Faculty Bibliography

Patients with chronic or end stage kidney disease often require multiple medications as part of their treatment regimen. The role of nephrology nurses in medication administration is to follow the five rights of medication administration, ensure all medication-related education is completed, and provide patient safety that enhances the delivery of quality care. By adding a medication and barcode scanning process in our outpatient dialysis units, we are demonstrating a solid commitment to accuracy and engagement in patient safety processes. Just as there is a need in the hospital for safety parameters for medication administration, medication safety strategies need to be implemented in outpatient settings. This approach helps minimize the risk of medication errors and adverse medication errors caused by polypharmacy and drug interactions.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To test whether AI-generated, clinician-edited after-visit summaries (AVS) are more patient-friendly than clinician-generated AVS, without compromising safety, when implemented in a live inpatient setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS/UNASSIGNED:grade reading levels, and presence of a "simplified" description of both the diagnosis and treatment/interventions. Our composite outcome was positive if all 3 of these outcomes were positive. We also surveyed patients, nurses, and clinicians on perceptions of safety, empathy, and understandability. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:grade than the control group (8.5 vs 10.6, P <.001). The AI-generated, clinician-edited AVS were also more likely to contain simplified explanations of diagnoses (96.7% vs 12.9%, P <.001) and hospital interventions (86.7% vs 12.9%, P <.001). Our composite outcome favored AI-generated, clinician-edited summaries (13.3% vs 6.5%, p = 0.637). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:In this small, randomized trial, exploratory and component measures suggest improved patient-friendliness in AI-generated, clinician-edited AVS, although no significant difference was observed in the primary outcome. CLINICALTRIALSGOV NUMBER/UNASSIGNED:NCT06711458.

The purpose of this review is to evaluate orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) in patients with prior/pre-transplant malignancy (PTM).

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Rare renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes present unique challenges for clinical trial design and drug development. This consensus initiative aimed to provide actionable expert guidance on advancing preclinical and clinical development of rational therapeutic strategies for non-clear cell RCC variants, including papillary, chromophobe, MiT family/translocation, collecting duct, renal medullary carcinoma, and fumarate hydratase-deficient RCC. METHODS:A modified Delphi method was employed to develop consensus statements among a multidisciplinary panel of 46 experts in urologic oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, molecular biology, genetics, and biostatistics, with representatives from pharmaceutical industry, regulatory affairs, and patient advocacy. Over multiple rounds, including an in-person meeting on November 13, 2025, 20 initial statements were proposed, evaluated, refined, and voted on. Consensus was defined a priori as a median Likert score ≥8 out of 10. RESULTS:Twenty final consensus statements were endorsed across 5 thematic domains: (1) Trial Design and Endpoints; (2) Perioperative Trials; (3) Operations and Accrual; (4) Biology-driven and Histology/molecular Strategy Trials; and (5) Preclinical Efforts, Target Identification, and Early Signal Testing. Key recommendations include prioritizing histology-specific trial designs over pooled "non-clear cell" approaches, adopting innovative single-arm and adaptive designs for ultra-rare subtypes, leveraging patient advocacy collaborations and natural history registries, and pursuing mechanism-informed therapeutic development. CONCLUSIONS:These recommendations provide a framework to guide researchers, cooperative groups, regulatory bodies, and pharmaceutical industry partners in advancing evidence generation and therapeutic development for patients with rare kidney cancer variants.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:late-onset CRC (LOCRC). METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) (2016-2020), we identified hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of CRC. Patients were categorized from a hospital-based classification of EOCRC (<50 years) or LOCRC (≥50 years). Multivariate logistic regression assessed associations between body mass index (BMI), demographics, and outcomes including inpatient mortality, length of stay (LOS), and chemotherapy use. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Among 246,231 CRC hospitalizations, 13.7% (n=33,662) were EOCRC. Compared to LOCRC, EOCRC patients were more likely to be female [odds ratio (OR): 1.09], Black (OR: 1.17), Hispanic (OR: 1.56), or Asian (OR: 1.29), and more often covered by Medicaid, private insurance, or have no coverage. EOCRC patients had higher rates of tobacco use disorder (OR: 1.26) and depression (OR: 1.13), but lower prevalence of diabetes, coronary artery disease (CAD), and alcohol use disorder. EOCRC hospitalizations had lower inpatient mortality (OR: 0.649). Inpatient chemotherapy was more common in EOCRC (OR: 1.78). Obesity was positively associated with EOCRC for BMI 30-39 (OR: 1.07) and BMI ≥40 (OR: 1.50), while LOCRC showed inverse associations for the same BMI groups. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:EOCRC is associated with unique demographic and clinical profiles when compared to LOCRC, highlighting disparities by race, insurance status, and comorbidities. The higher rate of inpatient chemotherapy use in EOCRC warrants further study to evaluate its clinical necessity and outcomes. These findings reinforce the need for targeted screening and inpatient care strategies for younger and underserved patient populations.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW/OBJECTIVE:To describe the relationship between reflux and bronchiectasis and to appraise recent literature on reflux characterization, clinical outcomes, and management strategies in patients with bronchiectasis. RECENT FINDINGS/RESULTS:Reflux is common in bronchiectasis and has been linked to worse respiratory symptoms and quality of life, more exacerbations and healthcare use, lower lung function, and higher mortality. These associations are seen across several cohorts, but nearly all data are observational, use variable reflux definitions, and cannot determine whether reflux contributes to bronchiectasis progression or simply identifies patients with more severe disease. Proposed pathways include microaspiration-related airway injury, reflex-mediated cough amplification, and microbial dysbiosis. No randomized bronchiectasis-specific trial has shown improved respiratory outcomes with reflux-directed therapy, and acid suppression alone is unlikely to address nonacid reflux, microaspiration, cough-reflex pathways, or airway dysbiosis. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS:In bronchiectasis, reflux should be separated into clinically relevant phenotypes, including typical gastroesophageal reflux disease, proximal or nonacid reflux, laryngopharyngeal symptoms, dysphagia, and aspiration. Management should be guided by the suspected reflux or aspiration pattern because acid suppression alone may not address airway-relevant reflux. Future studies should pair objective reflux and swallowing measures with bronchiectasis-specific outcomes.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Recent federal funding cuts have created pauses in admissions, hiring, and execution of research studies at academic medical centers internationally. These monetary reductions have also impacted allowances for non-essential faculty travel. As a result, faculty may now be faced with challenges in how they obtain professional development. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A cross-sectional, exploratory study was implemented to discover the impact of funding cuts on faculty travel for professional development opportunities, as well as strategies medical educators are using to mitigate the current landscape. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Findings indicate that faculty now must use alternative methods to obtain professional development and that institutional guidance is lacking in how to do so. DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:Authors provide concrete action steps for faculty to take amidst this challenge to remain engaged in professional development.

