Faculty Bibliography

Undergraduate medical educators seek to optimize student learning, improve grading transparency and fairness, and provide useful information to residency programs. Recently, the United States Medical Licensing Examination's shift to pass/fail scoring for Step 1 disrupted curricular and assessment operations, and schools' tiered grading practices have been scrutinized. In noting that significant institutional time and energy were being expended in addressing the current levels of student grade appeals, 6 public and private medical schools in the Northeastern United States engaged in an examination of grade appeals via a root cause analysis (RCA). From November 2021 to April 2022, the authors reviewed specific instances of grading challenges that the team of educators encountered previously. From May to June 2022, the authors met for a facilitated discussion of the question, "Why are students challenging grading processes and systems or outcomes?" From July to October 2022, the authors identified root causes by analyzing results from the fishbone diagram (process, equipment, materials, people, and environment) and using the "five whys" technique. Several potential explanations for grade appeals and challenging grading systems across institutions were identified, including variability in the quality or experience of evaluators, lack of clarity about the goals and expectations of clerkships and a lack of transparency about the grading process, having a tiered grading system, technical issues with equipment, and clinical productivity demands of faculty. In proposing solutions to root causes identified in the RCA, factors were mapped to Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) standards to facilitate quality and process improvements in grading. Aiming to support the learning environment and a fair and equivalent assessment process, the authors present a novel RCA and LCME method that can contribute to improving grading systems and has the potential to enhance learning and success.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the care of patients with cancer, but use among hospitalized patients is controversial as a result of questionable benefit and high costs. To evaluate the role of ICIs in the inpatient (IP) setting, we conducted the Inpatient Immunotherapy Outcomes Study (IIOS) to describe characteristics and outcomes of patients who received IP ICIs. METHODS:IIOS is a retrospective study of patients treated with ICIs during hospitalization between 2012 and 2021 at five academic institutions. Data collection was performed using each institution's electronic medical record. We estimated overall survival (OS) from the first administration of ICI using the Kaplan-Meier method and used adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to explore associations between clinicodemographic variables and OS. RESULTS:Two hundred fifteen patients received IP ICIs (median age 60 years; 55% White; 14% Black; 13% Hispanic). Thoracic and head and neck (24%), GI (21%), and hematologic (19%) malignancies were most common. Most of the patients were ICI-naïve (75%), had stage IV solid malignancies (75%) at the time of IP ICI initiation, and had no radiographic response to ICI therapy (88%). Median OS from the first IP ICI dose was 1.55 months (95% CI, 1.08 to 1.81) for all patients and 1.28 months (95% CI, 0.95 to 1.80) for patients with advanced solid malignancies. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model analysis found no clinicodemographic variables associated with improved OS after IP ICI administration. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:IIOS is the largest multi-institutional effort to describe outcomes after IP ICI administration. Clinical outcomes are poor after IP ICI use and IP ICIs should be used with caution.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Ballistics is the science that studies the trajectory, range, and effects of projectiles. Knowledge of the principles of wound ballistics is of particular importance to the surgeon because they allow the optimization of the diagnosis and treatment of those injured by firearms. This review focuses on the updated knowledge of wound ballistics as it pertains to the diagnosis and treatment of gunshot wounds. METHODS:A literature review was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases. The search was limited to observational articles pertaining to wound ballistics and its relationship to patient management in English and Spanish published between January 2014 and March 2024. Studies about weapon design, patients with lethal injuries, experimental, forensic, historical studies, and those reports on pediatric population were excluded. RESULTS:Eleven articles from twenty-eight publications meeting the inclusion criteria were reviewed. CONCLUSIONS:The understanding of wound ballistics enhances the ability to identify potential injuries and to optimize the treatment of gunshot wounds in adults.

