Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

person:pothub01

in-biosketch:true

Total Results:

199


Missed opportunities in the real-world genetic testing in BRCA gene variant carriers with cancers meeting NCCN criteria

Lee, Sarah S; Rajeev, Pournami; Finning, Skyler; Oh, Cheongeun; Pothuri, Bhavana
OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of patients meeting the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)'s BRCA genetic testing criteria prior to a diagnosis of a BRCA-related cancer. METHODS:This was a cross-sectional study of patients with BRCA pathogenic variants and a diagnosis of a BRCA-related cancer. Patients were included if they had known dates of genetic testing and cancer diagnosis. NCCN criteria (version 2.2021) were applied to determine if patients met criteria for testing before a BRCA-related cancer diagnosis. The outcome of interest was the proportion of patients undergoing genetic testing following a diagnosis of a BRCA-related cancer who qualified for genetic testing based on NCCN criteria. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U test, and logistic regression were performed with significance at p < 0.05. RESULTS:Of 270 patients with a BRCA-related cancer, 229 (85%) underwent genetic testing after a cancer diagnosis. Most patients (97%) met at least one NCCN criteria for BRCA testing; 166 (73%) of patients who were tested following a BRCA-related cancer diagnosis also met the criteria for testing by family history. Publicly insured or uninsured patients were three times more likely to undergo BRCA testing after a diagnosis of cancer (odds ratio [OR] 3.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-8.40). Patients with a family history of pathogenic variants were more likely to undergo testing before a cancer diagnosis (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.05-0.23). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Most patients with BRCA-associated cancers undergo genetic testing after their cancer diagnosis. Increased education on genetic testing criteria and novel methods to improve testing are desperately needed.
PMID: 36610379
ISSN: 1095-6859
CID: 5410212

UPLIFT (ENGOT-OV67/GOG-3048) A PIVOTAL COHORT OF THE XMT-1536-1 TRIAL OF UPIFITAMAB RILSODOTIN (XMT-1536; UPRI), A NAPI2B-DIRECTED ANTIBODY DRUG CONJUGATE (ADC) IN PLATINUM-RESISTANT OVARIAN CANCER [Meeting Abstract]

Richardson, D; Fidalgo, J A P; Gonzalez-Martin, A; Oaknin, A; Hamilton, E; Hays, J; Pothuri, B; Papadopoulos, K; Taylor, S; Huang, M; Lee, Y -C; Krivak, T; Moreno-Garcia, V; Calvo, E; Randall, L; Starks, D; Ross, M; Duska, L; Gao, B; Poka, R; Putiri, E; Barrett, J; Demars, L; Concin, N
Objectives UpRi is a first-in-class NaPi2b ADC with a novel scaffold-linker-payload that enables high drug-to-antibody ratio and controlled bystander effect. NaPi2b is a sodium-dependent phosphate transporter protein broadly expressed in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), with limited expression in healthy tissues. Interim data from the Phase 1b expansion cohort of heavily pretreated patients with recurrent HGSOC has been reported. These data demonstrated clinically meaningful activity, notably in patients with NaPi2b-high tumors (TPS>=75). Effective and well-tolerated treatments for PROC remains an unmet medical need. The standard of care, singleagent chemotherapy, has limited efficacy, significant toxicities, and short duration of response. UPLIFT was designed as a single- arm Ph2 registrational trial for UpRi monotherapy in PROC. Methods UPLIFT is enrolling patients with PROC with up to 4 prior LoT. Prior bevacizumab is required for patients with 1-2 prior LoT only; it's not required for patients with 3-4 prior LoT. Patients may enroll regardless of NaPi2b expression; <= Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy is permitted. Primary platinum refractory patients are excluded. UPLIFT will enroll ~180 patients globally, including ~100 patients with high NaPi2b expression. UpRi is dosed IV at 36 mg/ m2 up to ~80 mg dose maximum Q4W. Baseline tumor samples (fresh or archived) will be collected for central analysis of NaPi2b expression. The primary endpoint is ORR in NaPi2b-high expressing patients. The cut-off for high NaPi2b expression is TPS>=75. Secondary endpoints include ORR in the overall population, duration of response, and safety. UPLIFT is conducted in collaboration with ENGOT (ENGOT-ov67) and GOG (GOG-3048). NCT03319628 Results trialinprogress Conclusions trialinprogress
EMBASE:639891150
ISSN: 1525-1438
CID: 5512512

EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF MICROSATELLITE INSTABILTY ON LYMPH NODE METASTASES IN AN ENDOMETRIAL CANCER COHORT [Meeting Abstract]

Lightfoot, M; Karpel, H; Pothuri, B
Objectives Endometrial cancer (EC) is a molecularly driven disease, and prognostic and treatment paradigms are transitioning to focus on molecular subtyping. Surgical staging and the role of lymphadenectomy has similarly evolved over time, however current lymph node (LND) algorithms do not account for molecular subtyping. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of microsatellite instability (MSI) and lymph node metastases (LNM). Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing surgery for EC between 2010-2021. All EC patients at our institution undergo immunohistochemistry testing for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and next generation sequencing per clinician discretion. Sarcomas were excluded. Mutations were classified as microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) or MMR proficient (MMRp). Results 367 patients were included. Of these, 273 were MMRp and 94 were MSI-H. An average of 6.1 LND were removed and there was no difference in the average LND removed between groups (p= 0.91). LNM were identified in 8% (n=31) of the entire cohort. There was a statistically significant difference in the average LNM between MMRp and MSI-H patients (p<0.0001), with 1% (n=2) of the MMRp cohort and 30% (n=28) of the MSI-H cohort having LNM. Within the MSI-H cohort, all LNM occurred within the MMR deficient, MLH1 hypermethylated subgroup - representing a LNM rate of 41%. Conclusions There is a significant association between MSI status and LNM. Molecular classification, which is obtainable from preoperative biopsy, may be used to guide intraoperative decision making and should be evaluated in the context of sentinel LND protocols
EMBASE:639891117
ISSN: 1525-1438
CID: 5512522

ENROLLMENT TRENDS AS COMPARED WITH DISEASE PREVALENCE FOR MINORITY PATIENTS WITH OVARIAN AND ENDOMETRIAL CANCER [Meeting Abstract]

Karpel, H; Lightfoot, M; Pothuri, B
Objectives With the National Cancer Institute (NCI) call-toaction to increase racial/ethnic diversity in clinical trial enrollment, we sought to evaluate minority patient enrollment in gynecologic cancer clinical trials as compared with disease prevalence estimates by race/ethnicity. Methods Enrollment data from endometrial and ovarian therapeutic clinical trials from January 2018-May 2022 at a NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center in New York City was analyzed. Minority enrollment in ovarian and endometrial cancer trials was compared to SEER estimates of disease prevalence using chi-square analysis. Population estimates of NYC demographics were obtained from the U. S. Census. Results Over the study period, 129 patients were enrolled in ovarian cancer trials and 52 patients in endometrial cancer trials. Regarding total enrollment, the proportion of clinical trial participants identifying as racial/ethnic minorities (34.1%) was significantly higher than the SEER disease estimate of ovarian cancer in minority patients (25.7%, p<0.05). Likewise, total enrollment of minority patients in endometrial cancer trials (61.5%) exceeded their disease prevalence estimate of 28.5% (p<0.05). However, enrollment of Asian patients in endometrial cancer trials (1.9%) remained under disease prevalence estimates (7.7%) despite the NCI call-to-action (table 2). Conclusions In a diverse city population, enrollment of minority patients exceeded disease prevalence estimates for most underrepresented racial/ethnic groups in gynecologic cancer, with the exception of Asian patients in endometrial cancer. Further efforts are needed to increase enrollment of Asian patients in endometrial cancer clinical trials so that novel therapies can be tested in all patients
EMBASE:639890816
ISSN: 1525-1438
CID: 5512542

ACTIONABLE GERMLINE MUTATIONS IDENTIFIED THROUGH TUMOR SEQUENCING: EVALUATION OF ESMO GUIDELINES IN GYNECOLOGIC MALIGNANCY [Meeting Abstract]

