Faculty Bibliography

Background/Purpose: Early LeFort III (LFIII) surgery or LFIII distraction involve osteotomies and disjunction in the region of the maxillary tuberosity in proximity to the maxillary posterior tooth buds. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of early LFIII advancement and/or distraction on survival of the maxillary posterior permanent dentition. Methods/Description: A retrospective review of patients with syndromic craniosynostosis treated by early LFIII surgery and distraction was conducted. Of 225 syndromic craniosynostosis patients enrolled between 1973 and 2006, a total of 50 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria: 1) surgical intervention prior to age 8 years; 2) two panoramic radiographs, one prior to surgery and one in adolescence; 3) no apparent abnormalities in the position of permanent tooth buds. Of the 50 patients, 25 underwent LFIII surgery and 25 underwent midface distraction (M = 21, F = 29, average age at time of surgery = 5 +/- 1.1 years with diagnoses of Crouzon (20), Apert (17) and Pfeiffer (13), syndromes). Panoramic radiographs presurgically (T1) and postsurgically (T2) were inspected by a trained observer. The tooth buds were classified as being present (P), displaced (D), impacted (I), ankylosed (ANK), extracted (E), or absent (A). SPSS software was used to carry out chi-squared analysis and Fisher exact test.
Result(s): In the LFIII surgery group, 94% of maxillary second molars (D = 16%, I = 8%, E = 6%, A = 64%) and 28% of maxillary first molars (D = 18%, I = 4%, ANK = 2%, E = 2%, A = 2%) experienced a disturbance in eruption. Of the displaced second molars, 75% were located in the maxillary sinus and 25% in the maxillary tuberosity. Of the displaced first molars, 78% were located in the maxillary sinus and 22% in the maxillary tuberosity. In the distraction group, 80% of maxillary second molars (D = 38%, ANK = 4%, E = 14%, A = 24%) and 18% of maxillary first molars (D = 10%, I = 2%, E = 2%, A = 4%) experienced a disturbance in eruption. Of the displaced second molars, 37% were located in the maxillary sinus and 63% in the maxillary tuberosity. Of the displaced first molars, 100% were located in the maxillary tuberosity. Traditional LFIII osteotomy was significantly more likely to result in an adverse event for maxillary second molars compared to distraction (chi² = 4.33, P = .037).
Conclusion(s): The eruption of maxillary second molars had a high incidence of disruption following early LFIII intervention, with traditional LFIII surgery having greater negative consequences for the maxillary second molars compared to distraction. The maxillary first molars show significantly less disruption during early LFIII intervention with no significant differences noted between surgical procedures. Furthermore, a common disruption seen postsurgically is the displacement of the maxillary second molar tooth buds into the maxillary sinus, leading to the question if presurgical planning should include extraction/enucleation of the second molar tooth buds to avoid this sequela

OBJECTIVE:To compare continuous infusion preperitoneal wound catheters (CPA) versus continuous epidural analgesia (CEA) after elective colorectal surgery. METHODS:An open-label equivalence trial randomizing patients to CPA or CEA. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain as determined by numeric pain scores and supplemental narcotic analgesia requirements. Secondary outcomes included incidence of complications and patient health status measured with the SF-36 Health Survey (Acute Form). RESULTS:98 patients were randomized [CPA (N = 50, 51.0%); CEA (N = 48, 49.0%)]. 90 patients were included [ CPA 46 (51.1%); CEA 44 (48.9%)]. Pain scores were significantly higher in the CPA group in the PACU (p = 0.04) and on the day of surgery (p < 0.01) as well as supplemental narcotic requirements on POD 0 (p = 0.02). No significant differences were noted in postoperative complications between groups, aggregate SF-36 scores and SF-36 subscale scores. CONCLUSIONS:Continuous epidural analgesia provided superior pain control following colorectal surgery in the PACU and on the day of surgery. The secondary endpoints of return of bowel function, length of stay, and adjusted SF-36 were not affected by choice of peri-operative pain control.