BACKGROUND:Disruption of ambulatory healthcare in New York City (NYC) during the COVID-19 pandemic was common, but the impact on the cardiometabolic health of vulnerable patient groups is unknown. Therefore, we estimated the effect of total care disruption (TCD) on blood pressure (BP) control among older NYC residents with hypertension and at least one other chronic condition, and examined whether neighborhood poverty moderated this impact. METHODS:From the INSIGHT Clinical Research Network, we identified NYC residents ≥50 years of age with hypertension and at least one other chronic condition. TCD was defined as no ambulatory or telehealth visit during the pandemic. We contrasted the change in prevalence of controlled BP (BP <140/90) before and after the pandemic among those with and without TCD via an inverse probability weighted (IPW) difference-in-difference regression model. RESULTS:Among 212,673 eligible individuals, mean age was 69.5 years (SD: 10.2 years) and 15.1% experienced TCD. BP control declined from 52.4% to 45.9% among those with TCD and from 53.6% to 48.9% among those without TCD. After IPW adjustment, a larger decline in BP control was noted among those with TCD (adjusted difference-in-difference = 1.13 percentage points (95% CI 0.32-1.94, p-value=0.0058)). There was no consistent difference in the relationship between TCD and post-pandemic BP control across neighborhood poverty levels. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:COVID-19-related TCD was associated with a modest decline in BP control among older adults with hypertension in NYC; this was not moderated by neighborhood poverty level.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To report the clinical and multimodal imaging (MMI) findings and long-term follow-up of stellate nonhereditary idiopathic foveomacular retinoschisis (SNIFR) contiguous with midperipheral retinoschisis (MPRS) and to describe a severe SNIFR variant termed CARPET (Central Anomalous Retinoschisis with mid-PEripheral Traction). DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective case series. SUBJECTS/METHODS:Eleven patients (15 eyes) with SNIFR contiguous with MPRS in at least one eye at baseline or final follow-up. METHODS:MMI features, including cross-sectional and en face macular and peripheral spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography, were reviewed in all cases at baseline and at the final follow-up visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:Various courses (including progression, regression, or stability) of MPRS or SNIFR over time were evaluated. RESULTS:MPRS exhibited centripetal progression to SNIFR in 5 eyes of 3 patients with follow up of 67, 60, and 27 months, respectively, with maintenance of excellent visual acuity (range: 20/25-20/20) in 4 of these 5 eyes. In 2 eyes of 2 patients (including 1 eye with initial centripetal progression of MPRS to SNIFR), MPRS contiguous with SNIFR spontaneously resolved with long-term follow-up (77 and 48 months, respectively). SNIFR contiguous with MPRS partially regressed after 48 months in one patient, and was stable after 54 months in another. A distinctive midperipheral microvasculopathy, associated with MPRS that was contiguous with SNIFR, was identified in 7 eyes of 4 patients. Finally, 3 eyes of 3 patients exhibited additional unique features, including central neurosensory detachment and outer lamellar macular hole, which were associated with significant midperipheral traction, representing a severe variant subtype of SNIFR that we refer to as CARPET. Two of these 3 eyes progressed with short-term follow-up of 6 and 2 months, respectively, while the schisis resolved and vision improved after pars plana vitrectomy in the third case. CONCLUSIONS:MPRS can progress to SNIFR over multiple years of follow-up. SNIFR with MPRS can also spontaneously resolve or remain stable. MPRS can additionally be complicated by a midperipheral inner retinal microvasculopathy. Finally, CARPET may represent a unique and severe variant form of SNIFR driven by midperipheral vitreoretinal traction and associated with significant vision loss.

BACKGROUND:Incidence estimates of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection, also known as long-COVID, have varied across studies and changed over time. We estimated long-COVID incidence among adult and pediatric populations in three nationwide research networks of electronic health records (EHR) participating in the RECOVER Initiative using different classification algorithms (computable phenotypes). METHODS:This EHR-based retrospective cohort study included adult and pediatric patients with documented acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and two control groups-- contemporary COVID-19 negative and historical patients (2019). We examined the proportion of individuals identified as having symptoms or conditions consistent with probable long-COVID within 30-180 days after COVID-19 infection (incidence proportion). Each network (the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C), National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet), and PEDSnet) implemented its own long-COVID definition. We introduced a harmonized definition for adults in a supplementary analysis. RESULTS:Overall, 4% of children and 10-26% of adults developed long-COVID, depending on computable phenotype used. Excess incidence among SARS-CoV-2 patients was 1.5% in children and ranged from 5-6% among adults, representing a lower-bound incidence estimation based on our control groups. Temporal patterns were consistent across networks, with peaks associated with introduction of new viral variants. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our findings indicate that preventing and mitigating long-COVID remains a public health priority. Examining temporal patterns and risk factors of long-COVID incidence informs our understanding of etiology and can improve prevention and management.