Karpel, H; Sasse, S; Pothuri, B
Objectives Focusing on gynecologic cancer, we aimed to describe the frequency of positive tumor NGS results that met ESMO 2019 recommendations for germline genetic testing (GT), receipt of germline GT and positive GT results in a large cancer cohort. Methods Patients with tumor NGS within a large, urban healthcare system were retrospectively identified (Sept 2019- Feb 2022). ESMO guidelines were used to identify eligible patients with potentially actionable germline mutations on NGS (Mandelker et al. 2019). Chi-square analysis compared rates in gynecologic and all cancer patients. Results In 3796 patients undergoing tumor NGS, 357 (9.4%) had gynecologic cancers: ovarian, 177 (49.6%); endometrial, 149 (41.7%); cervical/vulvar/vaginal, 31 (8.7%). There were 454/3796 (12.0%) total cancer patients and 79/357 (22.1%) gynecologic cancer patients with at least one positive tumor result meeting ESMO guidelines for germline GT (table 1). Of eligible patients, more gynecologic cancer patients received germline GT than total cancer patients (70.9% vs 35.7%, p<0.05). Among 56 gynecologic cancer patients receiving germline GT, 40 (71.4%) had positive results: BRCA1, 12; BRCA2, 11; MUTYH, 5; BRIP1, 5; RAD51C, 2; and one each CHEK2, SDHA, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, NF1, PMS2. Conclusions Germline GT rates in gynecologic cancer may be higher than in all cancer patients due to guidelines recommending all ovarian cancer patients get GT and all endometrial cancer patients be screened for Lynch syndrome. Nonetheless, education and reflex protocols to further improve germline GT rates are warranted as almost 30% of gynecologic cancer patients with eligible tumor results based on ESMO criteria still did not receive GT
EMBASE:639890815
ISSN: 1525-1438
CID: 5512552

RACIAL DISPARITIES IN ADHERENCE TO ESMO GUIDELINES FOR GERMLINE GENETIC TESTING IN GYNECOLOGIC CANCER PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT SOMATIC TUMOR TESTING [Meeting Abstract]

Karpel, H; Sasse, S; Pothuri, B
Objectives Prior studies suggest use of genetic testing (GT) varies by race. In gynecologic cancer patients, we assessed frequency of positive tumor next generation sequencing (NGS) results that met ESMO 2019 recommendations for germline GT and determined differences in referral to and completion of germline GT by race/ethnicity. Methods Patients with tumor NGS within a large healthcare system in New York City were retrospectively identified (Sept 2019-Feb 2022). Eligible patients with potentially actionable germline mutations on NGS were identified based on ESMO guidelines (Mandelker et al. 2019). Chi-square/Fisher's exact analysis assessed differences in outcomes by race/ethnicity. Results Of 357 gynecologic cancer patients undergoing tumor NGS, 79 (22.1%) had at least one positive tumor mutation meeting ESMO guidelines for germline GT. The racial/ethnic distribution of eligible patients was: 48 (60.7%) non-Hispanic White, 12 (15.2%) Asian, 8 (10.1%) Hispanic, 7 (8.9%) Black, 4 (5.1%) Other. Non-Hispanic White patients were more likely to be referred to GT than patients of Other race/ ethnicity (93.8% vs 71.0%, p=0.009) as well as more likely to complete GT (81.3% vs 54.8%, p=0.02). Conclusions There are racial disparities in referral to and completion of GT in gynecologic cancer patients whose tumor results met EMSO criteria for germline testing. As outcomes of gynecologic cancer are worse for racial minorities, actions need to be taken to avoid further exacerbating health disparities regarding GT. Development of reflex protocols based on positive somatic mutations identified on tumor NGS or, alternatively, population based germline GT may help reduce disparities related to germline GT in gynecologic cancer patients
EMBASE:639890788
ISSN: 1525-1438
CID: 5512562

A PHASE I/II STUDY EVALUATING INTRAPERITONEAL GEN-1 IN COMBINATION WITH NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS NEWLY DIAGNOSED WITH ADVANCED EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER [Meeting Abstract]

