Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used to treat advanced cancer. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with an increased risk of malignancies; however, patients with RA have been excluded from ICI trials. In this study, we evaluated risk of toxicity after initiation of ICI treatment in RA patients. METHODS:We conducted a single-institution, medical records review analysis to assess the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and autoimmune disease (AID) flares among patients with AIDs treated with ICIs from 2011 to 2018. A subgroup analysis for RA patients was performed with frequencies of irAEs and AID flares reported. RESULTS:Twenty-two patients with RA who were treated with ICI for malignancy were identified. At the time of ICI initiation, 86% had inactive RA disease activity. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 7 (32%) of patients, with 2 (9%) developing grade 3 (i.e., severe) irAEs. Immune checkpoint inhibitors were temporarily discontinued because of irAEs in 5 patients (23%), and permanently in 1 patient. Rheumatoid arthritis flares occurred in 12 patients (55%). Of those, 10 (83%) received oral corticosteroids with an adequate treatment response. CONCLUSIONS:Our analysis suggests that irAEs following ICI treatment are not increased among RA patients compared with other cancer patients. Heightened RA disease activity during ICI treatment is common, but most adverse events are manageable with oral corticosteroids, and few require permanent ICI discontinuation. A close collaboration between the oncologist and rheumatologist is advisable when considering ICIs in patients with RA.

Introduction: A transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) carries a 2% risk of postoperative upper gastrointestinal bleeding. It presents as extensive bleeding resulting in hemorrhagic shock or respiratory failure. In this case, an early clot with sentinel bleeding prevented the widening of a full thickness aortoesophageal fistula formed from the TAVR placement, was symptomatic enough to prompt an earlier esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and prevented a probable fatality. Case Description/Methods: An 85-year-old male with a past medical history of AAA repair, GERD, HLD, TIA, aortic dissection s/p coronary bypass graft, AS with TAVR 5 months prior presented with hematemesis after initiating colonoscopy bowel prep. He also had unintentional 30-lb weight loss over 3 months, fecal incontinence, and melena. Medications include a daily aspirin. Abdominal CT demonstrated an 8cm aortic arch aneurysm, a 5cm descending thoracic aortic aneurysm, and a 5.8 x 4 cm collection posterolateral to the aorta with proximal dilation of the esophagus. EGD demonstrated a partially obstructing protruding mass in the esophagus 20 cm from the incisors with sentinel bleeding from an adherent clot. The mass was determined to be extrinsic compression from the aortic arch aneurysm with the TAVR seen through the aortoesophageal fistula (Image 1A-1B). The stomach and duodenum were unremarkable. Patient was transferred to vascular surgery where a 1cm compressed Amplatzer Vascular Plug II embolization and reinforcement of the endoleak was done. Patient remained hemodynamically stable and discharged home with a vascular follow up.
Discussion(s): Aorto-esophageal fistula following TAVR is a rare complication with a wide etiology ranging from infections, antithrombotic use, pressure necrosis, angiodysplasia, underlying PUD, or uncontrolled comorbidities such as HTN. Our patient's risk factors were his elderly age, comorbidities, use of daily aspirin, and contribution from the pressure or ischemic necrosis of the aortic aneurysm compressing on the esophagus. Presentation involves hemoptysis, chest pain, hemorrhagic shock, respiratory failure and frank bleeding. CTA is considered the initial test of diagnosis as endoscopy, though sensitive, could rupture the clot and unleash massive bleeding. In this case, sentinel bleeding and visualization of the TAVR through the fistula was enough to diagnose and retreat to be treated appropriately with embolization and reinforcement

Introduction: The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a common educational strategy to assess interpersonal skills and knowledge gaps, and we have previously shown its benefits in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) education. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been explosive growth in telehealth. Currently, we lack methods to teach and evaluate trainees' related skillset and no telehealth-specific milestones exist. We assessed the telehealth proficiency of gastroenterology (GI) fellows as part of an annual IBD OSCE over Zoom (Z-OSCE).
Method(s): Seven GI fellows from four programs participated in Z-OSCE featuring four clinical scenarios. We used previously validated OSCE checklists to assess the fellows' performance in IBDspecific cases. Telehealth communication skills were also assessed. One of the scenarios required the trainees to conduct a televisit focusing on preventative care for a Crohn's disease patient based on the ACG guideline. Checklists were scored on a 3-point Likert scale by the Standardized Patient (SP).
Result(s): The telehealth behavioral anchored checklist items included: maintaining proper computer etiquette, use of non-verbal communication and positioning to optimize the encounter, optimized technical aspects, and exhibiting comfort and confidence with the virtual platform. In these domains 5 or 6 (out of 7) fellows received 3 points. In contrast less than half of the fellows asked questions of the SP to make sure they understood or acknowledged emotion, and 3 out 7 fellows did not make appropriate eye contact. Despite high performance in the telehealth aspects of the encounter, the SP did not fully recommend fellows for their communication skills without reservations to friends/ family, with all fellows receiving 2 points.
Conclusion(s): Telehealth has quickly become a fixture of our profession, and merits educational opportunities and assessment to improve clinicians' competency, as it will likely outlast the COVID- 19 pandemic. To our knowledge, this is the first OSCE designed to assess telehealth performance in the delivery of IBD care. Z-OSCEs can play a unique role in simulating realistic telehealth visits and this pilot program helps us identify future educational needs. Assessment of fellows' performance during this virtual program can provide an opportunity for learning, growth and reflection as well as prepare trainees for future patient encounters

