Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Evidence suggests that pediatric patients requiring endodontic treatment in the permanent dentition are often a "missed population". AIM/OBJECTIVE:This study surveyed pediatric dentists and endodontists about the frequency with which they encounter pediatric patients requiring endodontic treatment, their training, practice patterns, and decision-making considerations for the treatment of immature permanent teeth. DESIGN/METHODS:analysis. The level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS:The response rate was 13.1% (n = 840). The frequency of clinicians encountering pediatric patients requiring endodontic treatment for permanent teeth did not differ significantly by specialty. Pediatric dentists and endodontists reported statistically significant differences in their practice patterns related to the performance of vital pulp therapy (p < 0.001) and procedures for necrotic immature permanent teeth (p < 0.001). Among specialists, apexification was more frequently performed than regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) (p < 0.001). When asked to consider clinical and patient factors related to the treatment of necrotic immature permanent teeth, pediatric dentists most frequently responded that they were "unsure" of their preferred treatment. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Standardized clinical knowledge and management of immature permanent teeth between specialties may improve interdisciplinary care for pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND:Historical reports of unpredictable outcomes associated with vital pulpal therapies, particularly direct pulp capping (DPC), have contributed to clinicians' skepticism of the procedure. Contemporary reports highlight more predictable outcomes of vital pulpal therapies, inclusive of DPC. There is a dearth of reported patient-centered outcomes of these procedures. METHODS:Insurance claims were used in an observational, retrospective cohort study to evaluate outcomes of DPC performed on permanent teeth. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression. Log-rank tests were used to evaluate unadjusted differences in survival. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate the adjusted hazard of adverse event occurrence. RESULTS:The analytic cohort included 4,136 teeth from 3,716 patients. DPC procedures were identified in public-payer (85.5%) and private-payer (13.4%) insurance claims databases. After DPC, procedure survival rate was 83% and tooth survival rate was 93% during a mean follow-up time of 52 months. Molar tooth type, same-day permanent restoration placement, and amalgam restoration type were significant positive predictors of procedure (DPC) survival. Age was not a statistically significant predictor of procedure survival after controlling for tooth type, gender, time to restoration, and restoration type. Nonmolar tooth type and younger age were significant positive predictors of tooth survival after DPC. Failures were most likely to occur within the first year. CONCLUSIONS:DPC has favorable patient-centered outcomes and contributes to long-term tooth survival. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:The favorable patient-centered outcomes of DPC bolster calls to consider cost-effectiveness and access to care for endodontic procedures.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:This study aimed to investigate access to care and financial considerations associated with the endodontic treatment of immature permanent teeth. METHODS:analysis and logistic regression. The level of significance was set to 0.05. RESULTS:The response rate was 13% (n=840). Respondent specialist groups were similar by age and years since specialty residency completion, but significantly different with regard to primary practice setting (e.g. private practice, Federally Qualified Health Center, hospital…), (p=0.001). The majority (91%) of respondents reported participation with dental insurance. Pediatric dentists (69%) were significantly more likely than endodontists (17%) to participate with public-payer dental insurance (p<0.001). The majority of respondents (82%) indicated that patients reported economic factors (time or money) as a barrier to accessing endodontic treatment. Pediatric dentists were significantly more likely to consider economic factors when treatment planning (p<0.001). Pediatric dentists were more likely than endodontists to have the opinion that endodontic procedures for treatment of necrotic immature permanent teeth should cost less than root canal therapy (apexification, p<0.001; regenerative endodontic procedures, p=0.002). Pediatric dentists (33%) reported encountering barriers when attempting to refer their patients to an endodontist. Inability to find an endodontist that participates with dental insurance was the most frequently cited barrier. CONCLUSIONS:Limited clinician participation with dental insurance and gaps in insurance coverage for endodontic procedures appear to contribute to access to care barriers for pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND:Dental schools aim to train and support a diverse dentist workforce. Among all faculty, full-time and part-time faculty who identify as members of historically underrepresented groups are 13.9% and 8.4%, respectively. The recruitment and retention of faculty is a known challenge, with growing faculty vacancies at dental schools. This study explored dental student perceptions of academic careers, specifically focusing on Black and Hispanic predoctoral students. METHODS:From August to November 2022, we conducted focus group with second-, third-, and fourth-year predoctoral dental students who identified as Black or Hispanic using a semi-structured interview guide that was developed for this study. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS:Four themes emerged: (1) students perceived academic dental dentistry as inclusive but not diverse spaces for Black and Hispanic people; (2) academic dental careers were perceived as secondary careers; (3) academic dental careers were perceived as a career option with a lack of autonomy and less income, compared to clinical practice in other settings; (4) students expressed a lack of knowledge about pathways to academic dental careers. Despite these challenges, students expressed interest in academic dental careers and noted being inspired by younger faculty members. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Dental schools must do more to encourage dental students to consider careers in academic dentistry. Pathway programs, mentoring, and the presentation of academic careers as a viable career option for students by faculty should be further emphasized practices. Increasing the diversity of faculty members is also key. Students cannot be who they cannot see.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:This epidemiological analysis used procedure codes from dental insurance claims data to identify apexification cases and evaluate survival at the tooth-level. METHODS:Dental insurance claims data from New York State (2006-2019) and Massachusetts (2013-2018) were used in an observational, retrospective cohort study to evaluate the provision and treatment outcomes of apexification. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate the hazard of adverse event occurrence by age, gender, tooth type, placement of permanent restoration, and dental provider type. A sensitivity analysis evaluated potential bias in the survival estimates and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) due to differential loss to follow-up. Robust standard errors were used to account for potential dependence between teeth within an individual. RESULTS:The analytic cohort of 575 individuals included 632 teeth, with an average follow-up time of 64 months. The survival rates of apexification procedures were 95% at 1 year; 93% at 2 years; 90% at 3 years; and 86% at 5 years. Tooth retention following apexification was 98% at 1 year; 96% at 2 years; 95% at 3 years; and 90% at 5 years. Tooth type and subsequent placement of a permanent restoration were significant predictors of survival after apexification. CONCLUSIONS:The procedural and tooth survival outcomes of apexification were high and comparable to studies that analyzed clinical data on tooth survival following apexification.

