Faculty Bibliography

Introduction: A transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) carries a 2% risk of postoperative upper gastrointestinal bleeding. It presents as extensive bleeding resulting in hemorrhagic shock or respiratory failure. In this case, an early clot with sentinel bleeding prevented the widening of a full thickness aortoesophageal fistula formed from the TAVR placement, was symptomatic enough to prompt an earlier esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and prevented a probable fatality. Case Description/Methods: An 85-year-old male with a past medical history of AAA repair, GERD, HLD, TIA, aortic dissection s/p coronary bypass graft, AS with TAVR 5 months prior presented with hematemesis after initiating colonoscopy bowel prep. He also had unintentional 30-lb weight loss over 3 months, fecal incontinence, and melena. Medications include a daily aspirin. Abdominal CT demonstrated an 8cm aortic arch aneurysm, a 5cm descending thoracic aortic aneurysm, and a 5.8 x 4 cm collection posterolateral to the aorta with proximal dilation of the esophagus. EGD demonstrated a partially obstructing protruding mass in the esophagus 20 cm from the incisors with sentinel bleeding from an adherent clot. The mass was determined to be extrinsic compression from the aortic arch aneurysm with the TAVR seen through the aortoesophageal fistula (Image 1A-1B). The stomach and duodenum were unremarkable. Patient was transferred to vascular surgery where a 1cm compressed Amplatzer Vascular Plug II embolization and reinforcement of the endoleak was done. Patient remained hemodynamically stable and discharged home with a vascular follow up.
Discussion(s): Aorto-esophageal fistula following TAVR is a rare complication with a wide etiology ranging from infections, antithrombotic use, pressure necrosis, angiodysplasia, underlying PUD, or uncontrolled comorbidities such as HTN. Our patient's risk factors were his elderly age, comorbidities, use of daily aspirin, and contribution from the pressure or ischemic necrosis of the aortic aneurysm compressing on the esophagus. Presentation involves hemoptysis, chest pain, hemorrhagic shock, respiratory failure and frank bleeding. CTA is considered the initial test of diagnosis as endoscopy, though sensitive, could rupture the clot and unleash massive bleeding. In this case, sentinel bleeding and visualization of the TAVR through the fistula was enough to diagnose and retreat to be treated appropriately with embolization and reinforcement

Introduction: Crohn's disease (CD) carries a major healthcare burden, costing over $10 billion a year in the United States. Strictures are a common complication of CD, emerging in over half of patients after 20 years from diagnosis, and requiring invasive interventions such as surgery which further increases healthcare costs. Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) has emerged as an alternative intervention in managing CD strictures. We determined the cost-effectiveness of EBD versus resection surgery for patients with short (<4-5cm) anastomotic or primary small or large bowel strictures.
Method(s): A microsimulation state-transition model simulated the benefits and risks of EBD and bowel resection surgery for patients with primary or anastomotic strictures due to CD. Our base case was a 40-year-old patient with CD who developed a stricture. Strategies included EBD or surgery as a patient's first procedure, after which they were allowed to receive either procedure based on probabilities of subsequent intervention derived from the literature. Our primary outcome was qualityadjusted life years (QALYs) over ten years, and strategies were compared using a willingness to pay of $100,000/QALY from a societal perspective. Costs (in 2021 $US) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated. Deterministic 1-way and probabilistic analyses assessed model uncertainty.
Result(s): The EBD strategy cost $19,822 and resulted in 6.18 QALYs while the surgery strategy cost $41,358 and resulted in 6.37 QALYs. Surgery had an ICER of $113,332 per QALY, making EBD a cost-effective strategy. The median number of EBDs was 6 in the EBD strategy and 0 in the surgery strategy. The median number of surgeries was 2 in the surgery strategy and 1 in the EBD strategy. Of individuals who initially received EBD, 50.4% underwent subsequent surgery. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the probabilities of requiring repeated interventions, surgery mortality (, 0.6%), and quality of life after interventions were the most influential parameters in our model. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses favored EBD in 50.9% of iterations.
Conclusion(s): EBD, when feasible, is a cost-effective strategy for managing CD primary or anastomotic strictures. Sensitivity analyses show that differences in patient risk and quality of life after intervention can impact cost-effectiveness. The decision between EBD or surgery should be made considering cost-effectiveness, patient risks, and quality of life preferences

