Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVES: Intraoperative testing of cochlear implant devices, establishment of electrical threshold for acoustic reflex, and recording neural responses to electrical stimulation have traditionally required the presence of a cochlear implant audiologist in the operating room. The goal of this study was to determine the feasibility of remote testing to improve time efficiency and reduce cost. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective. METHODS: A standard PC with Tridia VNC software and either Cochlear Corporation or Advanced Bionics Corporation mapping software was configured to perform remote testing. The time required to perform on-site or remote testing was measured. RESULTS: With the availability of the laptop and internet access, there were no geographic restrictions regarding the site of remote testing. Remote testing was time efficient, requiring 9 minutes of audiologist's time compared with 93 minutes when the audiologist had to travel to the operating room. CONCLUSION: Remote testing of the cochlear implant device and patient's response to electrical stimulation is technically feasible. It is timesaving, practical, and cost efficient

OBJECTIVE: To assess word recognition and pitch-scaling abilities of cochlear implant users first implanted with a Nucleus 10-mm Hybrid electrode array and then reimplanted with a full length Nucleus Freedom array after loss of residual hearing. BACKGROUND: Although electroacoustic stimulation is a promising treatment for patients with residual low-frequency hearing,a small subset of them lose that residual hearing. It is not clear whether these patients would be better served by leaving in the 10-mm array and providing electric stimulation through it, or by replacing it with a standard full-length array. METHODS: Word recognition and pitch-scaling abilities were measured in 2 users of hybrid cochlear implants who lost their residual hearing in the implanted ear after a few months. Tests were repeated over several months, first with a 10-mm array, and after, these patients were reimplanted with a full array. The word recognition task consisted of 2 50-word consonant nucleus consonant (CNC) lists. In the pitch-scaling task, 6 electrodes were stimulated in pseudorandom order, and patients assigned a pitch value to the sensation elicited by each electrode. RESULTS: Shortly after reimplantation with the full electrode array, speech understanding was much better than with the 10-mm array. Patients improved their ability to perform the pitch-scaling task over time with the full array, although their performance on that task was variable, and the improvements were often small. CONCLUSION: 1) Short electrode arrays may help preserve residual hearing but may also provide less benefit than traditional cochlear implants for some patients. 2) Pitch percepts in response to electric stimulation may be modified by experience

CONCLUSION: Neither speech understanding nor frequency discrimination ability was better in Nucleus Contour users than in Nucleus 24 straight electrode users. Furthermore, perimodiolar electrode placement does not result in better frequency discrimination. OBJECTIVES: We addressed three questions related to perimodiolar electrode placement. First, do patients implanted with the Contour electrode understand speech better than with an otherwise identical device that has a straight electrode? Second, do these groups have different frequency discrimination abilities? Third, is the distance of the electrode from the modiolus related to frequency discrimination ability? SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Contour and straight electrode users were matched on four important variables. We then tested these listeners on CNC word and HINT sentence identification tasks, and on a formant frequency discrimination task. We also examined X-rays and measured the distance of the electrodes from the modiolus to determine whether there is a relationship between this factor and frequency discrimination ability. RESULTS: Both speech understanding and frequency discrimination abilities were similar for listeners implanted with the Contour vs a straight electrode. Furthermore, there was no linear relationship between electrode-modiolus distance and frequency discrimination ability. However, we did note a second-order relationship between these variables, suggesting that frequency discrimination is worse when the electrodes are either too close or too far away from the modiolus

