Faculty Bibliography

Acetabular rim fractures can accompany patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Frequently, the acetabular rim fracture is excised. However, if the osseous fragment of the acetabular rim fracture is large enough to result in instability, then the acetabular rim fracture should be reduced and secured with internal fixation. The purpose of this technical note was to describe the arthroscopic technique of internal fixation of an acetabular rim fracture.

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has emerged as a common cause of hip pain, especially in young patients. While the exact cause of FAI is unknown, it is thought to result from repetitive microtrauma to the proximal femoral epiphysis leading to abnormal biomechanics. Patients typically present with groin pain that is exacerbated by hip flexion and internal rotation. Diagnosis of FAI is made through careful consideration of patient presentation as well as physical exam and diagnostic imaging. Use of radiographs can help diagnose both cam and pincer lesions, while the use of MRI can diagnose labral tears and cartilage damage associated with FAI. Both non-operative and surgical options have their role in the treatment of FAI and its associated labral tears; however, hip arthroscopy has had successful outcomes when compared with physical therapy alone. Unfortunately, chondral lesions associated with FAI have had poorer outcomes with a higher conversion rate to arthroplasty. Capsular closure following hip arthroscopy has shown superior clinical outcomes and therefore should be performed if possible. More recently, primary labral reconstruction has emerged in the literature as a good option for irreparable labral tears. While non-operative management may have its role in treating patients with FAI, hip arthroscopy has developed a successful track record in being able to treat cam and pincer lesions, chondral damage, and labral injuries.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the association between postoperative cam lesion measured by the "femoroacetabular impingement resection (FAIR) arc" and 2-year patient outcomes following hip arthroscopy. METHODS:A retrospective review of prospectively gathered data from 2013-2017 was performed. All patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI with ≥ 2-year follow-up were included. Cam FAIR arc measurements were made pre and postoperatively on a 45° Dunn view radiograph. The clinical effect of postoperative cam maximal radial distance (MRD) was assessed using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS). Patients were divided into subgroups based on relationship to the mean and standard deviations for cam MRD. One half standard deviation above the mean was found to be 3.15 mm. RESULTS:=0.004). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients in the cam MRD < 3.15 mm group had significantly higher mHHS (89.7 vs 70.0 p<0.001) and NAHS scores (90.5 vs 72.9, p<0.001) than those in the >3.15 mm group. Additionally, more patients in the <3.15 mm group reached the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (95.2% vs 78.9%, p=0.048) and were above patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) (95.2% vs 52.6%, p<0.001) compared to the >3.15 mm group. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients with a lower postoperative cam MRD relative to the FAIR arc demonstrated significantly improved outcomes as compared to those with higher postoperative MRD at two-year follow-up.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To determine if early PRO improvements in the 6 months after surgery are predictive of achieving a patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) at 2 years. METHODS:A prospectively collected database was retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria included patients ≥ 18 years of age, Tonnis grade 0 or 1 changes, radiographic imaging consistent with FAI or labral pathology, a primary diagnosis of symptomatic FAI for which they underwent primary hip arthroscopy and had baseline, 6 month and 2 year modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) scores. Revision cases were excluded. ROC curve analysis was conducted to determine if 6month changes in mHHS was a predictor for achieving PASS at 2 years. RESULTS:There were 173 patients (mean age: 39.8, 61.8% females) included within the study. Patients who do not achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), defined as a change of 8 points in mHHS, by 6 months (n = 21) tended to have significantly lower mHHS scores at 1 year and 2 years compared to those that did (n = 152). Only 52% of patients that did not achieve MCID by 6 months achieved MCID by 2 years (vs. 98% for those that did) and only 24% achieved PASS by 2 years (vs. 88% that did). Using the MCID as a cutoff for improvement in mHHS at 6 months results in a 96% sensitivity but 47% specificity for predicting PASS achievement at 2 years. Using 24 points of improvement in mHHS as a cutoff at 6 months improves sensitivity and specificity to 81% and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Early improvement in mHHS scores are associated with 2 year outcomes. Patients who do not achieve MCID within 6 months of surgery have a high rate of not achieving PASS at 2 years.

