Baricitinib versus dexamethasone for adults hospitalised with COVID-19 (ACTT-4): a randomised, double-blind, double placebo-controlled trial
Wolfe, Cameron R; Tomashek, Kay M; Patterson, Thomas F; Gomez, Carlos A; Marconi, Vincent C; Jain, Mamta K; Yang, Otto O; Paules, Catharine I; Palacios, Guillermo M Ruiz; Grossberg, Robert; Harkins, Michelle S; Mularski, Richard A; Erdmann, Nathaniel; Sandkovsky, Uriel; Almasri, Eyad; Pineda, Justino Regalado; Dretler, Alexandra W; de Castilla, Diego Lopez; Branche, Angela R; Park, Pauline K; Mehta, Aneesh K; Short, William R; McLellan, Susan L F; Kline, Susan; Iovine, Nicole M; El Sahly, Hana M; Doernberg, Sarah B; Oh, Myoung-Don; Huprikar, Nikhil; Hohmann, Elizabeth; Kelley, Colleen F; Holodniy, Mark; Kim, Eu Suk; Sweeney, Daniel A; Finberg, Robert W; Grimes, Kevin A; Maves, Ryan C; Ko, Emily R; Engemann, John J; Taylor, Barbara S; Ponce, Philip O; Larson, LuAnn; Melendez, Dante Paolo; Seibert, Allan M; Rouphael, Nadine G; Strebe, Joslyn; Clark, Jesse L; Julian, Kathleen G; de Leon, Alfredo Ponce; Cardoso, Anabela; de Bono, Stephanie; Atmar, Robert L; Ganesan, Anuradha; Ferreira, Jennifer L; Green, Michelle; Makowski, Mat; Bonnett, Tyler; Beresnev, Tatiana; Ghazaryan, Varduhi; Dempsey, Walla; Nayak, Seema U; Dodd, Lori E; Beigel, John H; Kalil, Andre C; Wahid, Lana; Walter, Emmanuel B; Belur, Akhila G; Dreyer, Grace; Patterson, Jan E; Bowling, Jason E; Dixon, Danielle O; Hewlett, Angela; Odrobina, Robert; Pupaibool, Jakrapun; Mocherla, Satish; Lazarte, Suzana; Cayabyab, Meilani; Hussein, Rezhan H; Golamari, Reshma R; Krill, Kaleigh L; Rajme, Sandra; Riska, Paul F; Zingman, Barry S; Mertz, Gregory; Sosa, Nestor; Goepfert, Paul A; Berhe, Mezgebe; Dishner, Emma; Fayed, Mohamed; Hubel, Kinsley; Martinez-Orozco, José Arturo; Bautista Felix, Nora; Elmor, Sammy T; Bechnak, Amer Ryan; Saklawi, Youssef; Van Winkle, Jason W; Zea, Diego F; Laguio-Vila, Maryrose; Walsh, Edward E; Falsey, Ann R; Carvajal, Karen; Hyzy, Robert C; Hanna, Sinan; Olbrich, Norman; Traenkner, Jessica J; Kraft, Colleen S; Tebas, Pablo; Baron, Jillian T; Levine, Corri; Nock, Joy; Billings, Joanne; Kim, Hyun; Elie-Turenne, Marie-Carmelle; Whitaker, Jennifer A; Luetkemeyer, Anne F; Dwyer, Jay; Bainbridge, Emma; Gyun Choe, Pyoeng; Kyung Kang, Chang; Jilg, Nikolaus; Cantos, Valeria D; Bhamidipati, Divya R; Nithin Gopalsamy, Srinivasa; Chary, Aarthi; Jung, Jongtak; Song, Kyoung-Ho; Kim, Hong Bin; Benson, Constance A; McConnell, Kimberly; Wang, Jennifer P; Wessolossky, Mireya; Perez, Katherine; Eubank, Taryn A; Berjohn, Catherine; Utz, Gregory C; Jackson, Patrick E H; Bell, Taison D; Haughey, Heather M; Moanna, Abeer; Cribbs, Sushma; Harrison, Telisha; Colombo, Christopher J; Schofield, Christina; Colombo, Rhonda E; Tapson, Victor F; Grein, Jonathan; Sutterwala, Fayyaz; Ince, Dilek; Winokur, Patricia L; Fung, Monica; Jang, Hannah; Wyles, David; Frank, Maria G; Sarcone, Ellen; Neumann, Henry; Viswanathan, Anand; Hochman, Sarah; Mulligan, Mark; Eckhardt, Benjamin; Carmody, Ellie; Ahuja, Neera; Nadeau, Kari; Svec, David; Macaraeg, Jeffrey C; Morrow, Lee; Quimby, Dave; Bessesen, Mary; Nicholson, Lindsay; Adams, Jill; Kumar, Princy; Lambert, Allison A; Arguinchona, Henry; Alicic, Radica Z; Saito, Sho; Ohmagari, Norio; Mikami, Ayako; Chien Lye, David; Hong Lee, Tau; Ying Chia, Po; Hsieh, Lanny; Amin, Alpesh N; Watanabe, Miki; Candiotti, Keith A; Castro, Jose G; Antor, Maria A; Lee, Tida; Lalani, Tahaniyat; Novak, Richard M; Wendrow, Andrea; Borgetti, Scott A; George, Sarah L; Hoft, Daniel F; Brien, James D; Cohen, Stuart H; Thompson, George R 3rd; Chakrabarty, Melony; Guirgis, Faheem; Davey, Richard T; Voell, Jocelyn; Strich, Jeffrey R; Lindholm, David A; Mende, Katrin; Wellington, Trevor R; Rapaka, Rekha R; Husson, Jennifer S; Levine, Andrea R; Yen Tan, Seow; Shafi, Humaira; Chien, Jaime M F; Hostler, David C; Hostler, Jordanna M; Shahan, Brian T; Adams, David H; Osinusi, Anu; Cao, Huyen; Burgess, Timothy H; Rozman, Julia; Chung, Kevin K; Nieuwoudt, Christina; El-Khorazaty, Jill A; Hill, Heather; Pettibone, Stephanie; Gettinger, Nikki; Engel, Theresa; Lewis, Teri; Wang, Jing; Deye, Gregory A; Nomicos, Effie; Pikaart-Tautges, Rhonda; Elsafy, Mohamed; Jurao, Robert; Koo, Hyung; Proschan, Michael; Yokum, Tammy; Arega, Janice; Florese, Ruth
