The International Guideline for the Definition, Classification, Diagnosis and Management of Urticaria
Zuberbier, T; Abdul Hameed Ansari, Z; Abdul Latiff, A H; Abuzakouk, M M; Agcaoili-De Jesus, M S; Agondi, R C; Al-Ahmad, M; Alangari, A A; Alhameli, H; Alonso Bello, C D; Alshareef, S; Al-Tamemi, S; Altrichter, S; Al Wahshi, H; Aquilina, S; Araújo, M; Arnaout, R; Asero, R; Ballmer-Weber, B; Bangert, C; Bauer, A; Ben-Shoshan, M; Bernstein, J; Bindslev-Jensen, C; Bizjak, M; Boccon-Gibod, I; Bonnekoh, H; Bouillet, L; Brockow, K; Brzoza, Z; Bulatović Ćalasan, M; Bulkhi, A; Buttgereit, T; Bygum, A; Caballero, T; Calderon, O; Campos, R; Cancian, M; Carne, E; Castor, M A; Cerecedo, I; Çetinarslan, T; Cherrez-Ojeda, I; Chkhikvadze, N; Chong-Neto, H J; Choo, K; Christoff, G; Chu, C-Y; Ciupka, K; Conlon, N; Costa, C; Craig, T; Criado, P; Danilycheva, I; Darlenski, R; De Arruda Chaves, E; de Montjoye, L; Doutre, M S; Du-Thanh, A; Ebo, D; Elkhalifa, S; Elmariah, S; El-Shanawany, T; Ensina, L F; Ertaş, R; Fachini Jardim Criado, R; Ferrer, M; Ferrucci, S; Fok, J S; Fomina, D; Fonacier, L; Fouda, G; Francescantonio, I; Fukunaga, A; Galvan Calle, C A; Garcia, E; Gáspár, K; Gelincik, A; Geng, S; Godse, K; Gonçalo, M; Gotua, M; Grattan, C; Grosber, M; Guidos Fogelbach, G; Guilarte, M; Guillod, R; Hamelmann, E; Hawkes, J; Hayama, K; Heuer, R; Hide, M; Hoetzenecker, W; Inomata, N; Kang, H-R; Kaplan, A; Kapp, A; Karam, M; Kasperska-Zajac, A; Katelaris, C H; Kessel, A; Khoshkhui, M; Kim, B; Kinaciyan, T; Kocatürk, E; Kolacinska-Flont, M; Kolkhir, P; Konstantinou, G N; Kosnik, M; Krasowska, D; Kulthanan, K; Kumaran, M S; Kuprys-Lipinska, I; Labrador, M; Larco, J I; Larenas-Linnemann, D; Latysheva, E; Lazaridou, E; Li, P H; Lima, H; Lippert, U; Magerl, M; Makris, M; Alves Marcelino, J; Marzano, A V; Medina, I; Meshkova, R; Micallef, D; Mohammed Ali, R; Mortz, C G; Munoz, M; Oude Elberink, H N G; Nakonechna, A; Nasr, I; Nast, A; Netchiporouk, E; Nettis, E; Nieto, S; Ogueta Canales, I; Okas, T-L; Orfali, R L; Özkaya, E; Parisi, C; Pennitz, A; Pawankar, R; Pereira, M P; Peter, J; Petkova, E; Pigatto, P D; Podder, I; Popov, T; Porebski, G; Pyatilova, P; Ramon, G D; Ratti Sisa, H A; Recto, M; Ress, K; Ridge, K; Riedl, M; Ritchie, C; Rosario Filho, N; Rosmaninho, I; Rudenko, M; Rukhadze, M; Rutkowski, K; Sabato, V; Sahiner, U M; Saini, S; Saleh Al Sabbagh, F; Salman, A; Salvo, F; Sanchez, J; Santucci, A; Schliemann, S; Schmid-Grendelmeier, P; Sekerel, B E; Serpa, F; Sheikh, F; Sheikh, J; Shendi, H; Siebenhaar, F; Sonomjamts, M; Soria, A; Sousa Pinto, B; Staevska, M; Staubach, P; Stephan, M; Stevanovic, K; Stingeni, L; Stobiecki, M; Su Küçük, Ö; Sussman, G; Szegedi, A; Takahagi, S; Tanaka, A; Teovska Mitrevska, N; Thomsen, S F; Toubi, E; Tsatsou, F; Turk, M; Vadasz, Z; Valerieva, A; Valle, S; Doorn, M V; Veleiro Perez, B; Vera Ayala, C E; Vestergaard, C; Vieira, R J; Maruta, C W; Wedi, B; Werner, R N; Yap, E W Y; Xepapadaki, P; Xiang, Y; Ye, Y-M; Yong, P; Yosipovitch, G; Zalewska-Janowska, A Z J; Zeyen, C; Zhao, Z; Metz, M; Giménez-Arnau, A M
This update and revision of the international guideline for urticaria was developed in accordance with the methods recommended by Cochrane and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group. It is an initiative of the Global Allergy and Asthma Excellence Network (GA2LEN) and its Urticaria and Angioedema Centers of Reference and Excellence (UCAREs and ACAREs), with the participation of 210 delegates from 107 national and international societies, from 59 countries. The consensus conference was held on December 6th, 2024. This guideline was acknowledged and accepted by the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS). Urticaria is a frequent, mast cell-driven disease, defined by a rapid appearance of wheals, angioedema, or both. The lifetime prevalence of acute urticaria is estimated to be approximately 20%. Chronic urticaria, categorized as either chronic spontaneous urticaria or chronic inducible urticaria, is disabling, impairs quality of life, and affects performance at work and school, however, novel therapies are available. This updated version of the international guideline for urticaria covers the definition and classification of urticaria and outlines expert-guided and evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for the different subtypes of urticaria.
