Faculty Bibliography

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy may vary substantially in their clinical presentation, including natural history, outcomes to treatment, and patterns. The application of clinical guidelines for irAE management can be challenging for practitioners due to a lack of common or consistently applied terminology. Furthermore, given the growing body of clinical experience and published data on irAEs, there is a greater appreciation for the heterogeneous natural histories, responses to treatment, and patterns of these toxicities, which is not currently reflected in irAE guidelines. Furthermore, there are no prospective trial data to inform the management of the distinct presentations of irAEs. Recognizing a need for uniform terminology for the natural history, response to treatment, and patterns of irAEs, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a consensus panel composed of leading international experts from academic medicine, industry, and regulatory agencies. Using a modified Delphi consensus process, the expert panel developed clinical definitions for irAE terminology used in the literature, encompassing terms related to irAE natural history (ie, re-emergent, chronic active, chronic inactive, delayed/late onset), response to treatment (ie, steroid unresponsive, steroid dependent), and patterns (ie, multisystem irAEs). SITC developed these definitions to support the adoption of a standardized vocabulary for irAEs, which will have implications for the uniform application of irAE clinical practice guidelines and to enable future irAE clinical trials.

Background: The high mortality of cutaneous melanoma (CM) is partly due to unpredictable patterns of disease progression in patients with early-stage lesions. The reliable prediction of advanced disease risk from early-stage CM, is an urgent clinical need, especially given the recent expansion of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy to the adjuvant setting. In our study, we comprehensively investigated the role of germline variants as CM prognostic markers. Methods: We performed a genome-wide association analysis in two independent cohorts of N=551 (discovery), and N=550 (validation) early-stage immunotherapy-naïve melanoma patients. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to identify associations with overall survival in the discovery group, followed by a validation analysis. Transcriptomic profiling and survival analysis were used to elucidate the biological relevance of candidate genes associated with CM progression. Results: We found two independent associations of germline variants with melanoma prognosis. The alternate alleles of these two SNPs were both associated with an increased risk of death [rs60970102 in MELK: HR=3.14 (2.05"“4.81), p=1.48×10^-7; and rs77480547 in SH3BP4: HR=3.02 (2.02"“4.52), p=7.58×10^-8, both in the pooled cohort]. The addition of the combined risk alleles (CRA) of the identified variants into the prognostic model improved the predictive power, as opposed to a model of clinical covariates alone. Conclusions: Our study provides suggestive evidence of novel melanoma germline prognostic markers, implicating two candidate genes: an oncogene MELK and a tumor suppressor SH3BP4, both previously suggested to affect CM progression. Pending further validation, these findings suggest that the genetic factors may improve the prognostic stratification of high-risk early-stage CM patients, and propose putative biological insights for potential therapeutic investigation of these targets to prevent aggressive outcome from early-stage melanoma.

Patients with preexisting autoimmune disease (pAID) are generally excluded from clinical trials for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for cancer due to concern of flaring pAID. In this multi-center, retrospective observational study, we compared safety of ICI combination (two ICI agents) versus monotherapy in cancer patients with pAIDs. The primary outcome was time to AEs (immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and/or pAID flares), with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival as secondary outcomes. Sixty-four of 133 patients (48%) received ICI combination and 69 (52%) monotherapy. Most had melanoma (32%) and lung cancer (31%). Most common pAIDs were rheumatic (28%) and dermatologic (23%). Over a median follow-up of 15 months (95%CI, 11-18 mo), the cumulative incidence of any-grade irAEs was higher for combination compared to monotherapy (subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) 2.27, 95%CI 1.35"“3.82). No statistically significant difference was observed in high-grade irAEs (sHR 2.31 (0.95"“5.66), P =.054) or the cumulative incidence of pAID flares. There was no statistically significant difference for melanoma PFS between combination versus monotherapy (23.2 vs. 17.1mo, P =.53). The combination group was more likely to discontinue or hold ICI, but > 50% of the combination group was still able to continue ICI therapy. No treatment-related deaths occurred. In our cohort with pAIDs, patients had a tolerable toxicity profile with ICI combination therapy. Our results support the use of ICI combination if deemed necessary for cancer therapy in patients with pAIDs, since the ICI toxicities were comparable to monotherapy, able to be effectively managed and mostly did not require ICI interruption.

