Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder caused by the abnormal accumulation of α-synuclein in the nervous system. Clinical features include autonomic and motor dysfunction, which overlap with those of Parkinson disease (PD), particularly at early disease stages. There is an unmet need for accurate diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for MSA and, specifically, a critical need to distinguish MSA from other synucleinopathies, particularly PD. The purpose of the study was to develop a unique cutaneous pathologic signature of phosphorylated α-synuclein that could distinguish patients with MSA from patients with PD and healthy controls. METHODS:We studied 31 patients with MSA and 54 patients with PD diagnosed according to current clinical consensus criteria. We also included 24 matched controls. All participants underwent neurologic examinations, autonomic testing, and skin biopsies at 3 locations. The density of intraepidermal, sudomotor, and pilomotor nerve fibers was measured. The deposition of phosphorylated α-synuclein was quantified. Results were compared with clinical rating assessments and autonomic function test results. RESULTS:< 0.0001) than patients with PD. These results provided >90% sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between the 2 disorders. DISCUSSION:α-synuclein is present in the peripheral autonomic nerves of patients with MSA and when combined with synuclein distribution accurately distinguishes MSA from PD. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE:This study provides Class II evidence that measurement of phosphorylated α-synuclein in skin biopsies can differentiate patients with MSA from those with PD.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:HIV-associated autonomic neuropathy (HIV-AN) is common; however, its clinical effect is unclear. Previously, it was shown that the composite autonomic severity score is associated with markers of morbidity such as the Veterans Affair Cohort Study index. In addition, it is known that cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy due to diabetes is associated with poor cardiovascular outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate whether HIV-AN is predictive of important adverse clinical outcomes. METHOD/UNASSIGNED:The electronic medical records of HIV-infected participants who underwent autonomic function tests at the Mount Sinai Hospital between April 2011 and August 2012 were reviewed. The cohort was stratified into those who had no or mild autonomic neuropathy (HIV-AN [-], CASS ≤3) and those with moderate or severe autonomic neuropathy (HIV-AN [+], CASS >3). The primary outcome was a composite of the incidence of death from any cause, new major cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event, or development of severe renal or hepatic disease. Time-to-event analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:One hundred eleven of 114 participants had follow-up data (median follow-up for HIV-AN (-) was 94.00 months, and HIV-AN (+) was 81.29 months) and were included in the analysis. Participants were followed until March 1, 2020. The HIV-AN (+) group (N = 42) was significantly associated with the presence of hypertension, higher HIV-1 viral load, and more abnormal liver function. Seventeen (40.48%) events occurred in the HIV-AN (+) group, and 11 (15.94%) occurred in the HIV-AN (-) group. Six (14.29%) cardiac events occurred in the HIV-AN (+) group, whereas 1 (1.45%) occurred in the HIV-AN (-) group. The other subgroups of the composite outcome had a similar trend. The adjusted Cox proportional hazards model showed that the presence of HIV-AN predicted our composite outcome (HR 3.85, CI 1.61-9.20). DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:These findings suggest that HIV-AN is associated with the development of severe morbidity and mortality in people living with HIV. People living with HIV with autonomic neuropathy may benefit from closer cardiac, renal, and hepatic surveillance.

Contact behaviors of medical devices, such as guidewires and catheters, are critical in endovascular surgeries. In this work, a new method to predict adhesive contact force between catheter and vascular artery is presented. Multi-asperity adhesion on the surface of vascular artery, deformation of asperity and deformation of vascular substrate are all considered. The single asperity behavior is described with Johnson-Kendall-Roberts (JKR) contact model. The multi-asperity behavior is based on Greenwood-Williamson (GW) asperity model. Vascular substrate is considered as elastic bulk substrate and its deformation is determined with Hertzian pressure from asperity on a circular region on the elastic half space. The model shows that the deformation of vascular substrate accounts for the majority of the total contact deformation and significantly affects the predicted contact force. The model is verified with published experimental data. The comparison shows that the model produces very accurate prediction of contact force between catheter and vascular artery when the contact force is compressive. Parametric analysis based on asperity topography is carried out. The analysis shows that the diameter of the circular region of the interface between asperity and vascular substrate has more significant effect on the estimation of contact force than the radius of asperity. Further validation of prediction accuracy of the model under experiment is needed.

Landmark changes to documenting and coding for office or other outpatient evaluation and management (E/M) codes were implemented on January 1, 2021. To decrease clinicians' administrative burden, many documentation requirements were eliminated. In addition, major changes were made in how medical decision making and time spent on the date of the encounter are used to determine the level of service. On January 1, 2023, these changes were extended to inpatient and observation E/M services. The level of service in both inpatient and outpatient settings can now be selected based on the total time dedicated to the patient's care on the day of the encounter or the new method of medical decision making. This article discusses the optimal ways to document and code for inpatient hospital and observation encounters after January 1, 2023.

Neuroimaging studies have demonstrated aberrant structure and function of the "cognitive-affective cerebellum" in major depressive disorder (MDD), although the specific role of the cerebello-cerebral circuitry in this population remains largely uninvestigated. The objective of this study was to delineate the role of cerebellar functional networks in depression. A total of 308 unmedicated participants completed resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans, of which 247 (148 MDD; 99 healthy controls, HC) were suitable for this study. Seed-based resting-state functional connectivity (RsFc) analysis was performed using three cerebellar regions of interest (ROIs): ROI₁ corresponded to default mode network (DMN)/inattentive processing; ROI₂ corresponded to attentional networks, including frontoparietal, dorsal attention, and ventral attention; ROI₃ corresponded to motor processing. These ROIs were delineated based on prior functional gradient analyses of the cerebellum. A general linear model was used to perform within-group and between-group comparisons. In comparison to HC, participants with MDD displayed increased RsFc within the cerebello-cerebral DMN (ROI₁) and significantly elevated RsFc between the cerebellar ROI₁ and bilateral angular gyrus at a voxel threshold (p < 0.001, two-tailed) and at a cluster level (p < 0.05, FDR-corrected). Group differences were non-significant for ROI₂ and ROI₃. These results contribute to the development of a systems neuroscience approach to the diagnosis and treatment of MDD. Specifically, our findings confirm previously reported associations between MDD, DMN, and cerebellum, and highlight the promising role of these functional and anatomical locations for the development of novel imaging-based biomarkers and targets for neuromodulation therapies. ClinicalTrials.gov TRN: NCT01655706; Date of Registration: August 2nd, 2012.

