Faculty Bibliography

Background Stroke remains a leading cause of death and long-term disability. Although stem cell-based approaches are being investigated as possible regenerative strategies for stroke, public perceptions of their potential benefits, risks, mechanisms, and clinical use are not well-characterized. This exploratory survey described responses to an investigator-developed questionnaire about stem cell therapy for stroke. Methods A 10-item cross-sectional questionnaire was distributed electronically through Google Forms (Google, Inc., Mountain View, CA) to 36 individuals in a convenience sample; 26 completed questionnaires were received (response rate: 72.2%). The questionnaire was investigator-developed and was not validated as a measure of factual knowledge, clinical efficacy, or safety. Responses were categorized as "yes," "no," or "maybe"; one item used time-based response categories. Counts and percentages were calculated using the total number of completed questionnaires as the denominator. The survey was independently conducted as a student-led summer academic project and did not undergo review by an institutional review board, school ethics committee, or independent ethics authority. Results Twenty-six responses were analyzed. For the item asking whether embryonic stem cells are effective in stroke treatment, eight respondents (30.77%) selected "yes," 16 (61.54%) selected "maybe," and two (7.69%) selected "no." For the item asking whether stem cell treatment has advantages for stroke, 21 respondents (80.77%) selected "yes," four (15.38%) selected "maybe," and one (3.85%) selected "no." "Maybe" was the majority or joint-most-frequent response for six of 10 items, including items about animal testing, adverse effects, alternative regenerative treatments, and use during pregnancy. Conclusions In this small convenience sample, responses to an investigator-developed questionnaire suggested favorable perceptions of possible benefits of stem cell therapy for stroke, alongside frequent uncertainty about safety, mechanisms, the timing of improvement, and use in special populations. Because the questionnaire was not validated as a factual-knowledge instrument, findings should be interpreted strictly as descriptive perceptions rather than as evidence of respondents' medical knowledge, treatment confidence, or the clinical efficacy or safety of stem cell therapy. Larger studies using validated instruments and representative sampling are needed.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To compare growth z-scores and prematurity-related comorbidities for preterm infants receiving Soybean Oil-Intravenous Lipid Emulsion (SO-ILE) versus Soybean + Medium-chain triglycerides + Olive + Fish oil ILE (SMOF-ILE). STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:A multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 347 preterm infants <32 weeks' gestational age with birth weight ≤1500 grams who received SO-ILE or SMOF-ILE for at least seven consecutive days. RESULTS:SO-ILE group (n = 179) demonstrated significantly improved growth for length (p ≤ 0.001) and head circumference z-scores (p = 0.015) at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age and significantly worse growth for weight z-scores at 1 month (p = 0.017) compared to the SMOF-ILE group (n = 168). SO-ILE group had significantly lower rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (p < 0.001) and urinary tract infections (UTI) (p = 0.045). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In this population, SO-ILE had better outcomes for growth, BPD, and UTI compared to SMOF-ILE. Therefore, SO-ILE remains a reasonable lipid emulsion for preterm infants until more evidence is available.

BACKGROUND:Bispecific T-cell-engaging antibodies against BCMA and GPRC5D demonstrate high efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) but are associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), traditionally prompting inpatient monitoring when commencing therapy. Contemporary step-up dosing and prophylactic strategies may enable safe outpatient administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:We conducted a single-center retrospective study evaluating outpatient step-up dosing (SUD) of teclistamab or talquetamab in adults with RRMM. Patients met institutional outpatient eligibility criteria and received standard pre-medications; prophylactic tocilizumab was administered at physician discretion. The primary endpoint was incidence and severity of CRS/ICANS. Secondary endpoints included SUD completion, healthcare utilization, and need for hospitalization. RESULTS:Thirty-eight patients underwent 43 outpatient SUD initiations (teclistamab n = 30; talquetamab n = 13). Median age was 72 years, and disease burden was high. SUD completion occurred in 93%. CRS occurred in 26% of initiations and was exclusively grade 1-2; no grade ≥ 3 CRS occurred. One possible grade III ICANS event (2%) occurred after completion of SUD. CRS incidence was similar with and without prophylactic tocilizumab (29% vs 32%). Most events occurred during the first two step-up doses. Hospitalization occurred in 5 (12%) SUD initiations for CRS/ICANS events and overall healthcare utilization was modest. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Outpatient administration of teclistamab and talquetamab SUD in RRMM is feasible and safe with low rates of low-grade CRS. Toxicities occur early and are manageable with structured monitoring, supporting outpatient delivery in appropriately selected patients.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To compare growth z-scores and prematurity-related comorbidities for preterm infants receiving Soybean Oil-Intravenous Lipid Emulsion (SO-ILE) versus Soybean + Medium-chain triglycerides + Olive + Fish oil ILE (SMOF-ILE). STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:A multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 347 preterm infants <32 weeks' gestational age with birth weight ≤1500 grams who received SO-ILE or SMOF-ILE for at least seven consecutive days. RESULTS:SO-ILE group (n = 179) demonstrated significantly improved growth for length (p ≤ 0.001) and head circumference z-scores (p = 0.015) at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age and significantly worse growth for weight z-scores at 1 month (p = 0.017) compared to the SMOF-ILE group (n = 168). SO-ILE group had significantly lower rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (p < 0.001) and urinary tract infections (UTI) (p = 0.045). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In this population, SO-ILE had better outcomes for growth, BPD, and UTI compared to SMOF-ILE. Therefore, SO-ILE remains a reasonable lipid emulsion for preterm infants until more evidence is available.

