Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:to date, no standardized, evidence-based follow-up schemes exist for the monitoring of patients who underwent focal therapy (FT) and expert centers rely mainly on their own experience and/or institutional protocols. We aimed to perform a comprehensive review of the most advantageous follow-up strategies and their rationale after FT for prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS:a narrative review of the literature was conducted to investigate different follow-up protocols of FT for PCa. Outcomes of interest were post-ablation oncological and functional outcomes and complications. RESULTS:Oncological success after FT was generally defined as the biopsy-confirmed absence of clinically significant PCa in the treated zone. De novo PCa in the untreated area usually reflects an inaccurate patient selection and should be treated as primary PCa. During follow-up, oncological outcomes should be evaluated with periodic PSA, multiparametric MRI and prostate biopsy. The use of PSA derivatives and new biomarkers is still controversial and therefore not recommended. The first MRI after FT should be performed between 6-12 months to avoid ablation-related artifacts and diagnostic delay in case of FT failure. Other imaging modalities, such as PSMA PET/CT scan, are promising but still need to be validated in the post-FT setting. A 12-month "for-protocol" prostate biopsy, including targeted and systematic biopsy, was generally considered the preferred biopsy method to rule out tumor persistence/recurrence. Subsequent mpMRIs and biopsies should follow a risk-adapted approach depending on the clinical scenario. Functional outcomes should be periodically assessed using validated questionnaires within the first year, when typically recover to a new baseline. Complications, despite uncommon, should be strictly monitored mainly in the first month. CONCLUSIONS:FT follow-up is a multifaceted process involving clinical, radiological, and histological assessment. Studies evaluating the impact of different follow-up strategies and ideal timings are needed to produce standardized protocols following FT.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The SPAN (Stroke Preclinical Assessment Network) is a confirmatory trial platform to test the efficacy and safety of candidate cerebroprotective interventions in acute stroke. As the largest multicenter preclinical stroke trial to date, the SPAN1 trial (first SPAN) prospectively captured many biological and procedural variables, revealing a high degree of heterogeneity introduced by the multicenter approach that may impact stroke outcomes. Here, we examined the biological and procedural predictors of tissue and neurological outcomes after focal cerebral ischemic stroke in rats. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:SPAN1 enrolled and randomized 698 rats to various active treatment arms or controls. Rats were subjected to transient middle cerebral artery occlusion for 60 (spontaneously hypertensive rats) or 120 minutes (young, healthy Sprague-Dawley rats) and followed for 1 month. Eight biological and procedural independent variables (sex, weight, strain, intervention arm, site, endovascular filament silicone tip coating characteristics, anesthesia duration, and intervention protocol) and 5 dependent outcome variables (weight loss, 4-point neuroscore, corner test, infarct volume, and mortality) were captured. Multivariable regression was used to identify independent predictors of each outcome readout and determine their effect sizes. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Spontaneously hypertensive rats exhibited larger infarcts than Sprague-Dawley rats, particularly among females. Neuroscores were also worse in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Prolonged anesthesia exposure was associated with smaller cortical and hippocampal infarcts. Filament thickness and length showed a complex association with different regional infarct volumes, neuroscores, weight loss, and corner test outcomes. Mortality was worse among females. Bivariate analysis of dependent variables revealed moderate correlations among the tissue and neurological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Using the large and multicenter, prospective SPAN1 dataset, our multivariable analyses identified several predictors influencing rat middle cerebral artery occlusion outcomes and refuted others previously reported. Investigators should consider whether biological and procedural predictors identified herein should be standardized, accounted for, or stratified during subject allocation to decrease variability and avoid confounders in future multicenter preclinical trials.

