Searched for: All
Differentiating spinal pathologies by deep learning approach
Haim, Oz; Agur, Ariel; Gabay, Segev; Azolai, Lee; Shutan, Itay; Chitayat, May; Katirai, Michal; Sadon, Sapir; Artzi, Moran; Lidar, Zvi
BACKGROUND CONTEXT:Spinal pathologies are diverse in nature and, excluding trauma and degenerative diseases, includes infectious, neoplastic (either extradural or intradural), and inflammatory conditions. The preoperative diagnosis is made with clinical judgment incorporating lab findings and radiological studies. When the diagnosis is uncertain, a biopsy is almost always mandatory since the treatment is dictated by the type of pathology. This is an invasive, timely, and costly process. PURPOSE:The aim of this study was to develop a deep learning (DL) algorithm, based on preoperative MRI and post-operative pathological results, to differentiate between leading spinal pathologies. STUDY DESIGN:We retrospectively collected and analyzed clinical, radiological, and pathological data of patients who underwent spinal surgery or biopsy for various spinal pathologies between 2008 and 2022 at a tertiary center. The patients were stratified according to their pathological reports (the threshold for inclusion was set to 25 patients per diagnosis). METHODS:Preoperative MRI, clinical data, and pathological results were processed by a deep learning model built on the Fast.ai framework on top of the PyTorch environment. RESULTS:A total of 231 patients diagnosed with carcinoma (80), infection (57), meningioma (52), or schwannoma (42), were included in our model. The mean overall accuracy was 0.78±0.06 for the validation, and 0.93±0.03 for the test dataset. CONCLUSION:Deep learning algorithm for differentiation between the aforementioned spinal pathologies, based solely on clinical MRI, proves as a feasible primary diagnostic modality. Larger studies should be performed to validate and improve this algorithm for clinical use. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE:This study provides a proof-of-concept for predicting spinal pathologies solely by MRI based DL technology, allowing for a rapid, targeted, and cost-effective work-up and subsequent treatment.
PMID: 37797840
ISSN: 1878-1632
CID: 5939492
Evaluating the impact of laboratory-based eligibility criteria by race/ethnicity in first-line clinical trials of DLBCL
Khurana, Arushi; Mwangi, Raphael; Nastoupil, Loretta J; Reagan, Patrick M; Farooq, Umar; Romancik, Jason T; McDonnell, Timothy J; Riska, Shaun M; Lossos, Lzidore S; Kahl, Brad S; Martin, Peter; Witzig, Thomas E; Cerhan, James R; Flowers, Christopher R; Nowakowski, Grzegorz S; Maurer, Matthew J
Underrepresentation of racial and ethnic subgroups in cancer clinical trials remains a persistent challenge. Restrictive clinical trial eligibility criteria have been shown to exacerbate this problem. We previously identified that up to 24% of patients treated with standard immunochemotherapy would have been excluded from recent first-line trials in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) based on 5 laboratory-based criteria. These ineligible patients had worse clinical outcomes and increased deaths related to lymphoma progression, suggesting the potential exclusion of patients who could have benefited most from the novel therapies being evaluated. Using data from the prospectively enrolled Lymphoma Epidemiology Outcomes cohort study, with demographics broadly similar to the US patients diagnosed with lymphoma, we evaluated the impact of laboratory eligibility criteria from recent first-line DLBCL trials across various racial and ethnic backgrounds. There were significant differences in the baseline laboratory values by race/ethnicity with Black/African American (AA) patients having the lowest mean hemoglobin and highest creatinine clearance. Based on recent clinical trial eligibility criteria, AA and Hispanic patients had higher rates of laboratory-based ineligibility than non-Hispanic White patients. The largest gap in the clinical outcomes between eligible and noneligible patients was noted within AA patients with an overall survival hazard ratio based on POLARIX clinical trial criteria of 4.09 (95% confidence interval, 1.83-9.14). A thoughtful approach to the utility of each criterion and cutoffs for eligibility needs to be evaluated in the context of its differential impact across various racial/ethnic groups.