Lynch syndrome and BRCA-mutation associated malignancies are fortunately rare. Affected patients have an increased risk of cancer diagnosis at a young age, often significantly overlapping with their reproductive years. In helping these patients, oncologists must navigate the following areas of care: cancer prevention, impact of cancer prevention strategies on fertility, impact of cancer treatment on fertility, effective cancer therapies, and preservation of fertility without compromising oncologic outcomes. This intersectionality between fertility preservation and effective cancer prevention/therapy makes the care of these patients extremely complex. With the utility of multidisciplinary care models, careful employment of evolving new treatment strategies, it is possible for patients to achieve their fertility desires while at the same time being protected from the risks imposed by their genetic mutations.

Contact dermatitis (CD) is the 5th most common skin disease1 and affects 15-20% of the general population over their lifetimes.2 Currently, the T.R.U.E. TEST® is the only FDA-approved diagnostic product to aid in the diagnosis of Allergic Contact Dermatitis. To address that diagnostic gap, the US Food and Drug Administration held a public workshop in October 2025. These proceedings summarize the workshop presentations and discussions.

BACKGROUND:Bispecific T-cell-engaging antibodies against BCMA and GPRC5D demonstrate high efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) but are associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), traditionally prompting inpatient monitoring when commencing therapy. Contemporary step-up dosing and prophylactic strategies may enable safe outpatient administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:We conducted a single-center retrospective study evaluating outpatient step-up dosing (SUD) of teclistamab or talquetamab in adults with RRMM. Patients met institutional outpatient eligibility criteria and received standard pre-medications; prophylactic tocilizumab was administered at physician discretion. The primary endpoint was incidence and severity of CRS/ICANS. Secondary endpoints included SUD completion, healthcare utilization, and need for hospitalization. RESULTS:Thirty-eight patients underwent 43 outpatient SUD initiations (teclistamab n = 30; talquetamab n = 13). Median age was 72 years, and disease burden was high. SUD completion occurred in 93%. CRS occurred in 26% of initiations and was exclusively grade 1-2; no grade ≥ 3 CRS occurred. One possible grade III ICANS event (2%) occurred after completion of SUD. CRS incidence was similar with and without prophylactic tocilizumab (29% vs 32%). Most events occurred during the first two step-up doses. Hospitalization occurred in 5 (12%) SUD initiations for CRS/ICANS events and overall healthcare utilization was modest. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Outpatient administration of teclistamab and talquetamab SUD in RRMM is feasible and safe with low rates of low-grade CRS. Toxicities occur early and are manageable with structured monitoring, supporting outpatient delivery in appropriately selected patients.

Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is a common interventional radiology (IR) procedure typically used in the treatment of biliary obstruction when an endoscopic approach has failed or is not technically feasible. PTBD has a low overall complication rate with the Society of Interventional Radiology suggesting adverse event thresholds of 10% for major complications, 5.7% for hemorrhage, 2% for hemobilia, and 3.3% for death, with the average reported rates of each of these being significantly lower. However, in rare instances serious complications such as vascular injury occur. The present report describes a case of a 62-year-old woman with Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis and remote Whipple procedure who developed symptomatic choledocholithiasis with failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Interventional radiology was consulted for PTBD, which was complicated by an iatrogenic portobiliary fistula (PBF). Diagnosis required sequential imaging and procedural evaluation, as initial non-invasive computed tomography (CT) and initial portal venography failed to clearly demonstrate the connection due to catheter occlusion of the fistula. This case report focuses on the management of this complication, which was successfully treated with balloon-expandable covered stent placement in the biliary system and dual-tract coil embolization.

Contact dermatitis (CD) is the 5th most common skin disease1 and affects 15-20% of the general population over their lifetimes.2 Currently, the T.R.U.E. TEST® is the only FDA-approved diagnostic product to aid in the diagnosis of Allergic Contact Dermatitis. To address that diagnostic gap, the US Food and Drug Administration held a public workshop in October 2025. These proceedings summarize the workshop presentations and discussions.