Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect that associated glenohumeral dislocations have on outcomes following surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures. METHODS:This IRB-approved study reports on 301 patients, who underwent operative treatment for proximal humerus fractures at an academic medical center from January 2006 to January 2023. Fractures were classified according to the Neer system. Patients were separated into two cohorts based on whether a glenohumeral dislocation was present at the time of initial injury. Outcomes measured included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, shoulder range of motion (forward elevation, external rotation, internal rotation), readmission rates, complications, hardware removal, and need for revision surgery. Independent samples t-tests and chi-squared analysis were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. A binary logistic regression was performed to analyze the influence of these factors on complication rate. RESULTS:230 patients sustained an isolated fracture (PHF) and 71 sustained a fracture-dislocation (FD). Significant differences were observed between the FD and PHF groups in all measured outcomes. The FD group had a poorer DASH score (24.38 ± 19.09 vs 10.54 ± 13.67; P < 0.001) and reduced range of shoulder motion in forward elevation (114° ± 40° vs 162° ± 19°; P < 0.001), external rotation (40° ± 19° vs 66° ± 19°; P < 0.001), and internal rotation (57° ± 26° vs 82° ± 21°; P < 0.001). Readmission rates were higher in the FD group (0.28 ± 0.85 vs 0.05 ± 0.28; P < 0.001). The FD cohort also had a higher rate of complications (25.35% vs 6.52%; P < 0.001), need for removal of hardware (14.08% vs 3.04%; P = 0.002), and overall revision surgery (11.27% vs 1.30%; P < 0.001). The FD cohort demonstrated a greater incidence of AVN (12.68% vs 4.35%; P = 0.012). No significant difference was observed regarding rates of fracture healing and recurrent dislocation. Multivariate analysis in the form of binary logistic regression indicated that fracture-dislocation significantly increased the complication risk (OR = 3.310, 95% CI = 1.42-7.70; P = 0.005). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Proximal humerus fracture-dislocations are associated with worse functional outcomes and higher complication rates compared to those without dislocations. These findings highlight the potential need for specialized treatment strategies to mitigate the impact of dislocation on recovery.

The interaction between sleep, circadian rhythms and cardiovascular resilience is a crucial yet underexplored research area with important public health implications. Disruptions in sleep and circadian rhythms exacerbate hypertension, diabetes mellitus and obesity, conditions that are increasingly prevalent globally and increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop examined these connections, as well as the emerging concept of cardiovascular resilience as a dynamic and multifaceted concept spanning molecular, cellular and systemic levels across an individual's lifespan. The workshop emphasized the need to expand the focus from solely understanding whether and how sleep and circadian rhythm disturbances contribute to disease, to also exploring how healthy sleep and aligned circadian rhythms can increase cardiovascular resilience. To develop a Roadmap towards this goal, workshop participants identified key knowledge gaps and research opportunities, including the need to integrate biological, behavioural, environmental and societal factors in sleep and circadian health with cardiovascular research to identify therapeutic targets. Proposed interventions encompass behavioural therapies, chronotherapy, lifestyle changes, organizational policies and public health initiatives aimed at improving sleep and circadian health for better cardiovascular outcomes. Future cross-disciplinary research and translation of discoveries into public health strategies and clinical practices could improve cardiovascular resilience across the lifespan in all populations.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS/OBJECTIVE:The TRISCEND II trial demonstrated superior clinical benefits for patients with ≥severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) treated with the EVOQUE transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) system plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone. This work reports 1-year and 18-month outcomes in patients stratified by baseline TR severity. METHODS:The multicentre, prospective TRISCEND II trial enrolled 400 patients with symptomatic, ≥severe TR and randomised 2:1 to TTVR (n=267) or control (n=133). In a post-hoc analysis, patients were stratified into severe TR (n=172) and massive/torrential TR (n=220) cohorts. Clinical and quality-of-life outcomes were reported at 1 year, with Kaplan-Meier estimates for all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalisation assessed at 18 months. Study oversight included an independent echocardiographic core laboratory, clinical events committee, and data safety monitoring board. RESULTS:One year after TTVR, TR was ≤mild in 95.2% of severe TR and 95.3% of massive/torrential TR patients. The primary safety and effectiveness endpoint (win ratio) favoured TTVR over control regardless of baseline TR severity: severe (1.64 [95% CI: 1.11, 2.43]) and massive/torrential (2.20 [1.55, 3.14]). At 18 months, TTVR patients had similar mortality to controls (rate difference: severe 0.2% [-11.6, 11.9], massive/torrential -5.8% [-17.6, 6.0], whereas HF hospitalisation rates favoured TTVR in the massive/torrential cohort (vs. control, severe 9.8% [-3.0, 22.7], massive/torrential -15.2% [-28.9, -1.5]). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with ≥severe TR benefit from TTVR, experiencing improvements in TR severity, functional capacity, and quality of life regardless of baseline TR severity, with a signal for greater benefit in patients with more advanced disease.