Thaker, P; Richardson, D; Bradley, W; Kuroki, L; Holloway, R; Depasquale, S; Reed, M; Bregar, A; Scalici, J; Bergman, M; Leath, C; Bell, M; Darus, C; Finkelstein, K; Pothuri, B; Warshal, D; Borys, N
Objectives GEN-1, an IL-12 DNA plasmid formulated with a synthetic carrier is being evaluated with neoadjuvant platinumtaxane chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. OVATION 2 is a multi-center, randomized, open-label phase I/II study evaluating the safety, antitumor activity, and immunological response to GEN-1 at a dose of 100 mg/m2 intraperitoneal (IP) actively enrolling at 20 centers in USA and Canada. Methods Up to 130 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either NACT plus GEN-1 or NACT alone. The phase I portion will evaluate safety in at least 6 patients administered in 8 weekly infusions starting at cycle 1 week 2 in combination with three 21-day cycles of carboplatin AUC 6 with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (PC). Following interval cytoreductive surgery an additional 9 weekly GEN-1 IP infusions starting at cycle 4 week 1 with three 21-day cycles of PC. If no dose limiting toxicities are found, then the study will continue into the phase II portion. To evaluate biological activity a subgroup of patients will have tumor tissue at initial biopsy/laparoscopy collected and at interval cytoreductive surgery. Tissue will be analyzed for the density of CD8, FoxP3, IDO-1, PD-1, and PDL-1 cells. Blood, peritoneal fluid/wash will be collected before and after treatment in a subgroup of patients to quantify for levels of IFN-g. The primary endpoint is PFS. Results Trial in progress: there are no available results at the time of submission. Conclusions Trial in progress: there are no available conclusions at the time of submission
EMBASE:639890391
ISSN: 1525-1438
CID: 5512572

TRENDS IN CLINICAL TRIAL ACCRUAL OF UNDERREPRESENTED PATIENTS WITH GYNECOLOGIC MALIGNANCY [Meeting Abstract]

Karpel, H; Lara, O; Lightfoot, M; Pothuri, B
Objectives Minority U.S. populations are underrepresented in oncologic clinical trials. In an urban NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center, we evaluated enrollment in gynecologic cancer trials by race/ethnicity pre and post the June 2020 NCI call-to-action for increased diversity in clinical trials. Methods Enrollment data in 22 therapeutic clinical trials from January 2018-May 2022 was analyzed. Chi-square/Fisher's exact analysis compared proportions of accrued patients by race/ethnicity pre and post the NCI call-to-action. Results Over the study period 205 patients were enrolled in gynecologic cancer trials: 129 (62.9%) ovarian, 52 (25.4%) endometrial, 24 (11.7%) cervical. Overall racial/ethnic distribution of patients in clinical trials was: 112 (54.6%) non-Hispanic White, 33 (16.1%) Hispanic, 32 (15.6%) Black, 28 (13.7%) Asian. Although not statistically significant, accrual of underrepresented populations increased from pre call-to-action (45/108, 41.7%) to post (48/97, 49.5%). Significantly more Black patients were accrued post NCI call-to-action (8/108, 7.4% vs 24/97, 24.7%, p=0.001). However, significantly fewer Asian patients were accrued post NCI call-to-action (21/ 108, 19.4% vs 7/97, 7.2%, p=0.01). Conclusions Overall accrual of Black patients in gynecologic cancer clinical trials increased following the NCI call-to-action, but accrual of Asian patients decreased. Further efforts are needed to ensure all racial/ethnic groups are represented in clinical trials
EMBASE:639890344
ISSN: 1525-1438
CID: 5512582

PATTERNS OF INITIAL OVARIAN CANCER RECURRENCE ON NIRAPARIB MAINTENANCE MONOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH NO BASELINE EVIDENCE OF DISEASE FOLLOWING FIRST-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY: PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 POST-HOC SUBGROUP ANALYSIS [Meeting Abstract]

