Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:To better understand the implications of tumor size on auditory brainstem implant (ABI) categories of auditory performance (CAP) score to facilitate more precise patient counselling. DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Single-center retrospective chart review. SETTING/UNASSIGNED:Tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:Patients > 18 years old with neurofibromatosis type 2 who underwent ABI placement between the years 2009 and 2023 were included. Patients with prior surgical resection were excluded to reduce the potential of previous cochlear nucleus trauma confounding results. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:Ipsilateral tumor volume was measured from the preoperative MRI, and the primary endpoint was the 1-year CAP score. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = 0.010). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Increased tumor size has a negative correlation with ultimate ABI performance. There were patients in this study with larger tumor sizes who still benefited from ABI placement. While larger tumor size should not be a contraindication for ABI placement, understanding the role tumor size can have on performance variation can serve to improve tumor management strategies and preoperative counselling.

OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:To develop and study a novel means of imaging auditory brainstem implant (ABI) paddle placement utilizing postoperative MRI images to determine correlation between ABI performance and ideal paddle placement properties. DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Single-center retrospective review and image analysis. SETTING/UNASSIGNED:Tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:Patients >18 years old who received an ABI from 2009 to 2023 and had subsequent MRI and auditory performance testing completed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:ABI paddle angulation and insertion depth measure, in addition to categories of auditory performance (CAP) score. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = 0.049) once patients with large tumor burden were excluded. Insertion depth and axial angulation showed a negative correlation, in which higher insertion depth was associated with a decrease in axial angulation value, although not statistically significant. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:We present a novel means of measuring ABI paddle placement utilizing MRI to improve the objectivity of paddle placements assessments. Multicenter collaboration to increase the number of patients studied with this new measurement scheme will be required before stronger measurement associations can be determined.

OBJECTIVE:To describe a novel surgical technique utilizing the placement of an apical ground electrode to facilitate intracochlear current modulation in patients with cochlear ossification and incomplete electrode array insertion. PATIENTS/METHODS:Patients with incomplete standard electrode array insertion due to cochlear ossification. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Standard cochlear implant (CI) electrode array insertion, in addition to the placement of the extracochlear ground electrode into the cochlear apex to enable current steering through areas of cochlear ossification and towards the cochlear apex. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:Procedural safety and patient-reported perceptual differences between programming configurations utilizing the apical ground. RESULTS:Placement of an apical ground electrode was safe and feasible in 3 patients with complex ossified cochlea and was able to augment sound perception, and improve performance, after adjustments to device programming. CONCLUSIONS:Apical ground electrode placement represents a technically achievable adjunct in selected patients with ossified cochlea and incomplete electrode array insertion. This approach may expand the functional stimulation field utilizing intracochlear current modulation to improve patient performance.

OBJECTIVE:We sought to apply a previously developed transimpedance (TIM) heatmap pattern classification scheme in patients with no known risk factors for cochlear anomalies, in addition to patients implanted in the revision setting, to better understand the incidence of pattern variants, and potential clinical implications. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Single-center retrospective review. SETTING/METHODS:Tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS/METHODS:Patients older than 6 months of age who underwent cochlear implantation between June 2020 and June 2024 with normal gross cochlear anatomy and no concern for fibrosis that had intraoperative TIM testing completed. Patients undergoing revision implantation were also included as a separate cohort. INTERVENTION/METHODS:None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:The number of patients with normal and variant TIM patterns was evaluated for each cohort. TIM patterns were subsequently compared with the electrode position found on intraoperative x-ray. RESULTS:There were 321 ears that underwent implantation and subsequent intraoperative TIM assessment meeting inclusion criteria. Of these, 310 (96.6%) were in the primary surgery setting, and 11 (3.4%) were in the revision surgical setting. In the primary surgical setting, 86.4% (n=268) of the implants demonstrated a normal TIM heatmap. Compared with the primary surgical setting, where only 45.5% (n=5) of revision surgery TIM heatmaps were interpreted as normal. One patient in the revision setting had a newly identified "double X" pattern corresponding to a normal electrode position on x-ray. CONCLUSIONS:There is a decreased incidence of previously developed TIM heatmap pattern variants in CI recipients with normal gross cochlear anatomy.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:We sought to consolidate the anatomical findings from radiologic research and prior surgical literature to develop a stepwise surgical approach utilizing cadaveric specimens which can serve to improve the accuracy and scalability of surgical apical cochleostomies in the future. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Cadaveric temporal bone dissections, with subsequent image documentation and distance measurements to confirm surgical accuracy. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:All four temporal bones (100%) that were drilled utilizing the newly developed surgical approach had an accurately placed apical cochleostomy. No inadvertent entry into the middle turn of the cochlea occurred. There was no violation of the labyrinthine facial nerve, or carotid artery. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Preliminary findings are promising for the described steps to achieve a substantial improvement in apical cochleostomy accuracy, with reduced trauma compared to historically taught techniques.

