Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Life-threatening, space-occupying mass effect due to cerebral edema and/or hemorrhagic transformation is an early complication of patients with middle cerebral artery stroke. Little is known about longitudinal trajectories of laboratory and vital signs leading up to radiographic and clinical deterioration related to this mass effect. METHODS:We curated a retrospective data set of 635 patients with large middle cerebral artery stroke totaling 95,463 data points for 10 longitudinal covariates and 40 time-independent covariates. We assessed trajectories of the 10 longitudinal variables during the 72 h preceding three outcomes representative of life-threatening mass effect: midline shift ≥ 5 mm, pineal gland shift (PGS) > 4 mm, and decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC). We used a "backward-looking" trajectory approach. Patients were aligned based on outcome occurrence time and the trajectory of each variable was assessed before that outcome by accounting for cases and noncases, adjusting for confounders. We evaluated longitudinal trajectories with Cox proportional time-dependent regression. RESULTS:Of 635 patients, 49.0% were female, and the mean age was 69 years. Thirty five percent of patients had midline shift ≥ 5 mm, 24.3% of patients had PGS > 4 mm, and 10.7% of patients underwent DHC. Backward-looking trajectories showed mild increases in white blood cell count (10-11 K/UL within 72 h), temperature (up to half a degree within 24 h), and sodium levels (1-3 mEq/L within 24 h) before the three outcomes of interest. We also observed a decrease in heart rate (75-65 beats per minute) 24 h before DHC. We found a significant association between increased white blood cell count with PGS > 4 mm (hazard ratio 1.05, p value 0.007). CONCLUSIONS:Longitudinal profiling adjusted for confounders demonstrated that white blood cell count, temperature, and sodium levels appear to increase before radiographic and clinical indicators of space-occupying mass effect. These findings will inform the development of multivariable dynamic risk models to aid prediction of life-threatening, space-occupying mass effect.

T cell receptor (TCR) gene therapy is a potent form of cellular immunotherapy in which patient T cells are genetically engineered to express TCRs with defined tumor reactivity. However, the isolation of therapeutic TCRs is complicated by both the general scarcity of tumor-specific T cells among patient T cell repertoires and the patient-specific nature of T cell epitopes expressed on tumors. Here we describe a high-throughput, personalized TCR discovery pipeline that enables the assembly of complex synthetic TCR libraries in a one-pot reaction, followed by pooled expression in reporter T cells and functional genetic screening against patient-derived tumor or antigen-presenting cells. We applied the method to screen thousands of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL)-derived TCRs from multiple patients and identified dozens of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell-derived TCRs with potent tumor reactivity, including TCRs that recognized patient-specific neoantigens.

OBJECTIVE:To examine the efficacy and safety of sodium oxybate versus placebo in a phase IIb randomized double-blind placebo-controlled 2-period cross-over clinical trial in patients with isolated laryngeal dystonia (LD). METHODS:The study was conducted from January 2018 to December 2021, pausing during the COVID-19 pandemic, at Massachusetts Eye and Ear in 106 patients with alcohol-responsive (EtOH+) and alcohol-non-responsive (EtOH-) LD (53 to receive 1.5g of sodium oxybate first, 53 to receive matching placebo first). The primary outcome was a change from baseline in LD symptom severity 40 minutes after drug intake. Safety was based on vital signs, cognitive function, suicidality, daytime sleepiness, and adverse events. Patients, investigators, and outcome assessors were masked to study procedures. RESULTS:Compared to baseline, EtOH+ but not EtOH- patients had a statistically significant improvement in LD symptoms following sodium oxybate versus placebo (EtOH+: 98.75% confidence interval [CI] = 0.6-26.9; p = 0.008; EtOH-: 98.75% CI = -6.2 to 18.7; p = 0.42). Statistically significant minimum drug efficacy in EtOH+ patients was found at ≥16% symptom improvement (OR = 2.09; 98.75% CI = 0.75-5.80; p = 0.036), with an average of 40.81% benefits (98.75% CI = 34.7-48.6). Drug efficacy waned by 300 minutes after intake without a rebound. No changes were found in cognitive function, suicidality, or vital signs. Common adverse events included mild dizziness, nausea, and daytime sleepiness. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:Sodium oxybate showed clinically meaningful improvement of symptoms in EtOH+ LD patients, with acceptable tolerability. Sodium oxybate offers the first pathophysiologically relevant oral treatment for laryngeal dystonia. ANN NEUROL 2024.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:In the DISCOMS (DISCOntinuation of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS)) randomized clinical trial, we could not demonstrate that discontinuing MS DMTs in older, stable adults was not inferior to continuing DMTs. Relapses were rare in both groups, and most new disease activity was one to two new brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions unassociated with clinical changes. OBJECTIVE/AIMS/UNASSIGNED:Describe results of the DISCOMS extension study. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Among 10/19 of the original sites, we enrolled patients who completed DISCOMS; did not reach the primary endpoint during the original trial; and retained original randomized assignment. Participants completed one study visit and brain MRI at least 30 months after original enrollment in DISCOMS. Primary endpoint was time from entry into the primary study to relapse or new brain MRI activity. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:= 0.043 from log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:From entry into DISCOMS extension study, time to new MS activity remained shorter in discontinuers, but relapses were absent and new brain MRI lesions were rare.

OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to externally validate the Memory Assessment Clinics Scale for Epilepsy (MAC-E), a brief self-report measure of subjective memory complaints in adults with epilepsy. METHODS:A cross-sectional study was conducted including adults with focal pharmacoresistant epilepsy from three Level 4 epilepsy centers in the U.S., who completed the MAC-E as part of a clinical neuropsychological evaluation. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted, and goodness-of-fit criteria were calculated to assess model fit: comparative fit index (CFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and standardized root mean residual (SRMR). Item response theory models were constructed, and Mokken analysis was used to assess discrimination and unidimensionality. Internal consistency was evaluated with McDonald's Omega. RESULTS:values for each of the 5 factors (0.58-0.91 and 0.34-0.82, respectively). MAC-E items demonstrated high levels of discrimination as well as the ability to evaluate across the entirety of each latent trait. Score responses were uniformly distributed across latent traits, and unidimensionality was established by factor (all H coefficients > 0.4). Internal consistency was high across factors (omega range: 0.77-0.88). CONCLUSIONS:Results of this study demonstrate good external validation of the MAC-E in an independent, multicenter cohort of adults with epilepsy. These findings provide further support that the MAC-E is a psychometrically valid, self-report instrument to assess every-day memory abilities in adults with epilepsy in both clinical and research settings.

BACKGROUND:Underlying intracranial stenosis is the most common cause of failed mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion. Adjunct emergent stenting is sometimes performed to improve or maintain reperfusion, despite limited data regarding its safety or efficacy. METHODS:We conducted a prospective multicenter observational international cohort study. Patients were enrolled between January 2022 and December 2023 at 25 thrombectomy capable centers in North America, Europe, and Asia. Consecutive patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy were included if they were identified as having underlying intracranial stenosis, defined as 50-99% residual stenosis of the target vessel or intra-procedural re-occlusion. The primary outcome was functional independence, defined as modified Rankin Scale of 0-2 at 90 days. After applying inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores, we compared outcomes among patients who underwent adjunct emergent intracranial stenting (stenting) versus those who received mechanical thrombectomy alone. RESULTS:A total of 417 patients were included; 218 patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy alone (168 anterior circulation) and 199 with mechanical thrombectomy plus stenting (144 anterior circulation). Patients in the stenting group were less likely to be non-Hispanic White (51.8% vs 62.4%, p=0.03), and less likely to have diabetes (33.2% vs 43.1%, p=0.037) or hyperlipidemia (43.2% vs 56%, p= 0.009). In addition, there was a lower rate of IV thrombolysis use in the stenting group (18.6% vs 27.5%, p=0.03). There was a higher rate of successful reperfusion (modified Treatment In Cerebral Infarction score ≥ 2B) in the stenting versus mechanical thrombectomy alone group (90.9% vs 77.9%, p<0.001) and a higher rate of a 24-hour infarct volume of <30 mL (n=260, 67.9% vs 50.3%, p=0.005). The overall complication rate was higher in the stenting group (12.6% vs 5%, p=0.006), but there was not a significant difference in the rate of symptomatic hemorrhage (9% vs 5.5%, p=0.162). Functional independence at 90 days was significantly higher in the stenting group (42.2% vs. 28.4%, adjusted odds ratio 2.67; 95% CI, 1.66-4.32). CONCLUSIONS:In patients with underlying stenosis who achieved reperfusion with mechanical thrombectomy, adjunct emergent stenting was associated with better functional outcome without a significantly increased risk of symptomatic hemorrhage. REGISTRATION/BACKGROUND:https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05403593.

