Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:The C8 Science Panel was composed of three epidemiologists charged with studying the possible health effects of PFOA in a highly exposed population in the mid-Ohio Valley. The Panel determined in 2012 there was a 'probable link' (i.e., more probable than not based on the weight of the available scientific evidence) between PFOA and high cholesterol, thyroid disease, kidney and testicular cancer, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and ulcerative colitis. OBJECTIVE:Here, former C8 Science Panel members and collaborators comment on the PFOA literature regarding thyroid disorders, cancer, immune and auto-immune disorders, liver disease, hypercholesterolemia, reproductive outcomes, neurotoxicity, and kidney disease. We also discuss developments regarding fate and transport, and pharmacokinetic models, and discuss causality assessment in cross-sectional associations among low-exposed populations. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:For cancer, the epidemiologic evidence remains supportive but not definitive for kidney and testicular cancers. There is consistent evidence of a positive association between PFOA and cholesterol, but no evidence of an association with heart disease. There is evidence for an association with ulcerative colitis, but not for other auto-immune diseases. There is good evidence that PFOA is associated with immune response, but uneven evidence for an association with infectious disease. The evidence for an association between PFOA and thyroid and kidney disease is suggestive but uneven. There is evidence of an association with liver enzymes, but not with liver disease. There is little evidence of an association with neurotoxicity. Suggested reductions in birthweight may be due to reverse causality and/or confounding. Fate and transport models and pharmacokinetic models remain central to estimating past exposure for new cohorts, but are difficult to develop without good historical data on emissions of PFOA into the environment. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Overall, the epidemiologic evidence remains limited. For a few outcomes there has been some replication of our earlier findings. More longitudinal research is needed in large populations with large exposure contrasts. Additional cross-sectional studies of low exposed populations may be less informative.

Residential mobility is hypothesized to impact health through changes to the built environment and disruptions in social networks, and may vary by neighborhood deprivation exposure. However, there are few longitudinal investigations of residential mobility in relation to health outcomes. This study examined enrollees from the World Trade Center Health Registry, a longitudinal cohort of first responders and community members in lower Manhattan on September 11, 2001. Enrollees who completed ≥2 health surveys between 2004 and 2016 and did not have diabetes (N = 44,089) or hypertension (N = 35,065) at baseline (i.e., 2004) were included. Using geocoded annual home addresses, residential mobility was examined using two indicators: moving frequency and displacement. Moving frequency was defined as the number of times someone was recorded as living in a different neighborhood; displacement as any moving to a more disadvantaged neighborhood. We fit adjusted Cox proportional hazards models with time-dependent exposures (moving frequency and displacement) and covariates to evaluate associations with incident diabetes and hypertension. From 2004 to 2016, the majority of enrollees never moved (54.5%); 6.5% moved ≥3 times. Those who moved ≥3 times had a similar hazard of diabetes (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.78; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.40, 1.53) and hypertension (HR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.68, 1.43) compared with those who never moved. Similarly, displacement was not associated with diabetes or hypertension. Residential mobility was not associated with diabetes or hypertension among a cohort of primarily urban-dwelling adults.

OBJECTIVE:To determine if World Trade Center (WTC) exposure is associated with hearing loss. METHODS:Logistic regression to evaluate the immediate impact of WTC exposure and parametric survival analysis to assess longitudinal outcomes. RESULTS:Those arriving on the morning of 9/11/2001 had elevated odds of low-frequency (odds ratio [OR]: 1.24;95%CI:1.04-1.47) and high-frequency (OR:1.16;95%CI:1.02-1.31) hearing loss at their first post-9/11/2001 exam. Longitudinally, participants arriving before 9/13/2001 and spending ≥6 months at the WTC-site had greater risk of hearing loss in the low frequencies (risk ratio [RR]:1.31;95%CI:1.05-1.60) and high frequencies (RR:1.37;95%CI:1.22-1.54). By 2016, 3,194 (37%) had abnormal hearing sensitivity in either ear and 1,751 (20%) in both ears. CONCLUSIONS:More heavily WTC-exposed workers were at increased risk of hearing loss, and group differences persisted for at least 15 years. Those with abnormal hearing sensitivity may benefit from interventions such as hearing aids and other rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND:Prior studies have found that rescue and recovery workers exposed to the 9/11 World Trade Center (WTC) disaster have evidence of increased persistent hearing and other ear-related problems. The potential association between WTC disaster exposures and post-9/11 persistent self-reported hearing problems or loss among non-rescue and recovery survivors has not been well studied. METHODS:We used responses to the World Trade Center Health Registry (Registry) enrollment survey (2003-2004) and first follow-up survey (2006-2007) to model the association between exposure to the dust cloud and persistent hearing loss (n = 22,741). RESULTS:The prevalence of post-9/11 persistent hearing loss among survivors was 2.2%. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of hearing loss for those who were in the dust cloud and unable to hear was 3.0 (95% CI: 2.2, 4.0). Survivors with persistent sinus problems, headaches, PTSD and chronic disease histories had an increased prevalence of reported hearing problems compared to those without symptoms or chronic problems. CONCLUSIONS:In a longitudinal study, we observed an association between WTC-related exposures and post-9/11 self-reported hearing loss among disaster survivors.

