Faculty Bibliography

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the main public health global burdens of the 21st century, responsible for over a million deaths every year. Hospital programs aimed at improving antibiotic use, referred to as antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs), can both optimize the treatment of infections and minimize adverse antibiotics events including the development and spread of AMR. The challenge of AMR is closely linked to the development and spread of healthcare-associated infection (HAIs). In fact, the management of patients with HAIs frequently requires the administration of broader-spectrum antibiotic regimens due to the higher risk of acquiring multidrug-resistant organisms, which, in turn, promotes resistance. For this reason, even before using antibiotics correctly, it is necessary to prevent and control the spread of HAIs in our hospitals. In this narrative review, we present seven measures that healthcare workers, even if not directly involved in the tasks of infection prevention and control, must know, support, and embrace. We hope that this review may raise awareness among all healthcare professionals about the issues with the increasing rate of AMR and the ongoing efforts towards minimizing its rise.

BACKGROUND:The Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy Study demonstrated that a target blood pressure of <140/90 mm Hg during pregnancy is associated with improved perinatal outcomes. Outside of pregnancy, pharmacologic therapy for patients with diabetes and hypertension is adjusted to a target blood pressure of <130/80 mm Hg. During pregnancy, patients with both diabetes and chronic hypertension may also benefit from tighter control with a target blood pressure <130/80 mm Hg. OBJECTIVE:We compared perinatal outcomes in patients with hypertension and diabetes who achieved blood pressure <130/80 vs 130 to 139/80 to 89 mm Hg. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:This was a secondary analysis of a multcenter randomized controlled trial. Participants were included in this secondary analysis if they had diabetes diagnosed prior to pregnancy or at <20 weeks of gestation and at least 2 recorded blood pressure measurements prior to delivery. Average systolic and diastolic blood pressure were calculated using ambulatory antenatal blood pressures. The primary composite outcome was preeclampsia with severe features, indicated preterm birth <35 weeks, or placental abruption. Secondary outcomes were components of the primary outcome, cesarean delivery, fetal or neonatal death, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and small for gestational age. Comparisons were made between those with an average systolic blood pressure <130 mm Hg and average diastolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg and those with an average systolic blood pressure 130 to 139 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure 80 to 89 mm Hg using Student's t test and chi-squared tests. Multivariable log-binomial regression models were used to evaluate risk ratios between blood pressure groups for dichotomous outcomes while accounting for baseline covariates. RESULTS:Of 434 participants included, 150 (34.6%) had an average blood pressure less than 130/80 mm Hg. Participants with an average blood pressure less than 130/80 were more likely to be on antihypertensive medications at the start of pregnancy and more likely to have newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus prior to 20 weeks. Participants with an average blood pressure less than 130/80 mm Hg were less likely to have the primary adverse perinatal outcome (19.3% vs 46.5%, adjusted relative risk 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.61, P<.01), with decreased risks specifically of preeclampsia with severe features (adjusted relative risk 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.54) and indicated preterm birth prior to 35 weeks (adjusted relative risk 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.24-0.79). The risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission was lower in the lower blood pressure group (adjusted relative risk 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.59-0.94). No differences were noted in cesarean delivery (adjusted relative risk 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.90-1.20), fetal or neonatal death (adjusted relative risk 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.12-2.92). Small for gestational age less than the 10th percentile was lower in the lower blood pressure group (adjusted relative risk 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.96). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In those with chronic hypertension and diabetes prior to 20 weeks, achieving an average goal blood pressure of <130/80 mm Hg may be associated with improved perinatal outcomes.

This case series describes the successful use of indocyanine green dye and near infrared fluorescence imaging in primary peripheral nerve repair.

OBJECTIVE:To examine the pattern of health services access and utilization that may contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in receiving continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS:This cross-sectional study used a national sample from the All of Us Research Program, which included over 80 % of participants from underrepresented populations in biomedical research. Study participants included adults aged 18 years and older diagnosed with OSA (N = 8518). Diagnosis of OSA and CPAP treatment were ascertained by diagnostic and procedural codes from the electronic health records. Sociodemographic characteristics and health service utilization factors were identified using self-reported survey data. RESULTS:With this national survey, the overall diagnosed prevalence of OSA was 8.8 %, with rates of 8.12 % in non-Hispanic (NH) Black adults, 5.99 % in Hispanic adults, and 10.35 % in NH White adults. When comparing to NH White adults, Hispanic adults were less likely to receive CPAP treatment for OSA after adjusting for socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, access to and utilization of health services, and comorbidities such as obesity and having multiple chronic conditions (OR = 0.73, 95 % CI = 0.59,0.90), p < 0.01. CONCLUSIONS:The rates of CPAP treatment among OSA patients are not consistent across racial and ethnic groups. Unequal access to health services based on residence may contribute to these differences. Interventions that target disparities in OSA diagnosis, access to treatment, and barriers in insurance coverage could potentially help reduce racial and ethnic differences in OSA diagnosis and management.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Autonomy during residency is crucial to the training and development of competent surgeons. An essential component of this process is the 'teaching assistant (TA)' case, an indispensable opportunity for residents to gain confidence and hone intraoperative skills. However, high-quality data on the volume and diversity of cases that graduates perform are scarce. METHODS:A retrospective analysis was performed from publicly collected data of operative case logs from general surgery residents graduating from ACGME-accredited programs from 2006 to 2023. Data on the median overall number of surgeon chief and TA cases were retrieved. Collected data were organized based on sub-specialties. The Mann-Kendall trend test was used to investigate trends in TA cases and surgeon chief operative volume. RESULTS:Between 2007 and 2023, the surgeon chief cases gradually increased from 229 to 274 (19.6 ​% increase; τ ​= ​0.610, p ​= ​0.001). There was a concurrent 72.7 ​% increase in TA cases from a median of 22-38 (τ ​= ​0.574, p ​= ​0.001). Surgeon chief (283 per resident) and TA cases (43 per resident) peaked in 2018-2019 and 2016-2017. The uptrend in TA cases was associated with the significant increase in colorectal (τ ​= ​0.559, p ​= ​0.001), general surgery-other (τ ​= ​0.404, p ​= ​0.018), and hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) (τ ​= ​0.596, p ​= ​0.001) subspecialties. Trauma and vascular surgery did not change significantly. With respect to total chief cases, general surgery-other (τ ​= ​0.956, p=<0.001), HPB (τ ​= ​0.713, p=<0.001) and colorectal (τ ​= ​0.522, p ​= ​0.004) volume increased. There was no significant change in trauma and foregut volume, while the volume of endocrine (τ ​= ​-0.485, p ​= ​0.006) and vascular surgery (τ ​= ​0.603, p ​= ​0.001) dropped significantly. The procedural category with the highest chief and TA volume was 'colorectal tract - large intestine.' Most procedural categories (53.49 ​%) retained a median of 0 teaching cases. No chief cases were logged for the specialties generally not considered part of general surgery (genitourinary, nervous system, orthopedics, and gynecology), although a median of 1 surgeon chief genitourinary case was recorded from 2018 to 2023. CONCLUSIONS:Over the past seventeen years, there has been a gradual uptrend in the number of surgeon chief and TA cases. While this is a positive indicator of improved autonomy, further research must focus on strategies to improve resident autonomy to train well-rounded surgeons safely.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Artificial intelligence models in radiology are frequently developed and validated using data sets from a single institution and are rarely tested on independent, external data sets, raising questions about their generalizability and applicability in clinical practice. The American Society of Functional Neuroradiology (ASFNR) organized a multicenter artificial intelligence competition to evaluate the proficiency of developed models in identifying various pathologies on NCCT, assessing age-based normality and estimating medical urgency. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:In total, 1201 anonymized, full-head NCCT clinical scans from 5 institutions were pooled to form the data set. The data set encompassed studies with normal findings as well as those with pathologies, including acute ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, and mass effect (detection of these, task 1). NCCTs were also assessed to determine if findings were consistent with expected brain changes for the patient's age (task 2: age-based normality assessment) and to identify any abnormalities requiring immediate medical attention (task 3: evaluation of findings for urgent intervention). Five neuroradiologists labeled each NCCT, with consensus interpretations serving as the ground truth. The competition was announced online, inviting academic institutions and companies. Independent central analysis assessed the performance of each model. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for each artificial intelligence model, along with the area under the ROC curve. RESULTS:Four teams processed 1177 studies. The median age of patients was 62 years, with an interquartile range of 33 years. Nineteen teams from various academic institutions registered for the competition. Of these, 4 teams submitted their final results. No commercial entities participated in the competition. For task 1, areas under the ROC curve ranged from 0.49 to 0.59. For task 2, two teams completed the task with area under the ROC curve values of 0.57 and 0.52. For task 3, teams had little-to-no agreement with the ground truth. CONCLUSIONS:To assess the performance of artificial intelligence models in real-world clinical scenarios, we analyzed their performance in the ASFNR Artificial Intelligence Competition. The first ASFNR Competition underscored the gap between expectation and reality; and the models largely fell short in their assessments. As the integration of artificial intelligence tools into clinical workflows increases, neuroradiologists must carefully recognize the capabilities, constraints, and consistency of these technologies. Before institutions adopt these algorithms, thorough validation is essential to ensure acceptable levels of performance in clinical settings.

BACKGROUND:5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a major component of gastrointestinal cancer treatments. In multidrug regimens such as FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and FOLFIRINOX, 5-FU is commonly administered as a bolus followed by an infusion. However, the pharmacologic rationale for incorporating the 5-FU bolus in these regimens is unclear, and there are other effective regimens for gastrointestinal cancers that do not include the bolus. The purpose of this study was to determine whether omission of the 5-FU bolus was associated with a difference in survival and toxicity. METHODS:A real-world database from Flatiron Health was queried for patients with advanced colorectal, gastroesophageal, and pancreatic cancers who received first-line FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and FOLFIRINOX regimens. Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to compare survival outcomes between patients who received the 5-FU bolus and those who did not. Inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) analysis was performed to adjust for treatment selection bias. RESULTS:This study included 11,765 patients with advanced colorectal (n=8,670), gastroesophageal (n=1,481), and pancreatic (n=1,614) cancers. Among all first-line 5-FU multidrug regimens, 10,148 (86.3%) patients received a 5-FU bolus and 1,617 (13.7%) did not. After IPTW analysis, we found that omitting the bolus was not associated with a decrease in overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91-1.07; P=.74). However, omitting the bolus was associated with reductions in neutropenia (10.7% vs 22.7%; P<.01), thrombocytopenia (11.2% vs 16.1%; P<.01), and use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors after treatment (19.6% vs 29.1%; P<.01). CONCLUSIONS:After adjusting for baseline clinical factors, we found that omission of the 5-FU bolus from FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and FOLFIRINOX regimens was not associated with decreased survival, but resulted in decreased toxicity and possible health care savings.

BACKGROUND:Rezum alleviates lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) while preserving sexual function, but long-term sexual function outcomes are lacking in patients with baseline erectile dysfunction (ED). AIM/OBJECTIVE:The study sought to analyze 4 years of real-world sexual function outcomes of Rezum using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, stratified by baseline ED status. METHODS:Participants included multiethnic Rezum-treated patients from a single outpatient office. IIEF domains and BPH medication usage were compared at baseline and 6, 12, and 48 months using t tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square tests, and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. OUTCOMES/RESULTS:Primary outcomes over 4 years included the IIEF functional domains (erectile function [EF], orgasmic function [OF], sexual desire [SD], intercourse satisfaction [IS], overall satisfaction [OS]) and BPH medication usage. RESULTS:A total of 91 patients were included: 40 (44%) in the ED cohort and 51 (56%) in the no ED cohort. History of diabetes was more prevalent in the ED cohort (35% vs 15.7%; P = .048). Baseline scores in the EF, OF, IS, and OS domains were lower in the ED cohort. Compared with baseline, there were no significant changes in any IIEF domains in either cohort at 6 months. At 12 months, the ED cohort had significant percent decreases in OF (-25%; P = .02), SD (-22.2%; P = .04), and OS (-33.3%; P = .004); the no ED cohort had a significant percent increase in EF (5%; P = .04). At 48 months, the no ED cohort had no significant changes in any IIEF domains, while the ED cohort had significant percent increases in EF (30%; P = .01), SD (22.5%; P = .02), IS (20%; P = .01), and OS (58.3%; P = .008). Both cohorts significantly discontinued BPH medications at all follow-ups. At 48 months, there were no cases of de novo ED in the no ED cohort. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:As modern BPH therapies continue to demonstrate efficacy in alleviating lower urinary tract symptoms, the preservation or improvement of sexual function emerges as an increasingly important consideration for patients, with our study suggesting Rezum as a compelling option. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS/UNASSIGNED:Our study has the strength of long-term Rezum outcomes in an ethnically diverse patient population, stratified by the presence of baseline ED, but is limited by retrospective design, single-center nature, and small sample sizes at long-term follow-ups. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Rezum preserved long-term sexual function in patients without baseline ED and improved sexual function in those with baseline ED; however, individuals with ED may experience temporary decreases in sexual function at 12 months.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Many teaching hospitals in the US segregate patients by insurance status, with resident clinics primarily composed of publicly insured or uninsured patients and faculty practices seeing privately insured patients. The prevalence of this model in obstetrics and gynecology residencies is unknown. OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:To examine the prevalence of payer-based segregation in obstetrics and gynecology residency ambulatory care sites nationally and to compare residents' and program directors' perceptions of differences in quality of care between payer-segregated and integrated sites. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:This national survey study included all 6060 obstetrics and gynecology residents and 293 obstetrics and gynecology residency program directors in the US as of January 2023. The proportion of program directors reporting payer segregation was calculated to characterize the national prevalence of this model in obstetrics and gynecology. Perceived differences in care quality were compared between residents and program directors at payer-segregated sites. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:The primary measure was prevalence of payer-based segregation in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs in the US as reported by residency program directors. The secondary measure was resident and program director perceptions of care quality in these ambulatory care settings. Before study initiation, the study hypothesis was that residents and program directors at ambulatory sites with payer-based segregation would report more disparity in perceived health care quality between resident and faculty practices compared with those from integrated sites. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 251 residency program directors (response rate, 85.7%) and 3471 residents (response rate, 57.3%) were included in the study. Resident respondent demographics reflected demographics of obstetrics and gynecology residents nationally in terms of racial and ethnic distribution (6 [0.2%] American Indian or Alaska Native; 425 [13.0%] Asian; 239 [7.3%] Black or African American; 290 [8.9%] Hispanic, Latinx, or Spanish; 7 [0.2%] Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander; 2052 [62.7%] non-Hispanic White; 49 [1.5%] multiracial; 56 [1.7%] other [any race not listed]; and 137 [4.2%] preferred not to say) and geographic distribution (regional prevalence of payer-based segregation: 36 of 53 [67.9%] in the Northeast, 35 of 44 [79.5%] in the Midwest, 43 of 67 [64.2%] in the South, and 13 of 22 [59.1%] in the West), with 2837 respondents (86.9%) identifying as female. Among program directors, 127 (68.3%) reported payer-based segregation in ambulatory care. University programs were more likely to report payer-based segregation compared with community, hybrid, and military programs (63 of 85 [74.1%] vs 31 of 46 [67.4%], 32 of 51 [62.7%], and 0, respectively; P = .04). Residents at payer-segregated programs were less likely than their counterparts at integrated programs to report equal or higher care quality from residents compared with faculty (1662 [68.7%] vs 692 [81.6%] at segregated and integrated programs, respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:In this survey study of residents and residency program directors, payer-based segregation was prevalent in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs, particularly at university programs. These findings reveal an opportunity for structural reform to promote more equitable care in residency training programs.

OBJECTIVE:To investigate the optimal gestational age to deliver pregnant people with chronic hypertension to improve perinatal outcomes. METHODS:We conducted a planned secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of chronic hypertension treatment to different blood pressure goals. Participants with term, singleton gestations were included. Those with fetal anomalies and those with a diagnosis of preeclampsia before 37 weeks of gestation were excluded. The primary maternal composite outcome included death, serious morbidity (heart failure, stroke, encephalopathy, myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, intensive care unit admission, intubation, renal failure), preeclampsia with severe features, hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion, or abruption. The primary neonatal outcome included fetal or neonatal death, respiratory support beyond oxygen mask, Apgar score less than 3 at 5 minutes, neonatal seizures, or suspected sepsis. Secondary outcomes included intrapartum cesarean birth, length of stay, neonatal intensive care unit admission, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), transient tachypnea of the newborn, and hypoglycemia. Those with a planned delivery were compared with those expectantly managed at each gestational week. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% CIs are reported. RESULTS:We included 1,417 participants with mild chronic hypertension; 305 (21.5%) with a new diagnosis in pregnancy and 1,112 (78.5%) with known preexisting hypertension. Groups differed by body mass index (BMI) and preexisting diabetes. In adjusted models, there was no association between planned delivery and the primary maternal or neonatal composite outcome in any gestational age week compared with expectant management. Planned delivery at 37 weeks of gestation was associated with RDS (7.9% vs 3.0%, aOR 2.70, 95% CI, 1.40-5.22), and planned delivery at 37 and 38 weeks was associated with neonatal hypoglycemia (19.4% vs 10.7%, aOR 1.97, 95% CI, 1.27-3.08 in week 37; 14.4% vs 7.7%, aOR 1.82, 95% CI, 1.06-3.10 in week 38). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Planned delivery in the early-term period compared with expectant management was not associated with a reduction in adverse maternal outcomes. However, it was associated with increased odds of some neonatal complications. Delivery timing for individuals with mild chronic hypertension should weigh maternal and neonatal outcomes in each gestational week but may be optimized by delivery at 39 weeks.