OBJECTIVE:To increase the rate of low dose aspirin (LDA) counseling and treatment in patients with 2 or more moderate risk factors of preeclampsia(PMRF) from 9% to 50% within a four-month period after implementation of interventions. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:A single-institution quality improvement initiative aimed at LDA screening and counseling of those with PMRF. Two groups were evaluated: pre-intervention (January - April 2022) and post-intervention (January - April 2023). This initiative focused on identifying PMRF and monitoring rates of LDA counseling and treatment. Rates were assessed at two-week intervals and presented on a run chart to visualize trends and measure progress over time. Providers underwent education utilizing preeclampsia (PEC) screening flowsheets and integrated a clinical decision-making (CDM) tool in initial prenatal visit documentation using a smart-tool. Patients were provided with educational flyers. RESULTS:In the pre-intervention group (n=126), 8.7% of patients received counseling on PMRF risk factors and LDA use, 7.9% were treated with LDA. In the post-intervention group (n=112) 52.7% of patients received counseling on PMRF risk factors and LDA use, and 35.7% were treated with LDA. There was an 83.5% increase in the percentage of patients counseled following intervention implementation. A progressive increase was noted in counseling rates within the 18 weeks post-intervention. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Integrating PEC screening flowsheets, clinical decision-making tools, and patient education flyers effectively enhances LDA counseling for patients with ≥2 PMRF with additional benefits seen in high-risk patients. These interventions offer a replicable model to enhance guideline adherence and reduce preeclampsia risk in vulnerable populations.

BACKGROUND:As the incidence of frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) continues to rise, there is a need for an optimal treatment algorithm for FFA. OBJECTIVE:To produce an international consensus statement on the treatment modalities and prognostic indicators of FFA. METHODS:Sixty-nine hair experts from six continents were invited to participate in a three-round Delphi process. The final stage was held as a virtual meeting facilitated via Zoom. The consensus threshold was set at ≥66%. RESULTS:Of 365 questions, expert consensus was achieved in 204 (56%) questions following completion of the three rounds. Three additional questions were included at the final meeting. The category with the strongest consensus agreement was disease monitoring (9; 100%). Questions pertaining to physical therapies achieved the least category consensus (15; 40%), followed by systemic therapy (45; 43%). LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:The study lacked sufficient representation from Africa and South America. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:SOFFIA highlights areas of agreement and disagreement among experts. Robust research is warranted to provide evidence-based treatment recommendations.

OBJECTIVE:To determine whether the timing of parathyroid surgery impacts the risk of renal stone retreatment and cardiovascular interventions. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Long-term, untreated primary hyperparathyroidism is associated with significant morbidity including nephrolithiasis and cardiovascular disease. METHODS:We conducted a Population-based Cohort study of New York and California state-wide data from 2000-2020. Adult patients who underwent renal stone treatment and subsequently diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) and underwent parathyroidectomy (PTX) were included. Patients were excluded if PTX was prior to index stone procedure, they underwent second stone treatment within 6 months, with stage V CKD, with secondary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism, with prior kidney transplant or hemodialysis, or with prior cancer diagnosis. Rate of renal stone retreatment and cardiovascular interventions after PTX in pHPT patients with nephrolithiasis who underwent parathyroid surgery at ≤ 2 years and >2 years after index stone procedure was measured. RESULTS:We identified 2,093 patients who underwent first-time stone treatment and subsequent PTX. The median time to PTX was 560 days (IQR 187-1477) and follow-up was 7.4 years (IQR 4.5-13.1). Delaying PTX for more than 2 years increased the risk of renal stone retreatment by 59% (HR 1.59; P<0.001), increased the risk of experiencing coronary disease or associated interventions by 118% (HR=2.18; P=0.01), and increased the risk of experiencing an overall cardiovascular event by 52% (HR 1.52; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/CONCLUSIONS:In symptomatic pHPT, delaying PTX significantly increases the risk of requiring future stone retreatment and cardiac/vascular surgical interventions. This highlights the importance of early surgical referral and multidisciplinary approaches to optimize outcomes and resource utilization in pHPT.