BACKGROUND:Gingivoperiosteoplasty can avoid secondary alveolar bone grafting in up to 60 percent of patients with a cleft. However, preoperative predictors of success have not been characterized. This study reports on the preoperative alveolar segment position most favorable for successful gingivoperiosteoplasty. METHODS:The authors performed a single-institution, retrospective review of patients with a unilateral cleft who underwent nasoalveolar molding. Alveolar segment morphology was directly measured from maxillary dental models created before and after nasoalveolar molding. Statistical analysis was performed to identify parameters associated with the decision to perform gingivoperiosteoplasty and its success, defined as the absence of an eventual need for alveolar bone grafting. RESULTS:Fifty patients with a unilateral cleft who received nasoalveolar molding therapy were included in this study (40 underwent gingivoperiosteoplasty and 10 did not). Eighteen alveolar morphology and position characteristics were tested, including cleft gap width, horizontal and vertical positions of the alveolar segments, alveolar stepoff, and degree of alveolar segment apposition. Post-nasoalveolar molding vertical rotation of the greater segment and the percentage of segment alignment in the correct anatomical zone were statistically significant predictors of the decision to perform gingivoperiosteoplasty (86 percent predictive power). Cleft gap, greater/lesser segment overlap, alveolar segment alignment, greater segment horizontal rotation, and alveolar segment width following nasoalveolar molding were significant predictors of gingivoperiosteoplasty success (86.5 percent predictive power). CONCLUSIONS:Greater segment vertical rotation and proper alveolar segment anatomical alignment are positive predictors of the decision to perform gingivoperiosteoplasty. Post-nasoalveolar molding evidence of proper alignment and direct contact between the alveolar segments were significant predictors of successful gingivoperiosteoplasty. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Risk, III.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Amniotic Band Syndrome is a clinical constellation of congenital anomalies characterized by constricting rings, tissue synechiae and amputation of body parts distal to the constriction bands. Involvement of the hand with loss of multiple digits not only leads to devastating deformities but also loss of functionality. Methods/UNASSIGNED:In this series, utilizing microvascular transfer of the second toe from both feet, along with local tissue reconfiguration, a tetra-digital hand with simile of normal cascade was reconstructed. A consecutive series of eight children with Amniotic Band Syndrome, younger than two years in age operated on by single surgeon over a twenty five year interval was reviewed. Results/UNASSIGNED:There was no flap loss. The hands were sensate with effective simple prehensile function. Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:Application of Microvascular toe-to-hand transfer for well selected, albeit severe hand deformity in Amniotic Band Syndrome is a valid surgical concept.

Autologous fat grafting is an important tool for plastic surgeons treating the aging face. Malar augmentation with fat is often targeted to restore the youthful facial contour and provides support to the lower eyelid. The existence of distinct facial fat compartments suggests that a stepwise approach may be appropriate in this regard. The authors describe a three-step approach to malar augmentation using targeted deep malar fat compartmental augmentation, termed the "boomerang lift." Clinical patients undergoing autologous fat grafting for malar augmentation were injected in three distinct deep malar fat compartments: the lateral sub-orbicularis oculi fat, the medial sub-orbicularis oculi fat, and the deep medial cheek (n = 9). Intraoperative three-dimensional images were taken at baseline and following compartmental injections (Canfield VECTRA H1). Images were overlaid between the augmented and baseline captures, and the three-dimensional surface changes were analyzed, which represented the resulting "augmentation zone." Three-dimensional analysis demonstrated a unique pattern for the augmentation zone consistent across patients. The augmentation zone resembled a boomerang, with the short tail supporting the medial lower lid and the long tail extending laterally along the zygomatic arch. The upper border was restricted by the level of the nasojugal interface, and the lower border was defined medially by the nasolabial fold and laterally by the level of the zygomaticocutaneous ligament. Lateral and medial sub-orbicularis oculi fat injections defined the boundaries of the boomerang shape, and injection to the deep medial cheek provided maximum projection. This is the first description of deep malar augmentation zones in clinical patients. Three-dimensional surface imaging was ideal for analyzing the surface change in response to targeted facial fat grafting. The authors' technique resulted in a reproducible surface shape, which they term the boomerang lift.

