Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Some pulse oximeters perform worse in people with darker skin, and this may be due to inadequate diversity of skin pigment in device development study cohorts. Guidance is needed to accurately and equitably characterize skin pigment to ensure diversity in research cohorts. We tested multiple methods for characterizing skin pigment to assess comparability and impact on cohort diversity. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Assess reliability and comparability of common skin pigment measurement methods Compare findings from different anatomical sites Demonstrate that pigment cannot be assumed from US National Institutes for Health (NIH) race categories. METHODS:We used three subjective methods (perceived Fitzpatrick pFP, Monk Skin Tone MST and Von Luschan VL) and two objective methods (Konica Minolta CM-700d spectrophotometer and Delfin Skin Color Catch DSCC colorimeter) for individual typology angle (ITA), across multiple measurement sites in adults. We calculated ΔE to estimate operator perceptibility thresholds for subjective methods and to determine reproducibility for objective methods. We used each method to categorize participants as 'light, medium, or dark' and compared the impact of method selection on cohort diversity. RESULTS:We studied 789 participants, with 33,856 assessments. The MST had the widest luminosity range, and VL had the least discernible adjacent categories. With 'dark' defined as ITA <-30°, 14% of participants were categorized 'dark' as compared to 26% by pFP or 16% by MST. Approximately half of the 'dark' cohort had an ITA <-50°. With an ITA threshold <-50°, only 7% of the cohort was categorized as 'dark.' When 'Black or African American' self-identification was used to define 'dark', 23% of the cohort was categorized as such. Each self-assigned NIH race category included a wide range of ITA and subjective scale categories. Both ITA and L* from the KM-700d and DSCC demonstrated strong correlation (⍴ > 0.7). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Common methods for skin pigment characterization, especially the use of race or subjective scales, have significant limitations. When applied to the same cohort, different methods yield significantly different results, and some may overestimate diversity. Previously published ITA thresholds for defining 'dark' skin are too light and lead to underrepresentation of people with darker skin.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Accurate localization of the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) within the dentatorubrothalamic tract (DRTT) is critical for effective neurosurgical treatment of essential tremor (ET). This study evaluated the feasibility and anatomical specificity of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) for direct VIM/DRTT visualization, comparing it with conventional diffusion tractography-based reconstructions. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Twenty-seven participants (10 healthy controls, 17 ET patients) were enrolled across two institutions and imaged on 3T MRI systems. QSM-defined VIM/DRTT regions were manually segmented based on characteristic hypointense susceptibility contrast. Whole-brain diffusion tractography was performed to reconstruct the DRTT, pyramidal tract (PT), and medial lemniscus (ML) tracts. Spatial overlap between QSM-and tractography-defined VIM/DRTT regions was calculated, as well as overlap with neighboring PT and ML tracts to assess specificity. RESULTS:Two participants were excluded due to insufficient VIM/DRTT streamlines in tractography reconstruction. In healthy controls, QSM-and tractography-defined VIM/DRTT showed high spatial correspondence (left: 87.6 ± 5.1%; right: 85.3 ± 6.5%). ET patients exhibited slightly lower overlap (mean range: 71.5 - 85.1%). Overlap with neighboring PT and ML tracts was minimal (<3.3%), confirming high anatomical specificity of QSM-derived VIM/DRTT regions. CONCLUSIONS:QSM enables direct visualization of the VIM/DRTT with high spatial agreement to conventional tractography-based approaches while demonstrating minimal overlap with adjacent tracts. These findings support QSM as a complementary or standalone imaging modality for improved, patient-specific neurosurgical targeting in ET. ABBREVIATIONS/BACKGROUND:DBS = deep brain stimulation; DRTT = dentatorubrothalamic tract; ET = essential tremor; ML = medial lemniscus; MRgFUS = MR-guided focused ultrasound; VIM = ventral intermediate nucleus; PT = pyramidal tract; QSM = quantitative susceptibility mapping; WM = white matter.

