Faculty Bibliography

Purpose: To explore variation in downstream costs associated with cartilage lesions incidentally detected on radiographs. Materials andMethods: The cohort was composed of 120 patients with incidental, not previously diagnosed, cartilage lesions seen on appendicular plain radiographs. The population was divided into three subgroups based on the interpreting radiologist's description: enchondroma, lowgrade cartilage lesion, and chondrosarcoma. Downstream events (follow-up imaging, office visits, biopsy, tumor resection) associated with the lesions were identified from the electronic medical record. American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria were used to classify radiologists' recommendations. NationalMedicare rates were used to estimate costs of downstream events. Average cost per lesion was stratified, and cost ratios were computed among subgroups.
Result(s): Average downstream cost per lesion was $75.56. Costs were 4.6 times greater in patients under the age of 65 than over. Costs were 13.2 and 13.7 times higher when radiologists characterized lesions as chondrosarcoma versus low-grade cartilage lesion and enchondroma, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in costs between the subgroups when accounting for size and location of lesions. Compared to when follow-up imaging was neither recommended nor obtained, costs rose from $0 to $26.03 per patient when follow-up imaging was recommended and obtained, and $62.21 per patient when followup imaging was obtained despite not being recommended. Costs rose from $0 to $14.83 per patient when radiologists' recommendations for follow-up were adherent to the ACR guidelines for management of incidental bone lesions. Costs were 2.3 times greater when ordering physicians overmanaged compared with radiologists' recommendations. No malignancy was pathologically proven in the cohort.
Conclusion(s): Costs for incidental cartilage lesions vary. Size and location of lesions do not have a significant effect on downstream costs; however, radiologists' characterization and recommendation have an impact. Therefore, it is imperative that radiologists accurately characterize such lesions and recommendations reflect the best value for patient care

OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to describe clinical experience with ultrasound-guided therapeutic procedures and associated pathologic conditions involving the peripheral nerves of the upper extremity over 5 years at a large academic institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:A retrospective database search of procedure codes was performed for all ultrasound-guided upper extremity peripheral nerve procedures between 2012 and 2017. Retrospective review of the electronic medical record for patient demographics, indications, interval follow-up pain relief, and complications was undertaken. Retrospective review of ultrasound and other correlative imaging findings was performed to assess for neural and perineural abnormalities. RESULTS:In total, 242 procedures performed on a cohort of 183 patients (53% women, 47% men; mean age, 53 years; range, 15-97 years) were reviewed. Nine patients underwent multifocal injections in a single encounter, and 39 underwent repeat injections of previously documented symptom generators. Perineural injections included ulnar (n = 109), median (n = 81), posterior interosseous-deep radial (n = 39), sensory branch of the radial (n = 7), anterior interosseous (n = 2), axillary (n = 2), suprascapular (n = 1), and digital (n = 1) nerves. Structural or dynamic abnormality seen either during the procedure or at preprocedural imaging included loss of normal morphologic features (n = 148), nerve subluxation (n = 8), ganglion cyst (n = 4), and neuroma (n = 7). Forty-four patients reported immediate pain relief after the procedure. Of the 89 patients with documented clinical follow-up, 52 reported a period of symptom relief (mean, 125 days), and six reported complete resolution of symptoms. Subsequent surgical procedures were performed on 32 patients, a combination of those who did (n = 12) and did not (n = 20) experience a period of symptom relief from the perineural injection. There were no complications with regard to the site or distribution of perineural injections. Three episodes of vasovagal reaction were reported. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Ultrasound-guided percutaneous interventions for upper extremity neural abnormalities can be safely performed for a variety of indications. Real-time ultra-sound evaluation during the procedure allows assessment for neural and perineural abnormalities and tailoring of the procedure to potentially symptomatic structural abnormalities.

