Faculty Bibliography

BackgroundThrombosis is the second leading cause of death in cancer patients and treatment for thrombosis and prevention for secondary prophylaxis is anticoagulation. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is more effective than vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of cancer-associated thromboembolism (CAT). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are non-inferior to dalteparin in treating CAT with similar major bleeding risks. Major guidelines recommend DOACs for CAT; however, data comparing individual DOACs to enoxaparin is lacking. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs compared to LMWH for CAT.MethodsA multi-site retrospective review was conducted in adult cancer patients with a CAT history who received either a DOAC (apixaban or rivaroxaban) or LMWH (enoxaparin). Primary efficacy and safety endpoints were recurrent thromboembolism and major bleeding occurrences. Secondary endpoints included time to subsequent CAT occurrence, time to first bleed event post initial CAT, and incidence of clinically relevant non-major and minor bleeding.ResultsA total of 102 patients were included in the study. There was no significant difference among the groups with respect to time to subsequent CAT (p = 0.5625). However, patients who received apixaban and rivaroxaban had a 2.39 times and 3.26 times higher risk of subsequent CAT respectively compared to those who received enoxaparin. Major bleeding rates were also not statistically significant (p = 0.465), despite enoxaparin having the highest rate at 8.8% and no rivaroxaban patients experiencing major bleeding.ConclusionNo differences were observed between rivaroxaban, apixaban, and enoxaparin in rates of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding.

Stercoral colitis is an inflammatory reaction secondary to fecal impaction and almost always occurs in the setting of chronic constipation. Luminal distention caused by dense and dehydrated stool compresses the vascular supply of the distal colon, resulting in bowel ischemia and ulceration. Stercoral colitis primarily affects elderly patients, but it can be seen in any patient with decreased bowel motility, with risk factors including neurodegenerative disorders, chronic medical diseases, malignancy, immobility, and the use of narcotic or anticholinergic medications. Patients most often present with abdominal pain and tenderness. However, the presentation is often nonspecific and can include nongastrointestinal symptoms. Due to the common presence of comorbidities, a thorough history and physical examination findings may be difficult to obtain. Imaging, especially CT, plays a vital role in the diagnosis of stercoral colitis, demonstrating hallmark features such as fecal impaction and a large colorectal stool burden. Mural thickening (>3 mm) and other CT signs of inflammation aid in diagnosis, although findings including perirectal fat stranding can be nonspecific. Signs of perforation, including mural discontinuity, extraluminal air, and extraluminal stool collections, can also be identified. Other potential complications include obstruction, bleeding, fistulas, and urinary tract involvement secondary to mass effect. The overlap of findings between stercoral colitis and other colonic diseases, particularly diverticulitis and malignancy, can sometimes make diagnosis challenging. Identification of fecal impaction and associated inflammatory changes helps in distinguishing stercoral colitis from other pathologic conditions. Prompt diagnosis of stercoral colitis and its complications allows appropriate management, which can range from preventive measures to emergent surgical treatment. ^©RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.

BACKGROUND & AIMS/OBJECTIVE:There is significant variability in the immediate post-operative and long-term management of patients undergoing per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), largely stemming from the lack of high-quality evidence. We aimed to establish a consensus on several important questions on the after care of post-POEM patients through a modified Delphi process. METHODS:A steering committee developed an initial questionnaire consisting of 5 domains (33 statements): post-POEM admission/discharge, indication for immediate post-POEM esophagram, peri-procedural medications and diet resumption, clinic follow-up recommendations, and post-POEM reflux surveillance and management. A total of 34 experts participated in the 2 rounds of the Delphi process, with quantitative and qualitative data analyzed for each round to achieve consensus. RESULTS:A total of 23 statements achieved a high degree of consensus. Overall, the expert panel agreed on the following: (1) same-day discharge after POEM can be considered in select patients; (2) a single dose of prophylactic antibiotics may be as effective as a short course; (3) a modified diet can be advanced as tolerated; and (4) all patients should be followed in clinic and undergo objective testing for surveillance and management of reflux. Consensus could not be achieved on the indication of post-POEM esophagram to evaluate for leak. CONCLUSIONS:The results of this Delphi process established expert agreement on several important issues and provides practical guidance on key aspects in the care of patients following POEM.

The cost of healthcare spending in foot and ankle surgery continues to rise. Several recent studies about cost effectiveness have been published. These may be difficult to understand and analyze without a background in business and healthcare economics. The goal of this narrative review is to provide the fundamentals for understanding and interpreting healthcare economic studies by defining key terminology and providing examples in the field of foot and ankle surgery. Foot and ankle surgeons should be familiar with the elements that comprise cost-effectiveness for providers, clinicians, researchers, and economists in caring for patients and making healthcare-related decisions.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for endometrial cancer staging may identify isolated tumor cells (ITCs). Although guidelines do not classify nodes with ITCs as positive, earlier papers reported that a significant proportion of gynecologic oncologists treat ITCs as they would positive nodes. The objective of this study was to examine practice patterns and determine if the presence of ITCs in endometrial cancer affects adjuvant treatment decision-making. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:test, and logistic regression were used with significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Of seven hundred thirty-four patients included, ITCs were identified in 41 patients (5.6 %). Deep myometrial invasion (61.0 % vs 20.5 %, p < 0.001) and lymphovascular invasion (58.4 % vs 17.7 %, p < 0.001) were more common in patients with ITCs than in those with negative lymph nodes. Patients with ITCs were more likely to receive adjuvant treatment (30 of 41, 73.2 % vs 289 of 693, 41.7 %, p < 0.001). When controlling for age, stage, histology, grade, and lymphovascular space invasion, ITCs were not associated with an increased likelihood of adjuvant therapy receipt. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Although patients with ITCs were more likely to receive adjuvant treatment, this was accounted for by other clinical and histological factors. Clinicians were likely to make decisions based on established risk factors, and more data are needed on the role of ITCs in the landscape of molecularly based decision making.

