Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: Healthcare systems rose to the challenges of COVID-19 by creating or expanding telehealth programs to ensure that patients could access care from home. Traditionally, though, physicians receive limited formal telemedicine training, which made preparedness for this transition uneven. We designed a survey for General Internal Medicine (GIM) physicians within our diverse health system to describe experiences with providing virtual patient care; with the ultimate goal of identifying actionable recommendations for health system leaders and medical educators.
METHOD(S): Surveys were sent to all faculty outpatient GIM physicians working at NYU Langone Health, NYC Health + Hospitals/Bellevue and Gouverneur, and the VA NY Harbor Health System (n=378) in May & June of 2020. Survey items consisted of Likert and open-ended questions on experience with televisits (13 items) and attitudes toward care (24 items). Specific questions covered barriers to communication over remote modalities.
RESULT(S): 195/378 (52%) responded to the survey. 96% of providers reported having problems establishing a connection from the patient's end while 84% reported difficultly establishing connection on the provider's end. Using interpreter services over the phone was also problematic for providers, with 38% reporting troubles. Regarding teamness, 35% of physicians found it difficult to share information with healthcare team members during virtual visits and 42% found it difficult to work collaboratively with team members, both when compared to in-person visits. When subdivided, 24% of private and 40% of public providers found info sharing more difficult (p<0.04). 31% of private providers and 45% of public found team collaboration more difficult (ns). Physicians also identified challenges in several domains including physical exams (97%), establishing relationships with new patients (74%), taking a good history (48%), and educating patients (35%). In thematic analysis of open-ended comments, themes emerged related to technological challenges, new systems issues, and new patient/provider communication experiences. Positives noted by physicians included easier communication with patients who often struggle with keeping in-person appointments, easier remote monitoring, and a more thorough understanding of patients' home lives.
CONCLUSION(S): Provider experience differences were rooted in the type of technology employed. Safety-net physicians conducted mostly telephonic visits while private outpatient physicians utilized video visits, despite both using the same brand of electronic medical record system. As we consider a new normal and prolonged community transmission of COVID-19, it is essential to establish telemedicine training, tools, and protocols that meet the needs of both patients and physicians across diverse settings. LEARNING OBJECTIVE #1: Describe challenges and barriers to effective communication and clinical skill utilization during televisits LEARNING OBJECTIVE #2: Conceptualize recommendations for educational curricula and health service improvement areas

STATEMENT OF PROBLEMOR QUESTION (ONE SENTENCE): To determine the feasibility and acceptability of using a virtual-only model for initiating and maintaining patients on PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis) for HIV prevention. LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1: Participants will be able to identify 3 key considerations in developing a clinical workflow for virtual PrEP initiation. LEARNING OBJECTIVES 2: Participants will be able to discuss 3-5 challenges associated with virtual PrEP initiation, and identify strategies to address these challenges. DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM/INTERVENTION, INCLUDING ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT (E.G. INPATIENT VS. OUTPATIENT, PRACTICE OR COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS): The Family Health Centers at NYU Langone (FHC) is a federally qualified health center network with 8 clinical sites in Brooklyn, NY, primarily serving a low-income, immigrant community. Since 2016, FHC has operated a focused outreach program to promote PrEP to high-risk individuals, using targeted strategies to engage those not currently in PrEP care. Our intervention sought to expand on our successful outreach model by using tele health to remove geographic barriers to participation. We developed clinical and patient navigation workflows to enable patients to initiate and continue PrEP through virtual visits. For necessary labs, patients were supported in identifying a lab collection site convenient to their home. Patient navigation staff played a key role in risk reduction education, benefits navigation, and facilitating compliance with labs and virtual care. MEASURES OF SUCCESS (DISCUSS QUALITATIVE AND/OR QUANTITATIVEMETRICSWHICHWILL BEUSEDTOEVALUATE PROGRAM/INTERVENTION): The key measure of success is PrEP uptake and continuation among the virtual visits cohort. Additional evaluation measures include the referral source of patients for virtual PrEP initiation, patient demographics, and HIV risk-these measures will enable us to assess whether we are reaching a more diverse or higher risk population through this program. FINDINGS TO DATE (IT IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO STATE FINDINGS WILL BE DISCUSSED): The pilot project launched in October 2020. In the three months since project launch, 8 patients were served through this program. Six of the patients (75%) had been initially engaged with the FHC through the HIV prevention program, while two were existing FHC patients-one of whom had previously been in standard PrEP care, but struggled to make the in-person visits. Six patients were cisgender men who have sex with men, while two were