OBJECTIVE:This study examines the American Headache Society First Contact-Headache in Primary Care program metrics to date in order to assess the program's reach and provide direction for future initiatives. BACKGROUND:Approximately 4 million primary care office visits annually are headache-specific encounters. Therefore, it is important that primary care providers are knowledgeable about headache management. Recognizing the need, the American Headache Society First Contact designed the comprehensive First Contact-Headache in Primary Care program with input from an advisory board comprised of a diverse group of physicians and advanced practice providers with backgrounds in family and internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, and neurology. This is the first study to assess the reach of the program and critically examine how to best meet the needs of clinicians and patients going forward. METHODS:We report descriptive statistics for the First Contact website metrics from October 2020 to June 2023 and grand rounds program data from May 2020 to December 2023. We also conducted a cross-sectional analysis of survey data from presentations conducted at two large national family medicine symposia, as well as a thematic analysis of the question: "Please indicate what areas of your practice could be enhanced or improved with additional education?" RESULTS:The First Contact program homepage was the second most visited page on the American Headache Society website (>100,000 views). A total of 20 podcast episodes were created for the program (>3500 plays). The First Contact program held 99 events (72 institutional grand rounds, 22 State-level meetings, and five national meetings), reaching >7000 clinicians. The institutional grand rounds and state-level meetings were held across 27 States and Washington D.C. Only 31.9% (30/94) of First Contact program events (excluding national meetings) occurred in the West census region, which has the fewest headache subspecialists and lowest headache subspecialist density in the United States. When examining survey data of participants who attended the two virtual national family medicine symposia (39.3% response rate, N = 636/1620), 85.7% (544/635) reported being "completely confident" or "very confident" in their ability to recognize and accurately diagnose patients presenting with a primary complaint of headache and 81.5% (517/634) reported being "completely confident" or "very confident" in their ability to develop evidence-based treatment plans that are tailored to the needs of individual patients. The use of diagnostic tools to recognize patients with migraine (60.4%, 384/636) and translating standards of care to the practice setting (42.5%, 270/636) were the most reported intended changes by participants. Most participants reported that program content was of clinical relevance and would improve their patients' outcomes (90.5% [571/631] and 90.6% [572/631], respectively). Over three-quarters (77.8%, 495/636) of participants reported areas of their practice that can be improved by additional education specifically regarding workflow, diagnosis, and management. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study evaluates one of the first national initiatives for primary care education. Data from the two First Contact Family Medicine national symposia indicate the program is generally well received with most participants reporting improved confidence and intention to implement key changes in practice to improve care for patients with headache; however, there remain areas of exploration for education that could further enhance participant experience and expand the reach of the initiatives. Areas for future programming include continued education on multifactorial approaches to headache treatment and suggestions for addressing cost, insurance, and time constraints. Also, future work may examine where the First Contact program might focus initiatives based on specific areas of need in headache care, such as geographic "desert" areas, racial and ethnic disparities, and uninsured/underinsured populations.

OBJECTIVE:Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are necessary to evaluate the efficacy of novel treatments for epilepsy. However, there have been concerning increases in the placebo responder rate over time. To understand these trends, we evaluated features associated with increased placebo responder rate. METHODS:Using individual-level data from 20 focal-onset seizure trials provided by seven pharmaceutical companies, we evaluated associations with change in seizure frequency in participants randomized to placebo. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate participant and study factors associated with differing rates of 50% reduction in seizure frequency during blinded placebo treatment, as compared to pre-randomization baseline seizure frequency. In addition, we focused on the association of placebo responder rate with pre-randomization baseline seizure frequency and country of recruitment. RESULTS:). In addition, there was a significantly higher 50RR in participants with a baseline seizure frequency of six or fewer seizures per 28 days (29% vs 21%, p = .00018). SIGNIFICANCE/CONCLUSIONS:These results can assist future RCTs in estimating the expected placebo responder rate, which may lead to more reliable power estimates. Higher placebo responder rate was associated with markers of less-refractory epilepsy. There were concerning significant differences in placebo responder rate by country and geographic region as well as an elevated placebo responder rate in participants with baseline seizure frequency close to the minimum eligibility criteria.