BACKGROUND & AIMS/OBJECTIVE:Delayed diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) leads to prolonged symptoms and worse long-term outcomes. We sought to evaluate whether race, ethnicity, disease type, and social factors are associated with delayed diagnosis of pediatric IBD. METHODS:We performed a cross-sectional study of newly diagnosed pediatric patients with IBD at 22 United States sites from 2019 to 2022. Parents/guardians reported race, ethnicity, time between symptom onset and diagnosis, and other social determinants of health. Through bivariate and multivariable analyses using generalized estimating equations, we evaluated associations between these factors and diagnosis time defined as ≤60 days, 61 to 180 days, 181 to 365 days, and >365 days. RESULTS:We enrolled 869 participants (mean age at diagnosis, 13.1 years; 52% male; 57% Crohn's disease [CD]; 34% ulcerative colitis [UC]; 8% Hispanic; 30% non-White). Overall, the mean time to diagnosis was 265.9 days. After adjustment, factors associated with longer diagnosis time included CD vs UC (odds ratio [OR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-3.5), 2 or more other health conditions (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.7), and longer travel time to clinic (>1 hour [OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.4], >2 hours (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.9] each vs <30 minutes). There was no association with race, ethnicity, birth country, sex, parent education, household income, insurance type, health literacy, and health system distrust. CONCLUSIONS:Consistent with prior literature, diagnostic delay is longer for CD than UC. Reassuringly, time to diagnosis is equitable across racioethnic groups. New models of diagnostic care are needed for communities affected by longer travel times.

OBJECTIVE:The Diabetes in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults (DiCAYA) network seeks to create a nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-based diabetes surveillance system. This study aimed to develop a DiCAYA-wide EHR-based computable phenotype (CP) to identify prevalent cases of diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS/METHODS:We conducted network-wide chart reviews of 2,134 youth (aged <18 years) and 2,466 young adults (aged 18 to <45 years) among people with possible diabetes. Within this population, we compared the performance of three alternative CPs, using diabetes diagnoses determined by chart review as the gold standard. CPs were evaluated based on their accuracy in identifying diabetes and its subtype. RESULTS:The final DiCAYA CP requires at least one diabetes diagnosis code from clinical encounters. Subsequently, diabetes type classification was based on the ratio of type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) diagnosis codes in the EHR. For both youth and young adults, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) in finding diabetes cases were >90%, except for the specificity and NPV in young adults, which were slightly lower at 83.8% and 80.6%, respectively. The final DiCAYA CP achieved >90% sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV in classifying T1D, and demonstrated lower but robust performance in identifying T2D, consistently maintaining >80% across metrics. CONCLUSIONS:The DiCAYA CP effectively identifies overall diabetes and T1D in youth and young adults, though T2D misclassification in youth highlights areas for refinement. The simplicity of the DiCAYA CP enables broad deployment across diverse EHR systems for diabetes surveillance.

OBJECTIVE:Social determinants of health (SDOH) may impact the incidence of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) infection and the uptake of vaccinations in pregnancy. The objective of this study is to identify contributors to disparities in RSV vaccination in pregnancy. DESIGN/METHODS:This is a retrospective cohort study of patients delivering at term within three hospitals during February and March 2024, comparing pregnant patients identified as receiving vs not receiving RSV vaccinations. This period and gestational age were chosen to include patients who would have qualified for RSV vaccination administration. Vaccination status was extracted from standardized admission templates where these variables were recorded as discrete fields. Patients without RSV vaccination information were excluded. Sociodemographic factors, COVID vaccination status, and delivery campus were evaluated. Outcomes were analyzed using chi-squared, t-test, and McNemar test. RESULT/RESULTS:2181 patients met inclusion criteria and RSV vaccination information was available for 1548 patients (71%) with a 14% vaccination rate. Compared to those not vaccinated (n=1332), RSV vaccinated patients (n=216) were more likely to be older (30.7 vs 34.8, p<0.001), have private insurance (42% vs 85%, p<0.001), speak English (82% vs 95%, p<0.001), and deliver at our regional perinatal center (26% vs 77%, p<0.001). 50% of RSV vaccinated patients had a history of COVID vaccination compared to 33% of those not vaccinated against RSV (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS:SDOH were associated with differences in RSV vaccination status. In addition, patients without RSV vaccination were less likely to have had COVID vaccination. These findings highlight the need to address SDOH to increase vaccination rates for vulnerable populations.