Purpose/UNASSIGNED:The purpose of this study was to systematically review the evidence in the literature to ascertain whether acetabular labral repair (ALR) or debridement (ALD) resulted in superior patient outcomes. Methods/UNASSIGNED:value <.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results/UNASSIGNED:There were 8 studies included (level of evidence [LOE] I = 1; LOE II = 2; LOE III = 5). The 7 studies compared 364 patients (369 hips) with ALR to 318 patients (329 hips) with ALD, with a mean follow-up time ranging between 32-120 months. Five studies found significantly improved patient reported outcomes with ALR (Harris Hip Score, Merle d'Aubigné, Pain, SF-12). Several studies compared the outcomes after ALR and ALD and found statistical significance in all investigated metrics in favor of ALR. One study found a significant improvement in abduction but no other study found any difference in range of motion. No study found any difference in complication rate, revision rate or conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Although, 2 studies found ALR reduced the rate of osteoarthritic progression. Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:Current literature suggests that acetabular labral repair may result in superior patient reported outcomes. However, there appears to be no significant difference in the rate of progression to total hip arthroplasty at up to 10-year follow-up. Level of Evidence/UNASSIGNED:Level III, systematic review of Level I, II, and III studies.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common pathology in athletes that often requires operative management in the form of hip arthroscopy. PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:To systematically review the rates and level of return to play (RTP) and the criteria used for RTP after hip arthroscopy for FAI in athletes. STUDY DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A systematic review of the literature, based on the PRISMA guidelines, was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Studies reporting outcomes after the use of hip arthroscopy for FAI were included. Outcomes analyzed were RTP rate, RTP level, and criteria used for RTP. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Our review found 130 studies, which included 14,069 patients (14,517 hips) and had a mean methodological quality of evidence (MQOE) of 40.4 (range, 5-67). The majority of patients were female (53.7%), the mean patient age was 30.4 years (range, 15-47 years), and the mean follow-up was 29.7 months (range, 6-75 months). A total of 81 studies reported RTP rates, with an overall RTP rate of 85.4% over a mean period of 6.6 months. Additionally, 49 studies reported the rate of RTP at preinjury level as 72.6%. Specific RTP criteria were reported in 97 studies (77.2%), with time being the most commonly reported item, which was reported in 80 studies (69.2%). A total of 45 studies (57.9%) advised RTP at 3 to 6 months after hip arthroscopy. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:The overall rate of reported RTP was high after hip arthroscopy for FAI. However, more than one-fourth of athletes who returned to sports did not return at their preinjury level. Development of validated rehabilitation criteria for safe return to sports after hip arthroscopy for FAI could potentially improve clinical outcomes while also increasing rates of RTP at preinjury levels.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic effect of lumbar spinal stenosis on clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI). METHODS:Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy between September 2009 to December 2015 for FAI with concomitant lumbar spinal stenosis (central/neuroforaminal) and a 2-year follow-up were identified (hip-spine). A 1:1 case-matching query using pre-operative modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) within 3 points, body mass index (BMI) within 3 points, age within 5 years, and gender identified a control cohort without spinal pathology. Follow-up patient reported outcomes and clinical failure rates to revision procedure were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS:, P=0.61; baseline mHHS: 44.27±2.82, P=0.98). ANOVA analysis demonstrated that all PROs improved from baseline to 2-year outcomes (P<0.001). The hip-spine versus control had lower 1-year (mHHS: 65.97±5.64 versus 85.04±3.09, P=0.006; nonarthritic hip score (NAHS): 70.26±5.71 versus 87.89±2.65, P=0.010) and 2-year (mHHS: 69.72±4.92 versus 84.71±2.56, P=0.007; NAHS: 72.23±5.18 versus 87.14±2.23, P=0.008) outcomes. While there was no difference in Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS) and Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) rates at 1-year follow-up, the hip-spine group demonstrated lower PASS (42% versus 81%, P =0.004) and MCID (58% versus 88%, P=0.027) rates at 2 years. Although susceptible to type II error, there was no difference in clinical failure rates to revision procedure (P=0.13). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:While net PROs from baseline improve after hip arthroscopy for FAI, the presence of concomitant lumbar spinal stenosis negatively affects post-operative PROs. FAI patients with spinal stenosis should be counseled accordingly. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:III, case-control study.

Symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement is one of the most common hip pathologies in young athletes. Intraoperative fluoroscopy is commonly used during hip arthroscopy to aid with portal placement and resection of the cam and pincer lesions. However, there are currently no universally agreed-on tools to allow for the assessment of adequacy of femoral and acetabular osteoplasty. Despite the general lack of consensus among hip arthroscopists, the senior author recommends using the femoroacetabular impingement resection arc to guide the adequacy of cam and pincer resection in hip arthroscopy. Using intraoperative fluoroscopy, one should aim to create a continuous "Shenton's line"-type arc along the inferior aspect of the anterior-inferior iliac spine and superolateral femoral neck base by resecting any bone that causes a break in the continuity of this arc.

Purpose/UNASSIGNED:To explore the relationship between generalized joint hypermobility and hip labrum width. Methods/UNASSIGNED:and Fisher exact testing as well as linear regression. Results/UNASSIGNED: = .004). Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Patients with a BTS ≥4 were found to have significantly thinner labra than those with a BTS of <4. Level of Evidence/UNASSIGNED:III, retrospective comparative trial.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of the study is to determine if patients with coexisting lumbar back pain experience back pain improvement after undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). METHODS:An IRB approved retrospective chart review compared patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI with lumbar spine back pain to patients solely reporting hip pain. The modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS) and Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) were recorded preoperatively and at 1-year follow up . The Oswestry disability score, which quantifies disability from lower back pain, and visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded from the Hip-Spine (HS) cohort alone. Statistical analysis was performed using paired sample t-tests with p≤ 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS:Sixty-eight patients who underwent hip arthroscopy between November 2016 and October 2018 were enrolled. Thirty-four patients with a mean age of 48.2 ± 14.0 years and BMI of 26.6 ± 6.6 had a history of back pain and 34 patients were age- and sex-matched for the Matched-Control (MC) cohort. The MC cohort had lower MHHS and NAHS scores preoperatively. The MC cohort reported a larger increase in the MHHS (p= 0.01) and NAHS scores (p= 0.01) postoperatively. More patients in the MC cohort reached MCID with MMHS (p=0.003) and NAHS (p=0.06). Following surgery, the HS cohort reported a lower Oswestry Disability score, indicating minimal disability (p= 0.01). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Surgical intervention for FAI can lead to improvements in hip and back pain in patients with co-existing lumbar pathology.