PMID: 41649409
ISSN: 1398-9995
CID: 6000592
Exploring Sex Differences in Stroke Outcomes: A Comprehensive Analysis From the SPAN 1 Trial
Chauhan, Anjali; Lee, Eunyoung Angela; Patel, Rakesh B; Kumskova, Mariia; Leira, Enrique C; Chauhan, Anil; Shi, Yanrong; Cao, Suyi; Koehler, Raymond C; Dhandapani, Krishnan M; Khan, Mohammad Badruzzaman; Kamat, Pradip K; Arbab, Ali; Hess, David C; Herman, Alison L; Boisserand, Ligia; Sansing, Lauren H; Morais, Andreia; Jin, Xuyan; Aykan, Sanem; Imai, Takahiko; Ayata, Cenk; Nagarkatti, Karisma A; Lamb, Jessica; Diniz, Márcio A; Lyden, Patrick D; Aronowski, Jaroslaw; McCullough, Louise D
BACKGROUND:Stroke is a sexually dimorphic disease, with different risk factors, incidence, outcomes, and treatment responses in men and women. While sex differences have been documented in preclinical studies, these findings often come from single-site studies with small sample sizes and require validation across diverse research settings. METHODS:We used data from the SPAN (Stroke Preclinical Assessment Network), a randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded, multilaboratory trial, to determine if sex differences in neurological outcomes are present in preclinical stroke models. We analyzed data from 665 stroke animals treated with saline, including young mice, diet-induced obese mice, aging mice, young rats, and spontaneously hypertensive rats. We compared the corner test index and brain morphology between the sexes using linear random effect models and assessed the mortality rate using Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS:No significant sex differences were found in neurological outcome measured with the corner test on either day 7 or day 30 after stroke, regardless of the mouse or rat stroke model used. Additionally, female and male mice exhibited similar infarct sizes on day 2 magnetic resonance imaging and on brain atrophy measures on day 30 after stroke, indicating a lack of sex differences in brain injury. Similarly, no sex differences were observed in acute or chronic sensorimotor or tissue outcomes in young rats. In 1 subanalysis, sex differences were seen in the spontaneously hypertensive rats cohort. Female rats exhibited a higher corner test index on day 30 than males, indicating more severe sensorimotor injury. CONCLUSIONS:In this multicenter preclinical study, we did not detect sex differences in stroke outcomes in mice, although sex differences in behavioral outcomes were observed in spontaneously hypertensive rats. These findings highlight that sex differences may be model-specific and subtle, emphasizing the need for methodological consistency and thoughtful inclusion of diverse animal models in translational stroke research to better understand if sex-specific responses contribute to stroke outcomes.
PMID: 41631765
ISSN: 2047-9980
CID: 5997812
Accountable Care Organization Efficiency on Entry and Shared Savings Bonuses
Srivastava, Arnav; Shay, Addison; Kaufman, Samuel R; Liu, Xiu; Maganty, Avinash; Oerline, Mary K; Guro, Paula A; Hill, Dawson; Dall, Christopher; Faraj, Kassem S; Ying, Meiling; Shahinian, Vahakn B; Hollenbeck, Brent K
IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Spending benchmarks in the Medicare Shared Savings Program previously only considered an accountable care organization's (ACO) historical spending, potentially disadvantaging efficient organizations in favor of inefficient ones. To more sustainably reward efficient ACOs, benchmark calculation has evolved, such as the incorporation of average regional spending in 2017, but how benchmarking policy, and its changes, have affected the financial performance of ACOs across the efficiency spectrum remains unclear. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To measure the association between ACO efficiency on entry (ie, the ratio of observed to expected spending) with earning a shared savings bonus. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:This cross-sectional study used a 20% national sample of Medicare claims to identify ACOs that participated in the Shared Savings Program for a minimum of 4 years between January 2013 and December 2020. ACOs were sorted in quartiles based on their observed to expected spending ratio in their first year of participants. Data analysis was conducted from July 2024 to May 2025. EXPOSURE/UNASSIGNED:Quartiles of ACO efficiency with a higher spending ratio denoting lower efficiency. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:The primary outcome was receipt of a shared savings bonus in the second, third, and fourth agreement years. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between ACO efficiency quartiles and earning a bonus and how the regional benchmark adjustment in 2017 affected this association across measured agreement years. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Across 402 ACOs, the median (IQR) spending ratio was 1.000 (0.993- 1.005). After adjustment, the most efficient ACOs (ie, lowest quartile of the spending ratio) had an increased probability of earning a bonus from 24.4% (95% CI, 15.3%-33.4%) to 45.2% (95% CI, 35.4%-55.0%) after the 2017 introduction of the regional benchmark adjustment. However, the least efficient ACOs (ie, top quartile of the spending ratio) were significantly more likely to earn bonuses prior to (43.8%; 95% CI, 33.7%-53.9%) and after (60.7%; 95% CI, 51.3%-70.1%) the benchmarking change, without evidence that this gap narrowed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:In this cross-sectional study, ACOs across the range of efficiency on entry had greater odds of earning bonuses after the introduction of the regional benchmark adjustment in 2017. However, less efficient ACOs had significantly greater odds of earning bonuses compared with more efficient ACOs, before and after the policy change.
PMCID:12947013
PMID: 41746643
ISSN: 2574-3805
CID: 6010372