OBJECTIVE:The CDC recommends initiating opioids for pain treatment at the lowest effective dose and duration. We examine how interactions between dose, duration, and other medication factors (e.g., drug type) influence opioid use disorder (OUD) risk-a gap not considered by CDC guidelines. SUBJECTS/METHODS:Using Medicaid claims data (2016-2019) from 25 states, we analyzed opioid-naïve adults, newly diagnosed with musculoskeletal pain who initiated opioids within three months of diagnosis. A 6-month washout confirmed no prior opioid exposure or musculoskeletal diagnosis. METHODS:Initial opioids were categorized by "dose-days supplied" (low [>0-20 mg MME] to very high [>90 mg MME] dose, and short [1-7 days] to moderate [>7-30 days] supply), and by opioid type; physical therapy (PT) sessions were also recorded. Using Poisson regression models, we estimated the OUD risk associated with dose-days categories, adjusting for baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and medications. We separately examined opioid dose-days and PT, and assessed PT's moderating effect on dose-days' impact. RESULTS:Among 30,536 patients, half initiated opioids at 20-50 MME for 1-7 days, and 20% received PT. OUD risk was 2-3 times higher for opioids initiated for >7-30 days compared to 1-7 days across doses, and 5.5 times higher for opioids initiated for >7-30 days at > 90 MME versus 1-7 days at < 20 MME. PT alone, neither affected OUD risk nor mitigated the increased risk from longer or higher-dose opioids. CONCLUSIONS:Our findings support the need for careful opioid prescribing and alternative pain management strategies, as the observed associations between initial prescription characteristics and OUD were not mitigated by adjunctive PT. PERSPECTIVE/CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrated that initial opioid prescriptions of 7-30 days, especially above 90 MME/day, increased OUD risk in opioid-naïve patients with musculoskeletal pain; physical therapy did not mitigate the risk. Different opioids posed varied risks, even at the same dose and duration. Careful prescribing and alternative pain management are essential.

AIM/OBJECTIVE:Postoperative delirium (POD) is a frequent neurological complication following surgery, often leading to poor prognoses. The red blood cell distribution width (RDW) to albumin ratio (RAR), an emerging indicator of inflammation and nutrition, was extensively utilized for prognostic evaluation of neurological disorders in elderly patients. However, the relationship between RAR and POD was not evaluated. This study aimed to investigate the independent risk factors for POD and assess the predictive value of preoperative RAR among elderly patients who had gastrointestinal tumors. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective analysis to collect perioperative data on 203 patients aged 65 years or older undergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery from November 2023 to August 2024. The risk factors for POD were detected through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to make their clinical characteristics balanced. RESULTS:Out of 203 patients, 30 (14.8%) experienced POD, with a median age of 70 (range 67-76). Hypertension, creatinine, MCH, and RAR were determined as independent risk factors for POD through multivariate logistic regression analysis. In the post-PSM cohort, RAR was still verified as a factor influencing POD. CONCLUSIONS:Hypertension, creatinine, MCH, and RAR were recognized as independent risk factors for postoperative delirium in patients following gastrointestinal tumor surgery. Particularly, the preoperative RAR served as a more efficient index for predicting POD. TRIAL REGISTRATION/BACKGROUND:Chinese Clinical Trial Center: ChiCTR2400094315.

Cardiovascular collapse and arrest in the periprocedural setting and intensive care unit differ from arrests in other contexts (such as out-of-hospital or hospital ward) because clinicians almost always witness the event, and the most likely precipitating cause may be known. In comparison to other settings, the response can be timelier and more focused on treating the underlying cause(s). Since many patients deteriorate over minutes to hours, clinicians can evaluate the patient expeditiously, generate a diagnosis, and initiate appropriate treatment more rapidly than in other arrest circumstances. This iteration of Perioperative Resuscitation and Life Support (PeRLS) employs Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology to review the most recent evidence on preventing and managing cardiac arrest during the perioperative period. Furthermore, many of the recommendations and algorithms may also be applicable to areas outside the operating room, such as the intensive care unit and emergency room.