Faculty Bibliography

Background: The growing opioid overdose epidemic has grappled the nation with the CDC now reporting that drug overdose deaths have become the most common cause of death for young people. Medical education has historically ignored substance use disorders, and though they generally require all medical students to learn basic life support, they have not taught how to respond to opioid overdoses. Further, medical education is moving towards modalities which utilize adult learning theory. One such modality are online modules. However, there are few studies comparing their outcomes with traditional lectures. Previously, the authors compared in-person and online training of medical students to respond to opioid overdoses using naloxone in a non-randomized controlled setting, which showed no meaningful differences in knowledge, attitudes, and preparedness outcomes for students. In this paper, the authors attempt to use a randomized controlled trial to compare the two educational modalities at a second urban medical school.
Objective(s): The author's primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of online compared to in-person training for knowledge. Our secondary objective were to show non-inferiority of online compared to in-person training attitudes, and preparedness.
Method(s): Our study received IRB exemption as an education intervention. As a part of a transition to clinical clerkships curriculum used for second year medical students, second year medical students in an urban medical school were randomized into training sessions by the office of medical education without foreknowledge of the planned study. Students taking the online training were provided with a link to online modules with pre- and post-tests and video based lectures. Students randomized to the in-person training group took a pre-test just prior to receiving an oral lecture, and then immediately completed a post-test. Paired student's t-tests were used to compare measurements for each group in knowledge, attitudes, and preparedness, and Cohen's D was used to measure the effect size of the change. We calculated 99% confidence intervals for each measure and utilized a margin of non-inferiority of 5%.
Result(s): The in-person group demonstrated a statistically significant increase in knowledge, a non-statistically significant decrease in self-reported preparedness, and a small non-statistically significant increase in attitudes, see Table 1. The online group demonstrated a statistically significant increase in knowledge and self-reported preparedness, without a statistically significant change in attitudes, see Table 1. 99% CIs were [-0.20, 1.09] for knowledge, [6.51, 10.93] for preparedness, and [-2.32, 1.59] for attitudes, see Figure 1.
Conclusion(s): Online training for opioid overdose prevention training provided non-inferior outcomes for knowledge, preparedness, and attitudes. This study supports the use of online opioid overdose prevention training as a non-inferior alternative to in-person training

Purpose: To explore the experiences of transgender and gender nonbinary (TGNB) medical students and physicians in the United States. Methods: The authors conducted a 79-item online survey using Likert-type and open-ended questions to assess the experiences of TGNB-identified U.S. medical students and physicians. Variables included demographic data, disclosure of TGNB status, exposure to transphobia, and descriptions of educational and professional experiences. Recruitment was conducted using snowball sampling through Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer professional groups, list-servs, and social media. The survey was open from June 2017 through November 2017. Results: Respondents included 21 students and 15 physicians (10 transgender women, 10 transgender men, and 16 nonbinary participants). Half (50%; 18) of the participants and 60% (9) of physicians had not disclosed their TGNB identity to their medical school or residency program, respectively. Respondents faced barriers on the basis of gender identity/expression when applying to medical school (22%; 11) and residency (43%; 6). More than three-quarters (78%; 28) of participants censored speech and/or mannerisms half of the time or more at work/school to avoid unintentional disclosure of their TGNB status. More than two-thirds (69%; 25) heard derogatory comments about TGNB individuals at medical school, in residency, or in practice, while 33% (12) witnessed discriminatory care of a TGNB patient. Conclusion: TGNB medical students and physicians faced significant barriers during medical training, including having to hide their identities and witnessing anti-TGNB stigma and discrimination. This study, the first to exclusively assess experiences of TGNB medical students and physicians, reveals that significant disparities still exist on the basis of gender identity.

The University of Florida Mobile Outreach Clinic's Care Coordination Program uses trained undergraduate volunteers to provide vital services; these include patient intake, recording vital signs, scribing first drafts of clinic notes, and making follow-up phone calls. The program and its benefits are replicable as demonstrated by our systematic implementation plan.

Background/UNASSIGNED:The purpose of this 6-week intervention was to test the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a telehealth-adapted Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) at a senior center. Methods/UNASSIGNED: = 16) attended weekly interactive webinars. At each measurement time point, participants completed questionnaires covering lifestyle, physical activity, quality of life, and food records and wore physical activity trackers. Qualitative data were gathered from 2 focus groups inviting all 16 participants with 13 and 10 participants attending, respectively. Results/UNASSIGNED:value = 0.001). Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:The feasibility of providing DPP via webinar appears to be high based on the retention and attendance rates. Similar to other behavioral interventions engaging older adults, recruitment rates were low. Acceptability was evidenced by high attendance at the intervention sessions and feedback from participants during focus group sessions. The intervention efficacy should be evaluated based on CDC criteria for program recognition in a larger scale randomized trial. Trial registration/UNASSIGNED:NCT03524404. Registered 14 May 2018-retrospectively registered. Trial protocol will be provided by the corresponding author upon request.