Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Colorectal strictures have been considered independent risk factors for neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We examined the association between colorectal stricture and subsequent risk of colorectal neoplasia (CRN) in patients with IBD colitis undergoing colonoscopic surveillance. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with IBD colitis enrolled in colonoscopic surveillance for CRN at an academic medical center between 2005 and 2017. Inclusion criteria were IBD involving the colon for ≥8 years (or any duration with primary sclerosing cholangitis [PSC]) undergoing surveillance. Exclusion criteria were advanced CRN (ACRN; colorectal cancer [CRC] or high-grade dysplasia [HGD]) prior to or at enrollment, prior colectomy, or limited (<30%) disease extent or proctitis. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression analysis estimated the association between colorectal stricture on the index colonoscopy and ACRN, CRN (indefinite dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia, HGD, CRC), or colectomy. RESULTS:Among 789 patients with IBD undergoing CRC surveillance, 72 (9%; 70 with Crohn's colitis) had a colorectal stricture on index colonoscopy. There was no significant difference in the frequency of ACRN or requirement for colectomy between patients with vs without a colorectal stricture (P > .05). Colorectal stricture was not associated with subsequent ACRN (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.41; 95% CI, 0.49-4.07), CRN (aOR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.51-2.58), or colectomy (aOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.65-1.84). CONCLUSIONS:In this analysis of patients with IBD colitis undergoing CRN surveillance, the presence of a colorectal stricture was not independently associated with risk of ACRN or colectomy. Multicenter, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings, particularly in patients with ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal stricture.

BACKGROUND: Midwives are a vital component of addressing maternal mortality crisis in the United States (US); however, there is scant understanding of the elements of midwifery practice that affect patient outcomes and the stability of the midwifery workforce in the country. This study investigates US midwives"™ perceptions of factors influencing their practice and willingness to stay in the profession. METHODS: We applied a pragmatic qualitative design using summative content analysis techniques to code 1,035 comments from a national sample of 2,887 certified nurse-midwives and certified midwives. Two coders identified categories and themes of midwives"™ perceptions of their practice environments, which were confirmed by an independent auditor. RESULTS: Eight themes emerged from the data: I love midwifery but"¦; feeling valued and respected"¦or not; workload; time and its consequences; the multilevel geography of midwifery practice; changes at odds with quality midwifery care; midwives withdrawing from practice to cope; and the ambiguity of "I just want to practice like a midwife." CONCLUSION: Midwives readily identified aspects of their practice environment that negatively impact quality of care and stability of the midwifery workforce, including not valuing midwives, high workload, regulatory restrictions, and moral distress; however, respondents expressed strong commitment to the profession of midwifery. The findings also demonstrated the lack of a universally accepted definition of midwifery care within respondents"™ professional communities and among respondents. Initiatives to increase integration of midwifery into the US perinatal health system will benefit from taking these findings into consideration.

It has been over 50 years since the Stonewall Inn Riots in June 1969, a seminal event for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and other sexual and gender-diverse minorities (LGBTQI+, or lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and everyone else) rights movement. However, sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals still face discrimination and harassment due to their sexual orientation or gender identity. As such, the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities has identified SGM communities as a "health disparity population." Broadly, there are higher rates of sexually transmitted infections, substance use and abuse, mental health conditions, obesity and eating disorders, certain cancers (breast, cervical, and anorectal), and cardiovascular disease in SGM communities. Transgender patients, especially those of color, are more likely to be uninsured, experience discrimination, and be denied health care than cisgender patients. In addition, SGM individuals have twice the risk of lifetime exposure to emotional, physical, and sexual trauma compared with heterosexuals. It is expected all these factors would negatively affect digestive health as well. This review summarizes the effects of social determinants of health and discrimination on health care access, highlights important digestive diseases to consider in the SGM population, and offers solutions to improve and prioritize the health of these communities. We aim to draw attention to SGM-specific issues that affect gastrointestinal health and spur research that is desperately lacking.

