Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening reduces all-cause and CRC-related mortality. New research demonstrates that the faecal haemoglobin concentration (f-Hb) may indicate the presence of other serious diseases not related to CRC. We investigated the association between f-Hb, measured by a faecal immunochemical test (FIT), and both all-cause mortality and cause of death in a population-wide cohort of screening participants. METHODS:Between 2014 and 2018, 1,262,165 participants submitted a FIT for the Danish CRC screening programme. We followed these participants, using the Danish CRC Screening Database and several other national registers on health and population, until December 31, 2018. We stratified participants by f-Hb and compared them using a Cox proportional hazards regression on all-cause mortality and cause of death reported as adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs). We adjusted for several covariates, including comorbidity, socioeconomic factors, demography and prescription medication. RESULTS:We observed 21,847 deaths in the study period. Our multivariate analyses indicated an association relationship between increasing f-Hb and the risk of dying in the study period. This risk increased steadily from aHR 1.38 (95% CI: 1.32, 1.44) in those with a f-Hb of 7.1-11.9 μg Hb/g faeces to 2.20 (95% CI: 2.10, 2.30) in those with a f-Hb ≥60.0 μg Hb/g faeces, when compared to those with a f-Hb ≤7.0 μg Hb/g faeces. The pattern remained when excluding CRC from the analysis. Similar patterns were observed between incrementally increasing f-Hb and the risk of dying from respiratory disease, cardiovascular disease and cancers other than CRC. Furthermore, we observed an increased risk of dying from CRC with increasing f-Hb. CONCLUSIONS:Our findings support the hypothesis that f-Hb may indicate an elevated risk of having chronic conditions if causes for the bleeding have not been identified. The mechanisms still need to be established, but f-Hb may be a potential biomarker for several non-CRC diseases.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The COVID-19 pandemic led to the urgent implementation of telehealth visits in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care; however, data assessing feasibility remain limited. OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:We looked to determine the completion rate of telehealth appointments for adults with IBD, as well as to evaluate demographic, clinical, and social predictors of incomplete appointments. DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients with IBD who had at least one scheduled telehealth visit at the NYU IBD Center between 1 March 2020 and 31 August 2021, with only the first scheduled telehealth appointment considered. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Medical records were parsed for relevant covariables, and multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted association between demographic factors and an incomplete telehealth appointment. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = 0.22). After adjustment, patients with CD had higher odds of an incomplete appointment as compared to patients with UC [adjusted odds ratio (adjOR): 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10-1.69], as did females (adjOR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.04-1.54), and patients who had a non-first-degree relative listed as an emergency contact (adjOR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.16-2.44). While age ⩾60 years was not associated with appointment completion status, we did find that age >80 years was an independent predictor of missed telehealth appointments (adjOR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.12-7.63) when compared to individuals aged 60-70 years. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:telehealth, particularly those aged 60-80 years, may therefore provide an additional venue to complement in-person care.

The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has declined over time, though it remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the U.S. It has the third highest incidence in incidence among all cancers and is the second leading cause of cancer death in both men and women. Screening reduces the incidence and mortality from CRC. There are several modalities for CRC screening, but the most common ones are a choice between a non-invasive stool-based test, such as fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) or an invasive endoscopic modality, such as colonoscopy. In the U.S. colonoscopy is the predominant CRC screening modality, with observational studies reporting large reductions in CRC incidence and mortality. Recently, a large randomized controlled trial (RCT) on effectiveness of colonoscopy reported smaller than expected reduction in CRC incidence and no reduction in CRC mortality with colonoscopy screening. Explanations of the lower than expected benefit include low uptake of colonoscopy, short follow-up for mortality endpoints and quality indicators (QIs) for some of the endoscopists participating in the screening colonoscopies. The findings of the study need to be taken in context with other literature on effectiveness of colonoscopy, with the overall message of reassuring patients of the benefits of screening, and colonoscopy. Here, we discuss the latest evidence on colonoscopy screening and it in the context of other screening modalities and the landscape.

