Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Robotic hiatal hernia repair (RHHR) has emerged as an innovative alternative to conventional laparoscopic techniques, offering potential advantages in visualization, dexterity, and ergonomics. However, predictors of revision surgery following RHHR remain incompletely understood. This systematic review investigates key surgical and patient factors associated with revision within 5 years following RHHR. METHODS:We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception through July 2025 for studies reporting revision or recurrence after RHHR, following PRISMA 2020 guidance. Eligible studies enrolled adults undergoing primary RHHR (≥ 10 patients) and reported revision or recurrence with at least 12 months of follow-up. Two reviewers independently screened records and extracted data, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer; methodological quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Because of substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity (variable hernia size criteria, fundoplication and crural closure techniques, outcome definitions, and follow-up duration), a formal quantitative meta-analysis was judged inappropriate; we therefore performed a structured descriptive synthesis with sample size-weighted pooled estimates where data permitted. RESULTS:), advanced age (> 70 years), and comorbidities (diabetes, chronic steroid use) showed inconsistent associations with revision risk, with only 6 of 14 cohorts performing multivariate analysis to control for confounding variables. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Hernia size consistently emerges as the primary determinant of revision following RHHR, with larger hernias demonstrating substantially higher revision rates regardless of surgical approach. Based on available data, the 5-year revision rate for RHHR ranges from 0 to 5.7%, with an estimated weighted average of 3.2%. Technical considerations including mesh reinforcement and reconstruction methods remain incompletely understood due to significant reporting variations across studies. Patient-specific factors require further investigation through adequately powered prospective studies. Future research demands rigorous prospective designs with standardized documentation of surgical techniques, hernia characteristics, and patient profiles to better identify and stratify revision risk factors after RHHR. The development of consensus guidelines for reporting outcomes in hiatal hernia surgery would facilitate meaningful comparison across studies and improve our understanding of optimal surgical approaches.

BACKGROUND:Gastroparesis is a chronic disorder characterized by delayed gastric emptying without mechanical obstruction, significantly impacting patient quality of life. Management of refractory gastroparesis remains challenging, with both gastric electrical stimulation (GES) and prokinetic medications used as treatment options. This systematic review synthesizes the available evidence on GES clinical outcomes, the role of continued prokinetic therapy after GES, and indirect comparative data relevant to symptom management in adult patients with refractory gastroparesis. METHODS:A comprehensive systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Multiple databases were searched for studies published between 2000 and 2011 focusing on GES for gastroparesis. This window was selected to capture the period from initial FDA Humanitarian Device Exemption approval of the Enterra system (2000) through publication of cohorts with mature, multi-year follow-up (up to 10 years), maximizing the durability evidence available for analysis. Inclusion criteria required adult patients with refractory gastroparesis, GES as primary intervention, symptom-related outcomes, and minimum 6-week follow-up. Eight studies met eligibility criteria with follow-up periods ranging from 6 weeks to 10 years. Quality assessment utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies and Cochrane risk-of-bias tools for controlled trials. RESULTS:Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) demonstrated significant symptom improvement in patients with treatment-resistant gastroparesis. Controlled studies showed vomiting frequency reduction of 57% at 6 weeks, improving to 67.8% after one year (p < 0.001). Long-term data revealed ≥ 50% reduction in Total Symptom Scores in 58% of diabetic gastroparesis patients, 53% of post-surgical cases, and 48% of idiopathic gastroparesis patients (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3; Table 2). Combination therapy (GES plus prokinetics) yielded significantly better symptom scores (1.35) compared to GES alone (2.20, p = 0.02). Device-related infection requiring removal occurred in approximately 7% of cases. No direct head-to-head comparisons between GES and prokinetic medications alone were identified. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:GES provides substantial symptom relief for treatment-resistant gastroparesis, particularly in diabetic gastroparesis. Combination therapy with GES plus prokinetics appears superior to GES monotherapy. However, the absence of direct comparative studies limits definitive conclusions regarding relative effectiveness versus prokinetic medications alone. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to establish optimal treatment protocols and patient selection criteria along with the role of other surgical approaches. Planned next steps include direct comparisons of GES with pyloric-directed interventions - namely gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) and surgical pyloroplasty - to clarify the optimal positioning of GES within the contemporary treatment algorithm for refractory gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Accelerated 3-year programs (A3YPs) for an MD degree offer a condensed medical education pathway to residency, often with directed pathways in primary care. Many programs aim to address workforce shortages and decrease debt. As these programs expand, assessing whether A3YP graduates are as prepared for residency as their peers from traditional 4 year programs is critical. This study evaluates milestone attainment of A3YP postgraduates in Year 1 (PGY-1s) compared to non-A3YP PGY-1s within family medicine residency programs. METHODS:We analyzed the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education milestone ratings for family medicine PGY-1s from 2021 to 2023. The study included 109 A3YP graduates across 51 family medicine programs and 1,638 non-A3YP PGY-1s (MD, DO, international