Faculty Bibliography

Background/Purpose: Alveolar cleft surgery is the most common bone reconstruction performed in patients with a cleft. Osteogenic agents such as BMP-2 have been used to restore the bony cleft without the morbidity of bone graft, but concerns remain regarding premature fusion of sutures, exuberant bone formation, and malignant degeneration. We have recently demonstrated that dipyridamole-coated, 3D printed bio-ceramic (3DPBC) scaffolds generate comparable bone amounts to BMP2 and significantly greater bone compared to negative controls in short-term growing animal model studies. No detrimental effects to growth sutures were noted in any animals. This study investigates the long-term osteogenic properties, degradation kinetics, and effects on facial growth of these tissue engineering constructs in growing animal models. Methods/Description: Twenty-two 1-month-old (immature) New Zealand white rabbits underwent creation of unilateral 3.5 x 3.5 mm alveolar defects. Each alveolar defect was repaired with either 3DPBC scaffolds coated with 1000 muM dipyridamole (n = 14) or with autogenous bone graft from the radius (n = 8). Six rabbits from the 3DPBC scaffold group were sacrificed at 8 weeks. The remaining rabbits (n = 8 each group) were euthanized following completion of craniofacial growth (6 months). Bone regeneration, scaffold degradation, and maxillary suture patency were calculated using CT images reconstructed and analyzed in Amira software. Facial symmetry was evaluated using dense-surface 3D modeling and validated with bilateral cephalometric measurements of maxillary projection. Bone growth and suture patency were qualitatively evaluated through histologic analysis.
Result(s): After 6 months, animals with defects repaired with 3DPBC scaffolds regenerated an average of 52.9% +/- 3.3% bone (mean +/- SEM), compared to 40.7%+/-4.0% in defects repaired with bone graft (P = .02). This is compared to unoperated alveolus occupied by 39.3% +/- 1.6% bone. Scaffolds showed significant degradation at 6 months (6.7% +/- 1.6%) compared to at 8 weeks (27.1% +/- 1.9%; P >= .001). Morphometric analysis using dense surface modeling showed similar symmetry indices of 55.0 +/- 3.3 for scaffold animals and 61.7% +/- 1.6% for bone graft animals (P = .10). Comparative measurements of operated and unoperated sides showed no significant differences in asymmetry between scaffold and bone graft animals (P = .86). Histologic analysis of scaffold samples revealed vascularized, organized bone within scaffold interstices without evidence of ectopic bone, excess inflammatory cells, or suture fusion.
Conclusion(s): In a growing animal model, dipyridamole-coated 3DPBC scaffolds can regenerate bone comparable to autogenous bone graft by radiographic and histologic analysis. Over 6 months, scaffolds show significant, favorable degradation and do not result in premature suture fusion or disruption of facial growth compared to bone graft. These results support long-term safety and efficacy of this tissue engineering strategy in the repair of alveolar cleft defects