BACKGROUND:Studies of type 1 diabetes in sub-Saharan Africa have suggested that the clinical phenotype might differ from phenotypes reported elsewhere. We aimed to establish whether type 1 diabetes diagnosed in children and young adults in three countries across sub-Saharan Africa is of autoimmune origin. METHODS:In this observational, cross-sectional study, we identified participants without obesity from outpatient clinics in government and private hospitals in Cameroon, Uganda, and South Africa who were of self-reported Black African ethnicity with young-onset (age <30 years), insulin-treated, clinically diagnosed type 1 diabetes. We measured islet autoantibodies to GADA, IA-2A, and ZnT8A, and calculated a genetic risk score (GRS) for type 1 diabetes, which we compared with control populations without diabetes derived from the Uganda Genome Resource databank and other studies. Endogenous insulin secretion was assessed using plasma C-peptide. We compared findings with those for participants with self-reported Black (n=429) and White (n=2602) ancestry with type 1 diabetes from the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth (SEARCH) study in the USA. FINDINGS/RESULTS:(19·5-24·1). Only 312 (34·9%) of 894 participants were positive for islet autoantibodies; these participants had classic features of type 1 diabetes, including 225 (82·7%) of 272 with plasma C-peptide <200 pmol/L, and high type 1 diabetes GRS. Those without islet autoantibodies (582 [65·1%] of 894) had significantly lower median type 1 diabetes GRS than those with autoantibodies (9·66 [IQR 7·77-11·33] vs 11·76 [10·49-12·91]; p<0·0001), suggesting a subgroup with a non-autoimmune diabetes subtype, with clinical features and C-peptide concentrations not consistent with type 2 diabetes. Among participants diagnosed younger than 20 years, autoantibody-negative diabetes was also observed in 65 (15·1%) of 429 participants with Black ancestry in SEARCH (although less frequently than in sub-Saharan Africa [59 (55·1%) of 107]), and these participants also had a low type 1 diabetes GRS (median 10·41 [IQR 8·65-12·22] in autoantibody-negative subgroup). No such pattern was observed in White participants in SEARCH: 241 (9·3%) of 2602 were autoantibody negative and median GRS for type 1 diabetes was similar in autoantibody-negative and autoantibody-positive participants (median 13·42 [IQR 11·80-14·61] vs 13·49 [12·29-14·58]). INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:In sub-Saharan Africa, clinically diagnosed type 1 diabetes is heterogeneous, comprising classic autoimmune type 1 diabetes and a novel, non-autoimmune, insulin-deficient diabetes subtype. There is evidence of this subtype in Black but not White individuals in the USA. Therefore, alternative causes must be considered in this group of individuals, and understanding the drivers of this subtype might offer new insights into prevention and treatment. FUNDING/BACKGROUND:UK National Institute of Health and Care Research. TRANSLATION/UNASSIGNED:For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:To evaluate the dosimetric and toxicity profiles of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer, comparing cohorts with and without intraprostatic boost (IPB) to assess feasibility and safety of IPB, with particular attention to urethral and bladder dose and toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This retrospective cohort study analyzed 349 patients with localized prostate cancer treated between 2018 and 2023. Of these, 266 received SBRT with IPB, and 83 received SBRT without IPB. Patients were treated using a robotic SBRT platform with fiducial tracking. Dosimetric parameters for the urethra, including D0.03cc, D0.3cc, and V40Gy, and for the bladder, including D0.03cc, D5cc, D10cc, and V37Gy, were evaluated. Acute and late toxicities were assessed using CTCAE criteria. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:For the urethra, median values for D0.03cc, D0.3cc, and V40Gy, and for the bladder, median values D0.03cc, D5cc, D10cc, and V37Gy were compared and no statistically significant differences were observed between the two cohorts. Late urinary toxicity of grade 3 or higher occurred in 2.25 % of patients in the IPB group and 2.47 % in the no IPB group, with no grade 3 acute toxicities reported. DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:These findings support the use of SBRT using an IPB as a feasible and safe approach to achieve focal dose escalation to dominant intra-prostatic lesions (DILs) without significantly increasing urethra or bladder dose or toxicity. Future research should focus on standardizing DIL contouring, exploring adaptive planning techniques to increase accuracy, and prospectively studying toxicity and quality of life in patients treated with IPB with SBRT.