Faculty Bibliography

CONTEXT/BACKGROUND:Chronic kidney disease (CKD) disproportionately impacts lower socioeconomic groups and is associated with many symptoms and complex decisions. Integration of Kidney Supportive Care (KSC) with CKD care can address these needs. To our knowledge, this approach has not been described in an underserved population. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:We describe our adaptation of an ambulatory integrated KSC and CKD clinic for implementation in a safety net hospital. We report our utilization metrics; characteristics of the population served; and visit activities. METHODS:We considered modifications from the perspectives of people with CKD, their providers, and the health system. Modifications were informed by meeting notes with key participants (hospital administrators [n = 5], funders [n = 1], and content experts [n = 2]), as well as literature on palliative care program building, safety net hospitals, and KSC. We extracted utilization data for the first 15 months of the clinic's operations, demographics, clinical characteristics, unmet health related social needs, and symptom burden, measured by the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale-Renal (total Score, and sub-scores of physical, psychological, and practical impact of CKD) from the electronic health record. Results are reported using descriptive statistics. RESULTS:Adaptions were proactive and done by clinical and administrative leaders. Meetings identified challenges of the safety net setting including people presenting with advanced disease and having several social needs. Modifications to our base model were made in staffing, data collection, and work flow. Show rate was approximately 68%, with a majority of people identifying as Black or Hispanic, and uninsured or on Medicaid. Symptom burden was lower than previous reports, driven by a better psychological sub-score. CONCLUSIONS:We describe a feasible ambulatory care model of KSC in a safety net setting that can serve as a framework for the development of other noncancer palliative care ambulatory clinics. Future work will optimize our model.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Chronic kidney disease (CKD) impacts more than 800 million people. It causes significant suffering and disproportionately impacts marginalized populations in the United States. Kidney palliative care has the potential to alleviate this distress, but has not been tested. This pilot study evaluates the feasibility of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) testing the efficacy of integrated kidney palliative and CKD care in an urban safety-net hospital. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:, and are receiving care at our safety net hospital. Participants will be randomized in permuted blocks of two or four to either the intervention group, who will receive monthly ambulatory care visits for six months with a palliative care provider trained in kidney palliative care, or to usual nephrology care. Primary outcomes are feasibility of recruitment, retention, fidelity to the study visit protocol, and the ability to collect outcome data. These outcomes include symptom burden, quality of life, and engagement in advance care planning. DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:This pilot RCT will provide essential data on the feasibility of testing integrated palliative care in CKD care in an underserved setting. These outcomes will inform a larger, fully powered trial that tests the efficacy of our kidney palliative care approach. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:NCT04998110.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE:Despite substantial growth in the population of older adults with kidney disease, there remains a lack of evidence to guide clinical care for this group. The Kidney Disease and Aging Research Collaborative (KDARC) conducted a Delphi study to build consensus on research priorities for clinical geriatric nephrology. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Asynchronous modified Delphi study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:Clinicians and researchers in the US and Canada with clinical experience and/or research expertise in geriatric nephrology. OUTCOME/RESULTS:Research priorities in geriatric nephrology. ANALYTICAL APPROACH/METHODS:In the first Delphi round, participants submitted free-text descriptions of research priorities considered important for improving the clinical care of older adults with kidney disease. Delphi moderators used inductive content analysis to group concepts into categories. In the second and third rounds, participants iteratively reviewed topics, selected their top 5 priorities, and offered comments used to revise categories. RESULTS:Among 121 who were invited, 57 participants (47%) completed the first Delphi round and 48 (84% of enrolled participants) completed all rounds. After 3 rounds, the 5 priorities with the highest proportion of agreement were: 1) Communication and Decision-Making about Treatment Options for Older Adults with Kidney Failure (69% agreement), 2) Quality of Life, Symptom Management, and Palliative Care (67%), 3) Frailty and Physical Function (54%), 4) Tailoring Therapies for Kidney Disease to Specific Needs of Older Adults (42%), and 5) Caregiver and Social Support (35%). Health equity and person-centricity were identified as cross-cutting features that informed all topics. LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Relatively low response rate and limited participation by private practitioners and older clinicians and researchers. CONCLUSIONS:Experts in geriatric nephrology identified clinical research priorities with the greatest potential to improve care for older adults with kidney disease. These findings provide a roadmap for the geriatric nephrology community to harmonize and maximize the impact of research efforts.

