Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Advances in pancreatic cancer surgery involve hepatotoxic chemotherapies and hepatic vasculature resections, increasing the risk of clinically relevant postpancreatectomy liver injury. The study aimed to analyze the incidence and impact of clinically relevant postpancreatectomy liver injury after pancreatectomy with hepatic vessel resection. METHODS:In this single-institutional study, patients undergoing pancreatectomy with resection of hepatic vessels (portal vein/superior mesenteric vein, celiac axis, and hepatic arteries) were analyzed. Arterial lactate, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, international normalized ratio, and Doppler ultrasound-derived resistive index were assessed postoperatively. Postoperative outcomes were assessed through 90 days. Clinically relevant postpancreatectomy liver injury was defined as American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases-defined liver failure and/or need for invasive treatment of liver complications. RESULTS:Among 116 patients (67% portal vein/superior mesenteric vein resection alone, 7% celiac axis/hepatic arteries alone, 26% portal vein/superior mesenteric vein + celiac axis/hepatic artery resection), 15 (13%) developed clinically relevant postpancreatectomy liver injury. Mortality was significantly higher in the clinically relevant postpancreatectomy liver injury group (47% vs 3%; P < .001). The proper hepatic artery resistive index was lower in the clinically relevant postpancreatectomy liver injury group (0.52 vs 0.65; P = .034), whereas the following 48-hour-peak blood tests were significantly higher in this group: Lac, bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase (all P < .01). Combined portal vein/superior mesenteric vein + celiac axis/hepatic arteries and elevated alanine aminotransferase 48-hour peak above 1680 U/L remained significantly associated with the occurrence of clinically relevant postpancreatectomy liver injury in multivariable analyses. Forty percent of clinically relevant postpancreatectomy liver injury occurred in the absence of vascular complications. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Clinically relevant postpancreatectomy liver injury is associated with significant mortality. Low resistive index and markedly elevated biochemical markers within the first 48 hours correlate with clinically relevant postpancreatectomy liver injury and may be used to trigger earlier intervention. Given the associated morbidity and mortality, defining, preventing, and mitigating clinically significant postpancreatectomy liver injury is of the utmost importance.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with extensive peripancreatic vessel involvement is classified as locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). For this group of patients, the current standard of care does not include considering a potentially curative oncologic resection. However, recent advances in multiagent chemotherapy and surgical techniques are challenging this paradigm. Moreover, the current determination of anatomic resectability is vague and unreliable. Here we propose a definition of local resectability, based on pre- and intra-operative assessment. This anatomic definition of resectability assumes careful patient selection based on tumor biology and patient condition. The pre-operative evaluation of vascular anatomy and tumor involvement is conducted using 3D-rendering of pancreas-protocol computed tomography. Identifying a disease-free arterial or venous segment above and below the tumor involvement ("suitable target") is the single critical factor that determines anatomic resectability. Intraoperative isolation of these target vessels confirms the feasibility of vascular reconstruction before resection. This approach, which focuses on identifying target vessels rather than circumferential involvement, offers a more straightforward and clinically relevant method for assessing surgical eligibility in LAPC patients at centers of excellence. In summary, reconstructability-based on surgical expertise and guided by tumor biology-now defines the modern paradigm of resectability in LAPC.