BACKGROUND: Central nervous system (CNS) germinomas are commonly located in the suprasellar and/or pineal regions. Current treatment strategies include irradiation (RT) alone or chemotherapy with RT to reduce the dose and field of RT. However, given their rarity and poorly defined imaging characteristics, germinomas originating in the basal ganglia/ thalami (BGTG) have proven challenging to treat. We present a case series of six patients with metastatic BGTG, given the paucity of published research on patients with metastatic CNS BGTG.
METHOD(S): A retrospective multi-institutional review was performed across four institutions in two countries.
RESULT(S): Two patients were females, and four were males. The median age at presentation was 14.9 years. Biopsies were performed in all patients except for one patient who underwent subtotal surgical resection of her primary tumor. Three patients received RT only, while the remaining three received chemotherapy with RT. Carboplatin and etoposide were used in all three patients who received chemotherapy. All six patients received craniospinal irradiation (CSI). For patients who received RT only, the CSI dose ranged between (24 -27.2 Gy) with a total dose to the primary site ranging between (36 -40 Gy). For patients who received chemotherapy, one patient received 36 Gy with a total dose of 54 Gy to the primary site. The second patient received 24 Gy with a total dose of 40 Gy to the primary site. The CSI dose was not available for the third patient. All patients remain alive with a median event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of 49 months (range: 14.3 -168 months).
CONCLUSION(S): In our series, patients with metastatic CNS BGTG treated with CSI with or without chemotherapy had excellent outcomes. Future larger studies are needed to compare the outcomes between CSI only and chemotherapy with low-dose CSI among patients with metastatic CNS BGTG

BACKGROUND:Hospitalist physicians' workload-the total number of patients they care for daily-is rising in the U.S. Hospitalists report that increased workload negatively affects patients care. OBJECTIVE:Measure the associations between hospitalist physicians' workload and clinical outcomes. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:Observational study, using electronic health record (EHR) data, of adults hospitalized on the hospitalist service at Yale-New Haven Hospital from 2015-2018. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES/METHODS:We defined hospitalists' workload as the number of patients they cared for on the first full hospital day of a given patient's encounter. We used multilevel Poisson and logistic regression to examine associations between workload and length of stay (LOS), return to the Emergency Department (ED), and readmission. We adjusted for sociodemographic factors, patient complexity and severity of illness, and weekend admission (for LOS) or discharge (for ED visits or readmission). RESULTS:We analyzed 38,141 hospitalizations. Median patient age was 64 years (IQR 51-78 years), 53% were female, and 34% were nonwhite. Mean workload was 15 patients (SD 3 patients; range 10-34 patients). LOS was prolonged by 0.05 days (95% CI 0.02, 0.08; p(0.001) when comparing the 75th workload percentile (16 patients) to the 25th workload percentile (13 patients). There were no associations between workload and ED visits or readmission within 7 and 30 days. CONCLUSIONS:There was a statistically significant but modest relationship between workload and LOS; workload was not associated with ED visits or readmissions.Given clinical reports of the deleterious effects of increased hospitalist workload, there is a need for prospective research assessing a range of outcomes, beyond those measurable in contemporary EHR data.

This third paper in the "Confronting Racism in All Forms of Pain Research" series discusses adopting an antiracism framework across all pain research disciplines and highlights the significant benefits of doing so. We build upon the previous call to action and the proposed reframing of study designs articulated in the other papers in the series and seek to confront and eradicate racism through a shared commitment to change current research practices. Specifically, we emphasize the systematic disadvantage created by racialization (ie, the Eurocentric social and political process of ascribing racialized identities to a relationship, social practice, or group) and discuss how engaging communities in partnership can increase the participation of racialized groups in research studies and enrich the knowledge gained. Alongside this critical work, we indicate why diversifying the research environment (ie, research teams, labs, departments, and culture) enriches our scientific discovery and promotes recruitment and retention of participants from racialized groups. Finally, we recommend changes in reporting and dissemination practices so that we do not stigmatize or reproduce oppressive forms of power for racialized groups. Although this shift may be challenging in some cases, the increase in equity, generalizability, and credibility of the data produced will expand our knowledge and reflect the pain experiences of all communities more accurately. PERSPECTIVE: Perspective: In this third paper in our series, we advocate for a shared commitment toward an antiracism framework in pain research. We identify community partnerships, diversification of research environments, and changes to our dissemination practices as areas where oppressive forms of power can be reduced.