BACKGROUND:Despite recent improvements in radiation safety, interventionalists are increasingly exposed to radiation during cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) procedures. The RADPAD was designed as a protective scatter-radiation absorbing shield with the goal of reducing scatter radiation. Early studies demonstrated between a 20 and 62 % relative reduction in scatter radiation. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of the RADPAD through a randomized controlled trial in a large contemporary CCL. DESIGN/METHODS:The ATTENUATE (v) Trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized controlled trial which will randomize 1000 CCL procedures 1:1 to use of the RADPAD vs. no use of the RADPAD. The primary outcome of interest is the most proximal operator's dose-area product (DAP)-normalized operator dose (E) defined as E divided by DAP. Additional subgroup analysis comparing types of procedure will also be performed. Every case will utilize contemporary radiation safety equipment. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS:The ATTENUATE Trial is the largest randomized controlled trial to evaluate the utility of the RADPAD in reducing relative operator exposure in a contemporary CCL including coronary and structural interventions.

OBJECTIVE:Preeclampsia remains one of the leading causes of perinatal mortality worldwide. Little is known of the modifiable risk factors that can be identified and addressed early in pregnancy to reduce the risk of preeclampsia and its associated adverse outcomes. We sought to determine if there is a synergistic effect of pre-pregnancy body-mass index and obstructive sleep apnea on the risk of preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:We conducted a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies delivered in Kaiser Permanente Southern California hospitals between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020 (n=342,349). Preeclampsia and sleep apnea were ascertained using clinical diagnosis codes. Body-mass index in kg/m2 measured during prenatal care visits was categorized as normal (18.5 to 24.9), overweight (25 to 29.9), and obese (≥30). Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted relative risks (adjusted RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS:Compared to normal weight in a pregnancy, overweight (adjusted RR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.5, 1.7) and obese body mass index (adjusted RR: 2.5; 95% CI: 2.4, 2.6) were associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia. Independent of pre-pregnancy body-mass index, a pregnancy with obstructive sleep apnea was associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia (adjusted RR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.8, 2.6). Compared to normal weight without the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in a pregnancy, overweight (adjusted RR: 4.6; 95% CI: 2.9, 7.4) and obese body mass index (adjusted RR: 3.8; 95% CI: 3.2, 4.6) with the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea were associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia. CONCLUSIONS:Obstructive sleep apnea and elevated body-mass index have independent and additive relationship with preeclampsia. Overweight women at-risk of preeclampsia should be advised of a higher likelihood of developing preeclampsia when both conditions occur together and may benefit from close monitoring and early interventions for these modifiable risk factors.

OBJECTIVE:Social determinants of health (SDOH) may impact the incidence of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) infection and the uptake of vaccinations in pregnancy. The objective of this study is to identify contributors to disparities in RSV vaccination in pregnancy. DESIGN/METHODS:This is a retrospective cohort study of patients delivering at term within three hospitals during February and March 2024, comparing pregnant patients identified as receiving vs not receiving RSV vaccinations. This period and gestational age were chosen to include patients who would have qualified for RSV vaccination administration. Vaccination status was extracted from standardized admission templates where these variables were recorded as discrete fields. Patients without RSV vaccination information were excluded. Sociodemographic factors, COVID vaccination status, and delivery campus were evaluated. Outcomes were analyzed using chi-squared, t-test, and McNemar test. RESULT/RESULTS:2181 patients met inclusion criteria and RSV vaccination information was available for 1548 patients (71%) with a 14% vaccination rate. Compared to those not vaccinated (n=1332), RSV vaccinated patients (n=216) were more likely to be older (30.7 vs 34.8, p<0.001), have private insurance (42% vs 85%, p<0.001), speak English (82% vs 95%, p<0.001), and deliver at our regional perinatal center (26% vs 77%, p<0.001). 50% of RSV vaccinated patients had a history of COVID vaccination compared to 33% of those not vaccinated against RSV (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS:SDOH were associated with differences in RSV vaccination status. In addition, patients without RSV vaccination were less likely to have had COVID vaccination. These findings highlight the need to address SDOH to increase vaccination rates for vulnerable populations.