Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE OF REVIEW:This article provides an update on the use of cystoscopy at the time of prolapse and incontinence surgery. RECENT FINDINGS:Iatrogenic lower urinary tract injury is a known complication of antiincontinence procedures and surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Intraoperative cystoscopy improves detection of lower urinary tract injuries in women undergoing pelvic floor surgery. The pelvic surgeon has a number of agents available to aid in the cystoscopic visualization of ureteral efflux. When injuries of the urinary tract are identified and treated intraoperatively, there is decreased morbidity, lower healthcare costs, and a lower risk of litigation than when detection is delayed. Therefore, many organizations, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS), and the American Urological Association (AUA) recommend cystoscopy at the time of pelvic floor surgery. SUMMARY:Cystoscopy should be universally employed at the time of prolapse and incontinence surgery, except in instances of isolated repair of the posterior compartment.

OBJECTIVES:Low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) is a rare cancer with an indolent course. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of adjuvant hormonal suppression (HT) with or without oophorectomy (BSO) in prolonging progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with LG-ESS. METHODS:We performed a multi-institutional retrospective review of patients treated for low grade LG-ESS from 1985 to 2014. Demographics, treatment and recurrence data were abstracted from medical records. Pathologic diagnosis was confirmed by a gynecologic pathologist. Long-term patient-reported outcomes were obtained via mailed survey. RESULTS:One-hundred-twelve patients underwent surgery for LG-ESS; 59 had postoperative data with a median follow-up of 55months (1-325months). The mean age at diagnosis was 48.5years (22-82years). Forty-nine (61%) had stage I disease. The most common presenting symptoms were abnormal uterine bleeding (38%) and pelvic mass (17%). Seventy-one (63%) patients had BSO at the time of diagnosis. Of the 59 patients with postoperative follow-up information, 49 (73%) underwent BSO, 26 (44%) received HT, 20 (33%) were expectantly managed, and 6 (10%) received chemotherapy, radiation or both. Median PFS for the entire group was 53months and OS was 63months. PFS for those who underwent BSO compared with those who retained their ovaries was 38 vs 11months, p=0.071. PFS for HT vs no HT was 28 vs 23months, p=0.77. CONCLUSIONS:Consistent with prior series, our results support BSO to prolong PFS in LG-ESS but are limited by sample size. Larger studies with more complete follow-up are needed to determine the effect of adjuvant hormonal suppression.

BACKGROUND:Ovarian small cell carcinoma is a rare, aggressive neoplasm that occurs in young women and has a poor long-term prognosis. Treatment involves surgical resection and chemotherapy. The required radicality of surgery is uncertain, balancing cytoreduction with fertility preservation. Various chemotherapy regimens are utilized due to confusion regarding the neoplasm's lineage. Case We describe an adolescent with small cell carcinoma, hypercalcemic type, stage IA. Surgery included left salpingo-oopherectomy, left pelvic/paraaortic lymphadenectomy, omentectomy and peritoneal biopsies. She received four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin, similar to high-risk germ cell cancers. She has received no further therapy and is eleven years from diagnosis without evidence of disease. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This is the first long-term juvenile survivor managed with both fertility-sparing surgery and BEP (bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin).

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of endometrial cancer staging procedures performed by a single surgeon utilizing traditional and robotic-assisted laparoscopic techniques. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of minimally invasive endometrial cancer staging performed by a single surgeon. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in operative time, blood loss, surgical complications, or length of hospitalization between laparoscopic (n = 45) and robotic-assisted (n = 77) procedures. On multivariable analysis controlling for surgical chronology, robotic assistance was independently associated with a significantly greater number of lymph nodes (23 vs. 19, p < 0.05; beta 0.163, p < 0.05). When comparing the first chronologic half of robotic-assisted surgeries to the second half, the latter had shorter operative time (208 vs. 246 min, p = 0.01) and a greater number of lymph nodes (27 vs. 19, p = 0.001). Finally, compared to the laparoscopic cases, the second half of robotic-assisted cases had a greater number of total (27 vs. 19, p < 0.001) and pelvic (23 vs. 17, p < 0.001) lymph nodes harvested. CONCLUSION: There was a learning curve associated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic endometrial cancer staging, with decreased operative time and increased lymph node yield over time. In our study population, robotic assistance was independently associated with a greater lymph node harvest with no increase in operative time or perioperative complications.