Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE:Individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, their families and clinicians may report worsening symptoms despite compliant use of medication, suggesting potential tolerance, but evidence remains conflicting. Some studies have also suggested tachyphylaxis, or acute tolerance, though research is limited. We conducted the first systematic review of empirical studies focussing on tolerance/tachyphylaxis to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medication to clarify their potential clinical relevance. METHODS:As registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024594759), we searched PubMed, OVID (including PsychInfo and MEDLINE) and Web of Knowledge up to 1 September, 2024, and assessed the risk of bias using National Institutes of Health quality assessment tools. RESULTS:The identified 17 studies were either interventional or observational, and varied greatly in design and duration. Four investigated tachyphylaxis, nine tolerance to the subjective and behavioural effects, and four tolerance to cardiovascular effects. We found preliminary evidence of tachyphylaxis to the affective or behavioural effects of stimulants, as well as tolerance to the subjective effects of d-amphetamine, such as drug liking and excitation, in neurotypical volunteers in the short term. Conversely, there was little or no evidence for tolerance to the therapeutic or cardiovascular effects of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medication in clinical settings in the longer term. Quality was rated as low in most studies because of small sample sizes and methodological limitations. CONCLUSIONS:Overall, these results do not support the hypothesis that tolerance commonly develops to the therapeutic effects of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medication, although robustly designed longitudinal studies are needed to provide more conclusive evidence. Clinicians may consider other potential explanations for reduced therapeutic effects over time, including natural fluctuations of symptoms, limited compliance, life events and co-occurrent mental health conditions.

This is the first bottom-up review of the lived experience of persons who attempt suicide. The study has been co-designed, co-conducted and co-written by experts by experience and academics, focusing on first-person narratives within and outside the medical field. The lived world of individuals who attempt suicide is characterized by experiences related to the attempt itself ("contemplating suicide as a deliberate death", "contemplating suicide as an escape route", "looking for online answers about suicide", "planning suicide", "finding rest between the suicidal decision and the final act", "changing one's mind during the suicide attempt", "acting on suicidal impulses"); experiences related to the self and time ("feeling unworthy", "feeling detached from oneself or the world and lacking a sense of agency", "splitting the self between the decision to live or die", "perceiving an abortive and doomed future"); and experience of emotions and the body ("feeling overwhelmed by hopelessness and despair", "feeling empty and drained of energy", "feeling alone"). The lived experience of individuals who attempt suicide is also described in terms of the social and cultural context, including the experience of others ("feeling that no one cares", "feeling like a burden to others", "facing others' difficulty in understanding"); cultural, gender and age differences ("experiencing geographical, cultural and religious taboos about suicide", "feeling inadequate in relation to gender stereotypes", "feeling abandoned in old age"); and the perception of stigma ("facing social stigma", "experiencing a stigmatized self", "silencing suicidal behaviors"). The lived experience of persons after an attempted suicide is characterized as a complex process of self-acceptance and rediscovery ("living with suicidal thoughts", "navigating the challenges of recovery", "gaining new perspectives during recovery", "restoring interpersonal relationships to recover"). Finally, the lived experience of individuals who attempt suicide is described with respect to their access to general health care ("seeking help before the suicide attempt", "feeling abandoned after a suicide attempt") and mental health care ("experiencing shame as a barrier to care", "fearing mental disorder label", "feeling accepted and listened to", "facing economic difficulties in accessing support", "coping with distress during hospitalization"). The experiences described in this paper hold educational and social value, informing medical and psychological practices and research, public health approaches, and promotion of social change. This research overcomes embarrassment, fear and stigma, and helps us to understand the fragile nature of our emotions and feelings, our immersion in the social world, and our sense of meaning in life.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The long-standing cholinergic hypothesis posits that cholinergic signaling is uniformly deficient in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Down syndrome (DS). We tested the hypothesis that this deficiency occurs primarily late in disease, while early stages involve excessive cholinergic signaling, with distinct implications for memory. METHODS:Tg2576 (AD model; n = 38), Ts65Dn (DS model; n = 14), and wild-type (WT; n = 17) mice at young (3 to 4 months) and old (>14 months) ages received treatments to reduce cholinergic signaling (medial septum chemogenetic inhibition, muscarinic antagonist scopolamine) or enhance it (acetylcholinesterase inhibitor donepezil). Memory assessments used novel object recognition. RESULTS:Anticholinergic manipulations restored memory in young Tg2576 and Ts65Dn mice but impaired age-matched WT mice. Conversely, donepezil improved the memory of old Tg2576, Ts65Dn, and WT but not young Tg2576 and Ts65Dn animals. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:These findings refine and challenge the cholinergic hypothesis, revealing for the first time a functional shift from cholinergic hyperactivity driving early cognitive impairment to late-stage degeneration requiring enhancement.