Background: Forensic odontology, a branch of dentistry includes identification of individuals in various crime scenes, natural calamities, and mass disasters. The identification is possible because every individual body is unique and so is our tongue due to its morphological variations. The primary objective of the study was to assess the morphological features of the tongue and its use in sex determination.
Method(s): The study included a sample size of 100 individuals (50 males and 50 females) in the age range of 20-50 years old. Photographs were taken of front and side view of the tongue; visual inspection was done and lastly impressions of the tongue were made with help of alginate and then poured with the help of dental stone. IBM SPSS statistics 20.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for the analyses of the data. Microsoft word and Excel were used to generate graphs, tables etc. Females presented with triangular shape, presence of shallow fissures more commonly and a sharp lingual apex of tongue. Males presented with rectangular shape, presence of deep fissure/absence of fissures more commonly and septate/ sharp lingual apex of the tongue.
Conclusion(s): Tongue exhibits various unique characteristics and can be used in sex determination.
Copyright

Introduction: Cytotoxic drugs are hampered by limited efficacy. Hence, a personalized treatment approach matching chemotherapy with appropriate patients remains an unmet need. Genomic heterogeneity creates an opportunity to discern key genomic aberrations and pathways that confer resistance and response to standard treatment options. We conducted a study using the Cellworks Computational Omics Biology Model (CBM) to identify novel genomic biomarkers associated with response among Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving platinum-based treatments.
Method(s): 104 NSCLC patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy were selected from TCGA: platinum-etoposide (N=18), platinum-gemcitabine (N=20), platinum-vinorelbine (N=31), platinum-paclitaxel (N=21), and platinum-docetaxel (N=14). Mutation and CNV from each case served as input for the CBM to generate a patient-specific protein network-map based on PubMed and other resources. Biomarkers unique to each patient were identified within protein network-maps. Drug impact on the disease network was biosimulated to determine efficacy score by measuring the effect of chemotherapy on the cell growth score, a composite of cell proliferation, viability, apoptosis, metastasis, DNA damage and other cancer hallmarks. Effectively, the mechanism of action of each drug was mapped to each patient's genome and biological consequences determined response.
Result(s): Among the 104 patients, 74 were responders (R) and 30 non-responders (NR), determined using compete and partial response based on RECIST criteria (Figure 1). The CBM predicted clinical response with 73% sensitivity and 77% specificity. Cellworks CBM identified novel biomarkers responsible for platinum-based combination therapy response as mentioned below. +Etoposide: 13q-del, RB1-del, MBD1-del, LIG4-del, ERCC5-del, ATP7B-del +Gemcitabine: AKT3-amp, MAPKAP2-amp, TAP1-del +Vinorelbine: TET2-del/LOF, TRIB3-amp, SLX4-del +Paclitaxel: KLF4-del, SNCG-del, RAC1-amp/GOF +Docetaxel: BCL2L1-amp, HMGA1-amp, NSD1-del, SLC22A7-amp, FSIP1-del These genes contributed to drug efficacy by impacting various pathways, including DNA repair, oxidative-stress, methylation machinery, spindle formation, and mitotic-catastrophe. The aberration frequency of these genes was high among the responders within each subgroup and was very low in non-responders. Additionally, a model of clinical outcome versus the linear and quadratic function of efficacy score, drug combination and the interaction of both showed that efficacy score provides predictive information above and beyond the choice of drug combination alone (likelihood ratio chi-sq = 35.56, df=13, p-value = 0.0007). [Formula presented]
Conclusion(s): This pilot study highlights how the Cellworks CBM biosimulation platform can help identify patients for therapy response prediction. By using novel biomarkers, a CBM-informed decision tree can be employed to identify the optimal drug combination for platinum-based therapy. We suggest that this approach be validated prospectively in a larger patient cohort. Keywords: Cancer Therapy Biosimulation, Multi-omics Therapy Biosimulation, Personalized Cancer Therapy
Copyright