transgender women. Virtual PrEP provided an opportunity to link patients to other needed healthcare services, including vaccination and STI treatment. KEY LESSONS FOR DISSEMINATION (WHAT CAN OTHERS TAKE AWAY FOR IMPLEMENTATION TO THEIR PRACTICE OR COMMUNITY): The tele health PrEP pilot program enabled us to reach a diverse group of high-risk patients, a majority of whom had not previously been engaged in care within our health system, and we anticipate continued growth this program as we expand our outreach to additional geographic areas. Navigation staff were key in overcoming some of the barriers associated with the virtual model by building relationships with the patients and serving as a reliable source of support for patients encountering logistical barriers. PrEP initiation by tele health must account for additional logistical considerations-most notably, ensuring patient compliance with labs-but it is a feasible approach for engaging high-risk patients in HIV prevention services

LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1: Describe a longitudinal curriculum to train internal medicine (IM) residents in point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). LEARNING OBJECTIVES 2: Recognize the impact of decreased patient contact on residents' retention of POCUS skills. SETTINGAND PARTICIPANTS:Despite thewell-documented benefits of POCUS, internal medicine residents receive little formal training. We implemented a curriculumin the 2019 academic year to train 55 PGY-2 IMresidents in POCUS across four urban teaching hospitals and a method to evaluate its efficacy. As the COVID pandemic hit, we additionally sought to understand the impact of COVID on the efficacy of our curriculum and to ascertain from IM residents their barriers to using POCUS during the COVID pandemic. DESCRIPTION: The curriculum was composed of three workshops, consisting of lectures and hands-on practice covering lung, cardiac, abdominal, and lower extremity vascular views. Following the workshops, we sought to consolidate learners' knowledge with a subsequent year-long skill building phase. The skill-building phase was truncated due to the pandemic.A hands-on assessment was performed prior to the course and not repeated at course conclusion due to social distancing concerns. An online knowledge test was administered before the course, immediately following the course, and at one year. A survey assessing attitudes and barriers to POCUS was administered before the course and at one year. EVALUATION: No resident passed the pre-course hands-on assessment. Prior to the course, the average resident score was 54% on the online knowledge quiz; directly after the workshop series, the average rose to 78%. At one year, the average score on the online knowledge quiz was 74%, a statistically significant decrease (p=0.04). Ninety-one percent of residents reported performing POCUS at least once/month prior to the pandemic. During the pandemic, scanning activity decreased; 67% residents reported they scanned rarely or never. DISCUSSION/ REFLECTION / LESSONS LEARNED: Our course led to significant improvement of knowledge regarding ultrasound technology and image interpretation, however this decayed at one year, likely due to lack of skill reinforcement. Though POCUS was widely used prior to the pandemic, usage dropped at the pandemic's peak, despite its utility as both a diagnostic and therapeutic tool. The most commonly cited reason for lack of use was concern regarding contamination and infectious exposure. While the COVID pandemic disrupted our curriculum, it also highlighted opportunities to incorporate POCUS into clinical practice and reinforced the importance of continued longitudinal practice to retain learned skills

Background/UNASSIGNED:Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a growing burden in low- and middle-income countries. Ghana seeks to address this problem by task-shifting CVD diagnosis and management to nurses. The Community-Based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) initiative offers maternal and pediatric health care throughout Ghana but faces barriers to providing CVD care. We employed in-depth interviews to identify solutions to constraints in CVD care to develop a nurse-led CVD intervention in two districts of Ghana's Upper East Region. Objective/UNASSIGNED:This study sought to identify non-physician-led interventions for the screening and treatment of cardiovascular disease to incorporate into Ghana's current primary health care structure. Methods/UNASSIGNED:Using a qualitative descriptive design, we conducted 31 semistructured interviews of community health officers (CHOs) and supervising subdistrict officers (SDOs) at CHPS community facilities. Summative content analysis revealed the most common intervention ideas and endorsements by the participants. Findings/UNASSIGNED:Providers endorsed three interventions: increasing community CVD knowledge and engagement, increasing nonphysician prescribing abilities, and ensuring provider access to medical and transportation equipment. Providers suggested community leaders and volunteers should convey CVD knowledge, marshaling established gathering practices to educate communities and formulate action plans. Providers requested lectures paired with experiential learning to improve their prescribing confidence. Providers recommended revising reimbursement and equipment procurement processes for expediting access to necessary supplies. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Frontline CHPS primary care providers believe CVD care is feasible. They recommended a three-pronged intervention that combines community outreach, provider training, and logistical support, thereby expanding task-shifting beyond hypertension to include other CVD risk factors. This model could be replicable elsewhere.