The midtarsal (Chopart) joint complex consists of the talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints and their stabilizing ligaments. Detailed assessment of this complex at MRI can be challenging owing to frequent anatomic variation and the small size of the structures involved. Nevertheless, a wide spectrum of pathologic conditions affect the joint complex, and its imaging evaluation deserves more thorough consideration. This review focuses on MRI evaluation of normal ligamentous anatomy and common variations about the Chopart joint, presenting practical imaging tips and potential diagnostic pitfalls. Imaging findings across a spectrum of traumatic Chopart joint injuries are also reviewed, from midtarsal sprains to Chopart fracture-dislocations. Midtarsal sprains-commonly associated with ankle inversion injuries-are emphasized, along with their often predictable radiographic and MRI injury patterns. Online DICOM image stacks are available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2018.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:F-FDG uptake on whole-body PET-CT with MR findings and compare the degree of FDG activity between symptomatic and asymptomatic knees. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Retrospective database query was performed using codes for knee MRI as well as whole-body PET-CT. Patients with malignant disease involving the knee or hardware were excluded. Patients who had both studies performed within 1 year between 2012 and 2017 were included for analysis. Knee joint osteoarthrosis, meniscal and ligamentous integrity, presence of joint effusion, and synovitis were assessed and recorded. Bone marrow edema lesions (BMELs) were identified, segmented, and analyzed using volumetric analysis. SUVmax was assessed over the suprapatellar joint space, intercondylar notch and Hoffa's fat pad. Symptomatic and asymptomatic knees were compared in patients with unilateral symptoms. RESULTS:Twenty-two cases (20 patients) with mean age 63.3 years (range, 36-91 years) were included. Two patients had bilateral pain. The most FDG avid regions in both symptomatic and asymptomatic knees were the intercondylar notch (SUVmax = 1.84 vs. 1.51), followed by suprapatellar pouch (SUVmax = 1.74 vs. 1.29) and Hoffa's fat pad (SUVmax = 1.01 vs. 0.87). SUVmax was significantly associated with cartilage loss (mean modified Outerbridge score) (r = 0.60, p = 0.003) and degree of synovitis (r = 0.48, p = 0023). Overall, mean SUVmax was significantly higher in the presence of a meniscal tear (1.83 ± 0.67 vs. 1.22 ± 0.40, p = 0.030). Nine patients had BMELs (volume: range = 0.6-27.8, mean = 7.79) however there was no significant association between BMEL volume and SUVmax. CONCLUSIONS:Higher FDG activity correlates with intra-articular derangement and the intercondylar notch represents the most metabolically active region of the knee.

OBJECTIVE:To review the MRI appearance of medial patellofemoral capsuloligamentous plication (also known as reefing or imbrication) for proximal patellar realignment in patients with patellofemoral instability. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Retrospective analysis of our surgical and PACS databases identified cases of medial plication performed between June 2011 and July 2016. Pre- and postoperative MRI characteristics were reviewed. Correlation was made with operative reports and clinical records to define postoperative appearances on MRI. RESULTS:Forty-one patients underwent medial plication during the study period; 29 were excluded owing to a lack of postoperative imaging. Ultimately, 12 knees were included in 11 patients who had postoperative MRI studies available (8 women and 3 men, mean age 27.3 ± 10.2 years). Ten (83%) of the surgeries were performed open and 2 (17%) arthroscopically. There were differences in the post-surgical MRI appearance of medial plications carried out after surgery using the open and arthroscopic techniques. The open technique produces a "heaped up" distal vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) with centralized patellar insertion (100%), which was absent in the case of arthroscopic plication, where subtle medial retinaculum thickening was demonstrated without alteration of its patellar insertion. The mean postoperative lateral patellar and patellofemoral congruence angles measured 2.5° ± 5.6° and 12.4° ± 19.9° respectively. A significant association was found regarding change in patellofemoral alignment (p = 0.018 and p = 0.004 respectively). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The MRI appearance of medial plication is not well described in the radiology literature; radiologists should be familiar with anticipated post-plication findings to avoid potential confusion for pathology and allow more accurate interpretation of postoperative imaging findings from this common surgery.

We describe an easily constructed, customizable phantom for magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion imaging and demonstrate its role as a learning tool to initiate clinical use of this emerging modality. Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion can prove unwieldy to integrate into routine practice. We demonstrate real-time fusion with single-sequence magnetic resonance imaging uploaded to the ultrasound console. Phantom training sessions allow radiologists and sonographers to practice fiducial marker selection and improve efficiency with the fusion hardware and software interfaces. Such a tool is useful when the modality is first introduced to a practice and in settings of sporadic use, in which intermittent training may be useful.

OBJECTIVE:The objective of this article is to review the normal anatomy and posttraumatic findings of the Chopart joint complex. Key imaging features of the normal ligaments and patterns of ligamentous and osseous injuries are discussed. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Traumatic midtarsal injuries, particularly midtarsal sprain, are often overlooked clinically and on imaging but are relatively common and typically are associated with inversion ankle injuries. Radiologists should be familiar with Chopart joint anatomy and the imaging features of midtarsal injuries because early diagnosis may help optimize clinical management.