OBJECTIVES: This article presents the first report of cochlear implantation in a patient with congenital aural atresia, microtia, dysplastic cochlea and internal auditory canals, and bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss (HL). This rare combination requires special management considerations. Preoperative issues include thorough evaluation of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging to determine favorable anatomy, cochlear implantation candidacy, and surgical planning. Intraoperative concerns include incision placement, surgical approach to the middle ear, and abnormal facial nerve anatomy. Postoperative use of a special headset combining a microphone and transmitter coil is required. STUDY DESIGN: Case report and literature review. METHODS: The patient's chart was reviewed for diagnostic studies, operative strategy, and postoperative auditory stimulation and testing. A literature review was performed. RESULTS: A 2-year-old male presented with bilateral aural atresia, microtia, and profound sensorineural HL. Imaging studies revealed multiple abnormalities of the cochlea, vestibule, and internal auditory canal, all of which were more favorable on the right side. An incision was designed to accommodate future microtia repair. The cochlear implant was placed without difficulty by way of a facial recess approach to the middle ear. Postoperative results include the detection of Ling sounds and voices in the environment as well as the ability to locate sounds. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of cochlear implantation in a patient with bilateral aural atresia, microtia, and profound sensorineural HL in conjunction with multiple inner ear abnormalities. Close collaboration among the otologist, neuroradiologist, and plastic surgeon is essential to coordinate surgical management and optimize cosmetic and functional outcomes in this unique population

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the new features of the Nucleus Research Platform 8 (RP8), a system developed specifically for research purposes The RP8 consists of a research implant, a speech processor and a new NRT software (NRT v4), and includes comparisons of the different artefact-cancellation methods, NRT threshold, and recovery function measurements. The system has new artefact-suppression techniques and new diagnostic capabilities; their performance has been verified in animal experiments. In this study, NRT data were collected from 15 postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant patients intraoperatively and up to 6 months postoperatively after switch-on. The initial investigation in two clinics in Europe focused primarily on the enhanced NRT capabilities Results from the trial in two European clinics indicate that NRT measurements can be obtained with lower noise levels. A comparison of the different artefact-cancellation techniques showed that the forward-masking paradigm implemented in the Nucleus 3 system is still the method of choice. The focus of this report is on recovery function characteristics, which may give insight into auditory nerve fiber properties with regard to higher stimulation rates

OBJECTIVES: Cochlear implant device failures and reimplantation have mainly been reported on in adults. The purpose of this study was to isolate precursors of device failures and assess the effects of reimplantation in children. METHODS: From 1997 to 2003, 27 children underwent cochlear reimplantation at our institution. The pre-failure complaints were categorized and correlated with actual failure modes and postimplantation results. Speech-recognition tests were used to evaluate pre- and post-reimplantation performance. RESULTS: Pre-failure length of usage ranged from 0 to 12 years. Symptoms including pain, intermittence, reduced performance, noise and the need for frequent device adjustments were associated with device failures, although not with a particular mode of failure. Post reimplantation performance was equal to but not immediately better than pre-failure results in children who received upgraded devices. CONCLUSIONS: Specific complaints, frequent need for device adjustments and reduced speech recognition can be precursors to device failures, underscoring the need for routine follow-up evaluations. Reimplantation with newer technology does not guarantee improved speech understanding and often requires an adjustment period to reach pre-reimplantation levels.

OBJECTIVES: Multichannel auditory brainstem implants (ABI) are currently indicated for patients with neurofibromatosis type II (NF2) and schwannomas involving the internal auditory canal (IAC) or cerebellopontine angle (CPA), regardless of hearing loss (HL). The implant is usually placed in the lateral recess of the fourth ventricle at the time of tumor resection to stimulate the cochlear nucleus. This study aims to review the surgical and audiologic outcomes in 18 patients implanted by our Skull Base Surgery Team from 1994 through 2003. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of 18 patients with ABIs. METHODS: We evaluated demographic data including age at implantation, number of tumor resections before implantation, tumor size, surgical approach, and postoperative surgical complications. The ABI auditory results at 1 year were then evaluated for number of functioning electrodes and channels, hours per day of use, nonauditory side effect profile and hearing results. Audiologic data including Monosyllable, Spondee, Trochee test (MTS) Word and Stress scores, Northwestern University Children's Perception of Speech (NU-CHIPS), and auditory sensitivity are reported. RESULTS: No surgical complications caused by ABI implantation were revealed. A probe for lateral recess and cochlear nucleus localization was helpful in several patients. A range of auditory performance is reported, and two patients had no auditory perceptions. Electrode paddle migration occurred in two patients. Patient education and encouragement is very important to obtain maximum benefit. CONCLUSIONS: ABIs are safe, do not increase surgical morbidity, and allow most patients to experience improved communication as well as access to environmental sounds. Nonauditory side effects can be minimized by selecting proper stimulation patterns. The ABI continues to be an emerging field for hearing rehabilitation in patients who are deafened by NF2