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate mail-in semen collection services for cryopreservation, focusing on costs, transparency, and efficacy due to the advancements of direct access to fertility testing and treatment. METHODS:Using Google, we identified eight prominent companies offering mail-in sperm cryopreservation services. We analyzed their costs, storage practices, marketing strategies, and prescription requirements. For comparison, we examined academic institutions offering similar services, exploring differences in pricing, processes, and accessibility. RESULTS:The average upfront cost to process and freeze sperm was $730 (range $329 to $1575) with 10-year storage costs of $3117, on average (range $1450 to $5500), which may or may not be guaranteed to remain level. Not all services disclosed future costs such as transport, thawing, and disposal fees, with some firms being less transparent. Two firms offered client depositor storage on-site and the remainder outsourced to partner labs scattered around the country. One facility offered storage of tissue samples for men with azoospermia; none of the companies required men to have an order from their doctor to use the service. CONCLUSIONS:Mail-in cryopreservation services provide convenience but present challenges, including varying costs, transparency issues, and potential limitations in medical oversight. Integrating these services into traditional healthcare settings could optimize patient outcomes and satisfaction.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS/OBJECTIVE:The TRISCEND II trial demonstrated superior clinical benefits for patients with ≥severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) treated with the EVOQUE transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) system plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone. This work reports 1-year and 18-month outcomes in patients stratified by baseline TR severity. METHODS:The multicentre, prospective TRISCEND II trial enrolled 400 patients with symptomatic, ≥severe TR and randomised 2:1 to TTVR (n=267) or control (n=133). In a post-hoc analysis, patients were stratified into severe TR (n=172) and massive/torrential TR (n=220) cohorts. Clinical and quality-of-life outcomes were reported at 1 year, with Kaplan-Meier estimates for all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalisation assessed at 18 months. Study oversight included an independent echocardiographic core laboratory, clinical events committee, and data safety monitoring board. RESULTS:One year after TTVR, TR was ≤mild in 95.2% of severe TR and 95.3% of massive/torrential TR patients. The primary safety and effectiveness endpoint (win ratio) favoured TTVR over control regardless of baseline TR severity: severe (1.64 [95% CI: 1.11, 2.43]) and massive/torrential (2.20 [1.55, 3.14]). At 18 months, TTVR patients had similar mortality to controls (rate difference: severe 0.2% [-11.6, 11.9], massive/torrential -5.8% [-17.6, 6.0], whereas HF hospitalisation rates favoured TTVR in the massive/torrential cohort (vs. control, severe 9.8% [-3.0, 22.7], massive/torrential -15.2% [-28.9, -1.5]). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with ≥severe TR benefit from TTVR, experiencing improvements in TR severity, functional capacity, and quality of life regardless of baseline TR severity, with a signal for greater benefit in patients with more advanced disease.

OBJECTIVE:To increase the rate of low dose aspirin (LDA) counseling and treatment in patients with 2 or more moderate risk factors of preeclampsia(PMRF) from 9% to 50% within a four-month period after implementation of interventions. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:A single-institution quality improvement initiative aimed at LDA screening and counseling of those with PMRF. Two groups were evaluated: pre-intervention (January - April 2022) and post-intervention (January - April 2023). This initiative focused on identifying PMRF and monitoring rates of LDA counseling and treatment. Rates were assessed at two-week intervals and presented on a run chart to visualize trends and measure progress over time. Providers underwent education utilizing preeclampsia (PEC) screening flowsheets and integrated a clinical decision-making (CDM) tool in initial prenatal visit documentation using a smart-tool. Patients were provided with educational flyers. RESULTS:In the pre-intervention group (n=126), 8.7% of patients received counseling on PMRF risk factors and LDA use, 7.9% were treated with LDA. In the post-intervention group (n=112) 52.7% of patients received counseling on PMRF risk factors and LDA use, and 35.7% were treated with LDA. There was an 83.5% increase in the percentage of patients counseled following intervention implementation. A progressive increase was noted in counseling rates within the 18 weeks post-intervention. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Integrating PEC screening flowsheets, clinical decision-making tools, and patient education flyers effectively enhances LDA counseling for patients with ≥2 PMRF with additional benefits seen in high-risk patients. These interventions offer a replicable model to enhance guideline adherence and reduce preeclampsia risk in vulnerable populations.