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Racial/ethnic minorities experience greater job loss than whites during periods of economic downturn and after a cancer diagnosis. Therefore, race/ethnicity-matched controls are needed to distinguish the impact of illness on job loss from secular trends METHODS: Surveys were administered during and 4-month post-completion of breast cancer treatment. Patients were pre-diagnosis employed women aged 18-64, undergoing treatment for stage I-III breast cancers, who spoke English, Chinese, Korean, or Spanish. Each patient was asked to: (1) nominate peers who were surveyed in a corresponding timeframe (active controls), (2) report a friend's work status at baseline and follow-up (passive controls). Both types of controls were healthy, employed at baseline, and shared the nominating patient's race/ethnicity, language, and age. The primary outcome was number of evaluable patient-control pairs by type of control. A patient-control pair was evaluable if work status at follow-up was reported for both individuals. RESULTS:Of the 180 patients, 25% had evaluable active controls (45 patient-control pairs); 84% had evaluable passive controls (151 patient-control pairs). Although patients with controls differed from those without controls under each strategy, there was no difference in the percentage of controls who were working at follow-up (96% of active controls; 91% of passive controls). However, only 65% of patients were working at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS:The majority of patients had evaluable passive controls. There was no significant difference in outcome between controls ascertained through either method IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Passive controls are a low-cost, higher-yield option to control for secular trends in racially/ethnically diverse samples.

Introduction: Children and adolescents with pre-existing type 1 diabetes (T1D) diagnosed with COVID-19 are at risk of adverse outcomes such as hospitalizations and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). There is limited data on the association between the presence of one or more comorbidities and the risk of adverse outcomes for patients with preexisting T1D and COVID19.
Objective(s): This study's aim is to determine if pediatric and adolescent patients with T1D and other pre-existing comorbidities were more likely to experience adverse outcomes than T1D patients with COVID-19 who did not have any other comorbidities.
Method(s): Data from 592 patients with previously established T1D aged <24 years with COVID-19 were analyzed from the T1Dx COVID-19 Surveillance Registry. Data were collected from 52 endocrinology clinics across the US using an online survey tool. Each clinic completed the survey using electronic medical record (EMR) data between April 2020 and May 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the study population, and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze the relationship between age, insurance type, use of diabetes technology, presence of comorbidities, adverse outcomes, and hospitalization.
Result(s): The most frequent comorbidities were obesity (14%), asthma (11%), celiac disease (9%), and hypothyroidism (7%). T1D patients with at least one other comorbidity had a higher DKA presentation (16% vs 12%, p = 0.03) and a higher all-cause hospitalization rate (24% vs 15%, p = 0.02) compared to T1D patients without additional comorbidities. T1D Patients with comorbidities and COVID-19 were almost twice as likely to be hospitalized than those with no comorbidities (Odds Ratio 1.94, 95% CI: 1.23-3.03). The most frequent comorbidities were obesity (14%), asthma (11%), celiac disease (9%), and hypothyroidism (7%). T1D patients with at least one other comorbidity had a higher DKA presentation (16% vs 12%, p = 0.03) and a higher all-cause hospitalization rate (24% vs 15%, p = 0.02) compared to T1D patients without additional comorbidities. T1D Patients with comorbidities and COVID-19 were almost twice as likely to be hospitalized than those with no comorbidities (Odds Ratio 1.94, 95% CI: 1.23-3.03).
Conclusion(s): Our data reveal higher rates of hospitalizations and adverse outcomes among children and adolescents with T1D with at least one more comorbidities and COVID-19 in comparison with T1D patients without additional comorbidities. (Table Presented)

OBJECTIVES:The number of hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 patients in March 2020 to April 2020 in our New York City hospital required increased physician staffing, including deployment of pediatricians to adult care. To improve the deployment process, we sought to understand the mindset, preparations for, and experience during deployment of pediatric faculty in our institution. METHODS:test were used to compare groups. Free-text responses were categorized by topic. Survey responses were shared with leadership in real time and adjustments to the deployment process made. RESULTS:= 16). Dissemination of details about schedules and role clarification before deployment were areas for improvement. CONCLUSIONS:Pediatric faculty facing deployment to adult care have concerns about the process of deployment as well as the work itself. Specific information distributed in advance, along with consistent and frequent communication, may help mitigate these fears.