medical graduate) in those same programs. PGY-1s were compared across milestone competency domains using mixed-effects regression that accounted for clustering by program and subcompetency. RESULTS:At midyear, A3YP PGY-1s scored significantly higher in medical knowledge, systems-based practice, and practice-based learning and improvement. Differences were statistically significant but modest. Coefficients ranged from 0.05 for patient care and medical knowledge to 0.10 for practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI; P&lt;0.01). At end-year, A3YP PGY-1s maintained slightly higher scores in medical knowledge, professionalism, PBLI, and communication (coefficients ranged from 0.07 to 0.10; P&lt;0.01). CONCLUSIONS:A3YP graduates demonstrate equal or minimally higher milestone attainment compared to non-A3YP peers during PGY-1, supporting the viability of accelerated pathways. These findings reassure residency programs of A3YP readiness and highlight their potential to address workforce shortages and reduce student debt without compromising educational outcomes.

Psychological distress among persons living with HIV (PLWH) can negatively impact behavioral and clinical outcomes. There is need for additional data surrounding mental health status in resource-constrained settings to inform intervention. We assessed social and economic factors associated with symptoms of depression and anxiety among PLWH in western Kenya. Baseline data from the Harambee cluster randomized trial were collected from May 2021 through March 2022 among 1040 PLWH (≥ 18 years of age) receiving care through the Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare program. Self-reported physiological distress (defined as non-specific symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress) was measured via the four-item Patient Health Questionnaire for Anxiety and Depression (PHQ-4). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with psychological distress. At study baseline, 24% of participants reported severe psychological distress (PHQ-4 summary score ≥ 6). Compared to participants earning <$7 USD per month, those with a monthly income of ≥$35 USD had reduced odds of reporting severe psychological distress (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR): 0.50; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.27-0.93). Participants in the highest (versus lowest) wealth quintile (aOR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.18-0.70), and those reporting moderate or high (versus low) levels of social support (aOR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.46-0.98) were less likely to report severe psychological distress. Among PLWH in rural Kenya, higher monthly income, greater household wealth, and higher levels of social support were negatively associated with severe psychological distress. Multilevel interventions that provide both economic and social support may be essential for improving their mental health.Trial Registry ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04417127.

Scans constitute an important role in cancer management. "Scanxiety", or scan-associated anxiety, is commonly experienced by patients undergoing cancer-related scans. Although more patients are turning to the internet and social media platforms such as YouTube for health information, few studies have evaluated the scanxiety content presented in these online resources. This study aims to evaluate YouTube videos and webpages available to patients relating to scanxiety. YouTube was searched using pre-defined scanxiety search terms and a Google search analysis for the term scanxiety was carried out and results from the first two pages were collected in August 2024. YouTube videos and webpages were evaluated using the validated DISCERN quality criteria for consumer health information and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). To assess accessibility of reading content, the Flesch-Kincaid reading level was determined for each webpage. Three independent reviewers performed video and webpage analysis. There were 82 videos and 18 webpages included in the analysis. Videos had a mean independent-reviewer rated quality DISCERN score of 1.8 out of 5, which was between low and moderate quality. Websites showed a higher mean quality DISCERN score of 2.7 out of 5. Despite better quality of information, websites were written at a higher reading level than that of the general population, limiting accessibility. Both videos and webpages had low actionability as patient education materials. Efforts are needed to improve scanxiety-related patient education as the number of patients living with cancer and requiring cancer-related scans has significantly increased.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Peritoneal metastases (PMs) arise from gastrointestinal, gynecologic, hepatobiliary, and colorectal origins and are associated with poor outcomes. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy offers benefit for select patients, but survival remains limited. This review aims to summarize recent insights into the molecular and tumor microenvironmental (TME) changes characteristic of PMs and the impact of IP chemotherapy. METHODS:A literature review was performed using recent clinical, translational, and preclinical studies examining alterations in molecular signaling, DNA repair alterations, metabolic pathways, and angiogenic factors in PMs before and after IP therapy. RESULTS:Peritoneal metastases exhibit distinct biology after being treated with IP chemotherapy. Treatment induces alterations in gene expression, mutational patterns, and immune infiltrates. Heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been associated with increased CD8+ T-cell activity, macrophage and NK cell shifts, and modulation of PD-1/PD-L1 signaling, which correlate with treatment response and survival. Emerging data on PIPAC similarly suggests induction of favorable gene expression changes with repeated treatment, though supporting evidence remains more limited than for HIPEC. Angiogenic pathways-particularly VEGF and HIF1α-remain key drivers of PM progression and predictors of post-operative outcomes. Early findings suggest potential synergy between IP chemotherapy and immunotherapy though clinical trials are ongoing. CONCLUSIONS:IP chemotherapy induces tumor microenvironmental changes that have potential to shape therapeutic response. Characterizing these measurable biologic changes may allow clinicians to improve patient selection and support the development of combination therapies to enhance outcomes.

