Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

person:riesev01

in-biosketch:true

Total Results:

3


Implementation strategies to reduce surgical site infections: A systematic review

Ariyo, Promise; Zayed, Bassem; Riese, Victoria; Anton, Blair; Latif, Asad; Kilpatrick, Claire; Allegranzi, Benedetta; Berenholtz, Sean
BACKGROUND:Surgical site infections (SSIs) portend high patient morbidity and mortality. Although evidence-based clinical interventions can reduce SSIs, they are not reliably delivered in practice, and data are limited on the best approach to improve adherence. OBJECTIVE:To summarize implementation strategies aimed at improving adherence to evidence-based interventions that reduce SSIs. DESIGN/METHODS:Systematic reviewMethods:We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, the WHO Regional databases, AFROLIB, and Africa-Wide for studies published between January 1990 and December 2015. The Effective Practice and Organization Care (EPOC) criteria were used to identify an acceptable-quality study design. We used structured forms to extract data on implementation strategies and grouped them into an implementation model called the "Four Es" framework (ie, engage, educate, execute, and evaluate). RESULTS:In total, 125 studies met our inclusion criteria, but only 8 studies met the EPOC criteria, which limited our ability to identify best practices. Most studies used multifaceted strategies to improve adherence with evidence-based interventions. Engagement strategies included multidisciplinary work and strong leadership involvement. Education strategies included various approaches to introduce evidence-based practices to clinicians and patients. Execution strategies standardized the interventions into simple tasks to facilitate uptake. Evaluation strategies assessed adherence with evidence-based interventions and patient outcomes, providing feedback of performance to providers. CONCLUSIONS:Multifaceted implementation strategies represent the most common approach to facilitating the adoption of evidence-based practices. We believe that this summary of implementation strategies complements existing clinical guidelines and may accelerate efforts to reduce SSIs.
PMID: 30786946
ISSN: 1559-6834
CID: 3686382

Improving Quality and Safety Through Use of Secondary Data: Methods Case Study

Goode, Victoria; Crego, Nancy; Cary, Michael P; Thornlow, Deirdre; Merwin, Elizabeth
Researchers need to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of data sets to choose a secondary data set to use for a health care study. This research method review informs the reader of the major issues necessary for investigators to consider while incorporating secondary data into their repertoire of potential research designs and shows the range of approaches the investigators may take to answer nursing research questions in a variety of context areas. The researcher requires expertise in locating and judging data sets and in the development of complex data management skills for managing large numbers of records. There are important considerations such as firm knowledge of the research question supported by the conceptual framework and the selection of appropriate databases, which guide the researcher in delineating the unit of analysis. Other more complex issues for researchers to consider when conducting secondary data research methods include data access, management and security, and complex variable construction.
PMID: 27733669
ISSN: 1552-8456
CID: 4473742

Are International Classification of Diseases Codes in Electronic Health Records Useful in Identifying Obesity as a Risk Factor When Evaluating Surgical Outcomes?

Goode, Victoria; Rovnyak, Virginia; Hinton, Ivora; Phillips, Elayne; Merwin, Elizabeth
This research addresses an important methodological issue on patient safety and obesity for the purposes of examining clinical and administrative data for the reliability of using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnoses codes alone to reliably identify obesity as a comorbidity and risk factor in care and management. The findings of this research confirm ICD codes for the obese surgical populations were underutilized. Despite more than 70% of patients classified as overweight or obese, ICD-9 codes for obesity were assigned in less than 10% of the overall sample. Patients in the extreme category of obesity (body mass index [BMI] >40 kg/m) were more likely to have a corresponding ICD-9 code compared with patients in the BMI range of 25 to 40 kg/m. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision coding for obesity was underutilized in patients with a BMI of greater than 25 kg/m. The associated health risks, costs, and potential adverse events associated with obesity make it imperative to continue to study the barriers to coding.
PMID: 27564528
ISSN: 1550-512x
CID: 4473732