Introduction: Children and adolescents with pre-existing type 1 diabetes (T1D) diagnosed with COVID-19 are at risk of adverse outcomes such as hospitalizations and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). There is limited data on the association between the presence of one or more comorbidities and the risk of adverse outcomes for patients with preexisting T1D and COVID19.
Objective(s): This study's aim is to determine if pediatric and adolescent patients with T1D and other pre-existing comorbidities were more likely to experience adverse outcomes than T1D patients with COVID-19 who did not have any other comorbidities.
Method(s): Data from 592 patients with previously established T1D aged <24 years with COVID-19 were analyzed from the T1Dx COVID-19 Surveillance Registry. Data were collected from 52 endocrinology clinics across the US using an online survey tool. Each clinic completed the survey using electronic medical record (EMR) data between April 2020 and May 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the study population, and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze the relationship between age, insurance type, use of diabetes technology, presence of comorbidities, adverse outcomes, and hospitalization.
Result(s): The most frequent comorbidities were obesity (14%), asthma (11%), celiac disease (9%), and hypothyroidism (7%). T1D patients with at least one other comorbidity had a higher DKA presentation (16% vs 12%, p = 0.03) and a higher all-cause hospitalization rate (24% vs 15%, p = 0.02) compared to T1D patients without additional comorbidities. T1D Patients with comorbidities and COVID-19 were almost twice as likely to be hospitalized than those with no comorbidities (Odds Ratio 1.94, 95% CI: 1.23-3.03). The most frequent comorbidities were obesity (14%), asthma (11%), celiac disease (9%), and hypothyroidism (7%). T1D patients with at least one other comorbidity had a higher DKA presentation (16% vs 12%, p = 0.03) and a higher all-cause hospitalization rate (24% vs 15%, p = 0.02) compared to T1D patients without additional comorbidities. T1D Patients with comorbidities and COVID-19 were almost twice as likely to be hospitalized than those with no comorbidities (Odds Ratio 1.94, 95% CI: 1.23-3.03).
Conclusion(s): Our data reveal higher rates of hospitalizations and adverse outcomes among children and adolescents with T1D with at least one more comorbidities and COVID-19 in comparison with T1D patients without additional comorbidities. (Table Presented)

Introduction: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have a 2-to 3-fold greater risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) than the general population, with increased risk during hospitalization. However, recent evidence suggests that this increased risk persists post-discharge. As such, we aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of post-discharge VTE prophylaxis among hospitalized patients with IBD.
Method(s): A decision tree was used to compare inpatient prophylaxis alone versus 4 weeks of postdischarge VTE prophylaxis with rivaroxaban 10 mg/day. Our primary outcome was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over one year, and strategies were compared using a willingness to pay of $100,000/QALY from a societal perspective. Costs (in 2020 $US), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), and number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one VTE and VTE death were calculated. Deterministic 1-way and probabilistic analyses were performed to assess uncertainty within the model.
Result(s): Four-week post-discharge prophylaxis with rivaroxaban resulted in 1.68 higher QALYs per 1000 persons and an incremental cost of $185,778 per QALY as compared to no postdischarge prophylaxis (see Table). The NNT to prevent a single VTE was 78 individuals, while the NNT to prevent a single VTE-related death was 3190 individuals. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that higher baseline VTE risk>4.5% or decreased cost of rivaroxaban <=$280 can reduce the ICER to<$100,000/QALY (see Figure, Tornado Diagram showing main drivers of the ICER). Probabilistic sensitivity analyses favored post-discharge prophylaxis in 30.5% of iterations
Conclusion(s): Four weeks of post-discharge VTE prophylaxis results in higher QALYs as compared to inpatient prophylaxis alone, and can prevent one post-discharge VTE among 78 patients with IBD. As such, post-discharge VTE prophylaxis in patients with IBD should be considered in a case-by-case scenario considering VTE risk profile, costs, and patient preference

