Faculty Bibliography

Background: The prevalence of autoimmune diseases (AIDs) in patients with lung cancer is approximately 14%. However, patients with pre-existing AIDs have been excluded from trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) known to cause immune activation and lead to immune related adverse events (irAEs) limiting the data on safety and efficacy of these agents. Oncologists are therefore wary to use them in this at-risk population.
Method(s): We conducted a single institution IRB-approved retrospective study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combination and single agent ICI therapy in patients with pre-existing AIDs and concomitant advanced lung cancer that were treated with ICI from 2011 to 2018. Primary endpoints were incidence of irAEs and AID flares. The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS).
Result(s): We evaluated records from 29 patients with lung cancer of which 17 (59%) had adenocarcinoma, 10 (34%) had squamous cell carcinoma, two (7%) had small cell cancer, and one (3%) had undifferentiated non-small cell lung cancer. AIDs included rheumatic (72%), gastrointestinal (10%), endocrine (10%) and neurologic (7%). 34% of patients experienced an irAE, though only 7% were severe (grade 3-4 colitis and hepatitis). 66% of patients reported no irAEs at all. The most common irAEs were dermatitis (14%) and colitis (10%). 10% of patients had to permanently discontinue ICIs due to an irAE while 17% temporarily held their ICI. 96% of patients with AIDs were either stable or in remission. AID flares were observed in 28% of patients with 24% requiring treatment. None of the AID flares resulted in permanent discontinuation of ICI therapy. 21% of patients were on immunomodulatory therapies at start of ICI treatment. The use of immunomodulatory medications was not associated with an increased incidence of either irAEs or AID flares. Median OS from ICI initiation was 8.5 months and median PFS was 6 months. There was no statistically significant difference for OS or PFS by presence of irAE or presence of immunomodulatory therapy at start of ICI use.
Conclusion(s): In this cohort, patients with pre-existing AIDs and advanced lung cancer reported fewer AID flares (28%) than has been cited in the literature (approximately 50%). IrAEs were seen at an incidence similar to that observed in patients without AIDs. In our cohort, the majority of adverse reactions were manageable and did not require permanent discontinuation of ICI therapy. Furthermore, the presence of irAEs did not detrimentally affect patients' OS or PFS. Based on these findings, we would consider ICI therapy as an option in select patients with pre-existing autoimmunity. Keywords: toxicity, pre-existing autoimmune disease, Immunotherapy
Copyright

Background/Purpose : The impact of glucocorticoid (GC) use on major organ damage in SLE patients has not been formally studied by amalgamating the relevant data published in the literature over the past 40 years. We aimed to study the association between GC use and the occurrence of major organ damage in SLE patients by performing meta-analyses of observational studies published between 1970 and December 2018. Methods : Literature search on PubMed (from 1966 to December 2018) for prevalence and longitudinal studies which reported GC exposure (proportion of GC users in the cohort [%GC use] and/or GC use in defined doses) and the occurrence (prevalence/incidence) of major organ damage in SLE patients using the keywords cataract, cerebrovascular (CVA), stroke, cardiovascular (CVS), angina, myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery bypass, osteoporosis, avascular necrosis (AVN) and osteonecrosis in respective combinations with lupus was conducted. Studies with sample size < 50 and observation duration < 12 months were excluded. The logit of the proportion of patients with disease damage was modelled as a random effect in the meta-analysis, which was employed to study the association between the proportion of patients with organ damage and variables of GC use (mean daily [mg/day] and cumulative [gm] prednisone [PDN] doses and %GC use). A 2-stage estimation of the random-effects logistic regression models was used with restricted maximum likelihood estimation. Univariate associations between organ damage and moderators were examined for statistical significance, and variables related to GC use were adjusted for SLE disease duration in multivariate models if their univariate P values were < 0.2. Results : Out of 8,882 publications screened, 212 articles involving 205,619 SLE patients were eligible for the metaanalyses (Figure 1), of which 97 were prevalence and 115 were longitudinal studies. Univariate analyses of prevalence studies revealed that mean daily PDN dose (odds ratio [OR]=1.10, p=0.007) and lower proportion of female in the cohort (OR=0.002, p=0.002) were associated with the prevalence of overall CVS events. Mean daily PDN dose (OR=1.52, p< 0.001) and %GC use (OR=2,255.2, p< 0.001) were associated with the prevalence of AVN. A significant association between cumulative PDN dose and prevalence of CVA was found after multivariate adjustment for SLE disease duration (OR=1.07, p=0.017). In longitudinal studies, a significant association was identified between cumulative PDN dose and incidence of cataracts after adjustment for SLE disease duration (OR=1.04, p=0.013). While the incidence of MI in SLE patients has dropped over the past 40 years (OR=0.94, p=0.002), it was associated with % GC use after adjustment for SLE disease duration (OR=8.18, p=0.012). Interestingly, significant univariate associations were found between antimalarial use and lower prevalence of MI (OR=0.05, p=0.002) and lower incidence of CVA (OR=0.20, p=0.032). Conclusion : Independent of SLE disease duration, cumulative PDN dose was associated with higher prevalence of CVA and incidence of cataracts, and higher incidence of MI was associated with overall GC use

