Faculty Bibliography

Sleep bruxism, an oral parafunction including teeth clenching and grinding, might be related to increased stress. To evaluate sympathetic cardiac activity in bruxism patients, we monitored cardiac autonomic modulation using spectral analysis of heart rate variability and compared results to those of age-matched healthy volunteers. In bruxism patients, sympathetic cardiac activity was higher than in volunteers. The increased sympathetic tone suggests increased stress and might be related to occlusal disharmonies

It is not known whether C-fiber functional subclasses are differentially affected by diabetes mellitus or whether the patterns of C-fiber dysfunction are different between type 1 and type 2 diabetes. We therefore examined efferent sympathetic sudomotor and primary afferent nociceptor C-fiber function in diabetic patients. Acetylcholine (10%) was used to evoke C-fiber (axon-reflex)-mediated responses. The nociceptor (flare) response was measured using a laser Doppler device. The sudomotor response was quantified with silastic imprints. The nociceptor C-fiber-mediated flare response was reduced in type 2 diabetic patients (P < 0.008) but was similar to controls in type 1 diabetic patients. The sympathetic C-fiber-mediated responses, including sweat volume (P < 0.05) and the number of activated sweat glands (P = 0.003), were increased in patients with type 1 diabetes. There also was a trend toward a larger axon-reflex sweat area in patients with type 1 diabetes (P = 0.09). No differences in these sweat responses were found in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to controls. These findings suggest that the functional abnormalities in diabetic peripheral neuropathy are not homogeneous and that C-fiber subclasses are differentially affected in type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus

Familial dysautonomia (FD) patients frequently experience debilitating orthostatic hypotension. Since physical countermaneuvers can increase blood pressure (BP) in other groups of patients with orthostatic hypotension, we evaluated the effectiveness of countermaneuvers in FD patients. In 17 FD patients (26.4 +/- 12.4 years, eight female), we monitored heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), cardiac output (CO), total peripheral resistance (TPR) and calf volume while supine, during standing and during application of four countermaneuvers: bending forward, squatting, leg crossing, and abdominal compression using an inflatable belt. Countermaneuvers were initiated after standing up,when systolic BP had fallen by 40mmHg or diastolic BP by 30mmHg or presyncope had occurred. During active standing, blood pressure and TPR decreased, calf volume increased but CO remained stable.Mean BP increased significantly during bending forward (by 20.0 (17 - 28.5) mmHg; P = 0.005) (median (25(th) - 75(th) quartile)), squatting (by 50.8 (33.5 - 56) mmHg; P = 0.002), and abdominal compression (by 5.8 (-1 - 34.7) mmHg; P = 0.04) - but not during leg-crossing. Squatting and abdominal compression also induced a significant increase in CO (by 18.1 (-1.3 - 47.9) % during squatting (P = 0.02) and by 7.6 (0.4 - 19.6) % during abdominal compression (P=0.014)). HR did not change significantly during the countermaneuvers. TPR increased significantly only during squatting (by 37.2 (11.8 - 48.2) %; P = 0.01). However, orthopedic problems or ataxia prevented several patients from performing some of the countermaneuvers. Additionally, many patients required assistance with the maneuvers. Squatting, bending forward and abdominal compression can improve orthostatic BP in FD patients, which is achieved mainly by an increased cardiac output. Squatting has the greatest effect on orthostatic blood pressure in FD patients. Suitability and effectiveness of a specific countermaneuver depends on the orthopedic or neurological complications of each FD patient and must be individually tested before a therapeutic recommendation can be given

Dysfunction of the peripheral and central autonomic nervous system is common in many neurological and general medical diseases. The quantitative assessment of sympathetic and parasympathetic function is essential to confirm the diagnosis of autonomic failure, to provide the basis for follow-up examinations, and potentially to monitor successful treatment. Various procedures have been described as useful tools to quantify autonomic dysfunction. The most important tests evaluate cardiovascular and sudomotor autonomic function. In this review, we therefore focus on standard tests of cardiovascular and sudomotor function such as heart-rate variability at rest and during deep breathing, active standing, and the Valsalva maneuver, and on the sympathetic skin response. These tests are widely used for routine clinical evaluation in patients with peripheral neuropathies. Refined methods of studying heart-rate variability, baroreflex testing, and detailed measures of sweat output are mostly used for research purposes. In this context, we describe the spectral analysis of slow modulation of heart rate or blood pressure, reflecting sympathetic and parasympathetic influences, and consider various approaches to baroreflex testing, the thermoregulatory sweat test, and the quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test. Finally, we discuss microneurography as a technique of direct recording of muscle sympathetic nerve activity. Muscle Nerve, 2005

Dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system is a frequent finding in many neurological and internal diseases. The quantitative assessment of cardiovascular and sudomotor function is important for diagnosing the autonomic impairment. In this review article, we focus on standard tests that allow evaluation of cardiovascular and sudomotor autonomic functions and describe methods of quantitative assessment that are better suited for research

Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy has been previously reported in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) using standard reflex tests. However, no study has separately evaluated both parasympathetic and sympathetic cardiovascular autonomic regulation. We therefore assessed the baroreflex-mediated vagal and sympathetic control of the heart rate and sympathetic control of the blood vessels in MS patients using sinusoidal neck stimulation.We studied 13 multiple sclerosis patients aged 28-58 years and 18 healthy controls aged 26-58 years. The carotid baroreflex was stimulated by sinusoidal neck suction (0 to -30 mmHg) at 0.1 Hz to assess the autonomic control of the heart and blood vessels, and at 0.2 Hz to assess the vagal control of the heart. Continuous recordings were made of blood pressure, electrocardiographic RR-interval and respiration, with breathing paced at 0.25 Hz. Spectral analysis was used to evaluate the magnitude of the low frequency (LF, 0.03-0.14 Hz) and high frequency (HF, 0.15-0.50 Hz) oscillations in RR-interval and blood pressure in response to the sinusoidal baroreceptor stimulation. Responses to the applied stimulus were assessed as the change in the spectral power of the RR-interval and blood pressure fluctuations at the stimulating frequency from the baseline values.The increase in the power of 0.1 Hz RR-interval oscillations during the 0.1 Hz neck suction was significantly smaller (p<0.01) in the MS patients (4.47+/-0.27 to 5.62+/-0.25 ln ms(2)) than in the controls (4.12+/-0.37 to 6.82+/-0.33 ln ms(2)). The increase in the power of 0.1 Hz systolic BP oscillations during 0.1 Hz neck suction was also significantly smaller (p<0.01) in the MS patients (0.99+/-0.19 to 1.96+/-0.39 mmHg(2)) than in the healthy controls (1.27+/-0.34 to 9.01+/-4.10 mmHg(2)). Neck suction at 0.2 Hz induced RR-interval oscillations at 0.2 Hz that were significantly smaller (p<0.05) in the patients (3.22+/-0.45 ln ms(2)) than in the controls (5.27+/-0.29 ln ms(2)). These results indicate that in MS patients, baroreflex dysfunction is not only restricted to the cardiovagal limb of the baroreflex, but that the sympathetic modulation of the blood vessels is also affected

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess baroreflex regulation of the heart rate and blood vessels in migraine patients in comparison with healthy controls. METHODS: In 30 migraine patients who were in a headache-free phase, aged 34 +/- 2 years, and 30 healthy controls, aged 34 +/- 3 years, we applied oscillatory neck suction at 0.1 Hz to assess the sympathetic modulation of the heart and blood vessels and at 0.2 Hz to assess the effect of parasympathetic stimulation on the heart. Breathing was paced at 0.25 Hz. Electrocardiographic RR-intervals, blood pressure and respiration were continuously recorded. Responses to the baroreflex stimulations were assessed as the changes in power of the RR-interval and blood pressure fluctuations at the relevant stimulating frequency from the baseline values. RESULTS: Systolic and diastolic blood pressure responses to the 0.1 Hz neck suction pressure were not significantly different between the patients and controls. The RR-interval oscillatory response to 0.2 Hz neck suction was significantly less (P < 0.05) in the migraine patients (4.45 +/- 0.27 ln ms2) compared with the controls (5.48 +/- 0.36 ln ms2). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that baroreflex-mediated cardiovagal responses are reduced in migraine patients. However, the sympathetic-mediated baroreflex control of the blood vessels is intact in the migraine patients. The autonomic nervous system may have a role in the pathophysiology of migraine