Taxi and for-hire vehicle (FHV) drivers are a largely immigrant, low-income occupational group at increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Poor dental health is a CVD risk factor, and dental care access is an unexamined taxi/FHV driver CVD risk factor. A cross-sectional survey was administered to 422 taxi/FHV drivers (2016-2017) to identify predictors of access to dental health care among drivers. One-third (n = 128, 30.3%) reported needing dental care/tests/treatment within the past six months, and nearly one-half (n = 61, 48%) were delayed/unable to obtain care. Only 57.6% (n = 241) had past-year dental cleanings. Not having enough money to cover household expenses was a significant predictor of being delayed/unable to obtain needed dental care/tests/treatment in the prior six months (0.5 OR; 95% CI, 0.28-0.89; p < .05). Lack of dental insurance coverage (2.72 OR; 95% CI, 1.60-4.63; p < .001) or lack of primary care provider (2.72 OR; 95% CI, 1.60-4.63; p < .001) were associated with lack of past-year dental cleaning. Seventeen percent of drivers with Medicaid were unaware of their dental coverage, which was associated with both inability to access needed dental care/tests/treatment in the past 6 months (p = .026) and no past-year dental cleaning (p < .001). Limited understanding of dental coverage was associated with both an inability to access needed dental care/tests/treatment in the past 6 months (p = .028) and lack of past-year dental cleaning (p = .014). Our findings can inform targeted intervention development to increase taxi/FHV driver dental care access/uptake, potentially improving their CVD risk.

Introduction: Critically-ill patients with COVID-19 often require long-term enteral access due to prolonged ventilator support and slow recovery from neurologic injury. The outcomes of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 who received gastrostomy tubes (GTs) are unknown and limited guidance exists on how to safely triage GT placement in this population. The Enteral Access Team (EAT) is a multidisciplinary team led by an attending gastroenterologist (GI) hospitalist with advanced practice providers who collaborate with Palliative Care, Geriatrics, Speech-Language Pathology, and Nutrition to reduce unnecessary feeding tube placements at the end-of-life. The EAT reviews the appropriateness of GT placement and triages each case to the indicated procedural service. The EAT's multidisciplinary approach was applied for patients with COVID-19.
Method(s): We performed a retrospective study of 135 hospitalized patients with positive PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 who received GTs between 3/2020 and 4/2021. The GTs were placed by 3 services (gastroenterology, interventional radiology and surgery) at 3 hospitals within 1 health system in New York. One of the hospitals employed the multidisciplinary EAT approach to its triage of GT placement. Outcomes were compared between the EAT site and control sites where GT placement was decided through direct consultation by the primary team with one of the procedural services.
Result(s): Demographics for the two groups, including overall numbers of COVID-19 admissions, can be seen in Table 1. At the EAT site (n =43) 5% of patients expired prior to discharge following GT placement compared with 25% at the control sites (P <0.05). Patients at the EAT site were older with a mean age of 70 years compared to the control sites with a mean age of 63 years (P=0.01). There was no significant difference in the percentage of COVID-19 patients who received GTs, length-ofstay, or time from gastrostomy to discharge or death. Multivariable analysis showed the odds of in hospital mortality were 10.1 times greater with the standard workflow than with the EAT workflow (OR 10.1, [95% CI: 1.7-60.6], P <0.05).
Conclusion(s): The EAT's novel multidisciplinary team-based approach helps to appropriately select hospitalized patients with SARs-CoV-2 for long-term enteral access leading to reduced in-hospital mortality following GT placement. Additionally, this approach may help to mediate the national shortage of GTs and reduce the risk of exposure to providers involved in GT placement