OBJECTIVE:The aim of this in vivo study is to compare the osseointegration of endosteal implants placed in atrophic mandibular alveolar ridges with alveolar ridge expansion surgical protocol via an experimental osseodensification drilling versus conventional osteotome technique. METHODS:Twelve endosteal implants, 4 mm × 13 mm, were placed in porcine models in horizontally atrophic mandibular ridges subsequent to prior extraction of premolars. Implants were placed with osseodensification drilling technique as the experimental group (n = 6) and osteotome site preparation as the control group (n = 6). After 4 weeks of healing, samples were retrieved and stained with Stevenel's Blue and Van Gieson's Picro Fuschin for histologic evaluation. Quantitative analysis via bone-to-implant contact (BIC%) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO%) were obtained as mean values with corresponding 95% confidence interval. A significant omnibus test, post-hoc comparison of the 2 drilling techniques' mean values was accomplished using a pooled estimate of the standard error with P-value set at 0.05. RESULTS:The mean BIC% value was approximately 62.5% in the osseodensification group, and 31.4% in the regular instrumentation group. Statistical analysis showed a significant effect of the drilling technique (P = 0.018). There was no statistical difference in BAFO as a function of drilling technique (P = 0.198). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The combined osseodensification drilling-alveolar ridge expansion technique showed increased evidence of osseointegration and implant primary stability from a histologic and biomechanical standpoint, respectively. Future studies will focus on expanding the sample size as well as the timeline of the study to allow investigation of long-term prognosis of this novel technique.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Rhinoplasty relies on clear patient communication and precise execution of a three-dimensional (3D) plan to achieve optimal results. As 3D imaging and printing continue to grow in popularity within the medical field, rhinoplasty surgeons have begun to leverage these resources as an aid to preoperative planning, patient communication, and the technical performance of this challenging operation. Objective/UNASSIGNED:Utilizing departmentally-available resources and open access 3D imaging platforms, we have developed an affordable, reproducible protocol for rapid in-house virtual surgical planning (VSP) and subsequent manufacture of 3D-printed rhinoplasty models. Methods/UNASSIGNED:Preoperative 3D photographic images underwent virtual rhinoplasty using a freely-available 3D imaging and sculpting program (BlenderTM [Version 2.78, Amsterdam, The Netherlands]). Once the ideal postoperative result was digitally achieved, scaled, sterilizable and patient-specific 3D models of the preoperative and ideal postoperative result were manufactured in-house using a departmentally-owned 3D printer. Results/UNASSIGNED:3D-printed models have successfully been manufactured and employed for 12 patients undergoing rhinoplasty. The average time to prepare a set of pre- and postoperative models was 3 hours, while the printing process required 18-24 hours per model. Each set of surgical models can be manufactured at a total materials cost of approximately $5.00. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:We describe an affordable means to construct sterilizable, scaled, patient-specific 3D-printed models for rhinoplasty. This technique may become of increasing interest to academic and cosmetic centers as hardware costs of 3D printers continues to fall.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the pullout resistance of CAD/CAM implant-supported crowns cemented with provisional and definitive cements on Ti-base implant abutments. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Sixty crowns were milled for use in Ti-base implant abutments and divided (n = 15/group) according to material, as follows: (a) [Pr] Temporary acrylic resin; (b) [Co-Cr] Cobalt-Chromium alloy; (c) [Zr] polycrystalline zirconia; and (d) [Ti] titanium. The cementation was performed with RelyX Temp NE (RxT) cement or RelyX U200 self-etching resin cement, under a 50 N (5 kg) load for 10 minutes. Twenty-four hours after cementation, the crowns were subjected to the pullout test in a universal test machine, at a 1.0 mm/min crosshead speed. The tests were performed first without cement to evaluate frictional resistance (Baseline), then with provisional cement (RelyX Temp NE without cement again (Baseline After RxT), and finally with resin cement (U200). The results were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey test (p < 0.05). RESULTS:Data evaluation as a function of cement type demonstrated the superiority of resin-based cements relative to provisional and baseline groups (p < 0.01). While Co-Cr crowns presented the highest pullout strength values, Pr showed the lowest values (data collapsed over cement) (p < 0.001). Retentiveness data as a function of both factors demonstrated similar pullout resistance between groups without cement (p < 0.001), except Zr baseline. Also, Co-Cr presented higher pullout strength compared to other materials. CONCLUSIONS:Self-adhesive resin cement exhibited superior retention compared to temporary cement, regardless of crown material. Co-Cr and titanium presented higher levels of retention to Ti-base abutment after being cemented.

This study sought to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the effect of osteotomy preparation by conventional (control group) or OD (OD group) instrumentation on osteotomy healing. An incision of 10 cm was made in the anteroposterior direction over the hip in five sheep, and 15 osteotomies were prepared in the left ilium of the sheep (n = 3/sheep). Three different instrumentation techniques were utilized: (1) conventional/regular drilling (R [recommended by manufacturer]) in a 3-step series of a 2-mm pilot, 3.2-mm, and 3.8-mm twist drills; (2) OD clockwise (OD-CW) drilling with Densah Bur (Versah) 2.0-mm pilot, 2.8-mm, and 3.8-mm multi-fluted tapered burs; and (3) OD counterclockwise (OD-CCW) drilling with Densah Bur 2.0-mm pilot, 2.8-mm, and 3.8-mm multi-fluted tapered burs. Drilling was performed at 1,100 rpm with saline irrigation. Qualitative histomorphometric analysis of the osteotomies after 6 weeks did not show any healing impairment due to the instrumentation. Histologic analysis shows bone remodeling and growth in all samples, irrespective of osteotomy preparation technique, with the presence of bone chips observed along the length of the osteotomy wall in sites subjected to osseodensification drilling.

This study evaluates the influence of two surface physicochemical modifications on osseointegration parameters of a healing chamber implant design. We examine dental implants with internal and external trapezoidal threads that have the following surface modifications: dual acid etching (DAE) and nano-hydroxyapatite (HA) coating over DAE surface (Nano). We installed implants in the right ilium of sheep and conducted histologic/metric analyses after 3 and 12 wk in vivo. We quantified the percentage of bone-to-implant contact (%BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (%BAFO) within implant threads. Histologic micrographs indicate early bone formation within the healing chambers of implants with Nano surface relative to DAE surface. Histomorphometric analysis demonstrates there to be no significant differences in %BIC between 3 and 12 wk (p = 0.298). Compared to DAE, Nano shows more bone formation in contact with implant, regardless of time (p < 0.025). We observe > %BAFO at 12 wk relative to 3 wk, which differs significantly for Nano (p < 0.038). Implant surface treatment affects the amounts of bone formation within healing chambers, with Nano significantly outperforming DAE at 12 wk (p < 0.025). Nano presents a synergistic effect with implant design, improving osseointegration parameters.