BACKGROUND:People with mental disorders have an increased risk of diabetes, yet conflicting evidence exists regarding the quality of diabetes care they receive. To address this evidence gap, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess and compare diabetes quality of care in people with diabetes with mental disorders versus people with diabetes without mental disorders. METHODS:test, blood pressure measured, foot surveillance, serum creatinine test, serum cholesterol test, BMI recorded, smoking status recorded, retinal monitoring). Secondary outcomes were study-specific diabetes quality of care individual indicators matched to the nine NICE diabetes monitoring indicators and specific diabetes interventions and anti-diabetes medications. We analysed primary and secondary outcomes according to any mental disorder and to specific diagnostic subgroups. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). FINDINGS/RESULTS:measurement (24 studies, 0·81 [0·68-0·97], p=0·024), retinal screening (21 studies, 0·77 [0·63-0·95], p=0·013), lipid and cholesterol measurement (20 studies, 0·83 [0·69-0·99], p=0·043), foot examination (11 studies, 0·85 [0·76-0·95], p=0·0044), and renal investigation (16 studies, 0·78 [0·63-0·96], p=0·022). A significant positive association was found between any mental disorder and recorded smoking status (two studies, 1·09 [1·02-1·17]; p=0·0076). Any mental disorder was significantly associated with higher odds of receiving insulin (ten studies, 1·52 [95% CI 1·16-1·99]; p=0·0022), but negatively associated with treatment with a GLP-1 receptor agonist (two studies, 0·26 [0·13-0·49]; p<0·0001). There was no evidence of publication bias. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:Mental disorders are negatively associated with receiving adequate diabetes monitoring and GLP-1 agonist therapy. Addressing these disparities has the potential to address the increased mortality associated with mental disorders. FUNDING/BACKGROUND:None.

BackgroundRates of psychiatric disorders and related hospitalizations among youth in the United States have risen substantially over recent decades. Despite evidence supporting outpatient care, fewer than half of youth receive treatment. When outpatient management is insufficient, inpatient psychiatric hospitalization is required, though it is costly, disruptive, and limited in availability. Prior research on predictors of inpatient length of stay has been dated and heterogenous, highlighting the need to identify current clinical and non-clinical factors associated with prolonged stays among youth populations.MethodThis IRB-approved retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 1,101 child and adolescent patients admitted to an inpatient psychiatric unit between June 1, 2018, and November 30, 2021. Baseline sociodemographic and clinical data were collected, and LOS was categorized into three groups: below-average (0-6 days), average (7-14 days), and above-average (15+ days). Comparative statistics were performed, and linear regression was used to identify independent predictors of LOS.ResultsThe average LOS was 10.5 days. Significant predictors of prolonged LOS included public insurance, admission for psychosis or suicide attempt, involvement of child protective services, number of prior hospitalizations, and number of medications prior to admission.ConclusionProlonged LOS in psychiatrically hospitalized youth is associated with specific clinical and non-clinical factors. Identifying these predictors at admission can guide treatment planning and set realistic expectations for families. Further research is required to validate these findings and explore the impact of LOS on treatment outcomes.

