Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION:Hazardous exposures from the World Trade Center (WTC) terrorist attacks have been linked to increased incidence of adverse health conditions, often associated with increased mortality. We assessed mortality in a pooled cohort of WTC rescue/recovery workers over 15 years of follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS:We analyzed mortality through 2016 in a pooled and deduplicated cohort of WTC rescue/recovery workers from three WTC-exposed cohorts (N = 60,631): the Fire Department of the City of New York (FDNY); the WTC Health Registry (WTCHR); and the General Responder Cohort (GRC). Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were estimated to assess mortality vs. the US and NY state populations. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine associations of WTC exposures (date of first arrival, working on the WTC debris pile) with mortality risk. RESULTS:There were 1912 deaths over 697,943.33 person-years of follow-up. The SMR for all-cause mortality was significantly lower-than-expected, both when using US (SMR 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.45) and NYS (SMR 0.51, 95% CI 0.49-0.53) as reference populations. SMRs were not elevated for any of the 28 major causes of death. Arriving at the WTC site on 9/11-9/17/2001 vs. 9/18/2001-6/30/2002 was associated with 30-50% higher risk of all-cause, heart disease and smoking-related mortality in non-FDNY/non-GRC members. Conversely, arriving on 9/11/2001 vs. 9/18/2001-6/30/2002 was associated with 40% lower all-cause and smoking-related mortality risk in FDNY members. Working on vs. off the WTC pile was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in non-FDNY/non-GRC members (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.25, 95% CI 1.04-1.50), and cancer-specific mortality in GRC members (aHR 1.39, 95% CI 1.05-1.84), but lower mortality risks were found in FDNY members. CONCLUSIONS:We did not observe excess mortality among WTC rescue/recovery workers compared with general populations. However, significantly increased mortality risks among some sub-groups with high WTC exposure warrant further investigation.

BACKGROUND:Multi-class resistance, intolerance, and drug-drug interactions can result in unique antiretroviral (ART) combinations for heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) people living with HIV (PLWH). We aimed to compare clinical outcomes between HTE and non-HTE PLWH. METHODS:Eligible ART-experienced PLWH in care in the OPERA® Cohort were identified in a cross-sectional manner on December 31, 2016 and observed from the date of initiation of the ART regimen taken on December 31, 2016 until loss to follow up, death, study end (December 31, 2018), or becoming HTE (non-HTE group only). In the absence of resistance data, HTE was defined based on the ART regimens used (i.e., exposed to ≥ 3 core agent classes or regimen suggestive of HTE). Time to virologic undetectability, failure, and immunologic preservation were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods; cumulative probabilities were compared between the two groups. Regimen changes, incident morbidities, and death were described. RESULTS:A total of 24,183 PLWH (2277 HTE PLWH, 21,906 non-HTE) were followed for a median of 28 months (IQR 21, 38). Viremic HTE PLWH (viral load [VL] ≥ 50 copies/mL) were less likely to achieve undetectability (VL < 50 copies/mL; 24-month cumulative probability: 80% [95% Confidence Interval 77-82]) than their non-HTE counterparts (85% [84-86]). No difference was observed in the probability of maintaining VLs < 200 copies/mL over the first 48 months after achieving suppression (< 50 copies/mL). HTE PLWH were less likely than non-HTE PLWH to maintain CD4 cell counts ≥ 200 cells/µL (24-month cumulative probability: 95% HTE [91-93]; 97% non-HTE [97-97]), and more likely to change regimens (45% HTE; 41% non-HTE). Incident non-AIDS defining event (ADE) morbidities were common in both populations, though more likely among HTE PLWH (45%) than non-HTE PLWH (35%). Incident ADE morbidities and deaths were uncommon among HTE (ADEs 5%; deaths 2%) and non-HTE (ADEs 2%; deaths 1%) PLWH. CONCLUSIONS:HTE PLWH were at greater risk of unfavorable treatment outcomes than non-HTE PLWH, suggesting additional therapeutic options are needed for this vulnerable population.

BACKGROUND:Readmission rates for heart failure remain high, and affordable technology for early detection of heart failure decompensation in the home environment is needed. Lung ultrasound has been shown to be a sensitive tool to detect pulmonary congestion due to heart failure, and monitoring patients in their home environment with lung ultrasound could help to prevent hospital admissions. The aim of this project was to investigate whether patient-performed tele-guided ultrasound in the home environment using an ultraportable device is feasible.Affiliations: Journal instruction requires a country for affiliations; however, these are missing in affiliations [1, 2]. Please verify if the provided country are correct and amend if necessary.Correct METHODS: Stable ambulatory patients with heart failure received a handheld ultrasound probe connected to a smart phone or tablet. Instructions for setup were given in person during a clinic visit or over the phone. During each ultrasound session, patients obtained six ultrasound clips from the anterior and lateral chest with verbal and visual tele-guidance from an ultrasound trained clinician. Patients also reported their weight and degree of dyspnea, graded on a 5-point scale. Two independent reviewers graded the ultrasound clips based on the visibility of the pleural line and A or B lines. RESULTS:Eight stable heart failure patients each performed 10-12 lung ultrasound examinations at home under remote guidance within a 1-month period. There were no major technical difficulties. A total of 89 ultrasound sessions resulted in 534 clips of which 88% (reviewer 1) and 84% (reviewer 2) were interpretable. 91% of ultrasound sessions produced interpretable clips bilaterally from the lateral chest area, which is most sensitive for the detection of pulmonary congestion. The average time to complete an ultrasound session was 5 min with even shorter recording times for the last session. All patients were clinically stable during the study period and no false positive B-lines were observed. CONCLUSIONS:In this feasibility study, patients were able to produce interpretable lung ultrasound exams in more than 90% of remotely supervised sessions in their home environment. Larger studies are needed to determine whether remotely guided lung ultrasound could be useful to detect heart failure decompensation early in the home environment.

The transition from medical student to resident is a pivotal step in the medical education continuum. For applicants, successfully obtaining a residency position is the actualization of a dream after years of training and has life-changing professional and financial implications. These high stakes contribute to a residency application and Match process in the United States that is increasingly complex and dysfunctional, and that does not effectively serve applicants, residency programs, or the public good. In July 2020, the Coalition for Physician Accountability (Coalition) formed the Undergraduate Medical Education-Graduate Medical Education Review Committee (UGRC) to critically assess the overall transition to residency and offer recommendations to solve the growing challenges in the system. In this Invited Commentary, the authors reflect on their experience as the trainee representatives on the UGRC. They emphasize the importance of trainee advocacy in medical education change efforts; reflect on opportunities, concerns, and tensions with the final UGRC recommendations (released in August 2021); discuss factors that may constrain implementation; and call for the medical education community-and the Coalition member organizations in particular-to accelerate fully implementing the UGRC recommendations. By seizing the momentum created by the UGRC, the medical education community can create a reimagined transition to residency that reshapes its approach to training a more diverse, competent, and growth-oriented physician workforce.

The transition from undergraduate medical education (UME) to graduate medical education (GME) constitutes a complex system with important implications for learner progression and patient safety. The transition is currently dysfunctional, requiring students and residency programs to spend significant time, money, and energy on the process. Applications and interviews continue to increase despite stable match rates. Although many in the medical community acknowledge the problems with the UME-GME transition and learners have called for prompt action to address these concerns, the underlying causes are complex and have defied easy fixes. This article describes the work of the Coalition for Physician Accountability's Undergraduate Medical Education to Graduate Medical Education Review Committee (UGRC) to apply a quality improvement approach and systems thinking to explore the underlying causes of dysfunction in the UME-GME transition. The UGRC performed a root cause analysis using the 5 whys and an Ishikawa (or fishbone) diagram to deeply explore problems in the UME-GME transition. The root causes of problems identified include culture, costs and limited resources, bias, systems, lack of standards, and lack of alignment. Using the principles of systems thinking (components, connections, and purpose), the UGRC considered interactions among the root causes and developed recommendations to improve the UME-GME transition. Several of the UGRC's recommendations stemming from this work are explained. Sustained monitoring will be necessary to ensure interventions move the process forward to better serve applicants, programs, and the public good.