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Chinese Americans are one of the fastest growing racial and ethnic groups and represent the largest subgroup of the Asian American population in the US and in New York City (NYC) where they number 573,528 in 2021. Despite their numbers, current pain perceptions, expectations, and attitudes of Chinese Americans remains poorly understood, especially as related to postoperative pain. OBJECTIVE:A better understanding of pain experience among Chinese American patients is needed to inform strategies on improving pain management satisfaction. METHODS:A total of 27 Chinese American postoperative patients from a NYC health system were recruited for face-to-face surveys and interviews with a trained bilingual and bicultural Community Health Worker. Questions from the Survey on Disparities in Quality of Healthcare and Kleinman's Explanatory Model of Illness were integrated into the survey and topic guide. Topics of discussion included satisfaction with healthcare and pain management during hospital stay and health beliefs and practices. RESULTS:More than half of participants experienced language challenges that made it difficult to communicate with healthcare staff. In general, high levels of satisfaction with pain management were reported; however, participants reported feeling less comfortable asking healthcare teams questions. Common themes across interviews included: (1) pain was an expected outcome of the procedure and was thus perceived as tolerable; (2) the wish to not be a burden to others; (3) concerns about side effects of pain medications; and (4) a cultural and language mismatch between healthcare teams and patients on words being used to elicit pain and discomfort. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our project findings can inform pain management strategies and tools to serve the Chinese American patient population.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Chronic pain is associated with sleep disturbances, with >70% of patients reporting clinically significant insomnia. Although dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) is an established therapy for focal neuropathic pain, its impact on sleep has not been well characterized. This study evaluated changes in patient-reported insomnia after DRGS and examined associations among sleep, pain, and functional outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed patients from a prospective DRGS registry treated between 2018 and 2025. Patients with baseline Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) scores ≥8 and ≥one follow-up were included. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity (numerical rating scale, NRS), disability (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI), and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D). Spearman's rank correlation was used to assess relationships between ISI changes and other outcome measures. RESULTS:Overall, 92 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 26.8 months. At final follow-up (range 3-60 months), mean (SD) ISI improved from 20.5 to 9.8 (-10.8 ± 9.9; -52.5%), ODI from 63.9 to 30.4 (-33.5 ± 17.7; -52.5%), NRS from 9.0 to 4.2 (-4.9 ± 2.1; -53.9%), and EQ-5D from 0.34 to 0.74 (+0.40 ± 0.21; +116.1%). The proportion of patients with moderate or severe insomnia decreased from 79% to 14%, with 59% (n = 54) reporting no clinically significant insomnia. ISI improvement correlated most with reductions in disability (ρ = 0.39; p < 0.0001) and only weakly with pain reduction (ρ = 0.19; p = 0.070). CONCLUSIONS:DRGS was associated with substantial and sustained improvements in sleep among patients with chronic pain with baseline insomnia. Robust improvements were observed in ODI, EQ-5, visual analog scale, and ISI that were maintained over time. Our findings suggest that sleep-related benefits are more closely tied to functional improvement than to pain relief, supporting a broader therapeutic role for DRGS.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE:Only a minority of renal oncocytic tumors are aggressive. These tumors' behavior is difficult to predict by histopathological evaluation; consequently, many patients experience anxiety upon diagnosis and may undergo unnecessary treatment. Our aim was to derive genomic and epigenomic signatures to distinguish clinically indolent renal oncocytic tumors from aggressive chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC). METHODS:We performed molecular profiling of nephrectomies from 68 patients: 44 with indolent renal oncocytic tumors (19 renal oncocytoma, two oncocytic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential, and 23 indolent ChRCC) and 24 with aggressive ChRCC. We performed targeted exome sequencing, gene expression profiling, and whole-genome methylation sequencing of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. We also analyzed The Cancer Genome Atlas Kidney Chromophobe data from 66 ChRCC patients in silico. Genomic and epigenomic signatures linked to aggressive ChRCC-obtained from sampling morphologically nonsarcomatoid foci-from both cohorts were derived using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS/UNASSIGNED:Aggressive ChRCC was distinguished from indolent ChRCC and other indolent renal oncocytic tumors using a focused seven- to 11-gene expression signature (ten-fold cross-validation [CV] area under the curve [AUC] = 0.77-0.85) with an external validation AUC of 0.88, and an eight-CpG methylation signature (ten-fold CV AUC = 0.86) with an external validation AUC of 0.91. TP53 and PTEN mutations substantially increased the probability of aggressive ChRCC. Limitations include the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Focused genomic and epigenomic signatures from routinely processed FFPE tumor tissues can help distinguish aggressive ChRCC from indolent renal oncocytic tumors, including indolent ChRCC. This forms the basis for replication studies to inform appropriate patient management, provide reassurance, and guide follow-up.