Despite decades of neuroimaging research, how white matter develops along the length of major tracts in humans remains unknown. Here, we identify fundamental patterns of white matter maturation by examining developmental variation along major, long-range cortico-cortical tracts in youth ages 5-23 years using diffusion MRI from three large-scale, cross-sectional datasets (total N = 2716). Across datasets, we delineate two replicable axes of human white matter development. First, we find a deep-to-superficial axis, in which superficial tract regions near the cortical surface exhibit greater age-related change than deep tract regions. Second, we demonstrate that the development of superficial tract regions aligns with the cortical hierarchy defined by the sensorimotor-association axis, with tract ends adjacent to sensorimotor cortices maturing earlier than those adjacent to association cortices. These results reveal developmental variation along tracts that conventional tract-average analyses have previously obscured, challenging the implicit assumption that white matter tracts mature uniformly along their length. Such developmental variation along tracts may have functional implications, including mitigating ephaptic coupling in densely packed deep tract regions and tuning neural synchrony through hierarchical development in superficial tract regions - ultimately refining neural transmission in youth.

OBJECTIVE:To assess associations between exposure to intrauterine SARS-CoV-2 and subsequent child neurodevelopment in a large, diverse cohort with confirmation of maternal SARS-CoV-2 status. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:edition (ASQ-3) and at 18 months with the ASQ Social-Emotional (ASQ-SE) and the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers-Revised (M-CHAT-R). We compared exposed and unexposed infants' ASQ-3 total and subdomain scores, ASQ-SE and M-CHAT-R scores, and proportions meeting published referral thresholds, using multivariable linear and logistic regression. RESULTS:Among 1179 participants enrolled, 1008 (85.5%) had exposure, with 806 (80.0%) exposed during Omicron predominance. Of those with known timing, 349 (41.4%) and 295 (35.0%) were exposed in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy respectively. Exposure was not associated with differences in ASQ-3 (adjusted difference: -0.61, 95% CI: -10.03, 8.81) or ASQ-3 subdomains at 12 months, ASQ-SE at 18 months (adjusted difference: 0.19, 95% CI: -4.02, 4.41), or M-CHAT-R scores. Findings were similar for proportions meeting referral thresholds, and when stratified by variant or by trimester. CONCLUSIONS:In this multicenter cohort largely exposed since Omicron and in second or third trimester, intrauterine SARS-CoV-2 exposure was not associated with neurodevelopmental screening outcomes through 18 months of age. Further assessments of the impact of intrauterine SARS-CoV-2 on neurodevelopment beyond 18 months of age are needed.

External trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) received US Food and Drug Administration clearance in 2019 as the first device-based, non-pharmacological treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), based on a small pilot sham-controlled randomized controlled trial (RCT) that reported symptom improvement in 62 children with ADHD. Here we conducted a confirmatory multicenter, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2b RCT to investigate short-term and long-term efficacy (6 months) of real versus sham TNS in 150 children and adolescents with ADHD. Participants were randomized to receive real TNS (n = 75, mean age (s.d.) = 12.6 (2.8) years) or sham TNS (n = 75, mean age (s.d.) = 12.6 (2.8) years) nightly for approximately 9 hours for 4 weeks. Bilateral stimulation targeted V1 trigeminal branches using battery-powered electrodes applied to the forehead. Sham TNS delivered 30 seconds of stimulation per hour at lower frequency and pulse width. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant differential treatment effects on ADHD symptoms (primary outcome) (estimated adjusted mean difference = 0.83; 95% confidence interval: -2.47 to 4.13; P = 0.622; Cohen's d = 0.09). No serious adverse events were reported, and side effects did not differ between groups. In conclusion, TNS is a safe intervention but does not demonstrate clinical efficacy for pediatric ADHD. Trial registration: ISRCTN82129325 .