PMCID:11375257
PMID: 38991126
ISSN: 2473-9537
CID: 5938632
Lymphoma-related intussusception in children: diagnostic challenges and clinical characteristics
Zhang, Rensen; Zhang, Minjie; Deng, Ruyu; Li, Yao; Guo, Chunbao
UNLABELLED:Intussusception is a common cause of acute abdominal pain in children and the most frequent cause of intestinal obstruction in infants. Although often idiopathic, it can stem from conditions like lymphoma. This study delves into lymphoma-related intussusception in children, aiming to enhance early detection and management. A retrospective review encompassed children admitted from 2012 to 2023 with intussusception due to intestinal lymphoma. Demographic, clinical, and imaging data were meticulously extracted and analyzed. The study included 31 children in the lymphoma-related intussusception group. Contrasted with non-lymphoma-related cases, the patients of lymphoma-related intussusception were notably older (median age: 87 months vs. 18.5 months), predominantly male, and demonstrated protracted abdominal pain. Ultrasound unveiled mesenteric lymph node enlargement and distinct intra-abdominal masses; enema reduction success rates were notably diminished. Detecting lymphoma-related intussusception remains intricate. Age, prolonged symptoms, and distinctive ultrasound findings can arouse suspicion. Timely surgical intervention, based on preoperative imaging, proves pivotal for accurate diagnosis. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS: Swift identification of lymphoma-related intussusception, distinguished by unique clinical and ultrasound features, is imperative for timely intervention and treatment. Further research is warranted to refine diagnostic approaches. WHAT IS KNOWN/BACKGROUND:• Intussusception in pediatric patients can be caused by a wide spectrum of underlying diseases including lymphoma. • Early Identifying the exact underlying cause of intussusception is crucial for tailored therapy, however often challenging and time-consuming. WHAT IS NEW/BACKGROUND:• Lymphoma-related intussusception may present with increased abdominal fluid accumulation, intestinal obstruction, and a higher likelihood of failed reduction during enema procedures. • For high-risk children, repeated ultrasound examinations or further investigations may be necessary to confirm the diagnosis.
PMID: 37861794
ISSN: 1432-1076
CID: 5942812
Matching-adjusted indirect comparison from the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes Consortium for Real World Evidence (LEO CReWE) study to a clinical trial of mosunetuzumab in relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma
Maurer, Matthew J; Casulo, Carla; Larson, Melissa C; Habermann, Thomas M; Lossos, Izidore S; Wang, Yucai; Nastoupil, Loretta J; Strouse, Christopher; Chihara, Dai; Martin, Peter; Cohen, Jonathon B; Kahl, Brad S; Burack, W Richard; Koff, Jean L; Mun, Yong; Masaquel, Anthony; Wu, Mei; Wei, Michael C; Shewade, Ashwini; Li, Jia; Cerhan, James R; Link, Brian K; Flowers, Christopher R
Mosunetuzumab is a novel bispecific antibody targeting epitopes on CD3 on T cells and CD20 on B cells with the goal of inducing T-cell mediated elimination of malignant B cells. A recent pivotal phase I/II clinical trial (GO29781) demonstrated that mosunetuzumab induced an overall response rate (ORR) of 80%, complete response (CR) rate of 60%, and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 17.9 months in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) following at least two prior lines of systemic therapy, including alkylator and anti-CD20 antibody-based therapy. Historical data from cohorts receiving therapy for R/R FL can provide some context for interpretation of single-arm trials. We compared the results from the mosunetuzumab trial to outcomes from a cohort of patients with R/R FL from the LEO Consortium for Real World Evidence (LEO CReWE). We applied clinical trial eligibility criteria to the LEO CReWE cohort and utilized matching- adjusted indirect comparison weighting to balance the clinical characteristics of the LEO CReWE cohort with those from the mosunetuzumab trial. ORR (73%, 95% CI: 65-80%) and CR rates (53%, 95% CI: 45-61%) observed in the weighted LEO CReWE cohort were lower than those reported on the mosunetuzumab trial (ORR=80%, 95% CI: 70-88%; CR=60%, 95% CI: 49-70%, respectively). PFS at 12 months was similar in the weighted LEO CReWE (60%, 95% CI: 51-69%) and the mosunetuzumab (58%, 95% CI: 47-68%) trial. Sensitivity analyses examining the impact of matching variables, selection of line of therapy, and application of eligibility criteria provide context for best practices in this setting.
