Faculty Bibliography

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) stands as a vital medical imaging technique, renowned for its ability to offer high-resolution images of the human body with remarkable soft-tissue contrast. This enables healthcare professionals to gain valuable insights into various aspects of the human body, including morphology, structural integrity, and physiological processes. Quantitative imaging provides compositional measurements of the human body, but, currently, either it takes a long scan time or is limited to low spatial resolutions. Undersampled k-space data acquisitions have significantly helped to reduce MRI scan time, while compressed sensing (CS) and deep learning (DL) reconstructions have mitigated the associated undersampling artifacts. Alternatively, magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) provides an efficient and versatile framework to acquire and quantify multiple tissue properties simultaneously from a single fast MRI scan. The MRF framework involves four key aspects: (1) pulse sequence design; (2) rapid (undersampled) data acquisition; (3) encoding of tissue properties in MR signal evolutions or fingerprints; and (4) simultaneous recovery of multiple quantitative spatial maps. This paper provides an extensive literature review of the MRF framework, addressing the trends associated with these four key aspects. There are specific challenges in MRF for all ranges of magnetic field strengths and all body parts, which can present opportunities for further investigation. We aim to review the best practices in each key aspect of MRF, as well as for different applications, such as cardiac, brain, and musculoskeletal imaging, among others. A comprehensive review of these applications will enable us to assess future trends and their implications for the translation of MRF into these biomedical imaging applications.

PURPOSE:mapping. METHODS:mapping and evaluate their performance in model agarose phantoms (n = 4) and healthy volunteers (n = 5) for knee joint imaging. We also tested the optimization with sequence parameters targeting faster acquisitions. RESULTS:Our results show that optimized variable flip angle can improve the accuracy and the precision of the sequences, seen as a reduction of the mean of normalized absolute difference from about 5%-6% to 3%-4% in model phantoms and from 15%-16% to 11%-13% in the knee joint, and improving SNR from about 12-28 to 22-32 in agarose phantoms and about 7-14 to 13-17 in healthy volunteers. The optimization can also compensate for the loss in quality caused by making the sequence faster. This results in sequence configurations that acquire more data per unit of time with SNR and mean of normalized absolute difference measurements close to its slower versions. CONCLUSION:mapping of the knee joint.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a widely occurring degenerative joint disease that is severely debilitating and causes significant socioeconomic burdens to society. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred imaging modality for the morphological evaluation of cartilage due to its excellent soft tissue contrast and high spatial resolution. However, its utilization typically involves subjective qualitative assessment of cartilage. Compositional MRI, which refers to the quantitative characterization of cartilage using a variety of MRI methods, can provide important information regarding underlying compositional and ultrastructural changes that occur during early OA. Cartilage compositional MRI could serve as early imaging biomarkers for the objective evaluation of cartilage and help drive diagnostics, disease characterization, and response to novel therapies. This review will summarize current and ongoing state-of-the-art cartilage compositional MRI techniques and highlight emerging methods for cartilage compositional MRI including MR fingerprinting, compressed sensing, multiexponential relaxometry, improved and robust radio-frequency pulse sequences, and deep learning-based acquisition, reconstruction, and segmentation. The review will also briefly discuss the current challenges and future directions for adopting these emerging cartilage compositional MRI techniques for use in clinical practice and translational OA research studies. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

BACKGROUND:Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) techniques have been recently described for simultaneous multiparameter cartilage mapping of the knee although investigation of their ability to detect early cartilage degeneration remains limited. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:relaxation times measured using a three-dimensional (3D) MRF sequence in healthy volunteers. STUDY TYPE/METHODS:Prospective. SUBJECTS/METHODS:The study group consisted of 24 healthy asymptomatic human volunteers (15 males with mean age 34.9 ± 14.4 years and 9 females with mean age 44.5 ± 13.1 years). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE/UNASSIGNED:maps of knee cartilage. ASSESSMENT/RESULTS:relaxation times of the knee were measured. STATISTICAL TESTS/METHODS:relaxation times. The value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: = 0.54-0.66). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:relaxation times simultaneously measured using a 3D-MRF sequence in healthy volunteers showed age-dependent changes in knee cartilage, primarily within the medial compartment.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:MRI. METHODS:maps using PD-SP and VD-SP and their optimized sampling patterns (PD-OSP and VD-OSP) were compared to the fully sampled reference using normalized root mean square error (NRMSE). RESULTS:mapping, the VD-OSP with low rank reconstruction for AFs <10 and VD-OSP with spatiotemporal finite differences for AFs >10 perform better. CONCLUSIONS:mapping for brain imaging applications.

Two optimization criteria based on Cramér-Rao Bounds are compared between each other and with non-optimized schedules for T_1ρ mapping using synthetic data, model phantoms, and in-vivo knee cartilage. The curve fitting is done on complex-valued data using an iterative Nonlinear Least Squares (NLS) approach. The optimization criteria are compared based on the Mean Normalized Absolute Error (MNAE) and variance of the estimated parameters. The optimized spin-lock time (TSL) schedules provided improved results over the non-optimized schedules for all cases that were tested. The simulations showed that optimized schedules can reach the same precision and reduce acquisition times by 16.5 min (42%) for the bi-exponential model, and 6.6 min (22%) for the stretched-exponential model. In the model phantoms experiments, the bi-exponential MNAE was reduced from 0.47 to 0.36, while stretched-exponential from 0.28 to 0.20 with a Modified Cramér-Rao Lower Bound (MCRLB). In-vivo knee cartilage experiments show a reduction in bi-exponential MNAE from 0.47 to 0.31, and stretched-exponential from 0.047 to 0.039. The optimized spin-lock times criteria reduced the error in all cases, being more significant in the synthetic data and model phantoms. The optimized TSL schedules can be either used to improve the quality of parameter maps or reduce scan time.