Prior studies have reported the prevalence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in average-risk screening population ages 50-75 to be 0.7%-1.0%.^1,2 However, no estimates from studies enrolling individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy have been reported. The experience of ongoing studies enrolling average-risk individuals is that the prevalence rates are substantially lower. A 2020 study from a community-based cohort undergoing CRC screening with fecal immunochemical testing followed by diagnostic colonoscopy reported a CRC prevalence rate of 1.46 per 1000, or 0.15%.³ The aim of our study is to report the screen-detected prevalence of CRC and advanced neoplasia in average-risk asymptomatic individuals from selected academic and community medical centers in the United States, Canada, and Germany and describe associated risk factors.

BACKGROUND:Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, data on national trends remain limited. AIMS/OBJECTIVE:To assess national trends in VTE-associated hospitalisations among patients with IBD as well as risk factors for, and mortality associated with, these events METHODS: Using the U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2000-2018, temporal trends in VTE were assessed using the National Cancer Institute's Joinpoint Regression Program with estimates presented as the average annual percent change (AAPC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS:Between 2000 and 2018, there were 4,859,728 hospitalisations among patients with IBD, with 128,236 (2.6%) having a VTE, and 6352 associated deaths. The rate of VTE among hospitalised patients with IBD increased from 192 to 295 cases per 10,000 hospitalisations (AAPC 2.4%, 95%CI 1.4%, 3.4%, p < 0.001), and remained significant when stratified by ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease as well as by deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. On multivariable analysis, increasing age, male sex, UC (aOR: 1.30, 95%CI 1.26, 1.33), identifying as non-Hispanic Black, and chronic corticosteroid use (aOR: 1.22, 95%CI 1.16, 1.29) were associated with an increased risk of a VTE-associated hospitalisation. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Rates of VTE-associated hospitalisations are increasing among patients with IBD. Continued efforts need to be placed on education and risk reduction.

Introduction: Nearly a quarter of older adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) require surgery. Patients with IBD are at risk for complications postoperatively and this risk is increased in older adults. However, little is known about the risk factors leading to these complications.We assessed risk factors associated with adverse postoperative outcomes among older adults who underwent IBD-related surgery, as well as evaluated trends in emergency vs. elective surgery in this population.
Method(s): Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database, we identified adults >=60 years of age who underwent an IBD-related intestinal resection from 2005-2019. Our primary outcome included a 30-day composite of mortality, readmission, reoperation, and/or what we identified as serious complications listed in NSQIP.
Result(s): In total, 9,640 intestinal resections were performed among older adults with IBD from 2005-2019, with 48.3% having undergone resection for Crohn's disease (CD), and 51.7% for ulcerative colitis (UC). Nearly 37% experienced an adverse outcome, with the most common complication being infection (20.21%). From 2005 to 2015, there was no decrease in the number of emergent cases among older adults. On univariate analysis, higher rates of adverse postoperative outcomes were seen with increasing age (p< 0.001), with nearly 50% of those >=80 years of age having an adverse outcome. Patients who underwent an emergency surgery had a higher likelihood of postoperative complications (66.86%; p< 0.001). On multivariable analysis, albumin <=3 (aOR 1.99; 95%CI 1.69-2.33), the presence of two or more comorbidities (aOR, 1.50; 95%CI 1.27-1.76), totally dependent functional status as compared to those partially dependent or independent (aOR, 7.28; 95%CI 3.14-21.2), and emergency surgery (aOR, 1.70; 95% CI 1.36-2.11) significantly increased the odds of an adverse outcome. (Figure)
Conclusion(s): Overall 37% of older adults with IBD experienced an adverse outcome as a result of IBD-related surgery. Limited functional health status, low preoperative serum albumin levels, and those undergoing emergent surgery were associated with a significantly higher risk. This is particularly important as the number of older adults with IBD is increasing, with a persisting number of emergency cases over time. Given the high rate of surgery in this population, future research should focus on preoperative rehabilitation, nutritional optimization, and timely surgery to improve outcomes. (Table Presented)