Background Prior studies of SLE clusters based on autoantibodies have utilized cross-sectional data from single centers. We applied clustering techniques to longitudinal and comprehensive autoantibody data from a large multinational, multiethnic inception cohort of well characterized SLE patients to identify clusters associated with disease outcomes. Methods We used demographic, clinical, and serological data at enrolment and follow-up visits years 3 and 5 from 805 patients who fulfilled the 1997 Updated ACR SLE criteria and were enrolled within 15 months of diagnosis. For each visit, ANA, dsDNA, Sm, U1-RNP, SSA/Ro60, SSB/La, Ro52/ TRIM21, histones, ribosomal P, Jo-1, centromere B, PCNA, anti-DFS70, lupus anticoagulant (LAC), IgG and IgM for anticardiolipin, anti-b2GP1, and aPS/PT, and IgG anti-b2GP1 D1 were performed at a single lab (except LAC). K-means clustering algorithm on principal component analysis (10 dimensions) transformed longitudinal ANA/autoantibody profiles was used. We compared cluster demographic/clinical outcomes, including longitudinal disease activity (total and adjusted mean SLEDAI- 2K), SLICC/ACR damage index and organ-specific domains, SLE therapies, and survival, using one-way ANOVA test and a Benjamini-Hochberg correction with false discovery rate alpha=0.05. Results were visualized using t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding. Results Four unique patient clusters were identified (table 1). Cluster 1, characterized by high frequency of anti-Sm and anti-RNP over time, was the youngest group at disease onset with a high proportion of subjects of Asian and African ancestry. At year 5, they had the highest disease activity, were more likely to have active hematologic and mucocutaneous involvement, and to be on/exposed to immunosuppressants/ biologics. Cluster 2, the largest cluster, had low frequency of anti-dsDNA, were oldest at disease onset, and at year 5, had the lowest disease activity, and were least likely to have nephritis and be on/exposed to immunosuppressants/biologics. Cluster 3 had the highest frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies over time, were more likely to be of European ancestry, have an elevated BMI, be former smokers, and by year 5, to have nephritis, neuropsychiatric involvement, including strokes and seizures (SLICC/ACR damage index). Cluster 4 was characterized by anti-SSA/Ro60, SSB/La, Ro52/TRIM21, histone antibodies, and low complements at year 5. Overall, survival of the 805 subjects was 94% at 5 years, and none of the clusters predicted survival. Conclusions Four SLE patient clusters associated with disease activity, organ involvement, and treatment were identified in this analysis of longitudinal ANA/autoantibody profiles in relation to SLE outcomes, suggesting these subsets might be identifiable based on extended autoantibody profiles early in disease and carry prognostic information

BACKGROUND: New York City became the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in the US, reporting its first case of SARS-CoV-2 on March 1, 2020. Patients with co-morbid conditions such as hypertension and diabetes are disproportionately impacted by COVID-19. Hospital systems have been burdened nationwide, including community and safety-net hospitals who serve medically underserved populations, placing them at risk from a resource-needs standpoint. Our study aim is to describe the clinical presentation and outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19, and to highlight the burden on community hospitals, in order to guide health policy and resource allocation in future crises.