Background/Purpose : DLE is a rare, disfiguring disorder in children. Small retrospective studies suggest 20-25% of patients progress to SLE. Progression risk factors are poorly understood, but DLE has been associated with delay in SLE diagnosis and reduced access to care. This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to describe baseline characteristics and clinical phenotypes of pediatric DLE patients at diagnosis. Methods : Medical records at eighteen sites were reviewed for pediatric dermatology and rheumatology patients with DLE. For inclusion, patients required clinical and/or histopathologic findings consistent with DLE. Baseline data were collected at the first documented visit including sociodemographic data, ACR/SLICC SLE criteria (i.e. DLE+SLE), date of DLE onset/diagnosis, DLE distribution, family history, comorbidities, and treatment. Outcome variables included ACR (primary outcome) /SLICC SLE criteria. Rates of progression from skin-limited DLE (DLE) to SLE (DLE+SLE) were evaluated. Analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square and Wilcoxon tests. Results : Out of >1,000 patients reviewed, 441 met inclusion criteria. The cohort was predominantly female (72%) and racially/ethnically diverse (Table 1). A minority presented at baseline with SLE based on ACR and SLICC criteria, respectively (n=165, 37%; n=183, 42%). DLE+SLE patients were older (median 13.7y vs 10.2y) with shorter time from DLE onset to diagnosis (median 2 mo vs 7 mo), compared to DLE patients (p< 0.001). DLE patients presented with low incidence of renal involvement, serositis, seizures or psychosis (p< 0.001, Table 2). DLE+SLE patients had more positive serologies and higher-titer ANAs (p< 0.001, Table 3), although 5% were ANA negative. Among 231 DLE patients with31 follow up visit, median follow-up was 2.7 y (range 0-13.9y) with 747 total subject-years. Progression to SLE occurred in 20% and 25% of patients based on ACR and SLICC criteria, respectively. Conclusion : To date, this is the largest investigation of pediatric DLE. Patients with DLE+SLE were most likely to present in adolescence with abnormal serologies and end-organ disease. Progression of DLE to SLE occurred at rates consistent with previous literature. All patients with DLE require SLE surveillance at diagnosis and regular follow-up, particularly during adolescence. Limitations include the retrospective study design with potential for misclassification, and analysis restricted to the baseline visit. Further analysis of follow up visits will evaluate for baseline risk factors and biomarkers of evolving SLE, as well as timing of progression, identifying DLE patients at highest risk for systemic disease