BACKGROUND:Successful pathway programs require early and sustained support of student participants. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:We present the history and outcomes of a successful decade of continuous, grassroots, pathway programming at an individual dental institution. METHODS:Programmatic data were used to evaluate information on program participant demographics, academic pursuits, and career interests. Descriptive analyses were used to report on program enrollment as well as alumni academic and career outcomes. RESULTS:Between the years of 2013 and 2022, 346 high-school students participated in Saturday Academy at NYU Dentistry. Of the 240 college-aged and older program alumni, 72% (n = 172) have shared their academic and career plans after high-school. At the time of publication, 78% (134/172) of alumni that have maintained contact with Saturday Academy and have expressed interest in pursuing a career in the health professions. Of the 172 alumni, 14% (n = 24) have enrolled in or graduated from a health professional program (dental hygiene, nursing, accelerated dental or medical program, dental or medical school, or other health professional program). Of these alumni (24/172), half (n = 12) have pursued education in the dental professions, specifically. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Saturday Academy at NYU Dentistry is an example of a sustainable and impactful pathway program in dental education and its outcomes support the merit of calls for increased institutional commitment and support of similar initiatives.

This study assessed if higher levels of self-reported stress were associated with selfreported oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among a sample of college-educated Black men. Using a community-based participatory approach, a questionnaire was developed and distributed using two validated instruments, the Holmes-Rahe Stress Inventory and the Oral Health Impact Profile-14. Eighty men completed the questionnaire, with 58.8% reporting Holmes-Rahe scores above 150 (mean=209, SD=175.2). The highest OHIP-14 mean ratings on a scale of 0 to 3 were for feeling self-conscious (mean=.67), painful aching (mean=.55), feeling embarrassed (mean=.49), and eating discomfort (mean=0.48). Among participants with Holmes-Rahe Stress Inventory scores above 150, mean OHRQoL levels were significantly higher for domains of painful aching (p=.007), eating discomfort (p=.038), feeling self-conscious (.006), and experiencing tense feelings (.049). Higher stress levels may be associated with college-educated Black men"™s experiences of oral health-related physical pain and psychological discomfort.

BACKGROUND:Despite substantial increases in dental benefits and improvements in the use of dental services among children and adolescents in the United States, oral health disparities according to dental insurance payer type persist. METHODS:The authors used an all-payer claims (2013-2017) database to perform a comparative analysis of the provision and treatment outcomes of an endodontic procedure (root canal therapy) in the permanent teeth of a pediatric population aged 6 through 18 years, according to dental insurance payer type. Statistical analyses, including logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards regression, and the Kaplan-Meier method, were performed at person and tooth levels. RESULTS:Compared with privately insured children and adolescents, public-payer children and adolescent beneficiaries were more likely to have had root canal therapy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.73 to 2.11) and had poorer treatment outcomes associated with the procedure (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.53 to 3.14; P < .0001) during the study period. Those enrolled in private insurance were more likely to receive treatment from an endodontist (specialist in providing root canal therapy) (P < .0001). Amounts allowed and paid by the insurer were significantly higher for private payers (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS:There were significant differences in the provision and outcomes of endodontic treatment between privately and publicly insured children and adolescents. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS:Despite ostensibly equal access to care, differences in the provision of oral health care exist between privately and publicly insured patients. These differences may be contributing to persisting oral health disparities.

BACKGROUND:Previously published epidemiological outcome studies of root canal therapy (NSRCT) in the Unites States utilize data only from a single, private dental insurer for adult populations. AIM/OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to investigate outcomes of initial NSRCT, performed on permanent teeth, in a publicly insured pediatric population. DESIGN/METHODS:New York State Medicaid administrative claims were used to follow 77,741 endodontic procedures in 51,545 patients aged 6-18, from the time of initial NSRCT until occurrence of an untoward event (retreatment, apicoectomy, extraction). Initial treatment and untoward events were identified by Current Dental Terminology codes. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated at 1, 3, and 5 years. Hazard ratios for time to permanent restoration and restoration type were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS:Median follow-up time was 44 months [range:12-158 months]. Procedural, NSRCT, survival was 98% at 1 year, 93% at 3 years, and 88% at 5 years. Extraction was the most common untoward event. Teeth permanently restored with cuspal coverage had the most favorable treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS:Overall, 89% of teeth were retained and remained functional over a minimum follow-up time of 5 years. These results elucidate expected outcomes of NSRCT in permanent teeth for pediatric patients with public-payer dental benefits.