Introduction: The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a common educational strategy to assess interpersonal skills and knowledge gaps, and we have previously shown its benefits in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) education. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been explosive growth in telehealth. Currently, we lack methods to teach and evaluate trainees' related skillset and no telehealth-specific milestones exist. We assessed the telehealth proficiency of gastroenterology (GI) fellows as part of an annual IBD OSCE over Zoom (Z-OSCE).
Method(s): Seven GI fellows from four programs participated in Z-OSCE featuring four clinical scenarios. We used previously validated OSCE checklists to assess the fellows' performance in IBDspecific cases. Telehealth communication skills were also assessed. One of the scenarios required the trainees to conduct a televisit focusing on preventative care for a Crohn's disease patient based on the ACG guideline. Checklists were scored on a 3-point Likert scale by the Standardized Patient (SP).
Result(s): The telehealth behavioral anchored checklist items included: maintaining proper computer etiquette, use of non-verbal communication and positioning to optimize the encounter, optimized technical aspects, and exhibiting comfort and confidence with the virtual platform. In these domains 5 or 6 (out of 7) fellows received 3 points. In contrast less than half of the fellows asked questions of the SP to make sure they understood or acknowledged emotion, and 3 out 7 fellows did not make appropriate eye contact. Despite high performance in the telehealth aspects of the encounter, the SP did not fully recommend fellows for their communication skills without reservations to friends/ family, with all fellows receiving 2 points.
Conclusion(s): Telehealth has quickly become a fixture of our profession, and merits educational opportunities and assessment to improve clinicians' competency, as it will likely outlast the COVID- 19 pandemic. To our knowledge, this is the first OSCE designed to assess telehealth performance in the delivery of IBD care. Z-OSCEs can play a unique role in simulating realistic telehealth visits and this pilot program helps us identify future educational needs. Assessment of fellows' performance during this virtual program can provide an opportunity for learning, growth and reflection as well as prepare trainees for future patient encounters

Introduction: The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) has been shown to not only assess but also improve the performance of trainees. Our group has previously demonstrated the benefits of OSCEs to assess gastroenterology (GI) fellows. We have successfully assessed performance across numerous milestones. Typically, OSCEs are held in person, however the COVID-19 pandemic has precipitated the need for virtual learning. We accordingly transitioned to a virtual zoom OSCE (Z-OSCE) and evaluated trainees' perception of this program.
Method(s): Fourteen first- and second-year GI fellows from five programs across multiple states participated in a four-station virtual OSCE on Zoom. Afterwards, participants answered a survey to share their perspectives and provide feedback. Learners were asked to rate the usefulness of the virtual OSCE and compare it to other in-person and virtual educational modalities. These questions were rated on a 10-point Likert scale (Figure 1). Additionally, free-text responses regarding any aspect of the OSCE were evaluated for comments on the virtual format.
Result(s): In comparing the usefulness of the virtual OSCE to other in-person modalities, trainees rated it a mean of 7.15 (range 5-10), and 31% of respondents rated it a 9 or 10. Trainees rated the virtual OSCE compared to other virtual learning modalities a mean of 8.15 (range 5-10), and 43% rated it 9 or 10. When asked whether they would recommend this OSCE as a training tool, the trainees gave a mean recommendation of 7.77 (range 5-10), and 38% gave a 9 or 10. General feedback regarding the nature of the OSCE noted the virtual format worked well, orientation to the format was important and could be improved by providing it in an email beforehand.
Conclusion(s): Virtual learning has been necessary during the COVID-19 pandemic, and it is crucial to evaluate the value of the novel Z-OSCE. Participants found the virtual OSCE may be more useful than in-person learning modalities and it compared favorably to other virtual learning modalities. One benefit of this modality was the easier inclusion of fellows from geographically disparate areas negating the need to travel for this program, a benefit given lack of universal access to simulation using standardized patients. To improve future exams, orientation prior to the day of the OSCE may improve trainees' experiences.