Objectives: The risk for psychopathology increases with the number of adverse childhood experiences. Summing a number of experiences, however, assumes that all adversity equitably confers risk and operates through complementary mechanisms. To disentangle neurobiological pathways between disparate events and mental health, we examined how threat and deprivation-2 common dimensions of adversity-relate to early childhood psychopathology. Threat or the presence of experiences involving harm or threat of harm affects emotional control. Deprivation or absence of expected environmental inputs affects higher-order cognitive function. If threat and deprivation differentially affect brain development, then they may differentially relate to psychopathology, especially among young children.
Method(s): To examine these patterns, we used the Duke Preschool Anxiety Study, a cross-sectional study of youth ages 2-6 years enrolled through primary care from 2007 to 2011, weighted to reflect a screened population of 3433. Threat and deprivation were operationalized using questions from the Conflict Tactics Scale-2, Conflict Tactics Scale for Parent and Child, and Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment. Threat measured physical or sexual abuse, domestic violence, and violent neighborhood. Deprivation measured neglect and lack of cognitive stimulation. Poisson regression with robust standard errors estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) jointly for deprivation and threat in relation to counts for total symptoms and symptoms for specific disorders, such as anxiety, depression, and ADHD, in 760 children.
Result(s): Threat (47%) and deprivation (18%) were common; 36 percent of children had at least one disorder, and the total number of symptoms ranged from 0 to 46. Threat-exposed children had 40 percent more total symptoms (95% CI 1.2-1.6) than unexposed children after adjusting for deprivation and demographic covariates. Deprivation was not meaningfully associated with total symptom count (PR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) after adjusting for threat and demographic covariates.
Conclusion(s): These disparate associations among threat, deprivation, and mental health symptomatology may reflect the young age of these children or our approach designed to distinguish the unique contributions of deprivation and threat, lending support to the dimensional model of adversity and psychopathology. CAN, PSP, PSC
Copyright

Objectives: We will: 1) describe the WonderLab, a digital health initiative within the New York University Langone Health Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry; 2) introduce When to Wonder: Picky Eating, which is the WonderLab's first early childhood mental health digital study; and 3) present preliminary data from this study. Our first objective is to demonstrate how smartphone-based tools developed to assess children in their homes and the use of advanced data analytics can transform how, when, and where we assess young children's development and mental health. Our second objective is to share how our multidisciplinary team and agile development methodology enable us to build and launch a consumer-facing pediatric health app within an academic medical center.
Method(s): The WonderLab creates scalable mobile digital health tools to collect multimodal data in children's homes at the individual, family, and population levels. In December 2018, we released When to Wonder: Picky Eating, a national study with consent, enrollment, study activities, and feedback fully integrated in iOS and Android apps that parents download from the app stores. When to Wonder: Picky Eating focuses on the emotions and behaviors related to picky eating in children under the age of 7 years. Data sources include parent-report, video, audio, and an active task that children and parents play independently to quantify children's food preferences.
Result(s): We will present preliminary data from When to Wonder: Picky Eating to characterize normative and clinically significant emotions and behaviors related to picky eating. We will also share data on recruitment and engagement using social media, app performance, and "lessons learned" about digital pediatric health.
Conclusion(s): We create clinically and scientifically valid digital tools that parents and children want to use. We integrate clinical, scientific, engineering, design, data science, and bioethics expertise with collaborative user engagement and a "build, measure, learn" agile development culture. Our app-based study demonstrates how to build digital health tools that collect and analyze population-level and individual-level, multimodal data about children and families in the home. These new tools and approaches have the potential to transform our engagement with families and our delivery of care. EA, EC, MED
Copyright