METHOD(S): We conducted a retrospective case series of patients admitted to NYU Langone Hospital - Brooklyn between March 13th and April 4th, 2020. Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction nasopharyngeal swab confirmed infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Clinical demographics were obtained from the electronic health record (Epic Hyperspace, Madison, WI). The primary outcome was time-to-event, defined as transfer to an intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation or death from time of admission. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata SE 16 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).
RESULT(S): There were 561 patients admitted with a median age of 61 years(IQR 48-74). See Table 1. The median time to composite event was 4.13 days(IQR: 2.23-7.97).
CONCLUSION(S): Our results show that the impact of COVID-19 on a community hospital is similar to what has been reported in the literature for tertiary centers, implying that safety-net hospitals can play an integral role in future impact mitigation. These implications hold true as the pandemic continues to disproportionately affect those with chronic diseases. As cases of COVID-19 near 20 million, our experience positions us as harbingers who can provide insight for resource allocation across the US. LEARNING OBJECTIVE #1: Patient Care: Identify the characteristics in patients with COVID-19 associated with increased risk for hospitalization LEARNING OBJECTIVE #2: Medical Knowledge: Understand the outcomes related to COVID-19 in a diverse population

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM OR QUESTION (ONE SENTENCE): Can user-centered design (UCD) facilitate the development of novel and effective training tools for the virtual ambulatory learning environment LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1: To identify the needs, preferences, and concerns of resident trainees and attending preceptors regarding the current virtual ambulatory care learning environment. LEARNING OBJECTIVES 2: To apply user-centered design (UCD) strategies to the development of effective tools to enhance the virtual learning experience of trainees and preceptors. DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM/INTERVENTION, INCLUDING ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT (E.G. INPATIENT VS. OUTPATIENT, PRACTICE OR COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS): The COVID-19 pandemic spurred a rapid transition to virtual learning environments, the design of which may impact learning experiences and competency development for trainees. User-centered design (UCD) offers a framework to iteratively and collaboratively incorporate needs, preferences, and concerns of users (e.g. trainees and preceptors) in the development of acceptable and effective educational tools. This study applied UCD strategies of empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test among Internal Medicine residents and outpatient attending preceptors to develop innovations for the virtual ambulatory care learning environment. MEASURES OF SUCCESS (DISCUSS QUALITATIVE AND/OR QUANTITATIVEMETRICSWHICHWILL BEUSEDTOEVALUATE PROGRAM/INTERVENTION): Using the UCD framework, we identified: 1) needs, preferences, and concerns of residents and preceptors in current virtual precepting practices (empathize) 2) key problem areas and pain points (define) 3) potential solutions (ideate) 4) specific products to develop (prototype), deploy, and evaluate (test) in practice FINDINGS TO DATE (IT IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO STATE FINDINGS WILL BE DISCUSSED): Qualitative needs-assessment interviews were conducted among 8 residents and 10 preceptors, which identified key areas of learner need: technical and workflow competency; the virtual precepting experience; patient rapport-building and communication; and documentation requirements. Subsequently, a Design Thinking Workshop focusing on virtual precepting was developed, and 3 workshops were conducted with 12 participants (residents and attendings). Using a three-phase interactive sequence of explore, ideate, and create, participants were divided into 2-or 3-person virtual breakout groups and asked to 1) identify a key problem in current virtual precepting, 2) brainstorm possible solutions, and 3) design and present a low-fidelity prototype of one solution. Key problems identified included: management of technical issues, goal setting for precepting sessions, clinic-specific information dissemination practices, and the loss of shared learning space with colleagues. Potential solutions included: a digital shared-learning plan for residents, a real-time virtual clinical bulletin board, an integrated virtual team huddle, and just-in-time digital chalk talks. Two prototypes are being developed for testing in the live precepting environment. KEY LESSONS FOR DISSEMINATION (WHAT CAN OTHERS TAKE AWAY FOR IMPLEMENTATION TO THEIR PRACTICE OR COMMUNITY): User-centered design can be deployed as an effective strategy to engage learners and preceptors in the design and development of educational innovations for the virtual training environment. We recommend collaborating with residents, preceptors, and other stakeholders in the iterative design of virtual learning tools