Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The association between pre-existing psychiatric disorders (PD) and gastric cancer outcomes has not been thoroughly investigated. This study evaluated whether PD, particularly serious pre-existing psychiatric disorders (SPD), is associated with differences in gastric cancer stage at diagnosis, overall mortality, and cancer-specific mortality. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective cohort study using SEER-Medicare data (2000-2017) to identify patients aged ≥ 68 years diagnosed with gastric cancer. PD was defined as a Medicare claim for depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder, psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia occurring 6-36 months before cancer diagnosis. SPD included claims for psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or major depressive disorder (MDD). Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess stage at diagnosis. Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models were used to assess overall and cancer-specific mortality, respectively. RESULTS:Among 15,882 patients, 1883 (12%) had PD. Patients with PD differed significantly from those with no pre-existing psychiatric disorders (NPD) in terms of demographics, comorbidities, and cancer characteristics. Compared with NPD patients, those with PD were more likely to be diagnosed with early (in situ/local) stage cancer yet had higher overall mortality (aHR: 1.17, 95% CI [1.11, 1.23]) and cancer-specific mortality (aSHR: 1.13, 95% CI [1.07, 1.21]). Patients with SPD also had higher risks of overall (aHR: 1.33, 95% CI [1.22, 1.45]) and cancer-specific mortality (aSHR: 1.25, 95% CI [1.14, 1.38]). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our findings highlight critical differences in gastric cancer outcomes among patients with PD and SPD. Despite being more likely to be diagnosed with early-stage cancer, these patients experienced worse survival.

Anthracyclines are cornerstone chemotherapeutic agents for several cancers but carry a substantial risk of cardiotoxicity. Multiple cardioprotective drugs have been investigated to prevent cardiac dysfunction in patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy. This study evaluated and ranked the cardioprotective effects of these agents using network meta-analysis. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to September 22, 2024 identified randomized clinical trials and cohort studies assessing cardioprotective agents in cancer patients treated with anthracyclines. Interventions included angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, statins, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and metformin. The primary outcome was change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Secondary outcomes were left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD), heart failure (HF), HF hospitalization, and all-cause mortality. Thirty-five studies were included, comprising 31 randomized controlled trials and 4 retrospective studies. Overall, cardioprotective therapy significantly improved LVEF, reduced CTRCD, all-cause mortality, HF incidence, and LVEDD, but had no significant effect on HF hospitalization. Subgroup and network meta-analyses showed that ACEIs plus beta-blockers, beta-blockers alone, statins, and ACEIs significantly improved LVEF versus controls, with ACEIs ranking highest. For CTRCD prevention, statins and beta-blockers significantly reduced risk, whereas ACEIs plus beta-blockers had the most favorable ranking. For mortality, the available retrospective SGLT2 inhibitor studies suggested an association with lower risk; however, because no randomized anthracycline-specific SGLT2 inhibitor trials were available and follow-up duration differed from the RCT evidence for other agents, this finding should be considered hypothesis-generating rather than definitive comparative evidence. ACEIs, beta-blockers, and statins appear effective for preserving cardiac function during anthracycline therapy. Treatment rankings, particularly for outcomes supported by sparse or observational evidence, should be interpreted cautiously, and further randomized trials are needed, particularly to evaluate SGLT2 inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To evaluate whether specialty pharmacy use reduces delays from biologic prescription to insurance approval and administration in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients prescribed asthma biologics in the Bronx, New York. Cohorts were defined by time period: before specialty pharmacy implementation (2017-2020) and after (2020-2023). Primary outcomes were time from prescription to insurance approval and administration. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests compared groups, and multivariable regression models adjusted for covariates. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = .057). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Specialty pharmacy implementation significantly accelerated approval and showed a trend toward faster treatment initiation. Delays in administration persisted despite adjustment for patient-level factors, underscoring the role of other barriers. Larger, multi-center studies are warranted.

Patients with chronic or end stage kidney disease often require multiple medications as part of their treatment regimen. The role of nephrology nurses in medication administration is to follow the five rights of medication administration, ensure all medication-related education is completed, and provide patient safety that enhances the delivery of quality care. By adding a medication and barcode scanning process in our outpatient dialysis units, we are demonstrating a solid commitment to accuracy and engagement in patient safety processes. Just as there is a need in the hospital for safety parameters for medication administration, medication safety strategies need to be implemented in outpatient settings. This approach helps minimize the risk of medication errors and adverse medication errors caused by polypharmacy and drug interactions.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To test whether AI-generated, clinician-edited after-visit summaries (AVS) are more patient-friendly than clinician-generated AVS, without compromising safety, when implemented in a live inpatient setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS/UNASSIGNED:grade reading levels, and presence of a "simplified" description of both the diagnosis and treatment/interventions. Our composite outcome was positive if all 3 of these outcomes were positive. We also surveyed patients, nurses, and clinicians on perceptions of safety, empathy, and understandability. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:grade than the control group (8.5 vs 10.6, P <.001). The AI-generated, clinician-edited AVS were also more likely to contain simplified explanations of diagnoses (96.7% vs 12.9%, P <.001) and hospital interventions (86.7% vs 12.9%, P <.001). Our composite outcome favored AI-generated, clinician-edited summaries (13.3% vs 6.5%, p = 0.637). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:In this small, randomized trial, exploratory and component measures suggest improved patient-friendliness in AI-generated, clinician-edited AVS, although no significant difference was observed in the primary outcome. CLINICALTRIALSGOV NUMBER/UNASSIGNED:NCT06711458.

As hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is now curable, HCV-positive donor organs have expanded the deceased donor pool. Using OPTN data, we identified adult kidney, liver, heart, and lung candidates listed between 2016-2025 and evaluated rates of consent to accept HCV antibody-positive (Ab+) and HCV viremic (NAT+) organs. Temporal trends were described, and multilevel modified Poisson regression with center-level random effects was used to estimate adjusted risk ratios for candidate factors and quantify center variation using median incidence rate ratios (MIRR). Rates of consent to accept both HCV Ab+ and NAT+ organs rose over time. By the end of follow-up, consent rates for HCV Ab+ organs were 63.1% for kidney, 80.6% for liver, 73.3% for heart, and 72.1% for lung candidates, and consent rates for NAT+ organs were 44.9%, 70.7%, 50.5%, and 46.1%, respectively. Associations between candidate characteristics and consent were small after adjustment for center, whereas center effects were large. For HCV Ab+ organs, MIRRs were 6.31 (kidney), 2.48 (liver), 2.90 (heart), and 4.36 (lung); for NAT+ organs, MIRRs were even higher, 9.65, 3.19, 4.00, and 7.30, respectively, indicating marked between-center variability. Our analyses suggest that access to HCV-positive organs is influenced more by center practices than patient characteristics.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:late-onset CRC (LOCRC). METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) (2016-2020), we identified hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of CRC. Patients were categorized from a hospital-based classification of EOCRC (<50 years) or LOCRC (≥50 years). Multivariate logistic regression assessed associations between body mass index (BMI), demographics, and outcomes including inpatient mortality, length of stay (LOS), and chemotherapy use. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Among 246,231 CRC hospitalizations, 13.7% (n=33,662) were EOCRC. Compared to LOCRC, EOCRC patients were more likely to be female [odds ratio (OR): 1.09], Black (OR: 1.17), Hispanic (OR: 1.56), or Asian (OR: 1.29), and more often covered by Medicaid, private insurance, or have no coverage. EOCRC patients had higher rates of tobacco use disorder (OR: 1.26) and depression (OR: 1.13), but lower prevalence of diabetes, coronary artery disease (CAD), and alcohol use disorder. EOCRC hospitalizations had lower inpatient mortality (OR: 0.649). Inpatient chemotherapy was more common in EOCRC (OR: 1.78). Obesity was positively associated with EOCRC for BMI 30-39 (OR: 1.07) and BMI ≥40 (OR: 1.50), while LOCRC showed inverse associations for the same BMI groups. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:EOCRC is associated with unique demographic and clinical profiles when compared to LOCRC, highlighting disparities by race, insurance status, and comorbidities. The higher rate of inpatient chemotherapy use in EOCRC warrants further study to evaluate its clinical necessity and outcomes. These findings reinforce the need for targeted screening and inpatient care strategies for younger and underserved patient populations.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Chronic hepatitis C can complicate the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD), especially among racial and ethnic minority patients. This study explores racial and ethnic differences in the prevalence of hepatitis C and inpatient mortality among patients admitted to the hospital primarily for a CAD event in the USA. METHODS:An observational analysis was conducted using data from the 2016 to 2021 National Inpatient Sample, including 1,946,182 CAD patients, of whom 7426 (0.38%) had chronic hepatitis C. We performed weighted logistic regressions to analyze the relationship between race and ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and other races) regarding the prevalence of hepatitis C and inpatient mortality, adjusting for patient sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities. RESULTS:Non-Hispanic Black patients had the highest prevalence of hepatitis C (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-1.67) and Hispanic patients with underlying hepatitis C had the highest in-hospital mortality (aOR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.11-2.20) compared to non-Hispanic White patients and other racial groups. CONCLUSIONS:We found significant racial and ethnic differences in the prevalence of hepatitis C and mortality among patients with underlying chronic hepatitis C admitted primarily for CAD events in the USA. This disparity may exist due to lower rates of hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, higher severity and prevalence of underlying health conditions, poorer healthcare access and insurance coverage, and a higher rate of alcohol use and cirrhosis progression in minority populations.