BACKGROUND:By 2030, nonacute subdural hematomas (NASHs) will likely be the most common cranial neurosurgery pathology. Treatment with surgical evacuation may be necessary, but the recurrence rate after surgery is as high as 30%. Minimally invasive middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) during the perioperative period has been posited as an adjunctive treatment to decrease the potential for recurrence after surgical evacuation. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of concurrent MMAE in a multi-institutional cohort. METHODS:Data from 145 patients (median age 73 years) with NASH who underwent surgical evacuation and MMAE in the perioperative period were retrospectively collected from 15 institutions. The primary outcome was the rate of recurrence requiring repeat surgical intervention. We collected clinical, treatment, and radiographic data at initial presentation, after evacuation, and at 90-day follow-up. Outcomes data were also collected. RESULTS:Preoperatively, the median hematoma width was 18 mm, and subdural membranes were present on imaging in 87.3% of patients. At 90-day follow-up, median NASH width was 6 mm, and 51.4% of patients had at least a 50% decrease of NASH size on imaging. Eight percent of treated NASHs had recurrence that required additional surgical intervention. Of patients with a modified Rankin Scale score at last follow-up, 87.2% had the same or improved mRS score. The total all-cause mortality was 6.0%. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study provides evidence from a multi-institutional cohort that performing MMAE in the perioperative period as an adjunct to surgical evacuation is a safe and effective means to reduce recurrence in patients with NASHs.

BACKGROUND:Clinical and real-world effectiveness data for the COVID-19 vaccines have shown that they are the best defense in preventing severe illness and death throughout the pandemic. However, in the US, some groups remain more hesitant than others about receiving COVID-19 vaccines. One important group is long-term care workers (LTCWs), especially because they risk infecting the vulnerable and clinically complex populations they serve. There is a lack of research about how best to increase vaccine confidence, especially in frontline LTCWs and healthcare staff. Our aims are to: (1) compare the impact of two interventions delivered online to enhanced usual practice on LTCW COVID-19 vaccine confidence and other pre-specified secondary outcomes, (2) determine if LTCWs' characteristics and other factors mediate and moderate the interventions' effect on study outcomes, and (3) explore the implementation characteristics, contexts, and processes needed to sustain a wider use of the interventions. METHODS:We will conduct a three-arm randomized controlled effectiveness-implementation hybrid (type 2) trial, with randomization at the participant level. Arm 1 is a dialogue-based webinar intervention facilitated by a LTCW and a medical expert and guided by an evidence-based COVID-19 vaccine decision tool. Arm 2 is a curated social media web application intervention featuring interactive, dynamic content about COVID-19 and relevant vaccines. Arm 3 is enhanced usual practice, which directs participants to online public health information about COVID-19 vaccines. Participants will be recruited via online posts and advertisements, email invitations, and in-person visits to care settings. Trial data will be collected at four time points using online surveys. The primary outcome is COVID-19 vaccine confidence. Secondary outcomes include vaccine uptake, vaccine and booster intent for those unvaccinated, likelihood of recommending vaccination (both initial series and booster), feeling informed about the vaccines, identification of vaccine information and misinformation, and trust in COVID-19 vaccine information provided by different people and organizations. Exploration of intervention implementation will involve interviews with study participants and other stakeholders, an in-depth process evaluation, and testing during a subsequent sustainability phase. DISCUSSION:Study findings will contribute new knowledge about how to increase COVID-19 vaccine confidence and effective informational modalities for LTCWs. TRIAL REGISTRATION:NCT05168800 at ClinicalTrials.gov, registered December 23, 2021.

Post-acute sequelae of COVID (PASC), or long COVID, is a multisystem complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection that continues to debilitate millions worldwide thus highlighting the public health importance of identifying effective therapeutics to alleviate this illness. One explanation behind PASC may be attributed to the recent discovery of persistent S1 protein subunit of SARS-CoV-2 in CD16+ monocytes up to 15 months after infection. CD16+ monocytes, which express both CCR5 and fractalkine receptors (CX3CR1), play a role in vascular homeostasis and endothelial immune surveillance. We propose targeting these receptors using the CCR5 antagonist, maraviroc, along with pravastatin, a fractalkine inhibitor, could disrupt the monocytic-endothelial-platelet axis that may be central to the etiology of PASC. Using five validated clinical scales (NYHA, MRC Dyspnea, COMPASS-31, modified Rankin, and Fatigue Severity Score) to measure 18 participants"™ response to treatment, we observed significant clinical improvement in 6 to 12 weeks on a combination of maraviroc 300 mg per oral twice a day and pravastatin 10 mg per oral daily. Subjective neurological, autonomic, respiratory, cardiac and fatigue symptoms scores all decreased which correlated with statistically significant decreases in vascular markers sCD40L and VEGF. These findings suggest that by interrupting the monocytic-endothelial-platelet axis, maraviroc and pravastatin may restore the immune dysregulation observed in PASC and could be potential therapeutic options. This sets the framework for a future double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial to further investigate the drug efficacy of maraviroc and pravastatin in treating PASC.