Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a multi-domain, inflammatory disease impacting joints, soft tissues, and skin; tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are typically the first biologic following inadequate response (IR) to conventional therapies. Although guidance is lacking on therapy selection after initial TNFi failure, data suggest TNFi-IR PsA patients may benefit from switching to a different mechanism of action (MOA) vs. cycling to another TNFi. Guselkumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-23p19 subunit. Emphasizing practicality and applicability to routine clinical practice, EVOLUTION will pragmatically evaluate whether switching to guselkumab is more effective than cycling to a second TNFi (subcutaneous [SC] golimumab) in TNFi-IR PsA patients. METHODS:The multicenter, longitudinal, prospective, observational Psoriatic Arthritis Research Consortium study guided eligibility criteria, outcome measures, and sample size estimates. Adults seen in clinical practice with active PsA (≥ 1 swollen joint) while receiving TNFi treatment will be eligible. Participants will be randomized (1:1:1) to guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); guselkumab 100 mg at Week 0, Week 4, and Q8W; or SC golimumab 50 mg Q4W (no washout period). The novel primary composite endpoint is achievement of clinical Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) low disease activity (≤ 13) and an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of psoriasis score of 0/1 (scale: 0-4) at Month12. Secondary endpoints include cDAPSA + IGA 0/1 at Month 6; achievement of minimal disease activity, resolution of enthesitis and dactylitis (among patients affected at baseline) at Months 6/12; and mean changes at Months 6/12 in the 12-item PsA Impact of Disease, Dermatology Life Quality Index, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurements Information System fatigue and depression questionnaires, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (patients with physician-determined axial disease). The target sample size is 150 participants (50/treatment group); all analyses are considered exploratory. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:EVOLUTION will employ a pragmatic approach, including a novel primary endpoint relevant to clinical practice, to assess whether switching to an alternate MOA biologic with guselkumab is more effective than cycling to a second TNFi among TNFi-IR PsA patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION/BACKGROUND:This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05669833, on 3 January 2023, https://www. CLINICALTRIALS/RESULTS:gov/study/NCT05669833?term=%20NCT05669833&rank=1.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Despite significant therapeutic advances in psoriatic arthritis (PsA), many patients do not achieve remission and cycle through multiple biologic (b)- or targeted synthetic (ts)- DMARDs. Identifying the underlying reasons for repetitive therapeutic failure remains a knowledge gap. Here we describe prescribing patterns and characteristics of PsA patients with multi-b/tsDMARD failure at the NYU Psoriatic Arthritis Center. METHODS:Nine hundred sixty PsA patients were enrolled in an observational, longitudinal registry. Demographics, medical history, medication use, and psoriatic disease phenotype were collected. Multi-b/tsDMARD failure was defined as requiring ≥ 4 b/tsDMARDs. RESULTS:Seven hundred twenty-five patients (75%) used ≥ 1 b/tsDMARD during their disease course. The initial b/tsDMARDs prescribed were predominately anti-TNF agents. 166 (17%) patients had multi-b/tsDMARD failure. Compared to those requiring 1 b/tsDMARD, female sex (OR 2.3; 95%CI 1.4-3.8), axial disease (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.2-3.6), depression (OR 2.0; 95%CI 1.1-3.7), and obesity (OR 1.7; 95%CI 1.0-2.8) were risk factors for multi-b/tsDMARD failure disease after adjustment for age, disease duration, sex, depression, smoking, obesity, and skin severity. Patients with multi-b/tsDMARD failure PsA also had increased disease activity at their clinical visit (i.e., swollen joint count, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In this cohort, 17% patients with PsA experienced multi-b/tsDMARD failure. These patients were more likely to be female, obese, and have higher rates of axial involvement and depression, along with higher active disease activity. This highlights the inflammatory and non-inflammatory drivers of multiple therapeutic failures, underscoring the need for precision medicine strategies and potential non-pharmacologic adjuvant therapies for patients with PsA to improve outcomes and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE:Individuals of racially and ethnically diverse backgrounds are underrepresented in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) research/clinical trials, despite evidence that their disease presentation, severity and course may be distinct. Here we aim to describe how race, ethnicity and other socioeconomic factors inform disease characteristics in PsA. METHODS:817 consecutive patients with PsA from a large, diverse metropolitan area, were enrolled in an observational, longitudinal registry. Demographics, medical history, medication use, and psoriatic disease phenotype and activity were all recorded and analyzed. RESULTS:The population was 77.4% non-Hispanic White, 2.2% Black, 7.1% Asian, and 9.9% identified as other races or multiracial, and 11.8% identified as Hispanic. Hispanic and non-White individuals had higher tender joint counts (p= 0.033) with similar swollen joint counts (p= 0.308) and medication use (p= 0.171). They also had high rates of radiographic axial disease. Hispanic individuals were significantly more likely to have higher tender joint counts (p= 0.029), higher RAPID3 scores (p= 0.004), and moderate-severe psoriasis (p= 0.010) compared with non-Hispanic White individuals. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In this diverse cohort, 22.6% of patients identified as underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups, mostly Asian or Hispanic. Despite similar swollen joint counts and medication use, non-white individuals have higher tender joint counts compared with white individuals. Phenotypically, they also were more likely to have radiographic axial involvement. These findings may reflect differences in PsA presentation, experience and outcomes in individuals of various racial and ethnic groups, which need to be taken into consideration in clinical care and research design.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To identify phenotype clusters and their trajectories in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and examine the association of the clusters with treatment response in a real-world setting. METHODS:In the multicentre PsA Research Consortium (PARC) study, we applied factor analysis of mixed data to reduce dimensionality and collinearity, followed by hierarchical clustering on principal components. We then evaluated the transition of PsA clusters and their response to new immunomodulatory therapy and tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi). RESULTS:Among 627 patients with PsA, three clusters were identified: mild PsA and psoriasis only (PsO) (Cluster 1, 47.4%), severe PsA and mild PsO (Cluster 2, 34.3%) and severe PsA and severe PsO (Cluster 3, 18.3%). Among 339 patients starting or changing, significant differences in response were observed (mean follow-up of 0.7 years, SD 0.8), with Cluster 3 showing the largest improvements in cDAPSA and PsAID. No differences were found among those starting TNFi (n=218). cDAPSA remission and PsAID patient acceptable symptom state were achieved in 10% and 54%, respectively. Clusters remained stable over time despite treatment changes, though some transitions occurred, notably from Cluster 3 to milder clusters. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Data-driven clusters with distinct therapy responses identified in this real-world study highlight the extensive heterogeneity in PsA and the central role of psoriasis and musculoskeletal severity in treatment outcomes. Concurrently, these findings underscore the need for better outcome measures, particularly for individuals with lower disease activity.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To identify phenotype clusters and their trajectories in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and examine the association of the clusters with treatment response in a real-world setting. METHODS:In the multicentre PsA Research Consortium (PARC) study, we applied factor analysis of mixed data to reduce dimensionality and collinearity, followed by hierarchical clustering on principal components. We then evaluated the transition of PsA clusters and their response to new immunomodulatory therapy and tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi). RESULTS:Among 627 patients with PsA, three clusters were identified: mild PsA and psoriasis only (PsO) (Cluster 1, 47.4%), severe PsA and mild PsO (Cluster 2, 34.3%) and severe PsA and severe PsO (Cluster 3, 18.3%). Among 339 patients starting or changing, significant differences in response were observed (mean follow-up of 0.7 years, SD 0.8), with Cluster 3 showing the largest improvements in cDAPSA and PsAID. No differences were found among those starting TNFi (n=218). cDAPSA remission and PsAID patient acceptable symptom state were achieved in 10% and 54%, respectively. Clusters remained stable over time despite treatment changes, though some transitions occurred, notably from Cluster 3 to milder clusters. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Data-driven clusters with distinct therapy responses identified in this real-world study highlight the extensive heterogeneity in PsA and the central role of psoriasis and musculoskeletal severity in treatment outcomes. Concurrently, these findings underscore the need for better outcome measures, particularly for individuals with lower disease activity.