BACKGROUND:The World Trade Center (WTC) attacks on 11 September 2001 created a hazardous environment with known and suspected carcinogens. Previous studies have identified an increased risk of prostate cancer in responder cohorts compared with the general male population. OBJECTIVES:To estimate the length of time to prostate cancer among WTC rescue/recovery workers by determining specific time periods during which the risk was significantly elevated. METHODS:Person-time accruals began 6 months after enrolment into a WTC cohort and ended at death or 12/31/2015. Cancer data were obtained through linkages with 13 state cancer registries. New York State was the comparison population. We used Poisson regression to estimate hazard ratios and 95% CIs; change points in rate ratios were estimated using profile likelihood. RESULTS:The analytic cohort included 54 394 male rescue/recovery workers. We observed 1120 incident prostate cancer cases. During 2002-2006, no association with WTC exposure was detected. Beginning in 2007, a 24% increased risk (HR: 1.24, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.32) was observed among WTC rescue/recovery workers when compared with New York State. Comparing those who arrived earliest at the disaster site on the morning of 11 September 2001 or any time on 12 September 2001 to those who first arrived later, we observed a positive, monotonic, dose-response association in the early (2002-2006) and late (2007-2015) periods. CONCLUSIONS:Risk of prostate cancer was significantly elevated beginning in 2007 in the WTC combined rescue/recovery cohort. While unique exposures at the disaster site might have contributed to the observed effect, screening practices including routine prostate specific antigen screening cannot be discounted.

BACKGROUND:World Trade Center (WTC)-exposed responders may be eligible to receive no-cost medical monitoring and treatment for certified conditions, including cancer. The survival of responders with cancer has not previously been investigated. METHODS:This study compared the estimated relative survival of WTC-exposed responders who developed cancer while enrolled in two WTC medical monitoring and treatment programs in New York City (WTC-MMTP responders) and WTC-exposed responders not enrolled (WTC-non-MMTP responders) to non-responders from New York State (NYS-non-responders), all restricted to the 11-southernmost NYS counties, where most responders resided. Parametric survival models estimated cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. Follow-up ended at death or on December 31, 2016. RESULTS:From January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2016, there were 2,037 cancer cases and 303 deaths (248 cancer-related deaths) among WTC-MMTP responders, 564 cancer cases, and 143 deaths (106 cancer-related deaths) among WTC-non-MMTP responders, and 574,075 cancer cases and 224,040 deaths (158,645 cancer-related deaths) among the NYS-non-responder population. Comparing WTC-MMTP responders with NYS-non-responders, the cancer-specific mortality hazard ratio (HR) was 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64-0.82), and all-cause mortality HR was 0.64 (95% CI = 0.58-0.72). The cancer-specific HR was 0.94 (95% CI = 0.78-1.14), and all-cause mortality HR was 0.93 (95% CI = 0.79-1.10) comparing WTC-non-MMTP responders to the NYS-non-responder population. CONCLUSIONS:WTC-MMTP responders had lower mortality compared with NYS-non-responders, after controlling for demographic factors and temporal trends. There may be survival benefits from no-out-of-pocket-cost medical care which could have important implications for healthcare policy, however, other occupational and socioeconomic factors could have contributed to some of the observed survival advantage.

BACKGROUND:A recent study of World Trade Center (WTC)-exposed firefighters and emergency medical service workers demonstrated that elevated thyroid cancer incidence may be attributable to frequent medical testing, resulting in the identification of asymptomatic tumors. We expand on that study by comparing the incidence of thyroid cancer among three groups: WTC-exposed rescue/recovery workers enrolled in a New York State (NYS) WTC-medical monitoring and treatment program (MMTP); WTC-exposed rescue/recovery workers not enrolled in an MMTP (non-MMTP); and the NYS population. METHODS:Person-time began on 9/12/2001 or at enrollment in a WTC cohort and ended at death or on 12/31/2015. Cancer data were obtained through linkages with 13 state cancer registries. We used Poisson regression to estimate rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for MMTP and non-MMTP participants. NYS rates were used as the reference. To estimate potential changes over time in WTC-associated risk, change points in RRs were estimated using profile likelihood. RESULTS:The thyroid cancer incidence rate among MMTP participants was more than twice that of NYS population rates (RR = 2.31; 95% CI = 2.00-2.68). Non-MMTP participants had a risk similar to NYS (RR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.72-1.28). We observed no change points in the follow-up period. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our findings support the hypothesis that no-cost screening (a benefit provided by WTC-MMTPs) is associated with elevated identification of thyroid cancer. Given the high survival rate for thyroid cancer, it is important to weigh the costs and benefits of treatment, as many of these cancers were asymptomatic and may have been detected incidentally.