OBJECTIVE:The current Phase 2b study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for migraine (MBCT-M) to reduce migraine-related disability in people with migraine. BACKGROUND:Mindfulness-based interventions represent a promising avenue to investigate effects in people with migraine. MBCT teaches mindfulness meditation and cognitive-behavioral skills and directly applies these skills to address disease-related cognitions. METHODS:Participants with migraine (6-30 headache days/month) were recruited from neurology office referrals and local and online advertisements in the broader New York City area. During the 30-day baseline period, all participants completed a daily headache diary. Participants who met inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomized in a parallel design, stratified by chronic migraine status, to receive either 8 weekly individual MBCT-M sessions or 8 weeks of waitlist/treatment as usual (WL/TAU). All participants completed surveys including primary outcome evaluations at Months 0, 1, 2, and 4. All participants completed a headache diary during the 30-day posttreatment evaluation period. Primary outcomes were the change from Month 0 to Month 4 in the headache disability inventory (HDI) and the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) (total score ≥ 21 indicating severe disability); secondary outcomes (headache days/30 days, average headache attack pain intensity, and attack-level migraine-related disability [Migraine Disability Index (MIDI)]) were derived from the daily headache diary. RESULTS:Sixty participants were randomized to receive MBCT-M (n = 31) or WL/TAU (n = 29). Participants (M age = 40.1, SD = 11.7) were predominantly White (n = 49/60; 81.7%) and Non-Hispanic (N = 50/60; 83.3%) women (n = 55/60; 91.7%) with a graduate degree (n = 35/60; 55.0%) who were working full-time (n = 38/60; 63.3%). At baseline, the average HDI score (51.4, SD = 19.0) indicated a moderate level of disability and the majority of participants (50/60, 83.3%) fell in the "Severe Disability" range in the MIDAS. Participants recorded an average of 16.0 (SD = 5.9) headache days/30 days, with an average headache attack pain intensity of 1.7 on a 4-point scale (SD = 0.3), indicating moderate intensity. Average levels of daily disability reported on the MIDI were 3.1/10 (SD = 1.8). For the HDI, mean scores decreased more from Month 0 to Month 4 in the MBCT-M group (-14.3) than the waitlist/treatment as an usual group (-0.2; P < .001). For the MIDAS, the group*month interaction was not significant when accounting for the divided alpha, P = .027; across all participants in both groups, the estimated proportion of participants falling in the "Severe Disability" category fell significantly from 88.3% at Month 0 to 66.7% at Month 4, P < .001. For diary-reported headache days/30 days an average headache attack pain intensity, neither the group*month interaction (Ps = .773 and .888, respectively) nor the time effect (Ps = .059 and .428, respectively) was significant. Mean MIDI scores decreased in the MBCT-M group (-0.6/10), whereas they increased in the waitlist/treatment as an usual group (+0.3/10), P = .007. CONCLUSIONS:MBCT-M demonstrated efficacy to reduce headache-related disability and attack-level migraine-related disability. MBCT-M is a promising emerging treatment for addressing migraine-related disability.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is an adverse immunologic phenomenon following allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Cutaneous manifestations are the earliest and most common presentation of the disease. This article describes the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment options available for acute and chronic GVHD. Acute and chronic GVHD result from an initial insult triggering an exaggerated inflammatory cascade. Clinical presentation for cutaneous acute GVHD is limited to maculopapular rash and oral mucosal lesions, whereas chronic GVHD can also include nail, scalp, and genitalia changes. Diagnosis is often made clinically and supported by biopsy, laboratory and radiology findings.

Little is known about the dietary patterns of Chinese Americans. Understanding their dietary patterns can provide insights for addressing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk among Chinese American immigrants. The objective of this study was to identify dietary patterns among Chinese American immigrants living in New York City (NYC) and to describe associations with demographic and CVD risk factors. A validated Food Frequency Questionnaire assessed usual dietary intake in Chinese American immigrants living in NYC as part of the Chinese American Cardiovascular Health Assessment (CHA CHA) in 2010-2011 (n = 1973, age range 21-89 years). Principal components analysis with varimax rotation retaining three factors with eigenvalues > 1.5 identified dietary patterns. Multivariable linear regression models tested associations between CVD risk factors and dietary pattern scores. In multivariable analyses, each unit of increase in the Sweets factor was associated with 0.76 ± 0.33 (mean ± SD) mg/dL higher HDL cholesterol and a 6.2 ± 2.7% increase in HOMA-IR. In contrast, each unit increase in the Fried Noodles factor was associated with a 0.27 ± 0.11 inch greater waist circumference, - 0.89 ± 0.40 mg/dL lower HDL cholesterol, and also a 6.9 ± 2.6% increase in HOMA-IR. Each unit increase in the Vegetables factor was associated with a - 1.40 ± 0.43 mmHg and - 0.95 ± 0.27 mm Hg decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively. Dietary patterns are significantly associated with CVD risk factors among Chinese American immigrants in NYC. Future work will inform how dietary patterns relate to level of acculturation in order to guide the development of dietary interventions to reduce CVD risk.

INTRODUCTION:Implicit bias is a growing area of interest among educators. Educational strategies used to elicit awareness of implicit biases commonly include the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Although the topic of implicit bias is gaining increased attention, emerging critique of the IAT suggests the need to subject its use to greater theoretical and empirical scrutiny. METHODS:The authors employed a meta-narrative synthesis to review existing research on the use of the IAT in health professions education. Four databases were searched using key terms yielding 1151 titles. After title, abstract and full-text screening, 38 articles were chosen for inclusion. Coding and analysis of articles sought a meaningful synthesis of educational approaches relating to the IAT, and the assumptions and theoretical positions that informed these approaches. RESULTS:Distinct, yet complementary, meta-narratives were found in the literature. The dominant perspective utilizes the IAT as a metric of implicit bias to evaluate the success of an educational activity. A contrasting narrative describes the IAT as a tool to promote awareness while triggering discussion and reflection. DISCUSSION:Whether used as a tool to measure bias, raise awareness or trigger reflection, the use of the IAT provokes tension between distinct meta-narratives, posing a challenge to educators. Curriculum designers should consider the premise behind the IAT before using it, and be prepared to address potential reactions from learners such as defensiveness or criticism. Overall, findings suggest that educational approaches regarding implicit bias require critical reflexivity regarding assumptions, values and theoretical positioning related to the IAT.