Faculty Bibliography

Background/UNASSIGNED:Perioperative cardiovascular outcomes of transplant surgery are not well defined. We evaluated the incidence of perioperative major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) after non-cardiac transplant surgery from a large database of hospital admissions from the United States. Methods/UNASSIGNED:Patients ≥18 years of age undergoing non-cardiac solid organ transplant surgery from 2004 to 2014 were identified from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS). The primary outcome was perioperative MACCE, defined as in-hospital death, myocardial infarction (MI), or ischemic stroke. Results/UNASSIGNED:A total of 49,978 hospitalizations for transplant surgery were identified. Renal (67.3%), liver (21.6%), and lung (6.7%) transplantation were the most common surgeries. Perioperative MACCE occurred in 1,539 transplant surgeries (3.1%). Recipients of organ transplantation were more likely to have perioperative MACCE in comparison to non-transplant, non-cardiac surgery (3.1% vs. 2.0%, p < 0.001; adjusted OR [aOR] 1.29, 95% CI 1.22-1.36). MACCE after transplant surgery were driven by increased mortality (1.7% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.001; aOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.23) and MI (1.2% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001; aOR 2.26, 95% CI 2.09-2.46) versus non-transplant surgery, with lower rates of stroke (0.3% vs. 0.5%, p < 0.001; aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.47-0.65). Among patients hospitalized for renal, liver, and lung transplantation, MACCE occurred in 1.7%, 5.6%, and 7.5%, respectively, with no difference in the frequency of MI by surgery type. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Cardiovascular outcomes of transplant surgery vary by surgical subtype and are largely driven by increased perioperative death and MI. Efforts to reduce cardiovascular risks of non-cardiac organ transplant surgery are necessary.

Influenza B is a rare cause of myocarditis that is usually caused by histiocytic and mononuclear cellular infiltrates. We describe a 22-year-old female patient presenting with fulminant myopericarditis secondary to influenza B infection that deteriorated to cardiogenic shock. Endomyocardial biopsy results yielded myocardial necrosis through complement-mediated cellular injury without evidence of interstitial infiltrates. The rare cause of this patient's disease, along with the unique pathologic findings, are an important reminder of the diversity of potential findings in myocarditis.

BACKGROUND: About one-third of patients with unexplained acute-onset heart failure (HF) recover left ventricular (LV) function; however, characterization of these patients in the setting of contemporary HF therapies is limited. We aim to describe baseline characteristics and predictors of recovery in patients with acute-onset cardiomyopathy. METHODS: We previously described 851 patients with unexplained HF undergoing endomyocardial biopsy. In this study, 235 patients with acute-onset HF were further retrospectively examined. RESULTS: Follow-up LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was available for 138 patients. At 1 year, 48 of 138 (33%) had LVEF recovery (follow-up LVEF >/=50%), and 90 of 138 (65%) had incomplete or lack of recovery. Higher cardiac index (P=.019), smaller LV diastolic diameter (P=.002), and lack of an intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) (P=.002) were associated with LVEF recovery. IVCD (P=.001) and myocarditis (P=.016) were independent predictors of the composite end point of death, LV assist device placement, and/or transplant at 1 year. Those with an IVCD had a significantly lower 1-year survival than those without (P=.007). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a smaller LV end-diastolic diameter, higher cardiac index, and lack of IVCD at presentation for acute-onset HF were more likely to have LVEF recovery. IVCD was a poor prognostic marker in all patients presenting with acute cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) leads to favorable changes in the failing heart at the molecular, cellular, and structural levels. However, myocardial recovery leading to device explantation is rare. We reasoned that the multicenter United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry might provide insights into clinical predictors and outcomes of the recovery process. METHODS: The MCS device data set of the UNOS registry was queried for patients with long-term continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) that were explanted for heart transplantation or indication of recovery. Analysis was restricted to adult patients (>/=18 years old) who were listed for an initial heart transplantation. Patients with CF-LVADs that were explanted because of recovery were compared with patients with CF-LVADs who underwent transplantation. RESULTS: We identified 594 patients with HeartMate II devices and 92 patients with HeartWare devices. Duration of support was on average 500.4 +/- 325.3 days. In 34 (5.0%) patients, devices were explanted secondary to myocardial recovery. Univariate predictors of recovery in patients with long-term LVADs included younger age (40 years vs 53 years), female sex, lower body mass index (25.7 kg/m2 vs 27.9 kg/m2), non-ischemic etiology (91% vs 59%), lack of implantable cardioverter defibrillator at the time of listing (44% vs 79%), and lower serum creatinine (0.97 mg/dl vs 1.28 mg/dl) (all p < 0.05). In the post-explantation period, freedom from death or transplantation was 66% at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of recovery on device support is low in the current MCS era and limited to a select cohort of predominantly young patients with non-ischemic myopathy. Given the high incidence of disease recurrence, patients should be closely followed after device explantation.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine inter-rater reliability of the 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for radionuclide imaging and whether physicians at various levels of training can effectively identify nuclear stress tests with inappropriate indications. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred patients were randomly selected from a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing nuclear stress testing at an academic medical center. Raters with different levels of training (including cardiology attending physicians, cardiology fellows, internal medicine hospitalists, and internal medicine interns) classified individual nuclear stress tests using the 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria. Consensus classification by 2 cardiologists was considered the operational gold standard, and sensitivity and specificity of individual raters for identifying inappropriate tests were calculated. Inter-rater reliability of the Appropriate Use Criteria was assessed using Cohen kappa statistics for pairs of different raters. The mean age of patients was 61.5 years; 214 (54%) were female. The cardiologists rated 256 (64%) of 400 nuclear stress tests as appropriate, 68 (18%) as uncertain, 55 (14%) as inappropriate; 21 (5%) tests were unable to be classified. Inter-rater reliability for noncardiologist raters was modest (unweighted Cohen kappa, 0.51, 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.55). Sensitivity of individual raters for identifying inappropriate tests ranged from 47% to 82%, while specificity ranged from 85% to 97%. CONCLUSIONS: Inter-rater reliability for the 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for radionuclide imaging is modest, and there is considerable variation in the ability of raters at different levels of training to identify inappropriate tests.