OBJECTIVE:Injuries at the calcaneocuboid and talonavicular joint have been described as two distinct, unrelated entities in the radiology literature. Our purpose was to assess the coexistence of these injuries using radiography and MRI and to correlate our findings with radiologic and clinical diagnoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Twenty-one patients with injury at the anterior calcaneal process on radiographs or MR images were retrospectively assessed for concomitant injury at the talonavicular joint. Radiologic and clinical diagnoses and treatment were documented. McNemar and kappa statistics were calculated; p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS:Radiographic and MRI rates of detection of injuries across the Chopart joint were statistically different. Calcaneocuboid avulsion fractures were evident on 48% of radiographs and 100% of MR images (p = 0.001). Talonavicular joint injuries were evident on 38% of radiographs and 76% of MR images (p = 0.008). Concomitant injury at both joints was evident on 14% of radiographs and 76% of MR images (p < 0.0001). Interrater agreement was 0.488-0.637 and 0.286-0.364 for talonavicular and 0.144-0.538 and 0.976-1 for calcaneocuboid injuries on radiography and MRI, respectively. Sixty percent of calcaneocuboid fractures were prospectively missed on radiography (none on MRI), whereas 38% and 25% of talonavicular findings were missed on radiography and MRI, respectively. Sixty percent of injuries were clinically misdiagnosed as ankle sprains. Chopart joint injury was never mentioned in prospective clinical or imaging diagnoses. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Calcaneocuboid and talonavicular injuries commonly coexist. Radiographs underestimate severity of injury; MR images show more subtle abnormalities. Lack of mention of Chopart joint injury clinically and on imaging reports underlies the need for greater familiarity with this entity.

Purpose: Assess the impact of MR pelvic and lumbosacral neuorgraphy on ultrasound-guided pelvic perineural injections. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of all ultrasound-guided pelvic perineural injections with prior MR pelvic and/or lumbosacral neurographic imaging over a 5-year period was performed. Demographics, presence of structural pathology on imaging, and immediate and interval pain relief was recorded. Results: 30 total injections were performed among 20 patients accounting for multiple injections in a single visit or multiple visits [mean age at injection: 52.03 (range 23-77), female (n= 24, 80%) male (n=6; 20%)]. In 24 cases a combination of steroid and anesthetic solution was administered. In the remaining 6 cases, only anesthetic solution was administered. Most commonly, injections involved the sciatic nerve (n = 21; 70%). Other injections in our series include pudendal (n=5, 16.7%), genitofemoral (n=2; 6.7%), lateral femoral cutaneous (n=1, 3.3%) and ilioinguinal (n= 1, 3.3%) nerves. Concurrent therapeutic procedures were performed in 10 cases (33%). Pre-procedure MR imaging revealed structural abnormality of the nerve or adjacent soft tissues in 11 of 22 MRIs performed amongst the 20 patients (50%). Pre-procedure ultrasound revealed structural abnormalities associated with the nerve in 9 cases of 19 cases that had complete documentation (47%). Of 26 injections with complete documentation, immediate improvement of symptoms was reported in 22 cases (85%). The remaining 4 cases either began with no pain (n=3), or reported no change in symptoms (n=1). Variable degrees of long-term symptom relief was achieved in 4 injections out of 11 steroid injections for which follow-up was available (37%). Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided perineural injections can be performed for treatment of a variety of pelvic neuropathies. MR imaging prior to sonographic intervention demonstrated an abnormality in nearly half of cases, and is a useful tool to appropriately target perineural injections

Purpose: To present a 4 year clinical experience with ultrasound-guided therapeutic perineural injections of upper extremity peripheral nerves and evaluate utility of ultrasound guidance for diagnosis of intrinsic or perineural pathologies. Materials and Methods: A retrospective keyword PACS search was conducted for upper extremity therapeutic perineural injections (May 2012-January 2017), yielding 342 cases. 175 were excluded because no perineural injection was performed. 5 patients underwent injection of more than one nerve during one visit, yielding 174 perineural injections among 130 patients. Retrospective chart review was undertaken to determine patient demographics, clinical indications, presence of structural pathology, as well as presence of pain relief at interval clinical follow-up. Results: 174 injections among 130 patients were reviewed (mean age=57.75 years [15-97], 68 female (52%), 62 male (48%)). The most commonly injected nerves included the ulnar (n=81, 46%) and median (n=61, 35%) nerves. The least common was the suprascapular nerve (n=1, 0.6%). Ultrasound at the time of injection revealed >1 structural abnormality in 110 (63%) cases. The most common was nerve enlargement (n= 101, 92%), although a variety of structural abnormalities were detected, including prior ulnar nerve transposition (n=7, 4%), epicondylitis (n=4, 2%), thickening at the arcade of Frohse (n=3, 2%), low triceps insertion (n=2), ganglion cyst (n=1, 0.5%), anconeus epithrochlearis (n=1, 0.5%), and post-traumatic neuromas (n=1, 0.5%). Interval clinical follow-up was available for 68 patients, of which 51 (75%) reported symptomatic relief. Complications are relatively rare, occurring in only 1 (0.4%) case. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided perineural injections about the upper extremity can be safely performed and provide lasting symptomatic relief for a variety of clinical indications. Sonographic evaluation at the time of injection allows identification of structural abnormalities that may contribute to neuropathic symptoms and allow more specific targeting, specific therapy, or surgical guidance