ganciclovir Cytomegalovirus Retinitis Trial compared the use of either ganciclovir or foscarnet for the initial treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. We previously reported that patients treated with foscarnet lived longer but were more likely to have their treatment switched, the latter suggesting foscarnet may not have been as well tolerated as ganciclovir. This study compared the morbidity and toxic reactions reported during the trial. Methods: Two hundred thirty-four patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and preciously untreated cytomegalovirus retinitis at 11 university centers were randomly assigned to receive intravenously either foscarnet (n = 107) or ganciclovir (n = 127). Medical histories, laboratory tests, and drug treatment histories during the first 6 months of treatment were analyzed. Results: Neutropenia was more common in patients assigned to ganciclovir than to foscarnet (34% vs 14%; P = .001). Patients assigned to foscarnet reported more infusion-related symptoms (58% vs 24%; P < .001) and, in male patients, more genitourinary symptoms (36% vs 16%; P > .001); they also experienced a trend toward more nephrotoxic effects (13% vs 6%; P = .082) and electrolyte abnormalities. The incidence of seizures was similar in both groups (foscarnet, 12%; ganciclovir, 9%; P = .511). Patients assigned to foscarnet were more likely to be switched to the alternative treatment (foscarnet to ganciclovir, 46%; ganciclovir to foscarnet, 11%, P < .001), and most of this excess was attributable to toxic reactions. In 88% of cases in which treatment was snitched as a result of toxic reactions and in which follow-up data were available, the toxic reaction resolved after the switch. No permanent disability or death resulted from toxic reactions. Conclusions: Compared with ganciclovir, the use of foscarnet was more frequently limited by the occurrence of toxic reactions. However, these toxic reactions rarely had long-term sequelae. In light of the previously reported survival benefit seen in patients treated with foscarnet, these data support the use of foscarnet for the initial treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis
ISI:A1995QA05800008
ISSN: 0003-9926
CID: 87463