Faculty Bibliography

Background: The introduction of electronic workflows has allowed for the flow of raw uncontextualized clinical data into medical documentation. As a result, many electronic notes have become replete of "noise" and deplete clinically significant "signals." There is an urgent need to develop and implement innovative approaches in electronic clinical documentation that improve note quality and reduce unnecessary bloating. Objective: This study aims to describe the development and impact of a novel set of templates designed to change the flow of information in medical documentation. Methods: This is a multihospital nonrandomized prospective improvement study conducted on the inpatient general internal medicine service across 3 hospital campuses at the New York University Langone Health System. A group of physician leaders representing each campus met biweekly for 6 months. The output of these meetings included (1) a conceptualization of the note bloat problem as a dysfunction in information flow, (2) a set of guiding principles for organizational documentation improvement, (3) the design and build of novel electronic templates that reduced the flow of extraneous information into provider notes by providing link outs to best practice data visualizations, and (4) a documentation improvement curriculum for inpatient medicine providers. Prior to go-live, pragmatic usability testing was performed with the new progress note template, and the overall user experience was measured using the System Usability Scale (SUS). Primary outcome measures after go-live include template utilization rate and note length in characters. Results: In usability testing among 22 medicine providers, the new progress note template averaged a usability score of 90.6 out of 100 on the SUS. A total of 77% (17/22) of providers strongly agreed that the new template was easy to use, and 64% (14/22) strongly agreed that they would like to use the template frequently. In the 3 months after template implementation, general internal medicine providers wrote 67% (51,431/76,647) of all inpatient notes with the new templates. During this period, the organization saw a 46% (2768/6191), 47% (3505/7819), and 32% (3427/11,226) reduction in note length for general medicine progress notes, consults, and history and physical notes, respectively, when compared to a baseline measurement period prior to interventions. Conclusions: A bundled intervention that included the deployment of novel templates for inpatient general medicine providers significantly reduced average note length on the clinical service. Templates designed to reduce the flow of extraneous information into provider notes performed well during usability testing, and these templates were rapidly adopted across all hospital campuses. Further research is needed to assess the impact of novel templates on note quality, provider efficiency, and patient outcomes.

The need for therapeutic drug monitoring of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remains an area of clinical equipoise. Although routine monitoring may be unnecessary given predictable pharmacokinetics in most patients, there may be altered pharmacokinetics in those with end organ dysfunction, such as those with renal impairment, or with concomitant interacting medications, at extremes of body weight or age, or in those with thromboembolic events in atypical locations. We aimed to assess real-world practices in situations in which DOAC drug-level monitoring was used at a large academic medical center. A retrospective review of the records of patients who had a DOAC drug-specific activity level checked from 2016 to 2019 was included. A total of 119 patients had 144 DOAC measurements (apixaban (n = 62) and rivaroxaban (n = 57)). Drug-specific calibrated DOAC levels were within an expected therapeutic range for 110 levels(76%), with 21 levels (15%) above the expected range and 13 levels (9%) below the expected range. The DOAC levels were checked in the setting of an urgent or emergent procedure in 28 patients (24%), followed by renal failure in 17 patients (14%), a bleeding event in 11 patients (9%), concern for recurrent thromboembolism in 10 patients (8%), thrombophilia in 9 patients (8%), a history of recurrent thromboembolism in 6 patients (5%), extremes of body weight in 7 patients (5%), and unknown reasons in 7 patients (5%). Clinical decision making was infrequently affected by the DOAC monitoring. Therapeutic drug monitoring with DOACs may help predict bleeding events in elderly patients, those with impaired renal function, and in the event of an emergent or urgent procedure. Future studies are needed to target the select patient-specific scenarios where monitoring DOAC levels may impact clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate how stress related to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected women's menstrual cycles. We hypothesized that women with high levels of COVID-19-related stress would have more menstrual changes compared with those with lower levels of stress. METHODS:Using a cross-sectional study design, we recruited a representative sample of U.S. adult women of reproductive age (18-45 years) using nonhormonal birth control to participate in an online REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture, Vanderbilt University) survey. COVID-19-related stress was assessed with the PSS-10-C (COVID-19 Pandemic-related Perceived Stress Scale) and dichotomized as low stress (scores lower than 25) and high stress (scores 25 or higher). Self-reported menstrual outcomes were identified as changes in cycle length, duration, or flow and increased frequency of spotting between cycles. We used χ 2 and Fisher exact tests to compare differences in outcome between the two stress groups and logistic regression models for effect estimates. RESULTS:A total of 354 women of reproductive age across the United States completed both the menstrual and COVID-19-related stress components of our survey. More than half of these women reported at least one change in their menstrual cycles since the start of the pandemic (n=191), and 10.5% reported high COVID-19-related stress (n=37). Compared with those with low COVID-19-related stress, a greater proportion of women with high COVID-19-related stress reported changes in cycle length (shorter or longer; P =.008), changes in period duration (shorter or longer; P <.001), heavier menstrual flow ( P =.035), and increased frequency of spotting between cycles ( P =.006) compared with prepandemic times. After adjusting for age, smoking history, obesity, education, and mental health history, high COVID-19-related stress was associated with increased odds of changes in menstrual cycle length (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.32; 95% CI 1.12-4.85), duration (aOR 2.38; 95% CI 1.14-4.98), and spotting (aOR 2.32; 95% CI 1.03-5.22). Our data also demonstrated a nonsignificant trend of heavier menstrual flow among women with high COVID-19-related stress (aOR 1.61; 95% CI 0.77-3.34). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:High COVID-19-related stress is associated with significant changes in menstrual cycle length, alterations in period duration, and increased intermenstrual spotting as compared with before the pandemic. Given that menstrual health is frequently an indicator of women's overall well-being, clinicians, researchers, and public health officials must consider the association between COVID-19-related stress and menstrual disturbances.