Adults with congenital heart disease now form the largest group of women with cardiac disease becoming pregnant in the developed world. This is both a mark of impressive steps forward in the management of congenital heart disease and also a challenge to the medical community to develop systems of care that will best serve these women and their babies. Each woman with congenital heart disease presents a unique pattern of challenges for the cardiologist, obstetrician, and anesthesiologist, and their care should be tailored to deal with their individual circumstances. As this population of patients continues to grow, we must continue to learn and improve our diagnostic tools and management strategies to refine their care. This review intends to focus on reviewing the outcomes in this set of patients and also an approach to the assessment and the management of these patients, primarily for an audience of obstetricians, pediatricians, and anesthesiologists.

BACKGROUND: Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is often considered when the pathogenesis of heart failure cannot be determined by noninvasive testing. Uncertainty remains about the diagnostic and clinical use of EMB in various clinical scenarios. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the characteristics of a cohort of patients with unexplained heart failure who underwent EMB at a tertiary care medical center. We categorized each patient into a clinical scenario as outlined by the 2007 AHA/ACC/ESC guidelines and determined the number of times EMB provided a diagnosis or altered the clinical course. A total of 851 patients underwent EMB from 2000-2009. Overall, 25.5% of EMBs provided a diagnosis and 22.7% of EMBs changed clinical course. Heart failure associated with unexplained restrictive cardiomyopathy was the most common clinical scenario, comprising 33.6% (286/851) of EMBs, and 84 (29.4%) of these EMBs were diagnostic. EMB for unexplained heart failure of <2 weeks duration had a diagnostic yield at 35% (39/109). There were 4 uncommon scenarios where EMB had a high diagnostic and clinical yield. There were 16 complications for an overall rate of 1.9%. CONCLUSIONS: We confirm that EMB is useful in acute onset unexplained cardiomyopathy. We demonstrate a role for EMB in suspected infiltrative disease and in the management of rare clinical scenarios, such as suspected hypersensitivity myocarditis, anthracycline cardiomyopathy, cardiac tumors, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Our results suggest low use of EMB in chronic heart failure that responds to usual care.

BACKGROUND: The presence of interstitial fibrosis and lipofuscin in endomyocardial biopsies may indicate the chronicity of heart failure. Fibrosis is known to increase in the failing heart. Lipofuscin increases with age, but its relationship to heart function is unknown. This study investigated whether lipofuscin or fibrosis had predictive utility in indicating function or adverse event (death, transplant, assist device placement) at 1 year postbiopsy in adolescents and young adults. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on nontransplant endomyocardial biopsies between 2000 and 2009 from individuals aged 10-40 years. Clinical and demographic information including ejection fraction (EF), EF at 1 year, and adverse events were obtained as available. Lipofuscin and fibrosis were scored retrospectively in a blinded fashion for 201 biopsies. Linear regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used for multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Increasing lipofuscin strongly correlated with patient age (P<.0001). Higher lipofuscin levels were correlated with a better EF at 1 year (P=.02). This remained significant (P=.04) after adjusting for age. The degree of fibrosis did not associate with any clinical variable and had no predictive capabilities in this study. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to incorporate lipofuscin in predicting future heart function. We found that more lipofuscin correlates with better EFs at 1 year, suggesting that lipofuscin is a marker for improved cardiac compensation. This information can help clinicians devise treatment plans for individuals in this age group.