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of cochlear implants in human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals and correlate these results with a proposed pathophysiological mechanism of human immunodeficiency virus-associated hearing loss. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series and temporal bone analysis of deceased human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Seven human immunodeficiency virus-positive individuals with profound sensorineural hearing loss. INTERVENTION: Cochlear implantation at New York University Medical Center. METHODS: The surgical outcomes and complications were analyzed. Additionally, electron microscopic and immunohistochemical findings of cadaver temporal bone specimens of other known human immunodeficiency virus-positive individuals were reviewed. The performance results of the human immunodeficiency virus-positive cochlear implant patients were then correlated with the previously hypothesized pathophysiological mechanism of human immunodeficiency virus-associated hearing loss. RESULTS: The patients had a varied performance with cochlear implantation, and as a group performance was good. There were no surgical complications or postoperative complications. The good performance of these patients supports the hypothesis that the mechanism of human immunodeficiency virus-associated deafness involves infiltration, malfunction, and premature degeneration of the hair cells and supportive cells of the cochlea. CONCLUSIONS: Human immunodeficiency virus-positive individuals benefit from cochlear implantation without increased surgical risk

The minimum age for cochlear implantation has been reduced to 12 months in an effort to provide auditory stimulation to children with hearing loss during early development. Because behavioral measures in such young children are limited, objective measures such as the electrically evoked compound action potential (EAP) from the auditory nerve are needed to facilitate measurement of stimulation level requirements. We assessed EAPs recorded by the Nucleus 24 neural response telemetry (NRT) system in children who underwent implantation between 12 and 24 months of age. We recorded EAPs in 37 such children (mean age at implantation, 18.1+/-3.6 months). The EAPs were of large amplitude, and thresholds fell between behavioral T and C levels. A correction factor applied to EAP thresholds provided useful predictions of T levels. The EAPs can be used to ensure that even very young children receive auditory stimulation with their cochlear implants upon device activation

OBJECTIVE: The study investigated the hypothesis that threshold and comfortable levels recorded from cochlear implant patients would reduce, and dynamic range increase, as distance of the electrode from the modiolar wall (radial distance) decreases. Two groups of cochlear implant patients participated; one group using the Nucleus' 24 Contour electrode array, and one group using the Nucleus standard straight (banded) array. The Nucleus 24 Contour array has been shown in temporal bone studies to lie closer to the modiolus than the banded array. The relationship of electrode impedance and radial distance is also investigated. DESIGN: The study, conducted at three centers, evaluated 21 patients using the Contour array, and 36 patients using the banded array. For each patient, threshold, comfortable levels and dynamic range were measured at four time points. Common ground electrode impedance was recorded clinically from each patient, at time intervals up to 12 wk. An estimate of the radial distance of the electrode from the modiolus was made by analysis of Cochlear view x-rays. RESULTS: Threshold and comfortable levels were significantly lower for the Nucleus 24 Contour array than for the banded array. However, dynamic range measurements did not show the predicted increase. In a majority of subjects, a significant correlation was found between the estimated radial distance of the electrode from the modiolus and the measured threshold and comfortable levels. This trend was not observed for dynamic range. The analysis indicates that other factors than radial distance are involved in the resultant psychophysical levels. Clinical impedance measures (common ground) were found to be significantly higher for the Contour array. However, the electrodes on the Contour array are half-rings, which are approximately only half the geometric size of the full rings as electrodes of the standard array. When the geometric electrode area in the two array designs are normalized, the trends in the electrode impedance behavior are similar. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the hypothesis that the relationship between the radial distance of the electrode and the psychophysical measures are influenced by patterns of fibrous tissue growth and individual patient differences, such as etiology and neural survival. Impedance measures for the Nucleus 24 Contour electrode array were higher than the banded electrode array, but this is primarily due to the reduction in electrode surface area. The different outcomes in impedance over time suggest differences in the relative contributions of the components of impedance with the two arrays