PMCID:11215382
PMID: 38031804
ISSN: 1592-8721
CID: 5938592
EAES/SAGES evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus on optimization of perioperative care in older adults
Keller, Deborah S; Curtis, Nathan; Burt, Holly Ann; Ammirati, Carlo Alberto; Collings, Amelia T; Polk, Hiram C; Carrano, Francesco Maria; Antoniou, Stavros A; Hanna, Nader; Piotet, Laure-Meline; Hill, Sarah; Cuijpers, Anne C M; Tejedor, Patricia; Milone, Marco; Andriopoulou, Eleni; Kontovounisios, Christos; Leeds, Ira L; Awad, Ziad T; Barber, Meghan Wandtke; Al-Mansour, Mazen; Nassif, George; West, Malcolm A; Pryor, Aurora D; Carli, Franco; Demartines, Nicholas; Bouvy, Nicole D; Passera, Roberto; Arezzo, Alberto; Francis, Nader
BACKGROUND:As the population ages, more older adults are presenting for surgery. Age-related declines in physiological reserve and functional capacity can result in frailty and poor outcomes after surgery. Hence, optimizing perioperative care in older patients is imperative. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways and Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) may influence surgical outcomes, but current use and impact on older adults patients is unknown. The aim of this study was to provide evidence-based recommendations on perioperative care of older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery. METHODS:Expert consensus determined working definitions for key terms and metrics related to perioperative care. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases for 24 pre-defined key questions in the topic areas of prehabilitation, MIS, and ERAS in major abdominal surgery (colorectal, upper gastrointestinal (UGI), Hernia, and hepatopancreatic biliary (HPB)) to generate evidence-based recommendations following the GRADE methodology. RESULT:Older adults were defined as 65 years and older. Over 20,000 articles were initially retrieved from search parameters. Evidence synthesis was performed across the three topic areas from 172 studies, with meta-analyses conducted for MIS and ERAS topics. The use of MIS and ERAS was recommended for older adult patients particularly when undergoing colorectal surgery. Expert opinion recommended prehabilitation, cessation of smoking and alcohol, and correction of anemia in all colorectal, UGI, Hernia, and HPB procedures in older adults. All recommendations were conditional, with low to very low certainty of evidence, with the exception of ERAS program in colorectal surgery. CONCLUSIONS:MIS and ERAS are recommended in older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery, with evidence supporting use in colorectal surgery. Though expert opinion supported prehabilitation, there is insufficient evidence supporting use. This work has identified evidence gaps for further studies to optimize older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery.
PMCID:11289045
PMID: 38942944
ISSN: 1432-2218
CID: 5941282
Novel treatment for mantle cell lymphoma - impact of BTK inhibitors and beyond
Gribbin, Caitlin; Chen, Jane; Martin, Peter; Ruan, Jia
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) primarily affects older adults, accounting for 3-10% of all non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in western countries. The disease course of MCL is heterogenous; driven by clinical, cytogenetics, and molecular features that shape differences in outcomes, including proliferation index, MIPI scores, and mutational profile such as TP53 aberration. The advent of novel agents has fundamentally evolved the treatment landscape for MCL with treatment strategies that can now be more effectively tailored based on both patient- and disease-specific factors. In this review, we discuss the major classes of novel agents used for the treatment of MCL, focusing on efficacy and notable toxicities of BTK inhibitors. We further examine effective novel combination regimens and, lastly, discuss future directions for the evolution of targeted approaches for the treatment of MCL.