Objectives: Digital innovation has the potential to transform both the science and practice of child mental health. Creation of pediatric digital health tools requires that bioethics, human-centered design, and clinical and scientific expertise are integrated with digital tool development, digital data collection, and data analytics. In this talk, we will describe the opportunities for innovations in pediatric digital mental health and the concurrent ethical and security risks. We will then present a framework and design methodology for creating ethical, human-centered, clinically informed, and evidence-based digital tools for children's mental health.
Method(s): The data presented will come from our experience founding and leading the New York University Langone Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry's WonderLab, which creates pediatric digital mental health tools that are evidence based, scalable, and ethical, as well as beautiful and fun so that parents and children would want to use them. The WonderLab brings clinical, scientific, digital engineering, digital design, data science, and bioethics expertise together with user engagement and a "build, measure, learn" agile development culture and methodology. We will use the WonderLab team's development and launch of our first app-based study, "When to Wonder: Picky Eating," to illustrate our framework and methodology.
Result(s): We will describe the innovation opportunities in pediatric digital mental health, including innovation in measurement, engagement, access, and collaborative methodologies. We will then present the ethical, privacy, security, and safety risks related to digital health applications and app-based data collection with children and their families. Finally, we will describe how the WonderLab team, methodology, and products innovate across multiple domains within an explicit ethical and clinically informed framework.
Conclusion(s): Digital innovation and data science have great potential to address the challenges facing our patients and our field. To build ethical and useful digital health tools for children's mental health requires multidisciplinary teams, user engagement, collaborative agile methodology, and a framework that ensures that innovations are integrated with and reflect our ethics and commitment to children. R, COMP, DAM
Copyright

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE:Systematic review tools that provide guidance on evaluating epidemiology studies are receiving increasing attention and support because their application facilitates improved quality of the review, consistency across reviewers, and transparency for readers. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Program has developed an approach for systematic review of evidence of health effects from chemical exposures that includes structured approaches for literature search and screening, study evaluation, data extraction, and evidence synthesis and integration. This approach recognizes the need for developing outcome-specific criteria for study evaluation. Because studies are assessed at the outcome level, a study could be considered high quality for one investigated outcome, and low quality for another, due to differences in the outcome measures, analytic strategies, how relevant a certain bias is to the outcome, and how the exposure measure relates to the outcome. The objective of this paper is to illustrate the need for outcome-specific criteria in study evaluation or risk of bias evaluation, describe the process we used to develop the criteria, and summarize the resulting criteria. METHODS:We used a process of expert consultation to develop several sets of outcome-specific criteria to guide study reviewers, improve consistency, and ensure consideration of critical issues specific to the outcomes. The criteria were developed using the following domains: outcome assessment, exposure measurement (specifically timing of exposure in relation to outcome; other exposure measurement issues would be addressed in exposure-specific criteria), participant selection, confounding, analysis, and sensitivity (the study's ability to detect a true effect or hazard). RESULTS:We discuss the application of this process to pregnancy-related outcomes (preterm birth, spontaneous abortion), other reproductive-related outcomes (male reproductive hormones, sperm parameters, time to pregnancy, pubertal development), chronic disease (diabetes, insulin resistance), and acute or episodic conditions (asthma, allergies), and provide examples of the criteria developed. For each outcome the most influential methodological considerations are highlighted including biological sample collection and quality control, sensitivity and specificity of ascertainment tools, optimal timing for recruitment into the study (e.g., preconception, specific trimesters), the etiologically relevant window for exposure assessments, and important potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS:Outcome-specific criteria are an important part of a systematic review and will facilitate study evaluations by epidemiologists with experience in evaluating studies using systematic review methods who may not have extensive discipline-specific experience in the outcomes being reviewed.

BACKGROUND:Asthma, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression have each been linked to exposure to the September 11, 2001 World Trade Center (WTC) terrorist attacks (9/11). We described the prevalence and patterns of these conditions and associated health-related quality of life (HRQOL) fifteen years after the attacks. METHODS:We studied 36,897 participants in the WTC Health Registry, a cohort of exposed rescue/recovery workers and community members, who completed baseline (2003-2004) and follow-up (2015-16) questionnaires. Lower respiratory symptoms (LRS; cough, dyspnea, or wheeze), gastroesophageal reflux symptoms (GERS) and self-reported clinician-diagnosed asthma and GERD history were obtained from surveys. PTSD was defined as a score > 44 on the PTSD checklist, and depression as a score > 10 on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ). Poor HRQOL was defined as reporting limited usual daily activities for > 14 days during the month preceding the survey. RESULTS:In 2015-16, 47.8% of participants had ≥1 of the conditions studied. Among participants without pre-existing asthma, 15.4% reported asthma diagnosed after 9/11; of these, 76.5% had LRS at follow up. Among those without pre-9/11 GERD, 22.3% reported being diagnosed with GERD after 9/11; 72.2% had GERS at follow-up. The prevalence of PTSD was 14.2%, and of depression was 15.3%. HRQOL declined as the number of comorbidities increased, and was particularly low among participants with mental health conditions. Over one quarter of participants with PTSD or depression reported unmet need for mental health care in the preceding year. CONCLUSIONS:Nearly half of participants reported having developed at least one of the physical or mental health conditions studied by 2015-2016; comorbidity among conditions was common. Poor HRQOL and unmet need for health were frequently reported, particularly among those with post-9/11 PTSD or depression. Comprehensive physical and mental health care are essential for survivors of complex environmental disasters, and continued efforts to connect 9/11-exposed persons to needed resources are critical.