BACKGROUND:Baricitinib and dexamethasone have randomised trials supporting their use for the treatment of patients with COVID-19. We assessed the combination of baricitinib plus remdesivir versus dexamethasone plus remdesivir in preventing progression to mechanical ventilation or death in hospitalised patients with COVID-19. METHODS:In this randomised, double-blind, double placebo-controlled trial, patients were enrolled at 67 trial sites in the USA (60 sites), South Korea (two sites), Mexico (two sites), Singapore (two sites), and Japan (one site). Hospitalised adults (≥18 years) with COVID-19 who required supplemental oxygen administered by low-flow (≤15 L/min), high-flow (>15 L/min), or non-invasive mechanical ventilation modalities who met the study eligibility criteria (male or non-pregnant female adults ≥18 years old with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection) were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either baricitinib, remdesivir, and placebo, or dexamethasone, remdesivir, and placebo using a permuted block design. Randomisation was stratified by study site and baseline ordinal score at enrolment. All patients received remdesivir (≤10 days) and either baricitinib (or matching oral placebo) for a maximum of 14 days or dexamethasone (or matching intravenous placebo) for a maximum of 10 days. The primary outcome was the difference in mechanical ventilation-free survival by day 29 between the two treatment groups in the modified intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses were done in the as-treated population, comprising all participants who received one dose of the study drug. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04640168. FINDINGS/RESULTS:Between Dec 1, 2020, and April 13, 2021, 1047 patients were assessed for eligibility. 1010 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, 516 (51%) to baricitinib plus remdesivir plus placebo and 494 (49%) to dexamethasone plus remdesivir plus placebo. The mean age of the patients was 58·3 years (SD 14·0) and 590 (58%) of 1010 patients were male. 588 (58%) of 1010 patients were White, 188 (19%) were Black, 70 (7%) were Asian, and 18 (2%) were American Indian or Alaska Native. 347 (34%) of 1010 patients were Hispanic or Latino. Mechanical ventilation-free survival by day 29 was similar between the study groups (Kaplan-Meier estimates of 87·0% [95% CI 83·7 to 89·6] in the baricitinib plus remdesivir plus placebo group and 87·6% [84·2 to 90·3] in the dexamethasone plus remdesivir plus placebo group; risk difference 0·6 [95% CI -3·6 to 4·8]; p=0·91). The odds ratio for improved status in the dexamethasone plus remdesivir plus placebo group compared with the baricitinib plus remdesivir plus placebo group was 1·01 (95% CI 0·80 to 1·27). At least one adverse event occurred in 149 (30%) of 503 patients in the baricitinib plus remdesivir plus placebo group and 179 (37%) of 482 patients in the dexamethasone plus remdesivir plus placebo group (risk difference 7·5% [1·6 to 13·3]; p=0·014). 21 (4%) of 503 patients in the baricitinib plus remdesivir plus placebo group had at least one treatment-related adverse event versus 49 (10%) of 482 patients in the dexamethasone plus remdesivir plus placebo group (risk difference 6·0% [2·8 to 9·3]; p=0·00041). Severe or life-threatening grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 143 (28%) of 503 patients in the baricitinib plus remdesivir plus placebo group and 174 (36%) of 482 patients in the dexamethasone plus remdesivir plus placebo group (risk difference 7·7% [1·8 to 13·4]; p=0·012). INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:In hospitalised patients with COVID-19 requiring supplemental oxygen by low-flow, high-flow, or non-invasive ventilation, baricitinib plus remdesivir and dexamethasone plus remdesivir resulted in similar mechanical ventilation-free survival by day 29, but dexamethasone was associated with significantly more adverse events, treatment-related adverse events, and severe or life-threatening adverse events. A more individually tailored choice of immunomodulation now appears possible, where side-effect profile, ease of administration, cost, and patient comorbidities can all be considered. FUNDING/BACKGROUND:National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