BACKGROUND:Cranial base sutures are important drivers of both facial and cranial growth. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence and location of cranial base suture fusion among three groups: nonaffected controls, patients with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, and patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. METHODS:Patients and computed tomographic scans were accrued from the authors' prospective craniofacial database. Computed tomographic scans were graded on the frequency of cranial vault and cranial base suture/synchondrosis fusion (0, open; 1, partially/completely fused) by an attending craniofacial surgeon and neuroradiologist. Statistical comparisons were conducted on location and rates of fusion, age, and diagnosis. RESULTS:One hundred forty patients met inclusion criteria: 55 syndromic, 64 nonsyndromic, and 21 controls. Average age at computed tomography of syndromic patients (3.6 ± 3.1 months) was younger than that of nonsyndromic patients (5.4 ± 3.1 months; p = 0.001) and control subjects (5.1 ± 3.2 months; p = 0.058). Syndromic craniosynostotic patients had over three times as many cranial base minor sutures fused (2.2 ± 2.5) as nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients (0.7 ± 1.2; p < 0.001) and controls (0.4 ± 0.8; p = 0.002), whose rates of fusion were statistically equivalent (p = 0.342). Syndromic craniosynostosis patients had a greater frequency of cranial base suture fusion in the coronal branches, squamosal arch, and posterior intraoccipital synchondrosis (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with syndromic craniosynostosis have higher rates of cranial base suture fusion in infancy, especially in the coronal arches, and this may have significant implications for both cranial and facial growth. In contrast, patients with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis have similar rates and sites of cranial base suture fusion as controls. Interestingly, there is a low, "normal," rate of cranial base suture/synchondrosis closure in infancy, the implications of which are unknown. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Risk, III.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the probability of survival and failure modes of different external hexagon connection systems restored with anterior cement-retained single-unit crowns. The postulated null hypothesis was that there would be no differences under accelerated life testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Fifty-four external hexagon dental implants (∼4 mm diameter) were used for single cement-retained crown replacement and divided into 3 groups: (3i) Full OSSEOTITE, Biomet 3i (n = 18); (OL) OEX P4, Osseolife Implants (n = 18); and (IL) Unihex, Intra-Lock International (n = 18). Abutments were torqued to the implants, and maxillary central incisor crowns were cemented and subjected to step-stress-accelerated life testing in water. Use-level probability Weibull curves and probability of survival for a mission of 100,000 cycles at 200 N (95% 2-sided confidence intervals) were calculated. Stereo and scanning electron microscopes were used for failure inspection. RESULTS:The beta values for 3i, OL, and IL (1.60, 1.69, and 1.23, respectively) indicated that fatigue accelerated the failure of the 3 groups. Reliability for the 3i and OL (41% and 68%, respectively) was not different between each other, but both were significantly lower than IL group (98%). Abutment screw fracture was the failure mode consistently observed in all groups. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Because the reliability was significantly different between the 3 groups, our postulated null hypothesis was rejected.

Background/UNASSIGNED:The number of men undergoing cosmetic surgery is increasing in North America. Objectives/UNASSIGNED:To determine the incidence and risk factors of major complications in males undergoing cosmetic surgery, compare the complication profiles between men and women, and identify specific procedures that are associated with higher risk of complications in males. Methods/UNASSIGNED:A prospective cohort of patients undergoing cosmetic surgery between 2008 and 2013 was identified from the CosmetAssure database. Gender specific procedures were excluded. Primary outcome was occurrence of a major complication in males requiring emergency room visit, hospital admission, or reoperation within 30 days of the index operation. Univariate and multivariate analysis evaluated potential risk factors for major complications including age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, diabetes, type of surgical facility, type of procedure, and combined procedures. Results/UNASSIGNED:Of the 129,007 patients, 54,927 underwent gender nonspecific procedures, of which 5801 (10.6%) were males. Women showed a higher mean age (46.4 ± 14.1 vs 45.2 ± 16.7 years, P < 0.01). Men had a higher BMI (27.2 ± 4.7 vs 25.7 ± 4.9 kg/m2, P < 0.01), and were more likely to be smokers (7.1% vs 5.7%, P < 0.01) when compared to women. Men demonstrated similar overall major complication rates compared to women (2.1% vs 2.1%, P = 0.97). When specific complications were analyzed further, men had higher hematoma rates, but lower incidence of surgical site infection. Additionally, major complications after abdominoplasty, facelift surgery, and buttock augmentation were noted to preferentially affect males. On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of major complications in males included BMI (RR 1.05), hospital or ambulatory surgery center procedures (RR 3.47), and combined procedures (RR 2.56). Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Aesthetic surgery in men is safe with low major complication rates. Modifiable predictors of complications included BMI and combined procedures. Level of Evidence 2/UNASSIGNED/: