Faculty Bibliography

In 1992, Brugada et al(1) suggested that the presence of right bundle-branch block and ST-segment elevation in leads V-1 to V-3 in the absence of structural heart disease is a marker of susceptibility to ventricular fibrillation and represents the diagnostic feature of a novel syndrome that rapidly became known as "Brugada syndrome." A few years later, mutations in the human cardiac sodium channel gene ( SCN5A) were identified in 3 families affected by the syn-drome and was therefore classified among the inherited arrhythmogenic diseases.(2). In the past 12 years, Brugada syndrome has become the focus of active investigations, and it has generated strong scientific debate concerning its diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment. In this article, we present our view on the diagnosis and management of Brugada syndrome, with a specific focus on asymptomatic patients.

We identify a human mutation (E1053K) in the ankyrin-binding motif of Na(v)1.5 that is associated with Brugada syndrome, a fatal cardiac arrhythmia caused by altered function of Na(v)1.5. The E1053K mutation abolishes binding of Na(v)1.5 to ankyrin-G, and also prevents accumulation of Na(v)1.5 at cell surface sites in ventricular cardiomyocytes. Ankyrin-G and Na(v)1.5 are both localized at intercalated disc and T-tubule membranes in cardiomyocytes, and Na(v)1.5 coimmunoprecipitates with 190-kDa ankyrin-G from detergent-soluble lysates from rat heart. These data suggest that Na(v)1.5 associates with ankyrin-G and that ankyrin-G is required for Na(v)1.5 localization at excitable membranes in cardiomyocytes. Together with previous work in neurons, these results in cardiomyocytes suggest that ankyrin-G participates in a common pathway for localization of voltage-gated Na(v) channels at sites of function in multiple excitable cell types

Ca(V)1.2, the cardiac L-type calcium channel, is important for excitation and contraction of the heart. Its role in other tissues is unclear. Here we present Timothy syndrome, a novel disorder characterized by multiorgan dysfunction including lethal arrhythmias, webbing of fingers and toes, congenital heart disease, immune deficiency, intermittent hypoglycemia, cognitive abnormalities, and autism. In every case, Timothy syndrome results from the identical, de novo Ca(V)1.2 missense mutation G406R. Ca(V)1.2 is expressed in all affected tissues. Functional expression reveals that G406R produces maintained inward Ca(2+) currents by causing nearly complete loss of voltage-dependent channel inactivation. This likely induces intracellular Ca(2+) overload in multiple cell types. In the heart, prolonged Ca(2+) current delays cardiomyocyte repolarization and increases risk of arrhythmia, the ultimate cause of death in this disorder. These discoveries establish the importance of Ca(V)1.2 in human physiology and development and implicate Ca(2+) signaling in autism

CONTEXT: Data on the efficacy of beta-blockers in the 3 most common genetic long QT syndrome (LQTS) loci are limited. OBJECTIVE: To describe and assess outcome in a large systematically genotyped population of beta-blocker-treated LQTS patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Consecutive LQTS-genotyped patients (n = 335) in Italy treated with beta-blockers for an average of 5 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cardiac events (syncope, ventricular tachycardia/torsades de pointes, cardiac arrest, and sudden cardiac death) while patients received beta-blocker therapy according to genotype. RESULTS: Cardiac events among patients receiving beta-blocker therapy occurred in 19 of 187 (10%) LQT1 patients, 27 of 120 (23%) LQT2 patients, and 9 of 28 (32%) LQT3 patients (P<.001). The risk of cardiac events was higher among LQT2 (adjusted relative risk, 2.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-5.27; P =.001) and LQT3 (adjusted relative risk, 4.00; 95% CI, 2.45-8.03; P<.001) patients than among LQT1 patients, suggesting inadequate protection from beta-blocker therapy. Other important predictors of risk were a QT interval corrected for heart rate that was more than 500 ms in patients receiving therapy (adjusted relative risk, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.16-3.51; P =.01) and occurrence of a first cardiac event before the age of 7 years (adjusted RR, 4.34; 95% CI, 2.35-8.03; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Among patients with genetic LQTS treated with beta-blockers, there is a high rate of cardiac events, particularly among patients with LQT2 and LQT3 genotypes

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that epinephrine test may have diagnostic value for genotyping LQT1, LQT2, and LQT3 forms of congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS). BACKGROUND: A differential response of dynamic QT interval to epinephrine infusion between LQT1, LQT2, and LQT3 syndromes has been reported, indicating the potential diagnostic value of the epinephrine test for genotyping the three forms. METHODS: The responses of 12-lead ECG parameters to epinephrine were retrospectively examined in 15 LQT1, 10 LQT2, 8 LQT3, and 10 healthy volunteers to select the best ECG criteria for separating the four groups. The epinephrine test then was prospectively conducted in 42 probands clinically affected with LQTS, their 67 family members, and 10 new volunteers. The best criteria were applied in a blinded fashion to prospectively separate a different group of 31 LQT1, 23 LQT2, 6 LQT3, and 30 Control patients (10 genotype-negative LQT1, 10 genotype-negative LQT2 family members, and 10 volunteers). RESULTS: The sensitivity (penetrance) by ECG diagnostic criteria was lower in LQT1 (68%) than in LQT2 (83%) or LQT3 (83%) before epinephrine and was improved with steady-state epinephrine in LQT1 (87%) and LQT2 (91%) but not in LQT3 (83%), without the expense of specificity (100%). The sensitivity and specificity to differentiate LQT1 from LQT2 were 97% and 96%, those from LQT3 were 97% and 100%, and those from Control were 97% and 100%, respectively, when Delta mean corrected Q-Tend >/=35 ms at steady state was used. The sensitivity and specificity to differentiate LQT2 from LQT3 or Control were 100% and 100%, respectively, when Delta mean corrected Q-Tend >/=80 ms at peak was used. CONCLUSIONS: Epinephrine infusion is a powerful test to predict the genotype of LQT1, LQT2, and LQT3 syndromes as well as to improve the clinical diagnosis of genotype-positive patients, especially those with LQT1 syndrome