PMID: 35617986
ISSN: 2213-2619
CID: 5249952
CoLchicine for Treatment of OsteoArthritis of the Knee (CLOAK)-A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial [Meeting Abstract]
Samuels, J; Pillinger, M; Toprover, M; Samuels, S K; Patil, A; Bomfim, F; La, Rocca Vieira R; Wei, D; Catron, S; Coronel, M; Kim, A; Moussavi, S
Background/Purpose: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is an inflammatory disease, with a probable role for IL-1b. Calcium and urate crystals may promote OA by activating the NLRP3 inflammasome to produce IL-1b. Colchicine is a well-tolerated anti-inflammatory agent that inhibits the inflammasome and suppresses IL-1b. Studies examining the impact of colchicine on knee OA have yielded varying results, with some reporting pain relief, others improvement of inflammatory markers, and none assessing synovial effusions. We report the interim, blinded results of our ongoing colchicine trial for knee OA.
Method(s): CLOAK is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of colchicine (once daily for 3 months) (Figure 1). We are enrolling subjects >= 40 years of age, with symptomatic knee OA, Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3 radiographs, and willingness to forego other anti-inflammatory therapy during the trial. The primary outcome is the change in knee pain by visual analog scale (VAS) after 3 months of treatment, comparing the colchicine and placebo groups. Secondary outcomes include pre to post treatment Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), mean doses of analgesics used, and changes in plasma and peripheral blood leukocyte inflammatory markers. Patients undergo knee ultrasound (US) pre-and post-treatment to assess synovitis and effusion. We aspirate synovial fluid when appropriate, and will analyze all available blood and synovial samples after study completion.
Result(s): To date, 715 potential subjects have been contacted, 82 screened, and 71 enrolled. Among 60 who have completed the study, 51.6% are male, 60% White, 30% Black, 3.3% Asian and 6.7% other, with mean BMI of 27.6 kg/m2 and age of 66.8 years. The mean VAS pain score among all completing participants (subjects and controls combined) improved Figure 1. Flow diagram of study plan. Figure 2. Subject improvement in KOOS score from beginning to end of study, according to high or low baseline severity as measured by VAS and KOOS scores and presence of synovial effusion. by 0.98 units in the index knee, and mean KOOS scores improved for symptoms, pain, activities of daily living (ADL), sports activity, and quality of life (QOL). Overall 36 (60%) demonstrated VAS improvement (mean improvement 2.3) whereas 24 (40%) demonstrated no change or worsening. Overall, subjects whose VAS improved showed concordant improvement in the KOOS: mean symptoms by 10.5, pain by 12.4, ADL by 14.8, sports activity by 5.8 and QOL by 11.4 units. The subsets of patients with baseline VAS >=6 and baseline KOOS <=60 (i.e., more severe) showed significantly more 3-month KOOS pain improvement, even with the blinded inclusion of placebo (Figure 2). All underwent US at baseline and 3 months. Among 36 patients with VAS improvement over 3 months, 6 had baseline synovial effusions >=4 mm (in longitudinal and transverse views) and 5 of these effusions were smaller on US post-treatment and one remained stable.
Conclusion(s): The results of this blinded analysis are consistent with a potential benefit of colchicine for pain, function and effusion in subjects not taking other anti-inflammatory agents. Enrollment is ongoing and the study will be unblinded and fully analyzed after completion
EMBASE:639965805
ISSN: 2326-5205
CID: 5513072