BACKGROUND:Though older adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a greater mortality risk than those without CKD, traditional risk factors poorly predict mortality in this population. Therefore, we tested our hypothesis that two common geriatric risk factors, frailty and cognitive impairment, and their co-occurrence, might improve mortality risk prediction in CKD. METHODS:Among participants aged ≥ 60 years from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2011-2014), we quantified associations between frailty (physical frailty phenotype) and global/domain-specific cognitive function (immediate-recall [CERAD-WL], delayed-recall [CERAD-DL], verbal fluency [AF], executive function/processing speed [DSST], and global [standardized-average of 4 domain-specific tests]) using linear regression, and tested whether associations differed by CKD using a Wald test. We then tested whether frailty, global cognitive impairment (1.5SD below the mean), or their combination improved prediction of mortality (Cox models, c-statistics) compared to base models (likelihood-ratios) among those with and without CKD. RESULTS: < 0.001) but not cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS:Frailty is associated with worse cognitive function regardless of CKD status. While CKD and frailty improved mortality prediction, cognitive impairment did not. Risk prediction tools should incorporate frailty to improve mortality prediction among those with CKD.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE:Because of the high risk of waitlist mortality and posttransplant complications, kidney transplant (KT) patients may benefit from advance care planning (ACP) and palliative care consultation (PCC). We quantified the prevalence and racial disparities in ACP and PCC among KT candidates and recipients. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:2,575 adult KT candidates and 1,233 adult recipients (2008-2020). EXPOSURE/METHODS:Race and ethnicity. OUTCOMES/RESULTS:All reports of ACP and PCC were abstracted from chart review. ACP was defined as patient self-report of an advance directive, presence of an advance directive in the medical record, or a documented goals-of-care conversation with a provider. PCC was defined as an ordered referral or a documented palliative care note in the medical record. ANALYTICAL APPROACH/METHODS:Racial/ethnic disparities in ACP/PCC were estimated using adjusted logistic regression. RESULTS:21.4% of KT candidates and 34.9% of recipients engaged in ACP. There were racial/ethnic disparities in ACP among KT candidates (White, 24.4%; Black, 19.1%; Hispanic, 15%; other race and ethnicity, 21.1%; P=0.008) and recipients (White, 39.5%; Black, 31.2%; Hispanic, 26.3%; other race and ethnicity, 26.6%; P=0.007). After adjustment, Black KT recipients had a 29% lower likelihood of engaging in ACP (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.91) than White KT recipients. Among older (aged≥65 years) recipients, those who were Black had a lower likelihood of engaging in ACP, but there was no racial disparity among younger recipients (P=0.020 for interaction). 4.2% of KT candidates and 5.1% of KT recipients engaged in PCC; there were no racial disparities in PCC among KT candidates (White, 5.3%; Black, 3.6%; Hispanic, 2.5%; other race and ethnicity, 2.1%; P=0.13) or recipients (White, 5.5%; Black, 5.6%; Hispanic, 0.0%; other race and ethnicity, 1.3%; P = 0.21). LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Generalizability may be limited to academic transplant centers. CONCLUSIONS:ACP is not common among KT patients, and minoritized transplant patients are least likely to engage in ACP; PCC is less common. Future efforts should aim to integrate ACP and PCC into the KT process. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY/UNASSIGNED:Kidney transplant (KT) candidates and recipients are at elevated risk of morbidity and mortality. They may benefit from completing a document or conversation with their palliative care provider that outlines their future health care wishes, known as advance care planning (ACP), which is a component of palliative care consultation (PCC). We wanted to determine how many KT candidates and recipients have engaged in ACP or PCC and identify potential racial disparities. We found that 21.4% of candidates and 34.9% of recipients engaged in ACP. After adjustment, Black recipients had a 29% lower likelihood of engaging in ACP. We found that 4.2% of KT candidates and 5.1% of KT recipients engaged in PCC, with no racial disparities found in PCC.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Itching is a frequent symptom experienced by people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We investigated the associations of CKD-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) with clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:This was a longitudinal cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:were included. EXPOSURE/UNASSIGNED:CKD-aP was self-reported by response to the question: "During the past 4 weeks, to what extent were you bothered by itchy skin?" OUTCOMES/UNASSIGNED:The outcomes were as follows: CKD progression, kidney replacement therapy (KRT) initiation, mortality, hospitalization, cardiovascular events, infection events. ANALYTICAL APPROACH/UNASSIGNED:Associations with time-to-event outcomes were investigated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = 0.87). LIMITATIONS/UNASSIGNED:The limitations were 25% nonresponse rate, recall bias, and residual confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:These results demonstrate a strong association between severe itch and clinical outcomes, providing the nephrology community new insights into the possible adverse consequences of CKD-aP in individuals with nondialysis CKD, and warrant further exploration. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY/UNASSIGNED:Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is a common disturbing symptom of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This article analyzes longitudinal data from the Chronic Kidney Disease Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (CKDopps) to describe prevalence of CKD-aP in 4,410 individuals with nondialysis CKD, and its association with clinical outcomes. We found that 51% of the surveyed population were bothered by pruritus. CKD-aP was more prevalent in those with more advanced stages of CKD, older age, and with more comorbid conditions. Compared to those not at all bothered by pruritus, those who were extremely bothered had a higher risk of all-cause mortality, hospitalizations, and cardiovascular events. Severity of CKD-aP was not associated with CKD progression or initiation of kidney replacement therapy.