Introduction: Immigration has been identified as an important social determinant of health (SDH), embodying structures and policies that reinforce positions of poverty, stress, and limited social and economic mobility. In the public health literature with regard to diet, immigration is often characterized as an individual-level process (dietary acculturation) and is largely examined in one racial/ethnic subgroup at a time. For this narrative review, we aim to broaden the research discussion by describing SDH common to the immigrant experience and that may serve as barriers to healthy diets. Methods: A narrative review of peer-reviewed quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies on cardiometabolic health disparities, diet, and immigration was conducted. Results: Cardiometabolic disease disparities were frequently described by racial/ethnic subgroups instead of country of origin. While cardiovascular disease and obesity risk differed by country of origin, diabetes prevalence was typically higher for immigrant groups vs United States (US)-born individuals. Common barriers to achieving a healthy diet were food insecurity; lack of familiarity with US food procurement practices, food preparation methods, and dietary guidelines; lack of familiarity and distrust of US food processing and storage methods; alternative priorities for food purchasing (eg, freshness, cultural relevance); logistical obstacles (eg, transportation); stress; and ethnic identity maintenance. Conclusions: To improve the health of immigrant populations, understanding similarities in cardiometabolic health disparities, diet, and barriers to health across immigrant communities"”traversing racial/ethnic subgroups"”may serve as a useful framework. This framework can guide research, policy, and public health practices to be more cohesive, generalizable, and meaningfully inclusive.

INTRODUCTION: Ventilatory ratio (VR) is a simple bedside index of carbon dioxide removal. VR correlates well with physiologic dead space fraction (VD/VT) and clinical outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We hypothesized that high VR would identify COVID-19 ARDS patients with higher risk for death and organ failure.
METHOD(S): We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to a single hospital in New York, NY, USA from March-July 2020 who had PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, met the Berlin criteria for ARDS, and required tracheostomy for prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). MV parameters were collected 2-8 hours after intubation. Based on prior studies, a VR>2 was considered to be abnormally elevated. Comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test or z-test for difference in proportions with alpha=0.05. The primary outcome was 30- day mortality and the secondary outcome was a composite endpoint of death or organ failure defined as requiring renal replacement or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during the hospitalization.
RESULT(S): Of 139 subjects enrolled, 67 (48.2%) had a VR>2. Low and high VR groups had similar baseline characteristics, including age (mean 58 years, SD +/-15.2), body mass index (30.1+/-6.69 kg/m2), simplified acute physiology score II (35.4+/-12.4), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (5.7+/-2.5), and a 19-point review of systemic disease history. High VR was not significantly associated with mortality (OR 0.92, p=0.827). However, high VR was associated with increased risk for the composite endpoint (OR 1.96, p=0.049) and independently identified patients with a higher risk of organ failure (OR 2.03, p=0.047). High VR was also associated with longer hospital length-of-stay for subjects who survived to discharge (52 vs. 43, p=0.035), more MV-free days within the 30 days after intubation (3.2 vs. 1.8, p=0.029), and higher SOFA score at 10+/-4 days post-intubation (6.2 vs. 4.8, p=0.024).
CONCLUSION(S): Ventilatory ratio identifies COVID-ARDS ventilated patients with increased risk for organ failure requiring advanced intervention, as well as patients who may require prolonged mechanical ventilation and hospitalization