BACKGROUND:Accurate preoperative malignancy risk assessment in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is essential to balance timely intervention for high-grade dysplasia or invasive cancer (HGD/IC) against avoiding unnecessary or premature surgery in low-grade IPMN. This study aimed to externally validate the 2023 International Association of Pancreatology (IAP)/Kyoto guidelines and develop a combined prediction model incorporating routinely collected clinical data and laboratory parameters. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 194 patients who underwent resection for IPMN between 2012 and 2024. We evaluated the predictive performance of the current IAP/Kyoto criteria ("Kyoto model"), developed a clinical model using routinely available laboratory and clinical variables, and integrated both into a combined model. Model performance was assessed using discrimination and calibration metrics, with internal validation via bootstrapping and five-fold cross-validation. RESULTS:The Kyoto model demonstrated modest discrimination (AUC 0.62). The clinical model, incorporating neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), smoking history, blood glucose, CA19-9, and alkaline phosphatase, achieved an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.76. Compared to the Kyoto model, the combined model (AUC 0.77) significantly improved discrimination and calibration (p < 0.001). At a predicted probability threshold of >0.75, the combined model achieved a 90% specificity and 91% positive predictive value for HGD/IC, identifying a high-risk subgroup suitable for surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS:Integrating routinely collected clinical and laboratory parameters with guideline-based imaging features shows promise to enhance preoperative identification of high-risk IPMN in patients already being considered for surgical resection. The combined model offers a practical, high-specificity tool to support surgical decision-making in this selected population, though its performance metrics should not be extrapolated to unselected surveillance cohorts. External validation is required before broader clinical implementation.

BACKGROUND:The 2024 Kyoto guidelines for the management of intraductal mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) build on previous guidelines that consider worrisome features (WF) and high-risk stigmata (HRS) to recommend surveillance or resection. These new guidelines have not yet been validated. METHODS:Patients undergoing pancreatectomy for an IPMN at an academic medical center between 2012 and 2023 were included. IPMNs were categorized as low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), or invasive carcinoma (IC). Preoperative imaging was used to determine HRS and WF in accordance with the 2024 Kyoto guidelines. We compared IPMNs with LGD to those with HGD or IC using univariate analyses and evaluated logistic regression models with c-statistics. RESULTS:Of 211 patients, 84 (40%) had LGD, 49 (23%) had HGD, and 78 (37%) had IC. Among HRS, obstructive jaundice (p = 0.004), pancreatic duct ≥ 10 mm (p < 0.001), and suspicious or positive cytology (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with HGD/IC. An increasing number of HRS were associated with higher rates of HGD/IC. Among WFs, an abrupt change in the caliber of pancreatic duct with distal pancreatic atrophy (p = 0.001) and cystic growth ≥ 2.5 mm/year (p = 0.033) were significantly associated with higher rates of HGD/IC. Increasing numbers of WFs were also associated with higher rates of HGD/IC. The 2024 Kyoto model showed improved discrimination (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.849) compared with the 2017 Fukuoka model (AUC=0.780, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The risk of HGD/IC in IPMNs increased in a stepwise fashion as the number of WFs increased. The 2024 guidelines represent an advancement over the 2017 guidelines, notably with the inclusion of suspicious cytology as an HRS.

BACKGROUND:Pancreatic cancer with early onset is increasing but comparisons with average onset cases have yielded mixed results (EOPC versus AOPC; age <50 versus ≥50). We compared clinicopathologic features, prognosis, and molecular traits of resected EOPC versus AOPC. METHODS:We retrospectively included patients with PDAC resected between 2010 and 2017 from The National Cancer Database (NCDB). Clinicopathologic data were compared across EOPC versus AOPC. Kaplan-Meier curves and cox-regression were used to perform survival analysis. Molecular features were compared using data from the cBioPortal. RESULTS:24,078 patients with resected PDAC were included, of whom 1698 (7.1 %) had EOPC. Poor prognostic factors, including high grade, advanced T-stage, and lymphovascular invasion, were less prevalent in EOPC (All p < 0.05). Patients with EOPC more frequently received neoadjuvant (28 % vs. 22 %; p < 0.001) and adjuvant chemotherapy (68 % vs. 58 %; p < 0.001) and experienced improved OS (median OS 29.5 vs 25.9 months, p = 0.023; 5-year OS: 26.9 % vs 20.8 %). No differences in the presence of key driver mutations were observed between the two groups but some distinct oncogenic mutations were observed in EOPC. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:EOPC and AOPC are clinically similar but some cases of EOPC may harbor divergent molecular changes. These patients may have only marginally improved survival.