Integrated kidney care requires synergistic linkage between preventative care for people at risk for chronic kidney disease and health services providing care for people with kidney disease, ensuring holistic and coordinated care as people transition between acute and chronic kidney disease and the 3 modalities of kidney failure management: conservative kidney management, transplantation, and dialysis. People with kidney failure have many supportive care needs throughout their illness, regardless of treatment modality. Kidney supportive care is therefore a vital part of this integrated framework, but is nonexistent, poorly developed, and/or poorly integrated with kidney care in many settings, especially in low- and middle-income countries. To address this, the International Society of Nephrology has (i) coordinated the development of consensus definitions of conservative kidney management and kidney supportive care to promote international understanding and awareness of these active treatments; and (ii) identified key considerations for the development and expansion of conservative kidney management and kidney supportive care programs, especially in low resource settings, where access to kidney replacement therapy is restricted or not available. This article presents the definitions for conservative kidney management and kidney supportive care; describes their core components with some illustrative examples to highlight key points; and describes some of the additional considerations for delivering conservative kidney management and kidney supportive care in low resource settings.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Conservative kidney management (CKM) is a viable treatment option for many patients with chronic kidney disease. However, CKM practices and resources in the United States are not well described. We undertook this study to gain a better understanding of factors influencing uptake of CKM by describing: (1) characteristics of patients who choose CKM, (2) provider practice patterns relevant to CKM, and (3) CKM resources available to providers. STUDY DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Cross-sectional study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:(n=1018) and available information on whether a decision had been made to pursue CKM at the time of kidney failure, patient (n=407) reports of discussions about forgoing dialysis, and provider (n=26) responses about CKM delivery and available resources in their health systems. ANALYTICAL APPROACH/UNASSIGNED:Descriptive statistics were used to report patient demographics, clinical information, provider demographics, and clinic characteristics. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Among data from 1018 patients, 68 (7%) were recorded as planning for CKM. These patients were older, had more comorbidities, and were more likely to require assistance with transfers. Of the 407 patient surveys, 18% reported a conversation about forgoing dialysis with their nephrologist. A majority of providers felt comfortable discussing CKM; however, no clinics had a dedicated clinic or protocol for CKM. LIMITATIONS/UNASSIGNED:Inconsistent survey terminology and unlinked patient and provider responses. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Few patients reported discussion of forgoing dialysis with their providers and even fewer anticipated a choice of CKM on reaching kidney failure. Most providers were comfortable discussing CKM, but practiced in clinics that lacked dedicated resources. Further research is needed to improve the implementation of a CKM pathway. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY/UNASSIGNED:For older comorbid adults with kidney failure, conservative kidney management (CKM) can be an appropriate treatment choice. CKM is a holistic approach with treatment goals of maximizing quality of life and preventing progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) without initiation of dialysis. We investigated US CKM practices and found that among 1018 people with CKD, only 7% were planning for CKM. Of 407 surveyed patients, 18% reported a conversation with their provider about forgoing dialysis. In contrast, most providers felt comfortable discussing CKM; however, none reported working in an environment with a dedicated CKM clinic or protocol. Our data show the need for further CKM education in the United States as well as dedicated resources for its delivery.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:There has been a call by both patients and health professionals for the integration of palliative care with nephrology care, yet there is little evidence describing the effect of this approach. The objective of this paper is to report the feasibility and acceptability of a pilot randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of integrated palliative and nephrology care. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:English speaking patients with CKD stage 5 were randomized to monthly palliative care visits for 3 months in addition to their usual care, as compared with usual nephrology care. Feasibility of recruitment, retention, completion of intervention processes, and feedback on participation was measured. Other outcomes included differences in symptom burden change, measured by the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale-Renal, and change in quality of life, measured by the Kidney Disease Quality of Life questionnaire and completion of advance care planning documents. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Of the 67 patients approached, 45 (67%) provided informed consent. Of these, 27 patients completed the study (60%), and 14 (74%) of those in the intervention group completed all visits. We found small improvements in overall symptom burden (-2.92 versus 1.57) and physical symptom burden scores (-1.92 versus 1.79) in the intervention group. We did not see improvements in the quality-of-life scores, with the exception of the physical component score. The intervention group completed more advance care planning documents than controls (five health care proxy forms completed versus one, nine Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment forms versus none). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:We found that pilot testing through a randomized controlled trial of an ambulatory integrated palliative and nephrology care clinical program was feasible and acceptable to participants. This intervention has the potential to improve the disease experience for those with nondialysis CKD and should be tested in other CKD populations with longer follow-up. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER/UNASSIGNED:Pilot Randomized-controlled Trial of Integrated Palliative and Nephrology Care Versus Usual Nephrology Care, NCT04520984.