Cerala is an oral inhibitor of ATR-related protein kinase, a key regulator of the DNA-damage response. Initial data suggest that it biases T cells to an immune-effective phenotype, which may sensitize tumors to immunotherapy (IO). The phase 2 VIKTORY study of cerala + durva showed manageable safety and promising antitumor activity in patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic melanoma after progression on anti-PD- 1 therapy. MONETTE (NCT05061134) is a global, randomized, open-label, phase 2 study assessing the efficacy and safety of cerala+/-durva in pts with unresectable/advanced melanoma and primary or secondary resistance to PD-( L)1 inhibition. Adults with histologically/cytologically confirmed cutaneous, acral or mucosal (not uveal) melanoma and >=1 lesion measurable by RECIST v1.1 are eligible. They must have had >=6 weeks of anti-PD- ( L)1 +/- anti-CTLA- 4, but <=2 metastatic melanoma treatment regimens. Exclusion criteria include symptomatic cardiac disease; or grade >=3 immune-related adverse events (AEs), immune-related neurologic or ocular AEs, or discontinuation of prior IO due to toxicity. An estimated 150 pts will be randomized 2:1 to cerala + durva or cerala alone. In a nonrandomized substudy, ~30 pts will provide biopsy samples at baseline, on-and off-treatment for one cycle of cerala, then switch to cerala + durva. Primary endpoints are objective response rate (ORR) by BICR per RECIST v1.1 in the main study and CD8 + T-cell tumor infiltration in the substudy. Secondary endpoints in the main study include duration of response (DoR), time to response (TTR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), change in tumor size (DELTATS), safety and PK. Substudy secondary endpoints are ORR, DoR, TTR, PFS, OS, DELTATS, safety, proliferation (Ki67) and expression of PD-L1 and pRAD50. Pts will be enrolled in North America, EU and Asia-Pacific

In CM238, 76% of patients (pts) with high-risk resected melanoma (MEL) treated with adjuvant NIVO were alive at 5 years, but there is limited RW data to validate these findings in a similar patient population. This study compared the OS of pts treated with adjuvant NIVO in CM238 vs. RW pts. Pts with stage III resected MEL (AJCC 8th edition) who received adjuvant NIVO were selected from CM238 and the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database (the RW cohort). Pts in the RW cohort were required to meet the eligibility criteria in CM238 where possible. OS/real-world OS (rwOS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using Cox proportional hazards models after adjusting for key prognostic baseline variables (age, sex, race, disease stage, time from surgical resection to index date, ECOG, and comorbidities) between the two cohorts. In the RW cohort, 492 pts with resected stage III MEL received adjuvant NIVO and 320 pts met the eligibility criteria of CM238. Compared with pts in the CM238 cohort, pts in the RW cohort were older (median: 64 vs. 56 years), heavier (91 vs. 82 kg), had a higher proportion of diabetes (9% vs. 6%) and ECOG PS 1 (17% vs. 10%), and had slightly more stage IIIA (4% vs. 1%), less stage IIIB (29% vs. 32%), and similar stage IIIC (63% vs. 63%) and stage IIID (4% vs. 5%). Before adjustment, pts in the RW cohort had a higher risk of mortality compared with pts in the CM238 cohort (HR: 1.46; 95% CI, 1.00 to 2.13; p < 0.05). After adjusting for differences in key patient characteristics, OS was similar between the two cohorts (HR: 1.12; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.84, p = 0.66). In conclusion, pts with stage III resected MEL treated with adjuvant NIVO in the RW setting had OS similar to those in CM238 after adjusting for key prognostic factors

Patients with preexisting autoimmune disease (pAID) are generally excluded from clinical trials for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for cancer due to concern of flaring pAID. In this multi-center, retrospective observational study, we compared safety of ICI combination (two ICI agents) versus monotherapy in cancer patients with pAIDs. The primary outcome was time to AEs (immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and/or pAID flares), with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival as secondary outcomes. Sixty-four of 133 patients (48%) received ICI combination and 69 (52%) monotherapy. Most had melanoma (32%) and lung cancer (31%). Most common pAIDs were rheumatic (28%) and dermatologic (23%). Over a median follow-up of 15 months (95%CI, 11-18 mo), the cumulative incidence of any-grade irAEs was higher for combination compared to monotherapy (subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) 2.27, 95%CI 1.35-3.82). No statistically significant difference was observed in high-grade irAEs (sHR 2.31 (0.95-5.66), P = .054) or the cumulative incidence of pAID flares. There was no statistically significant difference for melanoma PFS between combination versus monotherapy (23.2 vs. 17.1mo, P = .53). The combination group was more likely to discontinue or hold ICI, but > 50% of the combination group was still able to continue ICI therapy. No treatment-related deaths occurred. In our cohort with pAIDs, patients had a tolerable toxicity profile with ICI combination therapy. Our results support the use of ICI combination if deemed necessary for cancer therapy in patients with pAIDs, since the ICI toxicities were comparable to monotherapy, able to be effectively managed and mostly did not require ICI interruption.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Metastatic melanoma is a tumor amenable to immunotherapy in part due to the presence of antigen-specific tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL). These T cells can be activated and expanded for adoptive cell transfer (ACT), which has resulted in relatively high rates of clinical responses. Similarly, immune checkpoint inhibitors, specifically PD-1 blocking antibodies, augment antitumor immunity and increase the influx of T cells into tumors. Thus, we hypothesized that addition of PD-1 inhibition may improve the outcomes for patients undergoing ACT with TIL. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:Stage III/IV metastatic melanoma patients with unresectable disease who were anti-PD-1 treatment-naïve were enrolled. TIL were generated in the presence of anti-4-1BB antibody in vitro and expanded for ACT. Patients in Cohort 1 received TIL infusion followed by nivolumab. Patients in Cohort 2 also received nivolumab prior to surgical harvest and during TIL production. RESULTS:A total of 11 patients were enrolled, all of whom were evaluated for response, and nine completed ACT. Predominantly CD8+ TIL were successfully expanded from all ACT-treated patients and were tumor-reactive in vitro. The trial met its safety endpoint, as there were no protocol-defined dose-limiting toxicity events. The objective response rate was 36% and median progression-free survival was 5 months. Two non-responders who developed new metastatic lesions were analyzed to determine potential mechanisms of therapeutic resistance, which included clonal divergence and intrinsic TIL dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS:Combination therapy with TIL and nivolumab was safe and feasible for metastatic melanoma patients and provides important insights for future therapeutic developments in ACT with TIL.