OBJECTIVE:We evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab (UST) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS:This study utilized a retrospective, multicenter, multinational, consortium of UST-treated CD patients. Data included patient demographics, disease phenotype, disease activity, treatment history, and concomitant medications. Cumulative rates of clinical, steroid-free, endoscopic, and radiographic remission were assessed using time-to-event and clinical predictors were assessed by multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses. Serious infections and adverse events were defined as those requiring hospitalization or treatment discontinuation. RESULTS:A total of 1113 patients (51.8% female, 90% prior anti-TNF exposure) were included, with a median follow-up of 386 days. Cumulative rates of clinical, steroid-free, endoscopic, and radiographic remission at 12 months were 40%, 32%, 39%, and 30%, respectively. Biologic-naïve patients achieved significantly higher rates of clinical and endoscopic remission at 63% and 55%, respectively. On multivariable analyses, prior anti-TNF (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.49-0.99) and vedolizumab exposure (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.88) were independently associated with lower likelihoods of achieving endoscopic remission. In patients who experienced loss of remission, 77/102 (75%) underwent dose optimization, and 44/77 (57%) achieved clinical response. An additional 152/681 (22.3%) patients were dose optimized as a result of primary non- or incomplete response to UST, of whom 40.1% (61/152) responded. Serious infections occurred in 3.4% of patients, while other non-infectious adverse events [lymphoma (n=1), arthralgia (n=6), rash (n=6), headache (n=3), hepatitis (n=3), hair loss (n=3), neuropathy (n=1), and vasculitis (n=1)] occurred in 2.4% of patients. CONCLUSIONS:UST represents a safe and effective treatment option for CD, with 40% of patients from a highly refractory cohort achieving clinical remission by 12 months. The greatest treatment effect of UST was seen in bio-naive patients, and dose escalation may recapture clinical response.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS:Covert HE (CHE) is a common early stage of HE associated with poor outcomes. Available neuropsychiatric diagnostic testing is underutilized and has significant clinical limitations. Sleep deterioration is consistently associated with CHE and HE; however, objective data is sparse and it has not been studied longitudinally. We longitudinally study and describe an association of sleep metrics with CHE as detected by a commercial wearable technology. METHODS:We monitored sleep for 6 months using a commercial fitness tracker in 25 participants with cirrhosis, hypothesizing that CHE as diagnosed by psychometric testing would be associated with significant reductions in sleep quality, especially restorative sleep (deep sleep + rapid eye movement). Mixed-effects modeling was performed to evaluate sleep factors associated with CHE and developed and internally validated a score based on these sleep metrics for associated CHE. RESULTS:Across 2862 nights with 66.3% study adherence, we found that those with CHE had consistently worse sleep, including an average of 1 hour less of nightly restorative sleep, driven primarily by reductions in rapid eye movement. A model including albumin, bilirubin, rapid eye movement, sleep disturbances, and sleep consistency showed good discrimination (area under the receiver operating curve=0.79) for CHE status with a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 69%. CONCLUSIONS:Our large longitudinal study of sleep in cirrhosis suggests that sleep derangements in CHE can be detected using wearable technology. Given the known importance of sleep to overall health and CHE/HE to prognosis in cirrhosis, the ability to associate dynamic sleep metrics with CHE may in the future help with the detection and passive monitoring as factors that precipitate decompensation of cirrhosis become better understood and mobile health data validation and integration improves.

Background: Few prospective studies of Long COVID risk factors have been conducted. The purpose of this study was to determine whether sociodemographic factors, lifestyle, or medical history preceding COVID-19 or characteristics of acute severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are associated with Long COVID. Methods: In March 26, 2020, the COVID-19 Citizen Science study, an online cohort study, began enrolling participants with longitudinal assessment of symptoms before, during, and after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Adult participants who reported a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result before April 4, 2022 were surveyed for Long COVID symptoms. The primary outcome was at least 1 prevalent Long COVID symptom greater than 1 month after acute infection. Exposures of interest included age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, employment, socioeconomic status/financial insecurity, self-reported medical history, vaccination status, variant wave, number of acute symptoms, pre-COVID depression, anxiety, alcohol and drug use, sleep, and exercise. Results: Of 13 305 participants who reported a SARS-CoV-2 positive test, 1480 (11.1%) responded. Respondents' mean age was 53 and 1017 (69%) were female. Four hundred seventy-six (32.2%) participants reported Long COVID symptoms at a median 360 days after infection. In multivariable models, number of acute symptoms (odds ratio [OR], 1.30 per symptom; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-1.40), lower socioeconomic status/financial insecurity (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.02-2.63), preinfection depression (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.16), and earlier variants (OR = 0.37 for Omicron compared with ancestral strain; 95% CI, 0.15-0.90) were associated with Long COVID symptoms. Conclusions: Variant wave, severity of acute infection, lower socioeconomic status, and pre-existing depression are associated with Long COVID symptoms.