Kamavra, M; Gonzalez-Martin, A; Pothuri, B; Vergote, I; Graybill, W S; Mirza, M; Mccormick, C; Lorusso, D; Freyer, G; O'Malley, D; York, W; Malinowska, I A; Monk, B
Objectives Patterns of recurrence on PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy are unclear and may affect treatment choices for subsequent therapy, including secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS). This analysis of PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 evaluated patterns of recurrence on niraparib maintenance therapy. Methods This post hoc subgroup analysis included 314 patients treated with niraparib maintenance monotherapy following first-line chemotherapy and who had no lesions identified by CT/MRI (or by investigator assessment) at baseline. Number and site(s) of initial recurrent lesions at the time of investigator-assessed RECIST-defined progressive disease (PD) were evaluated. Results As of the primary data cut, May 17, 2019, with a median follow-up of 13.8 months (range <1-28), 141/ 314 (45%) patients developed investigator-assessed PD, with an average 1.9 (standard deviation 0.9) lesions at PD. At the time of recurrence, 62 patients (44%) had 1 lesion, 46 (33%) had 2 lesions, 24 (17%) had 3 lesions, and 9 (6%) had 4-5 lesions. The five most common sites with >=1 lesion at PD were the peritoneum (n=45), lymph nodes (n=36), liver (n=34), other (n=26), and pelvis (n=20). Conclusions For patients who received niraparib maintenance monotherapy after first-line chemotherapy and had no lesions at baseline, <50% had recurrent disease after a median 13.8 months of follow-up and >75% of patients with recurrence progressed in 1-2 sites. Prospective evaluation is required to determine whether patients with oligoprogressive disease have improved outcomes with local therapies, like SCS, in addition to systemic therapy
EMBASE:639890079
ISSN: 1525-1438
CID: 5512602

EFFECT OF BLEEDING DISORDERS ON PERIOPERATIVE HYSTERECTOMY TRANSFUSIONS: A NATIONAL SURGICAL QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (NSQIP) STUDY [Meeting Abstract]

Lee, S; Pothuri, B
Objectives Perioperative management varies for patients with bleeding disorders. We sought to determine the association between bleeding disorders and perioperative transfusions for hysterectomy patients. Methods We included patients undergoing non-emergent hysterectomy between 2014-2019 from the NSQIP, a validated, risk-adjusted database from 700 hospitals. We compared 30- day perioperative transfusions between patients with and without bleeding disorders (chronic, persistent, active hematologic disorders). Transfusions <=1day were immediate, and after >=2days were delayed. Covariates were age, race/ethnicity, preoperative anemia (hematocrit <=30%) and thrombocytopenia (platelet <100,000/mL), fibroids, endometriosis, cancer, and surgical route. Results Of 290,642 patients, 10,705 (3.7%) received perioperative transfusions (8,679 ,2.9%, immediate; 2,026, 0.7%, delayed). Of 2,687 patients with bleeding disorders, 283 (10.5%) received transfusions, compared to 10,422/287,995 (3.6%) of those without (p<0.001). For gynecologic cancer patients, 17.1% (121/707) with bleeding disorders received transfusions compared to 8.4% (3,261/38,379) of those without (p<0.001). 999 (0.3%) underwent reoperation for bleeding, and this was more likely with bleeding disorders (27/2,687, 1.0% vs. 972/287,955, 0.3%, p<0.001). Anemia (OR 11.7, CI 11.1-12.4) and bleeding disorders (OR 2.0, CI 1.7-2.3) were associated with transfusions when adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, fibroids, endometriosis, cancer, and surgical approach. The effect of bleeding disorders on transfusions persisted in the laparoscopic group (OR 2.5, CI 1.9-3.3). Bleeding disorders were associated with immediate transfusions (OR 1.7, CI 1.5-2.0) and delayed transfusions (OR 2.1, CI 1.6- 2.7). Conclusions Patients with bleeding disorders are twice as likely to receive immediate and delayed transfusions for hysterectomies, even with a laparoscopic approach. Data are needed to optimize bleeding disorders to decrease transfusion risk
EMBASE:639890025
ISSN: 1525-1438
CID: 5512612