BACKGROUND:Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are precursor lesions of pancreatic cancer with highly variable malignant potential. Current understanding of their biology remains incomplete, limiting accurate risk stratification and targeted interventions. OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to characterise the molecular and immune features of IPMN across different dysplasia grades and histological subtypes, with a focus on IPMN-associated invasive carcinoma (IPMN-IC). DESIGN/METHODS:Spatial whole-transcriptome profiling using Digital Spatial Profiling was conducted on 12 patients, capturing the full histological and dysplastic spectrum of IPMN and conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. A total of 117 epithelial, immune and stromal areas of interest were analysed. An expanded cohort of 43 patients with IPMN was used to validate selected key markers. RESULTS:Transcriptomic analysis unveiled stage-specific molecular alterations and identified two distinct subsets of high-grade (HG) IPMN lesions: one resembling indolent lesions (HG) and the other IC (HG+). Key markers associated with divergent biological behaviours were identified, including MUC5AC and TFF1 in indolent lesions, and Claudin-1 in lesions with invasive potential. Immune profiling revealed a trajectory from activation to suppression during IPMN progression. Several characteristic immune checkpoint molecules, including CEACAM1 and CD44, were identified in IPMN-IC. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study provides a spatially resolved molecular map of IPMN progression, delineating key transcriptomic and immune signatures. These findings advance the understanding of IPMN biology and highlight potential biomarkers for risk stratification and therapeutic strategies.

BACKGROUND:Poor outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are associated with delayed diagnosis and early systemic spread of disease. Development of liquid biopsies for screening could help detect low-stage disease in asymptomatic patients. We aimed to evaluate the association between incidental diagnosis on outcomes and assess the potential role of liquid biopsies. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:An institutional registry was used to identify patients undergoing resection for PDAC at between 2010 and 2015. Patients were stratified based on presenting symptoms, and outcomes were analyzed. Preoperatively collected plasma that was available on these patients was analyzed using a multianalyte screening test based on ctDNA and proteins. RESULTS:Seventy-nine (9.6%) of 823 patients were diagnosed incidentally (asymptomatic at diagnosis). Incidental diagnosis was associated with type of surgery, and absence of nodal disease and lymphovascular invasion (all P<0.05). On multivariable analysis incidental diagnosis (HR, 0.561; 95%CI, 0.406-0.775; P<0.001) was independently associated with improved overall survival (OS), while tumor size ≥4cm (HR, 1.617; 95%CI, 1.201-2.176; P=0.002), nodal disease (HR, 1.259; 95%CI, 1.018-1.558; P=0.034), perineural invasion (HR,1.338; 95%CI, 1.030-1.739; P=0.029), and positive margins (HR,1.302; 95%CI, 1.058-1.602; P=0.013) were associated with poorer OS. Asymptomatic patients had a significantly longer OS (median-OS: 38 vs. 19 months (P<0.001). The rate of multianalyte test positivity was 75% (6/8) in asymptomatic patients compared to 73% (59/81) in symptomatic patients (P=0.895). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Approximately 10% of patients with PDAC are diagnosed incidentally. In resected PDAC, incidental diagnosis is independently associated with improved OS. Multianalyte screening tests perform equally well in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. These findings further reinforce the need for development of screening tools that can increase the rate of diagnosis at an asymptomatic stage and improve survival.

Currently, no consensus exists regarding the definition of oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, its necessary diagnostic measures, and potential treatment approaches. To address these knowledge gaps, the OligoPanc project brought together an interdisciplinary group of experts to establish consensus using a modified Delphi process and clinical vignettes. Participants agreed that the number of metastatic lesions and the number of affected organs are key elements in defining oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Specifically, up to three lesions in a single organ, either the liver or the lung, define oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and could be either synchronous or metachronous. Necessary diagnostics include a triple-phase contrast-enhanced CT scan of the chest and abdomen and MRI of the liver with a hepatocyte-specific contrast agent. In unclear cases, [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET CT or MRI can be considered. A multidisciplinary tumour board is essential. Patient-intrinsic factors, including age, do not define oligometastatic disease but should be considered for any treatment decision. Systemic treatment before any local consolidative treatment, including surgery, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, or other locally ablative techniques, is mandatory. The proposed definition should be incorporated into future trials to improve comparability and enable validation.