BACKGROUND:Nondiagnostic cytology for thyroid nodules, consistent with The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology category I (B1) poses a management dilemma for clinicians. The objective of this study was to define the malignancy risk of nodules with B1 cytology using American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting & Data System (TI-RADS) and to assess whether TI-RADS can help guide the decision to perform a repeat biopsy of these nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS:This retrospective cohort study evaluated 139 B1 nodules that had a definitive diagnosis on repeat biopsy or surgical excision. Sonographic features were evaluated and classified according to TI-RADS. TI-RADS category and total points were compared to the final diagnosis to determine the malignancy risk of B1 thyroid nodules. RESULTS:Of the 139 nodules, 11 (7.9%) were malignant. The malignancy risk of nodules assigned TI-RADS category 1 and 2 were both 0%, TI-RADS 3 was 2.9%, whereas TI-RADS 4 and 5 were 5.9% and 46.2%, respectively. The optimal cutoff for TI-RADS points predicting malignancy was 5 points. CONCLUSION:B1 thyroid nodules in TI-RADS categories 1-3 may not require repeat biopsy given low malignancy risk. However, B1 nodules in TI-RADS categories 4 and 5 have a higher malignancy risk and thus should undergo repeat biopsy.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Retained foreign bodies (RFB), or those left behind following spine surgery, are considered "Never Events (NE < 1/1000: they should never happen)," or "Near Never Events (NNE < 1/100; they should nearly never happen)", but are not just "Adverse Events (AE >/= 1/100)." The vast majority of NE/NNE are due to cotton sponges, cottonoids, or residual cotton strands (i.e., collectively called Textilomas or Gossypibomas). However, RFB additionally included; fractured needles, guidewires, fractured screws/implants/drains, and/or broken instruments (i.e., scalpels). Notably, the spine surgeon of record, as captain of the ship, is primarily liable for RFB and is central to ensuing medicolegal suits. However, secondarily liable are the adjunctive surgical/medical personnel, (i.e., physicians, Physician Assistants, Nurses, Nurse Practitioners, Physical Therapists, Occupational Therapists), and others who are independent or work full-time for hospitals. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Patients with RFB may present with acute, subacute, or chronic/delayed pain and suffering. Additional complaints include; lost wages, sustained physical disability and/or injury attributed to these objects. Most RFB are diagnosed on plain X-rays, followed by MR and/or CT studies. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:RBS's may include; retained drain fragments, broken needles, fractured guidewires, broken scalpel blades, fractured screws, and/or instruments. Retrieval procedures warrant a wide variety of different techniques, some of which fail. Notably, RFB's largely occur due to the performance of; emergent procedures, doing an unfamiliar operation, encountering anatomical variants, or operating on patients with elevated body mass indexes (BMI). Additionally these include; surgeons' failure to order and/or radiologists' failure to correctly read intraoperative X-rays/fluoroscopic images, and/or nurses' failures to correctly perform end of surgery counts. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:RFBs, or foreign bodies left behind following spine surgery, are considered "Never Events (< 1/1000)" or "Near Never Events (< 1/100)," and are not just "Adverse Events (> 1/100)". When they do occur, the operating surgeon bears primary responsibility, but the nursing/adjunctive staff and hospital are also liable.