Tilsotolimod, an oligodeoxynucleotide TLR9 agonist, administered intra-tumorally, has been clinically evaluated. This compound has demonstrated the ability to induce changes within the tumor microenvironment, to convert non-inflamed cold tumors into inflamed hot tumors, with the hope that these tumors will be more responsive to immune checkpoint blockade.

BACKGROUND:Patients with advanced melanoma have limited treatment options after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Lifileucel, a one-time autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy, demonstrated an investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) of 36% in 66 patients who progressed after ICI and targeted therapy. Herein, we report independent review committee (IRC)-assessed outcomes of 153 patients treated with lifileucel in a large multicenter Phase 2 cell therapy trial in melanoma. METHODS:Eligible patients had advanced melanoma that progressed after ICI and targeted therapy, where appropriate. Melanoma lesions were resected (resected tumor diameter ≥1.5 cm) and shipped to a central good manufacturing practice facility for 22-day lifileucel manufacturing. Patients received a non-myeloablative lymphodepletion regimen, a single lifileucel infusion, and up to six doses of high-dose interleukin-2. The primary endpoint was IRC-assessed ORR (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1). RESULTS:The Full Analysis Set consisted of 153 patients treated with lifileucel, including longer-term follow-up on the 66 patients previously reported. Patients had received a median of 3.0 lines of prior therapy (81.7% received both anti-programmed cell death protein 1 and anti-cytotoxic lymphocyte-associated protein 4) and had high disease burden at baseline (median target lesion sum of diameters (SOD): 97.8 mm; lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) >upper limit of normal: 54.2%). ORR was 31.4% (95% CI: 24.1% to 39.4%), with 8 complete responses and 40 partial responses. Median duration of response was not reached at a median study follow-up of 27.6 months, with 41.7% of the responses maintained for ≥18 months. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 13.9 and 4.1 months, respectively. Multivariable analyses adjusted for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status demonstrated that elevated LDH and target lesion SOD >median were independently correlated with ORR (p=0.008); patients with normal LDH and SOD <median had greater likelihood of response than those with either (OR=2.08) or both (OR=4.42) risk factors. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (≥30%) were thrombocytopenia (76.9%), anemia (50.0%), and febrile neutropenia (41.7%). CONCLUSIONS:Investigational lifileucel demonstrated clinically meaningful activity in heavily pretreated patients with advanced melanoma and high tumor burden. Durable responses and a favorable safety profile support the potential benefit of one-time lifileucel TIL cell therapy in patients with limited treatment options in ICI-refractory disease.

BACKGROUND:Adjuvant therapy for high-risk resected melanoma with programmed cell-death 1 blockade results in a median relapse-free survival (RFS) of 5 years. The addition of low dose ipilimumab (IPI) to a regimen of adjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) in CheckMate-915 did not result in increased RFS. A pilot phase II adjuvant study of either standard dose or low dose IPI with NIVO was conducted at two centers to evaluate RFS with correlative biomarker studies. METHODS:Patients with resected stages IIIB/IIIC/IV melanoma received either IPI 3 mg/kg and NIVO 1 mg/kg (cohort 4) or IPI 1 mg/kg and NIVO 3 mg/kg (cohorts 5 and 6) induction therapy every 3 weeks for 12 weeks, followed by maintenance NIVO. In an amalgamated subset of patients across cohorts, peripheral T cells at baseline and on-treatment were assessed by flow cytometry and RNA sequencing for exploratory biomarkers. RESULTS:High rates of grade 3-4 adverse events precluded completion of induction therapy in 50%, 35% and 7% of the patients in cohorts 4, 5 and 6, respectively. At a median of 63.9 months of follow-up, 16/56 patients (29%) relapsed. For all patients, at 5 years, RFS was 71% (95% CI: 60 to 84), and overall survival was 94% (95% CI: 88 to 100). Expansion of CD3+CD4+CD38+CD127-GARP- T cells, an on-treatment increase in CD39 expression in CD8+ T cells, and T-cell expression of phosphorylated signal-transducer-and-activator-of-transcription (STAT)2 and STAT5 were associated with relapse. CONCLUSIONS:Adjuvant IPI/NIVO at the induction doses used resulted in promising relapse-free and overall survival, although with a high rate of grade 3-4 adverse events. Biomarker analyses highlight an association of ectoenzyme-expressing T cells and STAT signaling pathways with relapse, warranting future validation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:NCT01176474 and NCT02970981.