Faculty Bibliography

The FDA has issued several warnings about the dangers of Seldane, which are well known, over the last few years, but has not acted to take the drug off the market. Monday the agency said that it was now proposing to withdraw approval of Seldane, Seldane D and generic versions of the drugs because several newer and safer antihistamines were available

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the susceptibility to levofloxacin of clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) obtained from patients with HIV-related tuberculosis and to characterize the molecular genetics of levofloxacin resistance. DESIGN AND METHODS: Isolates from culture-positive patients in a United States multicenter trial of HIV-related TB were tested for susceptibility to levofloxacin by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determinations in Bactec 7H12 broth. Automated sequencing of the resistance determining region of gyrA was performed. RESULTS: Of the 135 baseline MTB isolates tested, 134 (99%; 95% exact binomial confidence interval, 95.9-99.9%) were susceptible to levofloxacin with an MIC < or = 1.0 microg/ml. We identified a previously unrecognized mis-sense mutation occurring at codon 88 of gyrA in a levofloxacin mono-resistant MTB isolate obtained from a patient with AIDS who had received ofloxacin for 8 months prior to the diagnosis of tuberculosis. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical MTB isolates from HIV-infected patients were generally susceptible to levofloxacin. However, the identification of a clinical isolate with mono-resistance to levofloxacin highlights the need for circumspection in the use of fluoroquinolones in the setting of potential HIV-related tuberculosis and for monitoring of rates of resistance of MTB isolates to fluoroquinolones

Large-cell change of hepatocytes (LCC), also called liver cell dysplasia of large-cell type, is a set of cytologic changes comprising nuclear and cytoplasmic enlargement, nuclear pleomorphism, and multinucleation. This entity is encountered frequently on histologic or cytologic examination of specimens obtained from livers with a variety of chronic diseases and originally was thought to have a premalignant nature. Accumulating evidence, however, now suggests that LCC is merely a reactive change. Having often observed LCC in liver specimens with chronic biliary tract disease, that is, in livers where cholestasis preceded hepatocyte injury, we surmised that LCC may be a result of prolonged cholestasis. To determine whether there was any association between LCC and cholestasis, we examined microscopically a series of 400 nodules from 40 consecutive adult cirrhotic livers, resected on transplantation, and graded LCC and cholestasis semiquantitatively. LCC was present diffusely in cirrhotic nodules of 25 specimens (62.5%). Nine additional specimens (22.5%) had focal mild LCC. Usually, LCC and cholestasis occurred together, in the same cirrhotic nodules and in the same areas of nodules. There was a statistically significant association between the presence and grade of LCC and those of cholestasis (p < 0.0001; chi-square test). Within etiological categories of cirrhosis (chronic hepatitis; n = 28; alcoholic liver disease; n = 6; biliary disease: n = 6), the significance was maintained. We conclude that, in cirrhosis of different etiologies, LCC may represent a reactive change that results from prolonged cytoplasmic cholestasis

Twenty-six patients with Grade III acromioclavicular joint separations were evaluated to determine the outcomes of nonoperative and operative management. Evaluation consisted of a detailed functional questionnaire, physical examination, and comprehensive isokinetic strength assessment. The patients were divided into two groups: operative (n = 16) and nonoperative (n = 10). Operative management consisted of coracoclavicular stabilization with heavy suture material and with nine of the sixteen patients treatment also consisted of coracoacromial ligament transfer and lateral clavicle resection. Nonoperative management consisted of short-term immobilization with early range of motion and rehabilitation. The two groups were similar in all characteristics except mean age: 30.7 years for the operative group and 49.6 years for the nonoperative group. Follow-up evaluation was performed an average of 32.9 months after either injury (nonoperative group) or surgery. Our results indicated that nonoperative management was superior to operative management with respect to time to return to work (0.8 months vs. 2.6 months), time to return to athletics (3.5 months vs. 6.4 months) and time of immobilization (2.7 weeks vs. 6.2 weeks). However, operative management was superior to nonoperative management in the following parameters: time to attain completely pain-free status, the patient's subjective impression of pain, range of motion, functional limitations, cosmesis, and long-term satisfaction. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to shoulder range of motion, manual muscle testing, or neurovascular findings. Isokinetic strength testing of the involved shoulder, expressed as a percentage of the uninvolved shoulder, showed no significant differences in peak torque, total work, or total power between the operative and nonoperative groups. However, comparison of the involved to the uninvolved extremity within each group did reveal a trend toward decreased peak torque, work, and power for abduction in the involved extremity regardless of the treatment used. These findings reached statistical significance only for power at the slower testing speed (60 degrees/sec). There was also a significant decrease in power in the involved extremity for external rotation at the faster speed (120 degrees/sec) in the nonoperative group. Finally, the absolute values for peak torque, work, and power were significantly greater for all motions tested in the operative group as compared to the nonoperative group. This may reflect the difference in age between the two groups. Based upon the patients studied, there are benefits to both nonoperative and operative methods of treatment of Grade III acromioclavicular separations. Recovery of strength did not differ between the two groups and therefore should be viewed as a less important factor in patient selection for operative versus nonoperative management. Careful patient selection should remain an important aspect of treatment for this controversial injury