Faculty Bibliography

AIMS/OBJECTIVE:The atherosclerotic profile and advanced plaque subtype burden in symptomatic patients ≤45 years old have not been established. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of coronary artery calcium (CAC), plaque subtypes, and plaque burden by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in symptomatic young patients. METHODS AND RESULTS/RESULTS:We included 907 symptomatic young patients (18-45 years) from Montefiore undergoing CCTA for chest pain evaluation. Prevalence and predictors of CAC, plaque subtypes, and burden were evaluated using semi-automated software. In the overall population (55% female and 44% Hispanic), 89% had CAC = 0. The likelihood of CAC or any plaque by CCTA increased with >3 risk factors {RFs, odds ratio [OR] 7.13 (2.14-23.7) and OR 10.26 (3.36-31.2), respectively}. Any plaque by CCTA was present in 137 (15%); the strongest independent predictors were age ≥35 years [OR 3.62 (2.05-6.41)] and family history of premature coronary artery disease (FHx) [OR 2.76 (1.67-4.58)]. Stenosis ≥50% was rare (1.8%), with 31% of those having CAC = 0. Significant non-calcified plaque (NCP, 37.2%) and low-attenuation plaque (LAP, 4.24%) burdens were seen, even in those with non-obstructive stenosis. Among patients with CAC = 0, 5% had plaque, and the only predictor of exclusively NCP was FHx [OR 2.29 (1.08-4.86)]. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In symptomatic young patients undergoing CCTA, the prevalence of CAC or any coronary atherosclerosis was not negligible, and the likelihood increased with RF burden. The presence of coronary stenosis ≥50% was rare and most often accompanied by CAC >0, but there was a significant burden of NCP and LAP even within the non-obstructive group.

Non-caseating granulomatous infiltration of the myocardium is the hallmark of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). CS manifests clinically as conduction disturbance, ventricular arrhythmia, sudden cardiac death and/or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Other than confirmation through endomyocardial biopsy, a diagnosis of probable CS can be established by histological evidence of systemic sarcoidosis in addition to characteristic clinical or advanced imaging findings. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance imaging (CMR) and ¹⁸F-flurodeoxyglycose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) are imaging modalities indispensable in the diagnosis and monitoring of CS. FDG-PET is the method of choice for identifying the active inflammatory phase of CS and in the monitoring and modifying of immunosuppressive treatment. CMR is better suited for assessing cardiac morphology and function. Both modalities are more effective in detecting CS when used in combination than either is alone. Management of CS is primarily based upon observational data of low quality due to a paucity of randomized controlled trials. Corticosteroid therapy and/or tiered-immunosuppression are the mainstays of treatment in reducing myocardial inflammation. Steroid-sparing agents aim to limit the unfavorable side-effects of a significant steroid burden. Antiarrhythmics and guideline-directed medical therapies are utilized for control of ventricular arrhythmia and left ventricular dysfunction respectively. CS necessitates multidisciplinary care in specialized centers to most effectively diagnose and manage the disease. Additional randomized trials are warranted to further our understanding of medical optimization in CS.

The most common abdominal malignancies diagnosed in the pediatric population include neuroblastoma, Wilms tumor, hepatoblastoma, lymphoma, germ cell tumor, and rhabdomyosarcoma. There are distinctive imaging findings and patterns of spread for each of these tumors that radiologists must know for diagnosis and staging and for monitoring the patient's response to treatment. The multidisciplinary treatment group that includes oncologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists relies heavily on imaging evaluation to identify the best treatment course and prognostication of imaging findings, such as the image-defined risk factors for neuroblastomas, the PRETreatment EXtent of Disease staging system for hepatoblastoma, and the Ann Arbor staging system for lymphomas. It is imperative for radiologists to be able to correctly indicate the best imaging methods for diagnosis, staging, and restaging of each of these most prevalent tumors to avoid inconclusive or unnecessary examinations. The authors review in a practical manner the most updated key points in diagnosing and staging disease and assessing response to treatment of the most common pediatric abdominal tumors. ^©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

To address the current and long-term unmet health needs of the growing population of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients, we established the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) cohort study (NCT02736357; https://leocohort.org/). A total of 7735 newly diagnosed patients aged 18 years and older with NHL were prospectively enrolled from 7/1/2015 to 5/31/2020 at 8 academic centers in the United States. The median age at diagnosis was 62 years (range, 18-99). Participants came from 49 US states and included 538 Black/African-Americans (AA), 822 Hispanics (regardless of race), 3386 women, 716 age <40 years, and 1513 rural residents. At study baseline, we abstracted clinical, pathology, and treatment data; banked serum/plasma (N = 5883, 76.0%) and germline DNA (N = 5465, 70.7%); constructed tissue microarrays for four major NHL subtypes (N = 1189); and collected quality of life (N = 5281, 68.3%) and epidemiologic risk factor (N = 4489, 58.0%) data. Through August 2022, there were 1492 deaths. Compared to population-based SEER data (2015-2019), LEO participants had a similar distribution of gender, AA race, Hispanic ethnicity, and NHL subtype, while LEO was underrepresented for patients who were Asian and aged 80 years and above. Observed overall survival rates for LEO at 1 and 2 years were similar to population-based SEER rates for indolent B-cell (follicular and marginal zone) and T-cell lymphomas, but were 10%-15% higher than SEER rates for aggressive B-cell subtypes (diffuse large B-cell and mantle cell). The LEO cohort is a robust and comprehensive national resource to address the role of clinical, tumor, host genetic, epidemiologic, and other biologic factors in NHL prognosis and survivorship.