Quantitative MRI can detect early biochemical changes in cartilage; however, the conventional techniques only measure one parameter (e.g., T₁ , T₂ , and T_1ρ ) at a time while also being comparatively slow. We implemented a 3D magnetic resonance fingerprinting (3D-MRF) technique for simultaneous, volumetric mapping of T₁ , T₂ , and T_1ρ in knee articular cartilage in under 9 min. It is evaluated on 11 healthy volunteers (mean age: 53 ± 9 years), five mild knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients (Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) score: 2, mean age: 60 ± 4 years), and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)/International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) system phantom. Proton density image, and T₁ , T_2, T_1ρ relaxation times, and B₁ ⁺ were estimated in the NIST/ISMRM system phantom as well as in the human knee medial and lateral femur, medial and lateral tibia, and patellar cartilage. The repeatability and reproducibility of the proposed technique were assessed in the phantom using analysis of the Bland-Altman plots. The intrasubject repeatability was assessed with the coefficient of variation (CV) and root mean square CV (rmsCV). The Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess the difference between healthy subjects and mild knee OA patients. The Bland-Altman plots in the NIST/ISMRM phantom demonstrated an average difference of 0.001% ± 015%, 1.2% ± 7.1%, and 0.47% ± 3% between two scans from the same 3-T scanner (repeatability), and 0.002% ± 015%, 0.62% ± 10.5%, and 0.97% ± 14% between the scans acquired on two different 3-T scanners (reproducibility) for T₁ , T₂ , and T_1ρ , respectively. The in vivo knee study showed excellent repeatability with rmsCV less than 1%, 2%, and 1% for T₁ , T₂ , and T_1ρ , respectively. T_1ρ relaxation time in the mild knee OA patients was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in healthy subjects. The proposed 3D-MRF sequence is fast, reproducible, robust to B₁ ⁺ inhomogeneity, and can simultaneously measure the T₁ , T₂ , T_1ρ , and B₁ ⁺ volumetric maps of the knee joint in a single scan within a clinically feasible scan time.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:) mapping. METHODS:fitting methods for MSF approaches. RESULTS:All optimized criteria were better than non-optimized ones. However, we observe that a modified CRLB and an MSF based on the mean of the normalized absolute error (MNAE) were more robust optimization approaches, performing well in all tested cases. The optimized TSLs obtained the best performance with synthetic data (3.5-8.0% error), model phantoms (1.5-2.8% error), and healthy volunteers (7.7-21.1% error), showing stable and improved quality results, comparing to non-optimized approaches (4.2-13.3% error on synthetic data, 2.1-6.2% error on model phantoms, 9.8-27.8% error on healthy volunteers). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:mapping. All optimized criteria allowed good results even using rapid scans with two TSLs when a complex-valued fitting is done with iterative NLS or ANN.

This work proposes an alternating learning approach to learn the sampling pattern (SP) and the parameters of variational networks (VN) in accelerated parallel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We investigate four variations of the learning approach, that alternates between improving the SP, using bias-accelerated subset selection, and improving parameters of the VN, using ADAM. The variations include the use of monotone or non-monotone alternating steps and systematic reduction of learning rates. The algorithms learn an effective pair to be used in future scans, including an SP that captures fewer k-space samples in which the generated undersampling artifacts are removed by the VN reconstruction. The quality of the VNs and SPs obtained by the proposed approaches is compared against different methods, including other kinds of joint learning methods and state-of-art reconstructions, on two different datasets at various acceleration factors (AF). We observed improvements visually and in three different figures of merit commonly used in deep learning (RMSE, SSIM, and HFEN) on AFs from 2 to 20 with brain and knee joint datasets when compared to the other approaches. The improvements ranged from 1% to 62% over the next best approach tested with VNs. The proposed approach has shown stable performance, obtaining similar learned SPs under different initial training conditions. We observe that the improvement is not only due to the learned sampling density, it is also due to the learned position of samples in k-space. The proposed approach was able to learn effective pairs of SPs and reconstruction VNs, improving 3D Cartesian accelerated parallel MRI applications.

Quantitative MRI can detect early biochemical changes in cartilage, but its bilateral use in clinical routines is challenging. The aim of this prospective study was to demonstrate the feasibility of magnetic resonance fingerprinting for bilateral simultaneous T₁ , T₂ , and T_1ρ mapping of the hip joint. The study population consisted of six healthy volunteers with no known trauma or pain in the hip. Monoexponential T₁ , T₂ , and T_1ρ relaxation components were assessed in femoral lateral, superolateral, and superomedial, and inferior, as well as acetabular, superolateral, and superomedial subregions in left and right hip cartilage. Aligned ranked nonparametric factorial analysis was used to assess the side's impact on the subregions. Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare subregions, and coefficient of variation to assess repeatability. Global averages of T₁ (676.0 ± 45.4 and 687.6 ± 44.5 ms), T₂ (22.5 ± 2.6 and 22.1 ± 2.5 ms), and T_1ρ (38.2 ± 5.5 and 38.2 ± 5.5 ms) were measured in the left and right hip, and articular cartilage, respectively. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed a significant difference between different subregions' relaxation times regardless of the hip side (p < 0.001 for T₁ , p = 0.012 for T₂ , and p < 0.001 for T_1ρ ). The Wilcoxon test showed that T₁ of femoral layers was significantly (p < 0.003) higher than that for acetabular cartilage. The experiments showed excellent repeatability with CV_rms of 1%, 2%, and 4% for T₁ , T₂ , and T_1ρ, respectively. It was concluded that bilateral T₁ , T₂ , and T_1ρ relaxation times, as well as B₁ ⁺ maps, can be acquired simultaneously from hip joints using the proposed MRF sequence.