Faculty Bibliography

We review evidence-based treatments for patients seeking care for lower-back pain and patients who have been diagnosed with nonspecific lower-back pain. The review is based on selected systematic reviews and national and international guidelines for the treatment of lower-back pain. Additional randomized controlled trials (ie, possibly those not previously included in the latest systematic reviews) were reviewed and added based on recommended procedures for the evaluation of methodological quality (ie, strong, moderate, and weak). In acute nonspecific lower-back pain (0-4 weeks duration of pain) there is moderate to strong evidence that self-care with over-the-counter medication and maintaining activity as tolerated or treatment with a limited number of sessions of manipulative therapy is effective for pain relief. In subacute nonspecific lower-back pain (4-12 weeks duration of pain) there is weak to moderate evidence that a graded activity program including exercises and cognitive behavioral treatment in combination is more efficient than usual care with regard to return to work. There is strong evidence that these programs reduce work absenteeism. In cases of chronic nonspecific lower-back pain (> 12 weeks duration of pain) a variety of treatments are available with limited and similar efficacy on pain and disability reduction. There is moderate evidence that surgery in chronic nonspecific lower-back pain is as effective as cognitive behavioral treatment with regard to pain, function, mood and return to work. Surgical indications for chronic nonspecific lower-back pain remain ill defined. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V (expert opinion). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence

The goal of this study was to determine which activities in four domains, daily life, exercises, sports and occupational activities, should be recommended, in favor or against, for the patient suffering from knee or hip OA. METHODS: Scientific literature was searched in Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases for articles in French or English, reporting original data. The articles were evaluated with standardized epidemiological criteria. Seventy-two articles were retained. Recommendations were graded according to the level of scientific evidence (A high, B moderate, C clinical consensus) and were formulated for primary care. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: For activity of daily life (ADL), the OASIS group states with a moderate level of scientific evidence, that ADL are a risk factor for knee OA and that risk increases with intensity and duration of activity. The group concludes that healthy subjects as well as OA patients in general can pursue a high level of physical activity, provided the activity is not painful and does not predispose to trauma (grade B). Radiographic or clinical OA is not a contraindication to promoting activity in patients who have a sedentary lifestyle (grade C). For exercises and other structured activities pursued with a goal of health improvement, the group states with a high level of scientific evidence that they have a favourable effect on pain and function in the sedentary knee OA patient. The OASIS group recommends the practice of exercises and other structured activities for the sedentary patient with knee OA (grade A). Static exercises are not favored over dynamic exercises, availability, preference and tolerance being the criteria for the choice of an exercise (grade A). As results deteriorate when exercises are stopped, they should be performed at a frequency of between one and three times per week (grade B). Professional assistance can be useful in improving initial compliance and perseverance (grade B). There is no scientific argument to support halting exercise in case of an OA flare-up (grade C). For sports and recreational activity, the group states with a high degree of scientific evidence, that these activities are a risk factor for knee and hip OA and that the risk correlates with intensity and duration of exposure. The group also states, with a high degree of scientific evidence, that the risk of OA associated with sport is lesser than that associated with a history of trauma and overweight. No firm conclusion could be drawn about the possible protective role of sports such as cycling, swimming or golf. The OASIS group recommends that athletes should be informed that joint trauma is a greater risk factor than the practice of sport (Grade A). The high level athlete should be informed that the risk of OA is associated with the duration and intensity of exposure (Grade B). The OA patient can continue to engage regularly in recreational sports as long as the activity does not cause pain (Grade C). The OA patient who practices a sport at risk for joint trauma should be encouraged to change sport (Grade C). For occupational activity, the OASIS group states with a high level of scientific evidence that there is a relationship between occupational activity and OA of the knee and hip. The precise nature of biomechanical stresses leading to OA remains unclear but factors such as high loads on the joint, unnatural body position, heavy lifting, climbing and jumping may contribute to knee and hip OA. The group recommends that taking an occupational history should always be part of managing the OA patient (Grade B). In the knee or hip OA patient, work-related activity that produces or maintains pain should be avoided (Grade B). Physicians should be alerted by the early knee and hip signs and symptoms in workers exposed to stresses that are known or supposed to favour knee or hip OA (Grade C)