BACKGROUND:The application of CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy has improved outcomes for thousands of patients with non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma (NHL). The toxicities associated with various CAR T cell products, however, can be severe and difficult to anticipate. METHODS:In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we set out to determine whether there are measurable differences in common toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), cytopenias, and infections, between CAR T products that are commercially available for the treatment of NHL. RESULTS:After a stringent study selection process, we used a cohort of 1364 patients enrolled in 15 prospective clinical trials investigating the use of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel). We found that the rates of CRS and ICANS were significantly higher with axi-cel as compared to both liso-cel and tisa-cel. Conversely, we demonstrated that rates of all-grade and severe neutropenia were significantly greater with liso-cel. Febrile neutropenia and all-grade infection rates did not differ significantly between products though rates of severe infection were increased with axi-cel. CONCLUSIONS:Overall, this study serves as the first to delineate toxicity profiles associated with various available CAR T products. By better understanding associated toxicities, it may become possible to tailor therapies towards individual patients and anticipate the development of toxicities at earlier stages.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Lymphoma is a common malignant proliferative disease in which bone marrow infiltration will upstage the disease and thus affect prognosis of the disease. As of now bone marrow biopsy is considered as a reference standard to find out bone marrow involvement in lymphoma. Performing an invasive and painful intervention in all newly diagnosed lymphoma patients is controversial. PET-CT is a non-invasive technique that gives functional information about the cells using the glucose metabolism. It can detect early bone marrow and extra medullary organ involvement which can lead to restaging of the disease. These advantages make PET-CT a valuable adjunct in diagnosis of lymphoma. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:Our study aims to evaluate the usefulness of 18 F-FDG PET-CT, a non-invasive, semi quantitative whole body imaging technique for detection of early bone marrow and extra medullary organ involvement in lymphoma patients which in turn can obviate the need for bone marrow study (BMS). The primary objective of study is to categorise FDG uptake in bone marrow as diffuse /unifocal /multifocal / no uptake and to correlate pattern of FDG uptake to bone marrow study. Our study also assesses the role of FDG PET/CT in staging of lymphoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Thirty patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma in the age group 18 to 75 years of both sexes within 3 months of diagnosis and who have not been started on any treatment was included in the study. Marrow uptake on FDG PET/CT has been categorized as diffuse, unifocal, multifocal and no uptake. Agreement between bone marrow study and FDG PET/CT has been assessed by reliability analysis using Cohen's kappa. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of PET/CT in detecting marrow involvement have been calculated. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:F-FDG PET/CT in marrow assessment. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:18F-FDG PET/CT is a highly sensitive imaging modality which can pick up extra-nodal organ and BMI in patients with lymphoma and can upstage the disease and alter treatment strategies. PET-CT cannot completely replace the bone marrow study. However, being an invasive painful procedure, BMB can be avoided in cases with unifocal or multifocal marrow involvement on PET-CT.

OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to determine whether Black patients with recurrent endometrial cancer were more likely than White patients to be ineligible for a recently published clinical trial due to specific eligibility criteria. METHODS:Patients with recurrent or progressive endometrial cancer diagnosed from January 2010 to December 2021 who received care at a single institution were identified. Demographic and clinicopathologic information was abstracted and determination of clinical trial eligibility was made based on 14 criteria from the KEYNOTE-775 trial. Characteristics of the eligible and ineligible cohorts were compared, and each ineligibility criterion was evaluated by race. RESULTS:One hundred seventy-five patients were identified, 89 who would have met all inclusion and no exclusion criteria for KEYNOTE-775, and 86 who would have been ineligible by one or more exclusion criteria. Patients in the ineligible cohort were more likely to have lower BMI (median 26.5 vs. 29.2, P <0.001), but were otherwise similar with regard to insurance status, histology, and stage at diagnosis. Black patients had 33% lower odds of being eligible (95% CI: 0.33-1.34) and were more likely to meet the exclusion criterion of having a previous intestinal anastomosis, but the result was not statistically significant. If this criterion were removed, the racial distribution of those ineligible for the trial would be more similar (46.4% Black vs. 42.2% White). CONCLUSIONS:Clinical trial eligibility criteria may contribute to the underrepresentation of racial groups in clinical trials, but other factors should be explored. Studies to quantify and lessen the impact of implicit bias are also needed.