Introduction: Biloma is an extrahepatic bile collection secondary to iatrogenic or traumatic biliary tree disruption. It is a rare complication of laparoscopy cholecystectomy with an incidence rate of approximately 2.5%. Without proper management, biloma can become infected and cause life-threatening complications such as peritonitis, biliary fistula, bilhemia and hemobilia. Here we described a case of complicated biloma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Case Description/Methods: The patient was a 24-year-old female with a past medical history of hypertension, obesity, and recent laparoscopic cholecystectomy complicated by hepatic subcapsular biloma. It was managed by biliary stent placement via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous drainage during the previous hospitalization. However, 6 days later, she presented with fever, chills, nausea, and right upper quadrant pain. Vital signs were fever 102.3 F and tachycardia 110 to 120 per min. The CT abdomen revealed decreased size in perihepatic fluid collection with air bubbles (14 x 11 x 18 cm; Figure). It also showed a common bile duct stent in place and a percutaneous drainage catheter tip in the inferior aspect of the collection. Lab results showed leukocytosis to 10.3, normal AST/ALT, total/direct bilirubin 2.1/12 mg/dL, and GGT 152 U/L. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were given in ED. The surgery team performed a laparoscopic lavage and discovered that the drain was not connected with the biloma. Two new drains were placed during the operation. She was discharged with PO antibiotics, and an outpatient follow-up was scheduled for drain removal.
Discussion(s): The management of biloma depends on the severity of the disease. Endoscopic therapy, such as a transpapillary biliary stent placement, can decrease the transpapillary pressure gradient, thus allowing preferential transpapillary bile flow rather than accumulation at the leaking site. However, given that stent placement does not reabsorb formed collection, patients failing ERCP should undergo percutaneous drainage or bile duct repair.Iatrogenic biloma can be detected by post-operational physical exams and image studies. Laparoscopic lavage with drainage should be considered in unresolved or infected biloma due to the high risk of peritonitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS/OBJECTIVE:Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening is endoscopist dependent, and colonoscopy quality improvement programs aim to improve efficacy. This study evaluated the clinical benefit and safety of using a computer-aided detection (CADe) device in colonoscopy procedures. METHODS:This randomized study prospectively evaluated the use of a CADe device at 5 academic and community centers by US board-certified gastroenterologists (n = 22). Participants aged ≥40 scheduled for screening or surveillance (≥3 years) colonoscopy were included; exclusion criteria included incomplete procedure, diagnostic indication, inflammatory bowel disease, and familial adenomatous polyposis. Patients were randomized by endoscopist to the standard or CADe colonoscopy arm using computer-generated, random-block method. The 2 primary endpoints were adenomas per colonoscopy (APC), the total number of adenomas resected divided by the total number of colonoscopies; and true histology rate (THR), the proportion of resections with clinically significant histology divided by the total number of polyp resections. The primary analysis used a modified intention-to-treat approach. RESULTS:Between January and September 2021, 1440 participants were enrolled to be randomized. After exclusion of participants who did not meet the eligibility criteria, 677 in the standard arm and 682 in the CADe arm were included in a modified intention-to-treat analysis. APC increased significantly with use of the CADe device (standard vs CADe: 0.83 vs 1.05, P = .002; total number of adenomas, 562 vs 719). There was no decrease in THR with use of the CADe device (standard vs CADe: 71.7% vs 67.4%, P for noninferiority < .001; total number of non-neoplastic lesions, 284 vs 375). Adenoma detection rate was 43.9% and 47.8% in the standard and CADe arms, respectively (P = .065). CONCLUSIONS:For experienced endoscopists performing screening and surveillance colonoscopies in the United States, the CADe device statistically improved overall adenoma detection (APC) without a concomitant increase in resection of non-neoplastic lesions (THR). CLINICALTRIALS/RESULTS:gov registration: NCT04754347.