Penicillin allergy labels are common and clinically consequential. Approximately 10% of patients report a penicillin allergy, yet most are not truly allergic and can safely receive beta-lactams. In the inpatient setting, these labels drive use of broader-spectrum agents, contributing to increased healthcare-associated infections, antimicrobial resistance, longer hospital stays, and higher costs. Recent evidence supports delabeling as a key antimicrobial stewardship strategy. The PEN-FAST clinical decision rule enables identification of low-risk patients suitable for streamlined evaluation. The PALACE randomized trial demonstrated that, among low-risk adults, direct oral penicillin challenge is noninferior to traditional skin testing and associated with very low rates of adverse reactions. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on epidemiology, mechanisms, risk stratification, and delabeling strategies, and provides practical recommendations for integrating penicillin allergy delabeling into routine clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Chronic hepatitis C can complicate the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD), especially among racial and ethnic minority patients. This study explores racial and ethnic differences in the prevalence of hepatitis C and inpatient mortality among patients admitted to the hospital primarily for a CAD event in the USA. METHODS:An observational analysis was conducted using data from the 2016 to 2021 National Inpatient Sample, including 1,946,182 CAD patients, of whom 7426 (0.38%) had chronic hepatitis C. We performed weighted logistic regressions to analyze the relationship between race and ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and other races) regarding the prevalence of hepatitis C and inpatient mortality, adjusting for patient sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities. RESULTS:Non-Hispanic Black patients had the highest prevalence of hepatitis C (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-1.67) and Hispanic patients with underlying hepatitis C had the highest in-hospital mortality (aOR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.11-2.20) compared to non-Hispanic White patients and other racial groups. CONCLUSIONS:We found significant racial and ethnic differences in the prevalence of hepatitis C and mortality among patients with underlying chronic hepatitis C admitted primarily for CAD events in the USA. This disparity may exist due to lower rates of hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, higher severity and prevalence of underlying health conditions, poorer healthcare access and insurance coverage, and a higher rate of alcohol use and cirrhosis progression in minority populations.