BACKGROUND: Evidence exists linking breath control to increases in intra-abdominal pressure and lumbar stability. Weight-lifting experts use this evidence as a rationale to suggest that increases in lumbar stability afforded by specific forms of breath control can influence the amount of force produced by the trunk. No studies have examined this issue. Therefore, this study determined whether voluntary control of the breath is related to maximal trunk extension force and if maximal force is correlated to intra-abdominal pressure. METHODS: Thirteen men and 20 women (mean age: 25.6 years (5.5)) performed a maximal isometric trunk exertion in a knee bent posture using voluntary breath conditions: (1) inhalation prior to exertion with hold during exertion; (2) exhalation prior to exertion with hold during the exertion; (3) inhalation prior to the exertion with exhalation during the exertion. A subset of subjects (n=11) were also simultaneously measured for intra-abdominal pressure. Separate repeated measures ANOVA were used to determine the effects of breath conditions on force and intra-abdominal pressure. Pearson coefficients were used to determine the correlation between force and intra-abdominal pressure. FINDINGS: Breath control did not significantly affect isometric force production (P=.089) but did affect intra-abdominal pressure (P=.003). Correlations between force and intra-abdominal pressure in each breath condition were low (range: 0.152-0.583). INTERPRETATION: Although breath control was shown to influence intra-abdominal pressure, it does not appear to influence isometric trunk extension force in a knees bent position. Further, the intra-abdominal pressure produced in such efforts appears to be unrelated to the amount of force produced

STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective study with a follow-up period of 4 years. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate the possible clinical utility of three biomarkers [i.e., keratan sulfate (KS), hyaluronan, and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein] measured in peripheral blood in severe acute sciatica at intake and follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: Our previous study and others have pointed out the interest of different laboratory tests in the acute phase of sciatica. Several blood biomarkers have been reported useful in the long-term follow-up of patients with osteoarthritis. We have found no information about the potential interest of these tests in spinal disorders. METHODS: Patients were admitted to the hospital for intensive conservative management of acute sciatica (n=82). A subgroup of patients (n=33) was selected based on the duration of symptoms at visit 1, and included those with the shortest (n=24) as well as those with the longest (n=9) duration of sciatica. Blood samples were drawn, centrifuged, and the plasma frozen. Antigenic KS, hyaluronan, and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein were measured by ELISA. Patients were re-evaluated at an average of 4.3 years (range: 2.1-6.8 years). RESULTS: Thirty-three subjects with an average age of 49.2+/-10.2 years participated. At intake, levels of the three biomarkers evaluated were within the range of normal values. No significant differences were found between the results of patients with a short history of sciatica (< or =3 weeks) and those with a long duration of symptoms (>20 weeks). At follow-up, a significant increase (P<0.05) in all three biomarkers was found. CONCLUSIONS: A single measurement of these three biomarker molecules does not seem to have any diagnostic or therapeutic relevance in patients with acute radicular compression. The significance of the increase in all three biomarkers after a mean follow-up of 4.3 years is unclear; it might reflect metabolic processes involved in degenerative spinal disorders. Even though we found no correlation with clinical outcome, we believe that more research is needed

BACKGROUND: The systemic inflammatory response to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with recurrent cardiac events; however, the pathophysiology of this inflammatory response is not well understood. The present study was performed to investigate the role of pathogen burden of infection in determining the magnitude of C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) response to PCI. METHODS: One hundred patients with stable angina pectoris undergoing elective PCI at a single center were recruited. Antibodies against cytomegalovirus, Chlamydia pneumoniae , Epstein-Barr virus, Helicobacter pylori , and herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 were determined before PCI. Plasma CRP and IL-6 levels were measured before and 6, 24, 48, 72 hours after PCI and data presented as area under the curve. RESULTS: Plasma CRP and IL-6 concentrations increased significantly after PCI. Neither antibodies against single nor multiple pathogens were associated with the CRP or IL-6 response to PCI. No correlations were found between the inflammatory markers and troponin T levels after PCI. With the exception for CRP and body mass index (R = 0.20, P < .05), neither risk factors for coronary heart disease nor medication but stent implantation was associated with increased plasma CRP (76 vs 61 mg/L, P < .005) and IL-6 (74 vs 64 pg/mL, P < .005) levels after PCI. CONCLUSION: Stent implantation, but not pathogen burden, is associated with the plasma CRP and IL-6 response to PCI