OBJECTIVE:To characterize transimpedance matrix (TIM) heatmap patterns in patients at risk of labyrinthine abnormality to better understand accuracy and possible TIM limitations. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective review of TIM patterns, preoperative, and postoperative imaging. SETTING/METHODS:Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS/METHODS:Patients undergoing cochlear implantation with risk of labyrinthine abnormality. INTERVENTION/METHODS:None. RESULTS:Seventy-seven patients were evaluated. Twenty-five percent (n = 19) of patients had a TIM pattern variant identified. These variants were separated into 10 novel categories. Overall, 9% (n = 6) of electrodes were malpositioned on intraoperative x-ray, of which 50% (n = 3) were underinserted, 17% (n = 1) were overinserted, 17% (n = 1) had a tip foldover, and 17% (n = 1) had a coiled electrode. The number of patients with a variant TIM pattern and normal x-ray was 18% (n = 14), and the number of patients with normal TIM pattern and malposition noted on x-ray was 3% (n = 2; both were electrode underinsertions that were recognized due to open circuits and surgical visualization).A newly defined skip heat pattern was identified in patients with IP2/Mondini malformation and interscalar septum width <0.5 mm at the cochlear pars ascendens of the basal turn. CONCLUSIONS:This study defines novel patterns for TIM heatmap characterization to facilitate collaborative and comparative research moving forward. In doing so, it highlights a new pattern termed skip heat, which corresponds with a deficient interscalar septum of the cochlea pars ascendens of the basal turn in patients with IP2 malformation. Overall, the data assist the surgeon in better understanding the implications and limitations of TIM patterns within groups of patients with risk of labyrinthine abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To better characterize the cochlear apex in relation to surgically relevant landmarks to guide surgeons and improve procedural success of apical electrode placement. STUDY DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective image analysis. SETTING/UNASSIGNED:Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS/UNASSIGNED:Cochlear implant recipients with available preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging. INTERVENTION/UNASSIGNED:None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE/UNASSIGNED:Cochlear dimensions and cochlear apex distance measures to surgically relevant middle ear landmarks and critical structures. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Eighty-two temporal bone CT scans were analyzed utilizing multiplanar reformats. The average lateral width of promontory bone over the cochlear apex was 1.2 mm (standard deviation [SD], 0.3). The anteroposterior distance from the round window (avg, 4.2 mm; SD, 0.5), oval window (avg, 3.3 mm; SD, 0.3), cochleariform process (avg, 2.3; SD, 0.5), and superior-inferior distance from the cochleariform process (avg, -0.9; SD, 0.8) to the cochlear apex were measured. The relationship of the cochlear apex to critical structures was highly variable.A newly developed stapes vector was created and found to mark the posterior/superior boundary of the apex in 94% of patients. When a vector parallel to the stapes vector was drawn through the round window, it marked the anterior/inferior boundary of the cochlear apex in 89% of patients. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:This study assists in characterizing cochlear apex anatomy and its relation to surrounding structures as a means of improving procedural accuracy and reducing trauma during apical cochleostomy. Understanding both distance relationships and expected boundaries of the apex could help to inform future surgical approaches.

OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:This study aims to synthesize current knowledge and outcomes related to pediatric auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) in children with severe inner ear malformations (IEMs). It highlights the clinical management practices, challenges, and potential future directions for consensus development in this field. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A systematic review of findings presented at the Third International Pediatric ABI Symposium organized by the Hacettepe Cochlear Implant team between 3 and 5 September 2020 was conducted, incorporating data from 41 departments across 19 countries. Relevant clinical outcomes, imaging techniques, surgical approaches, and rehabilitation strategies were analyzed to identify key trends and variability in practices. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The review indicates that children receiving ABIs exhibit diverse auditory outcomes influenced by individual anatomical variations and developmental factors. Early implantation, particularly before the age of three, positively correlates with better auditory and language development. Multicenter experiences underscore the necessity of tailored decision-making, which considers both surgical candidacy and comprehensive rehabilitation resources. DISCUSSION:/UNASSIGNED:The variability in outcomes emphasizes the need for improved consensus and guidelines regarding eligibility, surgical techniques, and multidisciplinary rehabilitation approaches. Notable complications and the necessity for thorough imaging assessments were also identified as critical components affecting clinical decisions. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:A formal consensus statement is warranted to standardize best practices in ABI management. This will not only enhance patient outcomes but also guide future research efforts to address the remaining challenges in the treatment of children with severe IEMs. Enhanced collaboration among team members will be pivotal in achieving these objectives.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The aim of this study was to examine how bimodal stimulation affects quality of life (QOL) during the postoperative period following cochlear implantation (CI). These data could potentially provide evidence to encourage more bimodal candidates to continue hearing aid (HA) use after CI. METHODS:In this prospective study, patients completed preoperative and 1-, 3-, and 6-month post-activation QOL surveys on listening effort, speech perception, sound quality/localization, and hearing handicap. Fifteen HA users who were candidates for contralateral CI completed the study (mean age 65.6 years). RESULTS:Patients used both devices at a median rate of 97%, 97%, and 98% of the time at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. On average, patients' hearing handicap scores decreased by 16% at 1 month, 36% at 3 months, and 30% at 6 months. Patients' listening effort scores decreased by a mean of 10.8% at 1 month, 12.6% at 3 months, and 18.7% at 6 months. Localization significantly improved by 24.3% at 1 month and remained steady. There was no significant improvement in sound quality scores. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Bimodal listeners should expect QOL to improve, and listening effort and localization are generally optimized using CI and HA compared to CI alone. Some scores improved at earlier time points than others, suggesting bimodal auditory skills may develop at different rates.