INTRODUCTION: Ventilatory ratio (VR) is a bedside index of impaired ventilation that can be used as a surrogate marker for pulmonary dead space fraction (VD/VT). Vasculopathy is hypothesized to increase VD/VT in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19. The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between VR and markers of inflammation in critically ill COVID-ARDS patients.
METHOD(S): We conducted a retrospective study of patients admitted to an intensive care unit due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. All subjects required invasive mechanical ventilation and met the Berlin criteria for ARDS. Clinical lab values were collected at two timepoints: 2-8 hours after intubation (T1) and 2-24 hours before tracheostomy (T2). VR was split into high (VR>2) and low (VR< 2) groups. Comparisons were performed using student's t, Mann-Whitney, and z tests for difference in proportions with alpha=0.05.
RESULT(S): Of the 139 subjects enrolled at T1, 67 (48%) had high VR (>2), with an overall mean VR of 2.08. High VR was significantly associated with leukocyte count (WBC) (13.3 vs. 10.6 x10^9/L, p=0.004), and platelet count (284 vs 248 x10^9/L, p=0.003). There was no association between VR status and procalcitonin (p=0.08), d-dimer (p=0.73), fibrinogen (p=0.38), CRP (p=0.22), and ferritin (p=0.33). Since certain markers had non-Gaussian distributions, we determined threshold values. D-dimer over 500 ng/mL was associated with higher VR (2.3 vs. 1.8, p=0.004) and procalcitonin over 0.5 ng/mL was moderately associated with higher VR (2.2 vs 1.9, p=0.052). CRP >181 mug/mL (the median) and ferritin values >1.5x the upper limit of normal were not associated with VR (p=0.30 and p=0.26, respectively). To enrich the dataset, we pooled data from T1 and T2 and treated each as an independent sample. In this pooled analysis, high VR was associated with higher platelet count (282 vs. 253, p=0.046), and higher procalcitonin (3.464 vs. 0.964, p=0.032). There were no significant associations with VR and d-dimer (p=0.88), fibrinogen (p=0.54), CRP (p=0.20), and ferritin (p=0.76) in the pooled data.
CONCLUSION(S): Ventilatory ratio appears to be associated with higher levels of some inflammatory markers including WBC, platelets, d-dimer, and procalcitonin in COVID-ARDS patients

INTRODUCTION: Mortality and morbidity associated with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been associated with pulmonary vasculopathy, which has been hypothesized to increase pulmonary dead space (VD/ VT). However, VD/VT is rarely measured at the bedside. As a result, multiple proxy estimates have been developed. Our hypothesis was proxy estimates for VD/VT would have differing utilities in prognostication of COVID-19 ARDS.
METHOD(S): We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to an intensive care unit with SARSCoV- 2 ARDS who required invasive mechanical ventilation. Ventilation parameters were collected 2-8 hours after intubation. The VD/Vt proxies examined were 1) ventilatory ratio (VR), 2) estimation of VD/VT using the Harris-Benedict equation for energy expenditure (VD/VT-HB), 3) direct estimation of VD/VT using Beitler et. al.'s formula (VD/VTDir), and 4) corrected minute ventilation (VECorr). For each proxy, subjects were dichotomized using the median value. Comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test with alpha=0.05.
RESULT(S): For 139 subjects, mean VR was 2.08 (SD+/-0.80), mean VD/VT-HB was 0.614 (+/-0.15), mean VD/VT-Dir was 0.657 (+/-0.08), and mean VECorr was 12.2 (+/-4.6) L/min. All four proxies had strong inter-measure correlation (Pearson's r 0.748-0.881, p< 0.001 for all comparisons). No proxy was predictive of 30-day hospital mortality. High VR and VECorr were associated with increased morbidity using a composite endpoint of death or organ failure (defined as requiring renal dialysis or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) with both having an odds ratio of 2.20 (95% CI: 1.12-4.33, p=0.022), while VD/VT-HB (p=0.552) and VD/VT-Dir (p=0.554) were not significantly associated. Of all proxies, only VR was significantly associated with increased sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score at 10+/-4 days post-intubation (6.2 vs. 4.8, p=0.024) and more ventilatorfree days within the 30 days after intubation (3.2 vs. 1.8, p=0.029).
CONCLUSION(S): Ventilatory ratio and corrected minute volume appear to have stronger associations with morbidity in COVID-19 ARDS compared to other VD/VT estimates. Ventilatory ratio is also associated with ventilator-free days and delayed SOFA score