Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:Recent advancements in dental technology has led clinicians to convert from traditional methods to digital workflows. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of various finish line designs and occlusal morphologies on the accuracy of digital impressions. MATERIALS AND METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Six maxillary molar crown preparations were designed by using a digital sculpting software program. The samples differed in finish line design and occlusal surface morphology. Three different finish line designs (shoulder, chamfer, and shoulder with internal round angle) and two different occlusal morphologies (sharp and rounded) were used, giving six groups. Using three different intraoral scanners, each group was scanned and compared with a reference scan obtained from an industrial scanner. The accuracy of each scan was studied, and the data were statistically analyzed. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: < 0.05). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:It has been suggested that chamfer finish line design and rounded occlusal anatomy may produce more accurate digital impression for single crown restorations.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:Digital impressions using intraoral scanners have recently gained popularity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the fit of full-arch screw-retained cobalt-chromium frameworks fabricated via two different digital impression methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS/UNASSIGNED:An edentulous resin master model with four dental implants was fabricated. Forty cobalt-chromium superstructures were fabricated and evaluated according to four groups. In Group 1, the superstructures were evaluated using an intraoral scanner to generate digital impressions. Group 2 relied on the help of an auxiliary geometric appliance in generation of digital impressions via intraoral scanner. The traditional method of splinted open-tray conventional impressions was designated for Group 3. Finally, the control group (Group 4) relied on scanning of the master model directly with a laboratory scanner. Vertical marginal discrepancy was evaluated, and data obtained were statistically analyzed. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: > 0.05). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:It has been suggested that the use of auxiliary geometric appliances yields increased scanning accuracy. Frameworks fabricated using the traditional splinted open-tray technique were more reliable compared to those frameworks from digital impressions.

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:A range of materials for single-tooth computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) restorations have been introduced that may affect CAM accuracy. This study aimed to review articles evaluating marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate (LD) and zirconia (Z) crowns fabricated by CAD-CAM systems using intraoral optical scanners (IOS). MATERIALS AND METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Under the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA), a systematic review was performed along with an electronic article search in the Medline/Pubmed database. The articles were limited to those in the English language that were published within the past ten years. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The initial search resulted in 50 articles and of those, a total of 18 articles were selected for full-text review following abstract evaluation. Eight articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded and the remaining ten articles, which provided internal and marginal gap values, were used in this review. For LD crowns, marginal gap values ranged between 45µm and 190.2µm. For Z crowns, the values varied between 39µm and 126.4µm. For LD crowns, the internal gap values were between 57.8µm and 475.4µm, and for Z crowns, the values were between 79µm and 205.8µm. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:The outcome of this review suggests that clinically acceptable marginal and internal fit can be attained with LD and Z all-ceramic CAD-CAM crowns using digital impressions. Additionally, it has been found that LD and Z ceramics provide similar marginal gap values, but LD material provides better internal fit than Z.

This report presents a clinical case that follows a comprehensive digital workflow to increase occlusal vertical dimension of a patient presenting with occlusal wear. A 56-year-old patient with aesthetic and functional problems presented to the authors' clinic. An intraoral scanner was used to obtain digital models of the patient's existing maxillary and mandibular arches. Advanced sculpting software and digital tooth libraries were used to design the patient's ideal smile. A three-dimensional (3D) printer was used to fabricate temporary restorations and resin casts. Full-mouth restoration was successfully completed with zirconia crowns using an advanced digital workflow.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:Zirconia has recently become a popular material for fixed restorations. The purpose of this study was to use a digital workflow to fabricate monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and assess the connection between variable connector sizes compared to their clinical performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS/UNASSIGNED:for the 4-unit restorations (pontic to pontic). Biological an technical outcomes of the FDPs were performed at 1 week, 6 months and then annually for 6 consecutive years. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:in the two broken 4-unit FDPs. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:The results of this study suggest that the use of digital scanning and milling to fabricate monolithic zirconia FDPs of posterior regions may be an acceptable alternative restorative approach to traditional metal-ceramic restorations.

This report describes a digital workflow and two-year follow-up of an immediately loaded implant-retained overdenture using flapless surgery and a computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) surgical guide. A prosthetically-driven approach, utilising a three-dimensional (3D) planning software and a CAD/CAM surgical guide, was used to place four implants in the edentulous maxillary arch of a 59-year-old male patient. All four implants were inserted through the surgical guide without raising soft tissue flaps. After placement, the patient was delivered an immediately loaded maxillary overdenture. Surgical implant placement was well tolerated by the patient, who reported no discomfort. Following a four-month period, a new implant-retained maxillary overdenture reinforced by a metal framework was fabricated and delivered to the patient. There were no adverse issues noted with neither the implants nor the maxillary overdenture during the two-year follow up period. The technique using the workflow described in this report may be a predictable and affordable alternative in the restoration of edentulous arches as compared to full-arch fixed restorations.