OBJECTIVE:Psoricatic disease remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. We developed and validated a suite of novel, smartphone sensor-based assessments that can be self-administered to measure cutaneous and musculoskeletal signs and symptoms of psoriatic disease. METHODS:Participants with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or healthy controls were recruited between June 5, 2019, and November 10, 2021, at two academic medical centers. Concordance and accuracy of digital measures and image-based machine learning models were compared to their analogous clinical measures from trained rheumatologists and dermatologists. RESULTS:assessment categorized physician-assessed upper extremity involvement, considering joint tenderness or enthesitis (AUROC = 0.68 (0.47-0.85)). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The Psorcast digital assessments achieved significant clinical validity, although they require further validation in larger cohorts before use in evidence-based medicine or clinical trial settings. The smartphone software and analysis pipelines from the Psorcast suite are open source and freely available.

BACKGROUND:For psoriatic patients who need to receive non-live or live vaccines, evidence-based recommendations are needed regarding whether to pause or continue systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis. OBJECTIVE:To evaluate literature regarding vaccine efficacy and safety and to generate consensus-based recommendations for adults receiving systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis receiving non-live or live vaccines. METHODS:Using a modified Delphi process, 22 consensus statements were developed by the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board and COVID-19 Task Force, and infectious disease experts. RESULTS:Key recommendations include continuing most oral and biologic therapies without modification for patients receiving non-live vaccines; consider interruption of methotrexate for non-live vaccines. For patients receiving live vaccines, discontinue most oral and biologic medications before and after administration of live vaccine. Specific recommendations include discontinuing most biologic therapies, except for abatacept, for 2-3 half-lives before live vaccine administration and deferring next dose 2-4 weeks after live vaccination. LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Studies regarding infection rates after vaccination are lacking. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Interruption of anti-psoriatic oral and biologic therapies is generally not necessary for patients receiving non-live vaccines. Temporary interruption of oral and biologic therapies before and after administration of live vaccines is recommended in most cases.

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate whether the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) is a responsive instrument in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and whether it differentiates between axial and peripheral disease activity in PsA. METHODS:Individuals with PsA initiating therapy in a longitudinal cohort study based in the United States were included. Axial PsA (axPsA), most often also associated with peripheral disease, was defined as fulfillment of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society axial spondyloarthritis classification criteria or presence of axial disease imaging features. Baseline BASDAI, individual BASDAI items, patient global assessment, patient pain, and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3, and score changes following therapy initiation were descriptively reported. Standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated as the mean change divided by the SD of the change. RESULTS:The mean (SD) baseline BASDAI score at the time of therapy initiation was 5.0 (2.2) among those with axPsA (n = 40) and 4.8 (2.0) among those with peripheral-only disease (n = 79). There was no significant difference in patient-reported outcome scores between the groups. The mean change for BASDAI was similar among axial vs peripheral disease (-0.75 vs -0.83). SRMs were similar across axial vs peripheral disease for BASDAI (-0.37 vs -0.44) and the individual BASDAI items. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:BASDAI has reasonable responsiveness in PsA but does not differentiate between axPsA and peripheral PsA. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03378336).