PMID: 37800170
ISSN: 1029-2403
CID: 5938912
Anogenital HPV-Related Cancers in Women: Investigating Trends and Sociodemographic Risk Factors
Lupi, Micol; Tsokani, Sofia; Howell, Ann-Marie; Ahmed, Mosab; Brogden, Danielle; Tekkis, Paris; Kontovounisios, Christos; Mills, Sarah
The incidences of anogenital HPV-related cancers in women are on the rise; this is especially true for anal cancer. Medical societies are now beginning to recommend anal cancer screening in certain high-risk populations, including high-risk women with a history of genital dysplasia. The aim of this study is to investigate national anogenital HPV cancer trends as well as the role of demographics, deprivation, and ethnicity on anogenital cancer incidence in England, in an attempt to better understand this cohort of women which is increasingly affected by anogenital HPV-related disease. Demographic data from the Clinical Outcomes and Services Dataset (COSD) were extracted for all patients diagnosed with anal, cervical, vulval and vaginal cancer in England between 2014 and 2020. Outcomes included age, ethnicity, deprivation status and staging. An age over 55 years, non-white ethnicity and high deprivation are significant risk factors for late cancer staging, as per logistic regression. In 2019, the incidences of anal and vulval cancer in white women aged 55-74 years surpassed that of cervical cancer. More needs to be done to educate women on HPV-related disease and their lifetime risk of these conditions.
PMCID:11202297
PMID: 38927883
ISSN: 2072-6694
CID: 5941272
Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair in patients with a history of previous abdominopelvic surgery
Hayward, Romilly; Smith, Jacob J; Kontovounisios, Christos; Qiu, Shengyang; Warren, Oliver J
A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair compared short- and long-term outcomes between individuals with or without history of previous abdominopelvic surgery, aiming to determine the feasibility of totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair within this population. All patients who underwent elective TEP inguinal hernia repair by one consultant surgeon across three London hospitals from January 2017 to May 2023 were retrospectively analysed to assess perioperative outcomes. Two hundred sixty-two patients were identified, of whom two hundred forty-three (93%) underwent laparoscopic TEP repair. The most frequent complications were haematoma (6.2%) and seroma (4.1%). Recurrence occurred in four cases (1.6% of operations, 1.1% of hernias). One hundred eighty-four patients (76%) underwent day-case surgery. There were no mesh infections or explanations, vascular or visceral injuries, port-site hernias, damage to testicle, or persisting numbness. There were no requirements for blood transfusion, returns to theatre, or readmissions within 30 days. There was one conversion to open and one death within 60 days of surgery. Eighty-three (34%) had a history of previous AP surgery. There was no significant difference in perioperative outcomes between the AP and non-AP arms. This finding carried true for subgroup analysis of 44 patients whose AP surgical history did not include previous inguinal hernia repair and for those undergoing repair of recurrent hernia. In expert hands, laparoscopic TEP repair is associated with excellent outcomes and low rates of long-term complications, and thus should be considered as standard for patients regardless of a history of AP surgery.
PMCID:11541412
PMID: 38652433
ISSN: 2038-3312
CID: 5941232
Does TRIANGLE take down transplantation in mantle cell lymphoma? [Comment]
Martin, Peter; Maddocks, Kami
PMID: 38705162
ISSN: 1474-547x
CID: 5939062
Beating the empty pelvis syndrome: the PelvEx Collaborative core outcome set study protocol
,
INTRODUCTION:The empty pelvis syndrome is a significant source of morbidity following pelvic exenteration surgery. It remains poorly defined with research in this field being heterogeneous and of low quality. Furthermore, there has been minimal engagement with patient representatives following pelvic exenteration with respect to the empty pelvic syndrome. 'PelvEx-Beating the empty pelvis syndrome' aims to engage both patient representatives and healthcare professionals to achieve an international consensus on a core outcome set, pathophysiology and mitigation of the empty pelvis syndrome. METHODS AND ANALYSIS:A modified-Delphi approach will be followed with a three-stage study design. First, statements will be longlisted using a recent systematic review, healthcare professional event, patient and public engagement, and Delphi piloting. Second, statements will be shortlisted using up to three rounds of online modified Delphi. Third, statements will be confirmed and instruments for measurable statements selected using a virtual patient-representative consensus meeting, and finally a face-to-face healthcare professional consensus meeting. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:The University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine ethics committee has approved this protocol, which is registered as a study with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative. Publication of this study will increase the potential for comparative research to further understanding and prevent the empty pelvis syndrome. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:NCT05683795.
PMCID:10860036
PMID: 38316595
ISSN: 2044-6055
CID: 5941172