Faculty Bibliography

Composite resins are increasingly used for the restoration of anterior and posterior teeth. Although adhesives and composites have become easier to use than earlier generations of these materials, the use of composite resins is still technique-sensitive. This article reviews the current recommendations for the use of direct composite resins and summarizes the technique for both anterior and posterior restorations.

Composites are widely used for the functional and esthetic restorations of anterior teeth. The placement of a cavosurface margin bevel on the enamel margins of anterior composite preparations traditionally has been recommended to enhance retention and for esthetic reasons, as bevels result in a gradual transition between the restoration and the tooth. However, advances in adhesive and composite technology, as well as careful composite selection and application techniques, have made it possible to place adequate anterior composites without a bevel. Elimination of bevels results in more conservative cavity preparations, a simpler technique, a reduced restored surface area, and the preservation of tooth structure when the restoration is replaced. This Critical Appraisal summarizes clinical reviews and laboratory publications related to the influence of cavity preparation and, more specifically, cavosurface bevels on the performance of anterior composite restorations.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Repair of worn, broken or discolored composite restorations can be accomplished using new composite material and dentin bonding systems. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of self-etching adhesive systems for composite re-bonding procedures onto different composite substrates that had been aged for 6 years prior to testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Two hundred cylinders (4 mm x 5 mm) of composite were fabricated using 4 hybrid composites [AeliteFil (Bisco), Prodigy (SDS Kerr), TPH (Dentsply Caulk), and Z100 (3M ESPE)] following manufacturers' directions and stored for 6 years in 1% NaCl solution. After aging, each specimen was wet polished through 600-grit SiC and randomly assigned to a self-etching bonding system (Adper Prompt L-Pop/Z100 [3M ESPE]; Tyrian One-Step Plus/AeliteFil [Bisco]; OptiBond Solo Plus SE/Prodigy [SDS Kerr], Xeno III/TPH [Dentsply Caulk]) or a total-etch control (Prime&Bond NT/TPH [Dentsply Caulk]) (n = 10 per group). Shear bond strengths (SBS) for repairs were evaluated after 48 h (crosshead speed = 0.5 mm/min) and were compared by two-way ANOVA (p = 0.05) with Tukey post-hoc tests. RESULTS:Significant differences (p < or = 0.05) were detected for the main effects (substrates and bonding systems), but the interaction was not significant. SBS for bonding systems were from highest to lowest: (1) Prime&Bond NT, (2) OptiBond Solo Plus SE, (3) Adper Prompt L-Pop, (4) Xeno III, (5) Tyrian One-Step Plus. SBS of the repair systems to Z100 were significantly lower than those to the other composite substrates. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Self-etching systems can be used to repair aged composite, but the efficacy of repair of aged composite is system dependent.